Kalamos
Level of Lemon Feather
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2003
- Messages
- 12,980
- Points
- 63
What if "pervs" won the vote?nosocksnoshoes said:Wouldn't it be simpler if some of the sub-forums had a voting process, like slashdot or digg, so that people have a chance to "vote the pervs out"? Takes a little burden off the mods, makes the folks like Goofy not feel marginalized, gives newbies a better idea of what's OK and not.
You are under the assumption that the vast majority of users dislikes non-consensual contents and would actively vote "sickos" out.
Sales figure from vid producers would indicate otherwise.
I mean, non-con vids far outweigh consensual stuff, as far as I know.
Also, you are not taking into account votes from fake users.
We had a prob with double and fake identities in the past; users would have no way to know if voting has been biased somehow - only mods could tell, defeating the purpose of the idea.
...
I know I sound harsh and overly negative.
But I think balance is required when handling delicate matters.
As I said, crying "perv" is not the wisest way to get things done.
...
EDIT:
The irony is: the more we fight "pervs" by unorthodox means, the more mods are forced to defend them, to be fair and keep order.
Last edited:



