At what point does posting candid pictures on a fetish site become creepy?

[TJDoom]

That's a shot in the dark to provide distraction. I'm not currently friends with any of the forum gathering folk and certainly not falling over myself to pander. They have received no desperate ploy from me nor do they know me. They'll tell you so.

I don't give a flying chupacabra about competition. The second you're born you have billions in your sex as competition. I went to a internet gathering years ago not based on sex and we had a week long drunk time with no hang ups because people were decent. That's how I was before I was ever sexually awakened.

If you want to call basic kindness "excessive", then be my guest. There are plenty of people that exist outside a clique with their own chosen values. More even! Because the fetish community is much larger than one site and I guarantee you that it will get tiresome when you call prude every time a decent human being simply questions motivations.

 

[rhiannon]

He's talking about guys agreeing with the women. "Look at ME, ladies, I'm not a PIG like them!"

Yeah, well.....one should think there are some decent guys out there. 🙂 Nobody forces anybody to out themselves as creepers. 🙂

 

[C.A.B.]

Yeah, well.....one should think there are some decent guys out there. 🙂 Nobody forces anybody to out themselves as creepers. 🙂

I'm a fairly decent guy with a fine ganache of delicious sadistic creepiness. 😉 I believe one can wear both hats with proper decorum.

 

[Filthyweasel]

I'm a fairly decent guy with a fine ganache of delicious sadistic creepiness. 😉 I believe one can wear both hats with proper decorum.

I'm a fucking pervert. I just know when the right time is to let it out. And that serves me well.

 

[rhiannon]

I'm a fairly decent guy with a fine ganache of delicious sadistic creepiness. I believe one can wear both hats with proper decorum.

I couldn't agree more. 🙂

 

[Speedbump]

I couldn't agree more. 🙂

Really? After all the arguing? You basically were saying how terrible people were if they took a picture and posted it without permission, and how creepy it was, without ever thinking to yourself that there might be more to them than just that one action, and yet now you "completely agree" being creepy and decent are both possible at the same time?

You're funny.

 

[rhiannon]

There is a difference between being plain creepy and having "a fine ganache of delicious sadistic creepiness". But I don't expect you to understand that difference. 🙂

 

[DontAskJusTckle]

Like DontAskJusTckle would be any more preferable? He thinks it’s okay to just put his hands on some random woman on the subway even if she might not like it, and if she happens to be creeped out by it, she is a “mentally disturbed whacko” and should she defend herself, a “violent psychopath”. His own words. It’s people with this kind of mindset to whom Phineas is referring as creeps or socially stunted.

If it's all the same to you, I'll be the one to decide what I think. If you want to quote me saying those things, go right ahead. Good luck with that.

Okay, so what would the reason of the girls be to say it's creepy to do something like that? Certainly not "putting other potential ticklers of women down"?

I think for the girls, the reason is a genuine expression of how they'd like to be treated. For YOU, I think it's a matter of pushing your own morals on the rest of us, and demonizing anybody who refuses to goose-step behind you.

 

[Speedbump]

There is a difference between being plain creepy and having "a fine ganache of delicious sadistic creepiness". But I don't expect you to understand that difference. 🙂

And I'm forever grateful that I think differently than you. Your logic is messed up on just about everything you talk about. lol

Anyway, this thread has run its course.

 

[rhiannon]

Your logic is messed up on just about everything you talk about. lol

I'm a woman. Nobody expects me to be logical anyways. One of the many freedoms of being female!

 

[LargerWorld2577]

If it's all the same to you, I'll be the one to decide what I think. If you want to quote me saying those things, go right ahead. Good luck with that.

I’m not trying to decide what you “think”. Just pointing it out to make it clear to others that that’s what you do indeed think, say, believe, whatever you wish to call it. If I may ask out of curiosity, why do you think that someone is a “mentally disturbed whacko” or “violent psychopath” if they feel creeped out by being tickled by a random stranger? If you’re so confident in the way you think, then explain.

I don’t think Phineas was at all trying to “eliminate the competition from other potential ticklers of women by putting them down, labeling them as creeps or "socially stunted fucktards”, but he did mention “socially stunted fuckwads who kept banging on about their God-given right to put their hands on anyone they pleased and to hell with whether or not that anyone wanted them to”, which is consistent with someone who thinks it’s okay to tickle a random stranger and that that stranger is a “mentally disturbed whacko” and a “violent psychopath” if they get creeped out by it.

Furthermore, this thread is about posting secretly taken candids of people on fetish sites regardless of how they might feel about it. As someone else said earlier, it’s all about consideration for other people.

 

[smokinj]

Furthermore, this thread is about posting secretly taken candids of people on fetish sites regardless of how they might feel about it. As someone else said earlier, it’s all about consideration for other people.

Yes that is what this thread started out as but as usual the morality police have to step in and call it creepy and chastise others for either viewing such pics or taking them personally.

I maintain if her face cannot be seen in such pics then by all means post everything you have!! Morality police say she's been 'violated'. I could care less.

This thread has gone on way too long but it's the proverbial car crash you can't look away from.

 

[LargerWorld2577]

I maintain if her face cannot be seen in such pics then by all means post everything you have!! Morality police say she's been 'violated'. I could care less.

