I tickled my aunts feet - Now I want more

[cue]

I just can't shake that shiver of creepiness and the feeling of nausea that comes with the thought of some poor woman being a victim to this person's intentions. Too bad we can't get in contact with her just to warn the poor woman to lock her doors.

 

[coldneck]

This guy tells a somewhat hot real-life tickling story without giving all the details and is now being accused of incest and perversion. Nice.
We don't even have all the facts, but that doesn't stop the mob from lighting torches and starting a witch hunt.

I'm thinking what raised the ire of so many was that he wasn't really soliciting advice in the first place, and when it was rammed down his throat he chose to ignore it and do what he wants.

So you're creeped out. You're nauseated. So what?!
It's not your life or decision. It's his.
Get over it.

 

[voided9]

So you're creeped out. You're nauseated. So what?!
It's not your life or decision. It's his.
Get over it.

Hmm, I believe you'd do well to take some of your own advice. Some people are into things that you may not approve of, doesn't make them right or wrong unless they're physically acting on it. Just a thought 😉

 

[rhiannon]

I'm thinking what raised the ire of so many was that he wasn't really soliciting advice in the first place, and when it was rammed down his throat he chose to ignore it and do what he wants.

He ends his opening post with "What do you think I should do?". So people tell him. Why does he even ask if he just wants applaus?

 

[cue]

The OP made it sound like he was getting aroused from the thought of tickling his aunt's feet. That's what is gross and nauseating. The OP ASKED what he should do. It sounds like he knows there's something wrong with it, but he's looking for some validation that it's okay. But getting a boner from tickling family is creepy, disgusting and nauseating.

 

[DontAskJusTckle]

And there you have it; garbage like this is part of what brings us shame.

The garbage that brings us shame is all of this moral hand-wringing over the very thing that's supposed to unite us all. The garbage is this shameful lynch-mob mentality to go after one of our own, along with anybody who has the "gall" to defend him.

Newsflash! For some of us, tickling IS everything. That's why we're here. We're not interested in your puritanical pusillanimity. We are not bound by your moral codes or sense of familial propriety. If Aunt Shirley has ticklish feet, we are going to tickle those feet because we feel that ticklish feet need to be tickled. Period, end of story.

Why does a man climb a mountain? Because it's there. Why does a man tickle his Aunt's feet. Same reason. It's no more complicated than that.

Go ahead, defend what amounts to assault. And if you don't like being called out for that, guess what? Follow your own advice and "get over it".

OMG. Tickling one's aunt is "assault??"

Excuse my while I

Dude, I can understand your disapproval, but that argument was just pathetic.

BTW, don't bother answering; you are now on my Ignore list.

And while Coldneck is off licking his wounds from that devastating blow, allow me to point out the profound lack of maturity in asking a question and then metaphorically putting fingers in both ears while singing "LA LA LA LA I DON'T HEEEAR YOUUU!"

It's too bad we don't know the names of anyone involved; if we did, we could warn this woman to look out.

Oh God, this just keeps getting better and better. Yeah, I can just hear THAT conversation...

"Hello?"

"Hi, you don't know me, but I'm calling to warn you."

"Warn me? About what? Is this the police?"

"No, I just think you should know that your nephew becomes sexually aroused when tickling your feet."

"OMG! Who the hell ARE you to be telling me this?? Are you his psychologist? Don't you have some Confidentiality requirement??"

"No, ma'am. I'm not really a doctor. I just play one on a tickling fetish forum. Your nephew is a member there also. We share the same sexual fetish for tickling female feet. I just disapprove of involving family members because that's assault, you know. So I decided to to the right thing and tell you about it, because I thought you should know. It's okay, you don't have to thank me."

"'THANK' you??!! Are you kidding me?! You'll be lucky if I don't track down this call, and teach you what real assault is all about! Now you listen to me, you pious little busybody! I love my nephew very much! And yes I was well aware of his...'excitement.' He's a year out of his teens, for God's sake. Boys that age are walking sperm banks. So if he gets a few jollies tickling my feet, I'm more than happy to be there for him. And you know what? I don't give a rats ass what you or the rest of the perverts on your fab board think of it! BUH! BYE!​

 

[rhiannon]

Why does a man climb a mountain? Because it's there. Why does a man tickle his Aunt's feet. Same reason. It's no more complicated than that.

I hope you're not comparing someone's aunt to a mountain here? Because if you do that, don't ever try to complain again when someone uses tickling someone against their will and rape in the same post.

 

[Deleted member 2452]

dude, there is a big reason not to go after your aunt, even if she's only related through marriage; the trouble it can cause in the entire family! what if uncle her husband get's pissed, or noticed his arousal, and smacks some sense into him! then his parents have to defend him, or kick him (the tickler)out! now the whole family is taking sides! do you really mean to sit there jerking off onto your key board and tell me/us that that is an acceptable risk?!
getting frisky with family is a far cry from what we are here for!

steve

 

[Sandrock74]

Did I read that correctly? Tickling someone and rape is comparable?? Wow, how misinformed some people are.

