-
If you would like to get your account Verified, read this thread -
The TMF is sponsored by Clips4sale - By supporting them, you're supporting us. -
>>> If you cannot get into your account email me at [email protected] <<<
Don't forget to include your username
feet licked by animals (animals/m)
- Thread starter retset
- Start date
Gemini_Tickle
TMF Poster
- Joined
- Jul 24, 2009
- Messages
- 147
- Points
- 0
Ok, this is a serious question...no judgements or anything...I'm honestly wondering...if someone films a clip with the intention of selling it and it involves being tickled by an animals tongue is that exploiting the animal? I have experienced this type of tickling and it's so fun and really really tickly but I worry that maybe if you sell it then it's exploiting the animal b/c the dog can't really give informed consent...unless maybe it was Lassie, cuz Lassie is like the smartest dog ever, but he's in feature films so probably not available for a tickle shoot anyways...(oh and probably the real Lassie died a long time ago)
Comfort Eagle
Level of Cherry Feather
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2003
- Messages
- 10,380
- Points
- 83
bwah
luvtosmellfeet
TMF Regular
- Joined
- Oct 20, 2009
- Messages
- 162
- Points
- 18
kucheeku
TMF Master
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2002
- Messages
- 764
- Points
- 43
Another sexist/homophobic post. I knew there was a reason why I hardly contribute posts to this board anymore. Thanks, moron!
I will reply to your reply, without getting into a spitting match. If we can keep this on a higher level of communication, I have no problem sharing thoughts. If it devolves into lower consciousness nonsense, I will bow out. I think sometimes gay people are bit sensitive, for probably good reasons, similar to us people with fetishes, who also are sensitive to some degree, because we all have been chained and blame to some extent. In fact, I feel for gay people with fetishes, because you have a double whammy. In your childhood you probably got hit from two sides instead of just once I'd like us. I am not against you, I'm actually much more in alignment with understanding you then you obviously realize. I do not need to defend myself; I am not homophobic, not one percent. I have been in the fetish business, and around every type of sexuality for my whole life. I'm quite comfortable with anyone doing anything, to anyone, with anyone, as long as it does not cross reasonable barriers, and does not hurt anybody. That is the truth. I think it is just that when it comes to heterosexuality and homosexuality, these are really two different species stop along separate when it comes to postings. That is just my opinion, and is not meant to offend anyone. Most of us heterosexual men, have a visceral reaction when we see homosexual behavior of the same sex., meaning man on man. I do not think that homosexual men fully understand how powerful the negative reaction can be when we see it in person or on film. And then the homosexual reaction is mostly to reflexively respond with the all too clichéd hackneyed and trite: "You are homophobic, and probably a homosexual subconsciously." Perhaps it takes a shift in viewpoint, and you should try to see it from our point of view, which is that while we do not judge you, at least most of us, we do wish to not be assaulted visually, which in essence is what happens when we see this stuff. By all means do as you wish, and rock 'n roll. In an ideal situation, in my humble opinion, there should be separate forums for homosexuals and heterosexuals for their respective fetishes. I do not see how these fetishes combine with homosexuality and heterosexuality. Same fetish but completely different animals. Pun intended. I hope that brought a smile to your face.🙂
The thing is...gay people are subjugated by SOCIETY. Heterosexuals can care for their loved ones in the hospital, can get health insurance for their loved ones, can adopt children, and can openly express affection in public without ridicule. For gay people, its a bit more complex, on a much wider level.
And many gay men do have visceral responses to woman on woman, and female sexual exploitation in general. However, you don't see us posting "woman...YUUUUCK" or any gay person posting things to advocate not having any /F content.
Great discussion, but I think the topic should be why the few Heterosexual MALES feel it necessary to post the derision over and over. They should give it a rest, calm down, and look at the other 99.99999% of the content on this site.
Peace.
And many gay men do have visceral responses to woman on woman, and female sexual exploitation in general. However, you don't see us posting "woman...YUUUUCK" or any gay person posting things to advocate not having any /F content.
Great discussion, but I think the topic should be why the few Heterosexual MALES feel it necessary to post the derision over and over. They should give it a rest, calm down, and look at the other 99.99999% of the content on this site.
Peace.
