• If you would like to get your account Verified, read this thread
  • The TMF is sponsored by Clips4sale - By supporting them, you're supporting us.
  • Reminder - We have a ZERO TOLERANCE policy regarding content involving minors, regardless of intent. Any content containing minors will result in an immediate ban. If you see any such content, please report it using the "report" button on the bottom left of the post.
  • >>> If you cannot get into your account email me at [email protected] <<<
    Don't forget to include your username

Is Lady Gaga truly female?

Agreed. And she's been around for a while, writing songs (hit singles), for other people. "Lady Gaga" is just a persona that sells albums. Stefani whatever her last name is has been behind the scenes for a long time. She knows exactly what she's doing and I believe has the talent to be around a while. She seems smart enough to know when to change her image.

Germanotta. 🙂
 
and a Self-confessed one at that.

She's not "messing with anyone" any more than Bowie was about being Bi-Sexual. Newsflash: He is.

She/He/It has a small, under-developed penis that cannot be surgically removed without risk of death.

I saw it's "performance" on SNL and was very underwhelmed. It's voice was buried in effects and there were tons of backup singers. It was more about costumes and dancing than the actual music.
All signs point to Flash-In-The-Pan.

In a couple of years, she will be a funky little footnote.
Gone and forgotten.

Flash-In-The-Pan eh...hmm, she just recently received FIVE Grammy noms. Normally Flash-In-The-Pan artists don't come even remotely close to that.

Also as far as her voice. SNL is notorious for shitty sound, but better yet that performance was supposed to be FUNNY. Here...try listening to this:
http://www.ticklingforum.com/showthread.php?t=166657
Whether you like her or not you can't deny she has a great voice.

...and in case you aren't convinced...
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/gY9GzCN74SA&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/gY9GzCN74SA&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/oZ7N3ygYFZ0&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/oZ7N3ygYFZ0&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

...She/He/It has a small, under-developed penis that cannot be surgically removed without risk of death.

I saw it's "performance" on SNL and was very underwhelmed...

Whether she's a hermaphrodite or not (has never been proven btw) has nothing to do with the girl's talent. It sounds to me like you have a serious issue with the possibility of her having an extra appendage and are allowing that to cloud your view of her as a singer. Look if she was born with "it" that's not her fault. Some people are born ugly too. So what? Get. Over. It. That is all. 🙂
 
Sorry, Charlie...but a Grammy nomination doesn't mean much anymore.

How about this? M.C. Hammer was not only nominated, but WON a Grammy for Best Rap Solo Performance.
Lil Wayne and the Carter III were nominated for eight Grammys. Eight.
I could go on, but I think you get it.

As far as the above being "convincing" of greatness, it's not. It just isn't.
The first song was tolerable, but nothing a first round American Idol contestant couldn't pull off. It was jus' ahiiight for me, dog.
The second song? Please. I lasted 1:32 seconds into it before pulling the plug. It was terrible.

Now, as far as being a flash-in-the-pan, only time will tell.

Wee-wees, Pee-pees, Dingleberries or Doodlenuts aside, it has average talent and isn't built to last. I hope whatever it is enjoys her time in the spotlight, cause it's gonna be a short, bumpy and very brief ride.
 
Wow, it's sad you think that, because she REALLY DOES have an incredible voice. Look up some of her acoustic stuff sometime. You know, where there are no voice over, effects, etc. I seriously doubt she'll be going anywhere, anytime soon. A lot of people adore her.


Her acoustic stuff is great! I love her voice.:cheer:
 
I iz having a de ja vu. :upsidedow How many threads on this topic are there? Does it reeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaaalllly matter if she is or isn't? She/he/it is amazingly talented. Period. For what it's worth though, I say LADEE.:tiger:

Oh and...Dance, dance, just, j-j-just dance. :boogie:
 
A double pleasure's waiting for youuuuuuuuuu................

A double pleasure with Doublemint Gum........
 
Her voice aint all that. If it was she wudn't need all them funky gimmicks and costumes. But thats what the masses go for. Not the music but the show.


It's always been that way though. Some of my all time fave bands/singers had an "all around" appeal. Sure, I appreciate talent but it's cool when someone steps outside of the box and is different.

She's like the American version of Bjork lol.
 
Edit:
It's always been that way though. Some of my all time fave bands/singers had an "all around" appeal. Sure, I appreciate talent but it's cool when someone steps outside of the box and is different.

She's like the American version of Bjork lol.
LOL you beat me to it luv. 😉


Her voice aint all that. If it was she wudn't need all them funky gimmicks and costumes. But thats what the masses go for. Not the music but the show.

I beg to differ. She can most definitely sing. She doesn't need the gimmicks for that. She uses the costumes because it's entertainment. See Madona, Michael Jackson, Beyonce, um ANY major pop singer of the last 50 years. Elvis for god sakes. Costumes are part of the industry. People pay really good money to see a show not just hear someone sing. Just sayin.

As for her voice, here: http://www.ticklingforum.com/showthread.php?t=166657&highlight=Lady+gaga
 
Steps in *side note* Marquis is 4 posts away from a new feather. :bounce: Bye bye ugly yellow feather. :yayzorz:

Ok back to our originally scheduled programming of discussing what tools are under Lady Gaga's skirt. Box or stick??? The world may never know.:sherlock:
 
and a Self-confessed one at that.

She's not "messing with anyone" any more than Bowie was about being Bi-Sexual. Newsflash: He is.

She/He/It has a small, under-developed penis that cannot be surgically removed without risk of death.

I saw it's "performance" on SNL and was very underwhelmed. It's voice was buried in effects and there were tons of backup singers. It was more about costumes and dancing than the actual music.
All signs point to Flash-In-The-Pan.

In a couple of years, she will be a funky little footnote.
Gone and forgotten.

I hate having to repeat myself. The article where she "admits" to being a hemophrodite was doctored up. What she admitted is that she was bisexual. Which is why she wore the lightening bolt makeup as a nod to bowie.

When you google the infamous article the wording changes each and every single time depending on the website you visit. Everything from "i have pussy and cock" to "I have peener a poonanie". If it were real the wording would not keep changing.
 
I dont really care what she is. I saw an half hour interview with her and she seems like a very nice person. To me thats what really matters.
 
What's New
1/27/26
Visit Clips4Sale for a great selection of tickling clips!

Door 44
Live Camgirls!
Live Camgirls
Streaming Videos
Pic of the Week
Pic of the Week
Congratulations to
*** brad1701 ***
The winner of our weekly Trivia, held every Sunday night at 11PM EST in our Chat Room
Top