 

[DontAskJusTckle]

I hope you're not comparing someone's aunt to a mountain here?

It's pretty clear to see that I'm not.

Because if you do that, don't ever try to complain again when someone uses tickling someone against their will and rape in the same post.

Of course, Mistress. I hear and obey.

 

[rhiannon]

Did I read that correctly? Tickling someone and rape is comparable?? Wow, how misinformed some people are.

No, you didn't read that correctly.

It's pretty clear to see that I'm not.

You might want to rephrase that sentence then. It sounded like you did!

 

[WorkInProgress]

And, it's Sunday night, the end of that weekend. Do we get to find out who was right?

Side note: For as much as I disagree with the "tickling is everything" and "go for it" crowd, I also disagree with the people who treated the OP as a willful wrongdoer. I don't think that's fair either.

 

[Mane'o]

Has it occurred to anyone else that the OP may be spinning a tall tale and enjoying the typical dueling between the "go-for-its" and the "don't-you-dare" faction?
Put it in the stories section pal, even the true tales if that's what starts your engine.

 

[rhiannon]

It isn't sex and it isn't harmful, so I'm not going to judge him.

Okay, I will share a little story here that I haven't told to very many people before, because up to this day I still feel uncomfortable about it. I hear so often, that it doesn't matter if the person tickling others gets aroused from it or not, but believe me, it does!

When I was younger, my grandma used to have neighbors that I sometimes used to visit and bring them leftovers from what my grandma cooked. They were about my grandma's age, and the guy always wanted a hug. I never quite liked it, but hey....I was a kid, so I did it. When I grew older, about 14, 15, one day when the guy hugged me I realized that he had a boner pressing against me. I never ever went there again, I felt confused, dirty, used and abused. And that was just a hug!

It does something in people when you use them to get your rocks off, and even though it took me a long time to realize that it happened, in the end I realized what was going on, and it made me feel bad. Eventually, stuff like this comes out, and there most likely will be hard feelings involved.

 

[cue]

Thank you for sharing that with us, Rhiannon. I'm sorry to hear something like that occurred to you, but you are truly brave to have shared something so personal with us.

It's those consequences that we're trying to warn the OP. Some may view tickling as an assault, because they did not ask to be touched. Anytime anyone touches someone without permission it's under battery. We always tell people to keep their hands to themselves that no one has the right to touch us unless we give them permission. Why would that suddenly not be the case just because it's tickling? Not everyone likes being tickled, and from what others can vouch on this board, there are enough of those in the 'vanilla' world who would view us as being creepy and a person to avoid at all costs. Why encourage them to do something that could possibly lead others to think the same thing? If one of my relatives was getting aroused from tickling me, that would make me feel so dirty. I don't want to arouse my relatives. And where would it stop? Would you encourage them to just tickle family to the point of actually ejaculating?

 

[rhiannon]

It's those consequences that we're trying to warn the OP.

Exactly! I mean, he was just a neighbor of my grandma and I was able to avoid him without anything much happening about it, and I was too embarrassed to tell someone about it. The OP will not be able to avoid his aunt, and I am pretty sure if she gets what's going on that she will not keep her mouth shut. I wouldn't want my whole family to know something like that about me!

 

[cue]

Not unless they're a Jerry Springer family..lol.

 

[DontAskJusTckle]

Okay, I will share a little story here that I haven't told to very many people before, because up to this day I still feel uncomfortable about it. I hear so often, that it doesn't matter if the person tickling others gets aroused from it or not, but believe me, it does!

When I was younger, my grandma used to have neighbors that I sometimes used to visit and bring them leftovers from what my grandma cooked. They were about my grandma's age, and the guy always wanted a hug. I never quite liked it, but hey....I was a kid, so I did it. When I grew older, about 14, 15, one day when the guy hugged me I realized that he had a boner pressing against me. I never ever went there again, I felt confused, dirty, used and abused. And that was just a hug!

It does something in people when you use them to get your rocks off, and even though it took me a long time to realize that it happened, in the end I realized what was going on, and it made me feel bad. Eventually, stuff like this comes out, and there most likely will be hard feelings involved.

I'm just wondering who besides myself has difficulty taking this story seriously, especially with the old man in question conveniently absent and hence, unable to present his side of the story. Quite frankly, I don't believe a word of it, and here's why.

You said you were 14-15 years old? And this guy you said was your grandparents age? That would put him at about 55-65 years old. Men of that age don't achieve erections that easily. We're talking the marketing demographic for Viagra, here. Unless you "examined" him, for all you know he may have had something in his pocket, a scenario I find a lot more plausible than an old man sporting a hard-on like that of man in his 20s. Unless you're going to tell us that at 14, you'd had enough familiarity with male genitalia that you could identify an erection beyond the shadow of a doubt.

