I have started talking to a couple of persons about having my religious/modest wife tickled. This is related to something I did initiate last fall---secretly getting a man in our area to try to seduce her.
One key, central aspect of the tickle idea is all about the chances a tickle victim would report the incident to authorities, or for that matter tell anyone at all about it.
I have concluded that being tickled (not talking about anyone who wants to be and knows ahead of time) is so embarrassing and odd/weird that no one would want to talk about it later, tell anyone anything. That maybe to a lot of people, getting tickled would not seem to them any sort of real crime, and possibly if authorities DID have a case turned into them, they would have difficulties prosecuting unless other acts/actions were also done along with the tickle-tickle such as robbery or what have you.
I also want to bring up that tickling, though it could be classified as an assault, leaves no what I call residual evidence behind. A tickle victim later would have nothing to point to, nothing to show or prove that anything happened, no marks or scars or injuries or any other of the forensic possibilities really. Shall I say it would boil down to the word of one person against the other if it went to court?
Anyhow, I am contemplating it all, and wonder about and welcome the input of others.
One key, central aspect of the tickle idea is all about the chances a tickle victim would report the incident to authorities, or for that matter tell anyone at all about it.
I have concluded that being tickled (not talking about anyone who wants to be and knows ahead of time) is so embarrassing and odd/weird that no one would want to talk about it later, tell anyone anything. That maybe to a lot of people, getting tickled would not seem to them any sort of real crime, and possibly if authorities DID have a case turned into them, they would have difficulties prosecuting unless other acts/actions were also done along with the tickle-tickle such as robbery or what have you.
I also want to bring up that tickling, though it could be classified as an assault, leaves no what I call residual evidence behind. A tickle victim later would have nothing to point to, nothing to show or prove that anything happened, no marks or scars or injuries or any other of the forensic possibilities really. Shall I say it would boil down to the word of one person against the other if it went to court?
Anyhow, I am contemplating it all, and wonder about and welcome the input of others.