I maintain that, as well. I’m in complete agreement with you on that.

 

[smokinj]

I maintain that, as well. I’m in complete agreement with you on that.

Thank you, I knew I wasn't alone on this.

 

[seanwoj]

I maintain that, as well. I’m in complete agreement with you on that.

So.... What you're saying is you condone (means you're ok with) people, possibly yourself posting pics of women without their consent as long as their face is hidden?

Hmm.... Very curious.

You claim to have a sense of morality in regards to posting pics as long as there's consent. But when the persons face is not visible, you just conveniently look the other way?

Kinda creepy if you ask me, but whatever. You do what you wanna do. All I ask is that you deal with the consequences if and when they occur, and take your punishment with dignity and honor.

I don't know about any of you others, but I'd get permission no matter what.

 

[LargerWorld2577]

I'm all for getting permission, as well. I just don't think a foot is the same as someone's face, someone's identity. I myself would always ask permission no matter what I'm taking a picture/video of. What I should have said is that if you're going to take a candid at all, just leave the person's face out of it because at least their identity is protected. The fine line for me with regards to consent, however, is the face, and I stand by that.

 

[DontAskJusTckle]

I’m not trying to decide what you “think”. Just pointing it out to make it clear to others that that’s what you do indeed think, say, believe, whatever you wish to call it.

What I think is that I'm in a considerably better position than you to know what I'm thinking. The only thing you're making clear to others is the absurdity of your silly assumption to the contrary.

If I may ask out of curiosity, why do you think that someone is a “mentally disturbed whacko” or “violent psychopath” if they feel creeped out by being tickled by a random stranger?

Well, you can ask that particular question, sure. But I don't think you can ask it out of curiosity - at least not genuine curiosity. I'm inclined to believe that a genuinely curious guy would ask people what they think instead of assuming he already knows. Such assumptions are symptoms of know-it-all arrogance, not curiosity. Since you already presume to know what I think, then I'm sure you don't need me to tell you why I think something. Simply make another presumption.

If you’re so confident in the way you think, then explain.

Sure, no problem. Hey, you want fries with that?

I don’t think Phineas was at all trying to “eliminate the competition from other potential ticklers of women by putting them down...

Well I suppose we'll just have to agree to disagree.

 

[LargerWorld2577]

Well, you can ask that particular question, sure. But I don't think you can ask it out of curiosity - at least not genuine curiosity. I'm inclined to believe that a genuinely curious guy would ask people what they think instead of assuming he already knows. Such assumptions are symptoms of know-it-all arrogance, not curiosity. Since you already presume to know what I think, then I'm sure you don't need me to tell you why I think something. Simply make another presumption.

I’m not assuming anything, I know you said those things, and usually what you say reflects what you think unless you’re not in the right state of mind. You did say that a person being creeped out by being tickled by a stranger is a “mentally disturbed whacko” and all the rest of it. I was just asking you why you believe that. You disagreed with the labeling of people as creeps and socially stunted, and I was just using what you said as an example of maybe why people might be inclined to label a person as such.

 

[Speedbump]

I'm a woman. Nobody expects me to be logical anyways. One of the many freedoms of being female!

Well played. Why do you make me annoyed, then immediately say something awesome?

 

[Jagermeistered]

Well played. Why do you make me annoyed, then immediately say something awesome?

From subjective to objective argument - switch.

Works everytime! 😛

 

[DontAskJusTckle]

I’m not assuming anything, I know you said those things, and usually what you say reflects what you think unless you’re not in the right state of mind. You did say that a person being creeped out by being tickled by a stranger is a “mentally disturbed whacko” and all the rest of it.

Quotes or it didn't happen.

If you want me to respond to something you claim that I said, you're going to have to quote me saying it, along with a link to the the post in which I said it. If you can do that, I'll respond. If you can't, then buh bye.

 

[rhiannon]

Why do you make me annoyed, then immediately say something awesome?

Because I am awesome and could charm you right out of your socks (and everything else you're wearing) if I wanted to! 😀

 

[LargerWorld2577]

Quotes or it didn't happen.

If you want me to respond to something you claim that I said, you're going to have to quote me saying it, along with a link to the the post in which I said it. If you can do that, I'll respond. If you can't, then buh bye.

Sent you a PM.

 

[chicago]

Candid Pictures

Barrington police have been looking into registered sex offenders in the area but do not know the man’s motivation, Police Chief Dave Dorn said.

“The bottom line is we are taking what the individual is doing seriously and we are looking at it as a disorderly conduct,” he said, due to the alarming nature of the man’s actions.

Dorn also wants to raise awareness in the community about the situation.

Obviously, since the guy's taking pictures of children, it'll probably be treated more seriously, but I could see something similar happening on a college campus, for instance, if enough people were freaked out.

Just be careful, creepy candid photographers!

 

[Speedbump]

Candid Pictures



Obviously, since the guy's taking pictures of children, it'll probably be treated more seriously, but I could see something similar happening on a college campus, for instance, if enough people were freaked out.

Just be careful, creepy candid photographers!

Reads to me like you're taking an extreme stance on this topic. "Hey, because you took a picture of a girls feet, I'm gonna consider you just as bad as a pedophile taking pictures of children on a playground!"

Wheeeeee.