Secondly, even if the guy did have an erection, so what? It's a bodily function that we can't always turn on and off like a light switch. Many guys wake up every morning with a full erection that has absolutely zilch to do with sexual arousal. Sometimes, Little Elvis stands at attention at odd times during the day or evening.

Third, even if he was truly aroused, you're only assuming that you were the cause of it. For all you knew, he could have had an image or scene stuck in his head, the way sometimes that song in your head just won't go away. Without his testimony, we can only speculate as to what caused his alleged arousal.

Fourth, even if you were the cause of his alleged arousal, that doesn't mean he planned for it to happen. He may have been taken by surprise and felt worse about it than you claim to.

But no, it makes for better drama and impact if we all just assume he was deliberately fondling the neighbor's granddaughter, which would of course make him a pedophile, rendering this entire "example" moot, since the OP's Aunt was in her thirties.

But of course, that was the whole point of this story. To cast people like the OP in the same moral category as pedophiles. To suggest that not only is tickling somebody unaware of your fetish akin to rape, it's akin to pedophilia as well.

 

[WorkInProgress]

DAJT, I never quite realized what a troll you are until I read this preceding post. There is no way that anybody who was even trying to be serious and honest would respond that way. Rhiannon's story makes perfect sense, the bit about 55-to-65-year-olds not getting erections without Viagara is hogwash, and you know damn well that a teenage girl could sense that something was not right and then have it confirmed as she described it. I can't believe that you would stoop so low as to post this garbage. I know I've called you a troll before, but I never meant it quite as seriously as I do now.

 

[ChicagoDavid]

I'm just wondering who besides myself has difficulty taking this story seriously, especially with the old man in question conveniently absent and hence, unable to present his side of the story. Quite frankly, I don't believe a word of it, and here's why.

You said you were 14-15 years old? And this guy you said was your grandparents age? That would put him at about 55-65 years old. Men of that age don't achieve erections that easily. We're talking the marketing demographic for Viagra, here. Unless you "examined" him, for all you know he may have had something in his pocket, a scenario I find a lot more plausible than an old man sporting a hard-on like that of man in his 20s. Unless you're going to tell us that at 14, you'd had enough familiarity with male genitalia that you could identify an erection beyond the shadow of a doubt.

Secondly, even if the guy did have an erection, so what? It's a bodily function that we can't always turn on and off like a light switch. Many guys wake up every morning with a full erection that has absolutely zilch to do with sexual arousal. Sometimes, Little Elvis stands at attention at odd times during the day or evening.

Third, even if he was truly aroused, you're only assuming that you were the cause of it. For all you knew, he could have had an image or scene stuck in his head, the way sometimes that song in your head just won't go away. Without his testimony, we can only speculate as to what caused his alleged arousal.

Fourth, even if you were the cause of his alleged arousal, that doesn't mean he planned for it to happen. He may have been taken by surprise and felt worse about it than you claim to.

But no, it makes for better drama and impact if we all just assume he was deliberately fondling the neighbor's granddaughter, which would of course make him a pedophile, rendering this entire "example" moot, since the OP's Aunt was in her thirties.

But of course, that was the whole point of this story. To cast people like the OP in the same moral category as pedophiles. To suggest that not only is tickling somebody unaware of your fetish akin to rape, it's akin to pedophilia as well.

Lamest post ever award. Have our flame wars really sunk so low that a member shares a childhood experience and we say, "you're full of BS and even if you are not full of BS, who cares, you should have shrugged it off." I once advocated a rule. Don't post something you wouldn't say if the other person were in the room with you. Seems like a good rule. And yes, I'd gladly say this to DAJT. And DAJT, PLEASE do not respond by saying that you would say all that to Rhiannon to her face. It would get you the new "incredibly, even lamer post award."

 

[rhiannon]

To cast people like the OP in the same moral category as pedophiles.

Just so you know, in Germany the legal age to have sex is 14. I would not have qualified as a child, nor he as a pedophile.
Except that, I have nothing more to say to your post, apart from that it doesn't surprise me.

 

[cue]

DAJT, you haven't read the OP's first and only post correctly. It's not the neighbor's granddaughter he's getting aroused from, but his aunt. I would hope the story isn't true, because the mere thought of it having an ounce of truth is enough to cause some of us to take multiple showers.

 

[C.A.B.]

25 years from now, OP bawls to his psychiatrist that his Aunt abused his innocence as a teen. This is all troll rubbish, just like the non-con threads. Somebody is getting their jollies off.

 

[cue]

I would hope that people are aware that it's not a good idea to start tickling people just because they can, or that "it's just tickling". If you start becoming creepy to the point where you ignore a person's choice about something that happens to their own body, then those idiots deserve every bad karma thing that happens to them.

 

[BellybTickler]

This is w/o doubt, one of the most entertaining threads I've had the privilege to read. Please, keep it coming.