I appreciate your response being respectful, and you being mature about this. Respectfully again, I think you are not getting the larger picture here-we actually do understand your position more than you see. We, like you, men with tickle fetishes and foot fetishes, are a subjugated minority subsumed within a larger majority. We also are relegated to being different, and a negative fashion. We relate to you, we are not against you. The point we are making is that we, the foot fetish and tickle fetish males, who are heterosexual, have a powerful negative response, generally, most of us, when we see our fetishes being played out with men on men. It does not mean we do not like you. It does not mean we're judging you negatively. You're mixing apples and oranges. For instance, if we see a female foot rubbing a penis, to orgasm, it arouses us. If we see a male foot rubbing a penis to orgasm, it would probably disgusts most of the men here. Why? It's only feet causing friction to a penis. It's the same thing correct? Whether male or female feet correct? Wrong. It is a very different thing. This forum is for heterosexual foot fetish and tickle fetish activity. Not homosexual. No one here is denying you the right, or wants to deny you the right, to have your own forums, and I would assume most, the majority of these guys, would not stop you from having tax breaks, marriage rights, or whatever. That's all fine. I could not care less, meant in a positive way. We just want to explore our fetish fantasies heterosexually without having to be visually assaulted by homosexual images. I am sure you can understand that. There must be forums that are homosexual. If not, why don't you start one up? Be a pioneer. I do not care if it's regular sex, or fetish sex. Heterosexual and homosexual activity are two different things. But taking any of this personally, makes one wonder why you are taking it personally. Sometimes, not always, and it is stereotypical, granted, but, there is some truth to the statement that there are patterns to things-and there is a pattern wherein probably a majority of homosexual men have feminine emotional characteristics. This means, that they are overly sensitive. That is not a bad thing. It is just a female characteristic. Men have their own stuff. So if one is brought up with a fetish, or being homosexual, they are assaulted by society as being different-that also makes them sensitive, just like us men with fetishes. But combine the childhood of assault with the more often than not typical homosexuals inner nature, which usually makes them overly sensitive innately, and you have a double whammy. That is kind of what I see when I encounter these post that homosexual men write, wherein they seem to be over the top over sensitized over nothing. Just think about it. Peace
kucheeku
TMF Master
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2002
- Messages
- 764
- Points
- 43
Lightfoot:
"This forum is for heterosexual foot fetish and tickle fetish activity. Not homosexual."
Really?! This is going to come as a surprise to all those who've posted f/f and m/m material, including myself and I've never been threatened with being banned for doing so.
Is the point of your last post that publicly blasting */m tickling material is okay because straight tickle lovers are a minority subjected to ridicule by those who don't understand? Thus, because you have feelings and opinions and somehow wired differently, it's open season on any */m material? No amount of verbose explanation will negate the fact that this is one thing: hypocrisy.
My point about other guys heading to an m/m tickling frat board is that they feel safe there. I've chatted with straight guys--yes, lightfoot, as in guys who have sex with and love women--who feel safer there sharing their love of m/m tickling, because of the nonsense presented on (sad to say) this board and others and in situations where they could never express this to their male "buddies."
I'm openly gay and I don't like m/f or f/f tickling. But, as I've expressed here before (and you can check the archives for these posts), if I were to post my "opinions" about how much I did not like seeing women being tickled or "wish it were him getting tickled instead of her," I would be savagely attacked on this board and rightfully so. It's not my business to impose forcefully what others would find pleasant or arousing. So when there's a post up decrying some guy getting tickled here on this board--this board, which is just flooded with /f material--it's just disingenuous to say something to the effect of "oh, it's okay because I'm stating an opinion." What the hell is the point? Really?
It goes back to the old saying that a lot of grandmothers have used I'm sure: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything. So in that spirit, Lightfoot, I apologize for calling you a moron.
"This forum is for heterosexual foot fetish and tickle fetish activity. Not homosexual."
Really?! This is going to come as a surprise to all those who've posted f/f and m/m material, including myself and I've never been threatened with being banned for doing so.
Is the point of your last post that publicly blasting */m tickling material is okay because straight tickle lovers are a minority subjected to ridicule by those who don't understand? Thus, because you have feelings and opinions and somehow wired differently, it's open season on any */m material? No amount of verbose explanation will negate the fact that this is one thing: hypocrisy.
My point about other guys heading to an m/m tickling frat board is that they feel safe there. I've chatted with straight guys--yes, lightfoot, as in guys who have sex with and love women--who feel safer there sharing their love of m/m tickling, because of the nonsense presented on (sad to say) this board and others and in situations where they could never express this to their male "buddies."
