paracarl44
Wielder of 100 Feathers
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2007
- Messages
- 130,118
- Points
- 0
I think what some of the women are saying........
is they want to date a sexual mature man.![Roll eyes :rolleyes: :rolleyes:]()
is they want to date a sexual mature man.
is they want to date a sexual mature man.![]()
I've never dated anyone younger than me. The youngest person I dated was a year older than me, the oldest person I've dated was 21 years older than me. Although, most of the guys I date tend to be 5 to 8 years older than me.
I just find that the majority of guys my age are still super immature. Not all, but most.
Whether it's biological or not, the preference is real. David Buss researched mate preferences among 37 vastly different cultures all over the world. In every last one, from the Americans, to the Japanese, to the South African Zulu, he found that men consistently preferred younger women, while women preferred older men. You can easily argue that this makes sense from an evolutionary psychology perspective, suggesting a biological foundation.
Interestingly, other researchers have pointed out that the more equality there is in a society, the smaller the gap there between the mate preferences of women and men. So maybe with time, these differences will disappear completely? I think it's too early to say.![]()
I think alot of it may be rooted in evolutionary biology/psychology, specifically the single all important difference between men and women: women can get pregnant while men do the impregnating.
What does the fact that only women can get pregnant have to do with anything? Well, evolutionary biology and psychology show that, as a result of this fact, women as a whole (who invest the maximum amount of time and energy into raising a single offspring) desire a man who possesses the best genes to be passed on and who can provide and acquire the most resources for them and the offspring. Obviously, this thought only exists at the subconscious level (could you imagine a college girl at a club thinking "Boy, that hottie probably has some genes to pass on, and could definitely provide for my future offspring), and manifests itself in a women's collective desire for strong guys, smart guys, rich guys, etc. Since I really don't think nice guys fall into this category, they end up finishing last as they say.
This isn't a cultural thing because it isn't limited to humans. To name one example out of many, there is a specie of peacock in which the males have colorful something-or-others on their backs; the more vibrant the colors, the stronger their genes are or something (pretty much the stronger the ability to attract a female as the female peacocks instinctively see it as a sign of fertility and strength and everything). Come mating system, the men strut their stuff (literally) and the females choose which males they think will produce the best offspring. And then they go fuck.
That subconscious drive exists in humans as it does in other animals (men to go spread their seed to produce as many offspring as possible, women to carefully choose the best male with whom to create the best possible offspring), though this is greatly masked by human rational thought. In the case of attraction to older men, well we (I) said that women as a whole want a man who can provide resources for the offspring (manifested into a woman's attraction toward rich guys), and older guys are more likely to be richer than younger guys (or, if nothing else, are seen as such). I'm sure you can put two and two together here. Attraction to older men may be a manifestation of the subconscious desire to find a mate that can provide resources for offspring.
Of course, I could be wrong. Oh, and I should also point out that I'm talking about women as a whole, not individuals or specific groups. What this person likes or why that person is attracted to older men doesn't matter here.
Female Peacocks Not Impressed by Male FeathersMarch 26, 2008 -- The feather train on male peacocks is among the most striking and beautiful physical attributes in nature, but it fails to excite, much less interest, females, according to new research.
The determination throws a wrench in the long-held belief that male peacock feathers evolved in response to female mate choice. It could also indicate that certain other elaborate features in galliformes, a group that includes turkeys, chickens, grouse, quails and pheasants, as well as peacocks, are not necessarily linked to fitness and mating success.
For Indian peafowl, which the researchers studied, male vocalizations appear to do a better job of grabbing the attention of females than their visually screaming "attire"....