Ticklerguy4u
3rd Level Orange Feather
- Joined
- May 18, 2005
- Messages
- 2,531
- Points
- 36
Well truth doesn't always mean its right, it just means its fact.wendynpeter said:As long as it's true.
wendynpeter said:The Supreme Court has made that distiction very clear: If you can't prove you're solving a problem you have NOW, you cannot reverse-discriminate. So why do so many corporations and governments do it anyway? Because every time someone challenges, the rules change. For now, we are just going to have to live with it. But it's only hurting the people it's meant to help. Every time one black woman gets a job she can't really do, it lowers the respect level -- exponentially. If there's one example of institutional racism in America today, it's the backlash againt affirmative action by the people who observe that it's time to go to a merit-based way of doing things. But even that isn't racism. I clearly see the difference between the affirmative action hires at my job and the black and Indian people who are awesome hires and can kick ass and take names at what they do. I think most people can see that too. I think that right now, affirmative action is hurting black women more than anyone else...
Well its just made to give everyone an opportunity. What the person does with it is their decision. Being a woman already has its unfair judgements add to that a color barrier and its double jeopardy. I can see where you would think that it hurts a woman by giving her what she has not really earned.
Again, I personally don't care if a woman is a fireman or firewoman. All I care about is when I'm trapped in a building ...she needs to lift me up and carry me out to safety. So to say that its hurting them is automatically assuming that their is no discrimination against women themselves let alone a black woman. Even if it is on a hush-hush. I know many men in power that are threatened by any woman of that same power. Once this no longer is an issue , it will die out and the phrase "All men/women are created equal" will have merit.
wendynpeter said:Yes, true. If the categories are white and non-white, definitely so. If you break things out in finer resolution, though, I think you can still talk about non-white minorities.
why catergorize a certain race of people as minorities..minor to what or who? They are all human beings as are we all but then again I guess I shouldn't be surprised. The way this world is built..there a winners and losers, wealthy and poor, popular and unpopular, beautiful and average, powerful and powerless, etc. and obviously minorities...I wonder what the base of comparison is?
wendynpeter said:True. And when that was a problem, affirmative action was the correct solution. But affirmative action was never meant to be permanent. I see employee populations where affirmative action has resulted in such obvious over correction that it's now something to worried about in terms of civil liability coming the other way.
Well its probably because people are dishonest or honest to a fault. I'm sure their are people out there that use this as a way of getting something they didn't earn, but at the same time the person that did earn it gets shunned away because of gender or race. No one knows what a person's true intentions are. Whether to climb the ladder of success through hard work or manipulation or keep someone from advancing because of laziness or prejudice. You can never know what a person is truly thinking you just have to set some rules up to avoid it the best way you can. If it becomes all too common. When does it stop..I guess when we all stop taking advantage of it.
wendynpeter said:That's true also. There are people who legitimately competed for jobs who turn out to be zeros in every field, I comppletely agree. But hiring someone who you should have known would turn out to be a underperformer because they weren't qualified in the first place is something else altogether, don't you agree?
Yes, I do. Some time ago New York voted for a black mayor...Dinkins. It was no secret why either, but it backfired. Why, because his color had nothing to do with what kind of leader he was as many disappointingly found out. It was assumed that he would take care of his own and when he didn't ...he was never re-elected. Again, it all has to do with recognition. Those who have the ability to hire someone that is not qualified may have to grit there teeth as not to be considered discrimating and those who do not deserve to be given the job despite what color they are have to stop acting as if they deserve it. The color, gender, physical limitations or sexual orientation (within reason of course, hiring a guy to be "towel girl" in a ladies locker room isn't a good idea or vice versa) should never be a factor when dealing with job requirements but it does. That is the truth and fact of the matter.

You sure know how to make a brown girl blush! The package will come complete with my MBA in 2008. You see, I'll put in the work to get what I want and don't expect anyone to give it to be on an "entitlement" basis. Don't let wendy or anyone else fool you; I've been in the workforce long enough to know what works and what doesn't.


. I don't believe that the white race is superior over other races. That's my opinion & I am sticking to it.
the "challengers" to his "obvious superiority", and hopefully everyone will just forget that he makes such offensive, condescending statements, and he moves on, to rip the statements of others that he disagrees with.....