I'm openly gay and I don't like m/f or f/f tickling. But, as I've expressed here before (and you can check the archives for these posts), if I were to post my "opinions" about how much I did not like seeing women being tickled or "wish it were him getting tickled instead of her," I would be savagely attacked on this board and rightfully so. It's not my business to impose forcefully what others would find pleasant or arousing. So when there's a post up decrying some guy getting tickled here on this board--this board, which is just flooded with /f material--it's just disingenuous to say something to the effect of "oh, it's okay because I'm stating an opinion." What the hell is the point? Really?
It goes back to the old saying that a lot of grandmothers have used I'm sure: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything. So in that spirit, Lightfoot, I apologize for calling you a moron.
And there we have it-the conversation devolves into immaturity and silliness. I did say that I would duck out once this happen; never having a doubt that it would happen. So this will be my last post on this topic. Again I wish to argue with you or anyone else. What I wrote above did not call for the reaction that you wrote. My opinions were written in a respectful manner, and did not attack anyone in any way whatsoever: nor could it be construed by any reasonable person as such. it was unnecessary to call me a moron. And inappropriate. I do not however take any Internet forum exchange as anything serious: nor would I take it serious in person either. Silliness is just silliness.I am sorry that you have such negativity with in to spew without. One only does or shares what they are or have inside. To possibly help you-I would ask others to share in with their opinions about the exchange above, and I can almost predict 100% that they will agree with me in that I was completely respectful, attempting to engage in an intellectual conversation over opinions, and you threw it in the gutter. It only underscores what I said about possible oversensitivity in most gay men. Unfortunately, what could have been a mutually beneficial exchange of ideas, just died, because you could not maintain dignity and grace. Now you may keep your poison and your opinions to yourself. I will not read it any further; nor will I respond to it, concise or verbose.
Oddjob0226
4th Level Indigo Feather
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2001
- Messages
- 6,852
- Points
- 0
Nope. We all have preferences. Off topic.
kucheeku
TMF Master
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2002
- Messages
- 764
- Points
- 43
I totally agree with you. It's amazing how some (not all, thankfully) heterosexual males feel compelled to express "opinions" and "preferences" indirectly denigrating others in the process but not fessing up to it. Like I said before, what's the point? Insecurity? Well, best of luck in life to them.
Though a bit old, I'll quote this. Many of the arguement was missing the main point by putting in extra opinions (like the matter on how gays are treated or assuming how heterosexuals think), but that lightfoot did rudely express a female need and seem to push that only heterosexual posts are allowed in this part of the forum.
Maybe the same can be said about females and gay men when it comes to m/f or other heterosexual imagery/videos. But no, heterosexual is normal and we being gay means we should help protect those that aren't. I'll agree to that when heteros help shield their content.
Or maybe people can keep their opinions (specifically what lightfoot said to start the whole thing) and just keep searching if this isn't the thread you wanted.
Dave Pavet
Banned
- Joined
- Sep 29, 2007
- Messages
- 814
- Points
- 0
If you are not turned on by men you are a homophobe?... I am so sick of the left and their politically correct bullshit!
blackfeather22
Registered User
- Joined
- Jun 1, 2009
- Messages
- 17
- Points
- 0
Geez, no one said that. The point was that people who don't like /M stuff feel a need to express their distaste in the most denigrating and judgmental way possible, rather than being mature and either ignoring the /M material, or simply saying '/M is not for me'.
Dave Pavet
Banned
- Joined
- Sep 29, 2007
- Messages
- 814
- Points
- 0
Yeah Blackfeather I see you point... When Lightfoot said, "MEN? Yuuuch" I should have slashed my wrist like any other normal person. I really wish Lightfoot was more sensitive and said something like "MEN? aw shucks", or perhaps "MEN? Gee whiz", or "MEN? gosh darnit."
Oddjob0226
4th Level Indigo Feather
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2001
- Messages
- 6,852
- Points
- 0
Yeah, not at all. All they did say was how terrible it was to be a victim of society, in thread after thread after thread after thread. Some of them mighty, mighty lengthy. All over one rude post.
On a website about people being tickled.
So, 1 wrong + 1 equal and opposite wrong = a right, right?
'night!
