Is underage tickling understood wrong?

[ticklish boy]

I think it is. And I am not a pervert. I just like watching tickling videos and other stuff. For me it wouldn't be a problem seeing a video where some kids(or maybe teens...12-18 years old) having a tickle fight. I think that the underage tickling shouldn't be prohibited...there should only be some restrictions(no nudity, no sexual content...you know what I mean). What is your opinion about this?

PS: I hope I didn't mess with this forum's rules by posting this

 

[badreligion]

I think it is. And I am not a pervert. I just like watching tickling videos and other stuff. For me it wouldn't be a problem seeing a video where some kids(or maybe teens...12-18 years old) having a tickle fight. I think that the underage tickling shouldn't be prohibited...there should only be some restrictions(no nudity, no sexual content...you know what I mean). What is your opinion about this?

PS: I hope I didn't mess with this forum's rules by posting this

12 to 17 years old = this

 

[RavenMoon]

It comes down to the intent of the video.

Videos that are produced from the majority of the alternative genres are essentially designed to excite and arouse. (I am generalizing here. There are very, very few exceptions.) Everything from fetish smoking, 'looners, foot fetish and tickling are designed to make the target audience want more. People watch these because they are interested in the subject matter. That interest manifests in attraction, excitement and arousal.

So, on to your subject of underage tickling. Why would one want to watch a tickle fight between kids? Yes, they are kids. Would one find it arousing? Or is it just because they think it is humorous? Reality check time. One would watch because it is exciting and arousing.

Therefore no. Absolutely not. While one may claim they would not be aroused by it, there are others who will. And one would seriously question the honesty of those who claim not to be aroused by it.

 

[Banshee]

Uh

I take offense to that. I could watch it without being aroused but I'd certainly be repulsed.

 

[RUNOFFSTAGE]

I think the age limit 18 y/o is a good limit. I can only speak for myself when I say that watching underage tickling kind of... makes me feel like some old pedophile ><
If someone wants to watch it, so be it, but I don't think that it should be a part of this forum.

 

[Banshee]

I Agree

I think the age limit 18 y/o is a good limit. I can only speak for myself when I say that watching underage tickling kind of... makes me feel like some old pedophile ><
If someone wants to watch it, so be it, but I don't think that it should be a part of this forum.

Note the paragraph you read prior to entering the TMF

The TMF does not provide content, only an open forum for the sharing of it. Thus, the forum's content is totally contributed by its members. Some of this material may be of an adult nature. Due to this fact, you must be at least 18 to enter. If you are, then click upon the "Enter Forums" link below and come on in! If you are under 18, I'm afraid you have to leave. Perhaps you might find this information useful.

 

[RavenMoon]

I take offense to that. I could watch it without being aroused but I'd certainly be repulsed.

Of course you would be repulsed and watch without getting aroused. You are obviously not the intended audience of an underage video.

 

[RUNOFFSTAGE]

Oh, thank you for enlightening me, Banshee!
... It's not like I'm reading that ever day -.-a

 

[TicklesFemales]

I think somewhere in this forum it says you must be 18 years of age to join, therefore I don't think it is appropriate for anyone under the age of 18 to be shown being tickled on this forum. That is just my opinion. I find anything done with a child under the age of 18 be it tickling or anything of a sexual matter as disgusting.

TicklesFemales

 

[Happyman]

this is a fetish site, of course its wrong. Im sure that we could see underage people tickle each other or wrestle and it not be a big deal, but if your feeling the need to post it at a fetish site, then it obviously is a big deal and you shouldnt be looking at it

 

[ticklish boy]

..

Guys you understood me wrong...I didn't say anything about this specific forum. I was complaining(not really complaining...just remarking) that underage tickling is totally forbidden on all the forums/sites I know and there are no underage tickling videos. Personally, I see tickling more as a friendly and funny stuff...not as a sexual thing.

 

[ViperGTS]

Are you serious? You really like to watch underage minors tickling each other for fun, the same way you like to go to the movies, for entertainment purposes only?

You're never in any way turned on by watching minors tickling each other?

 

[keptsKEEPER]

Your reaction

If watching a video of minors being tickled is a turn on for you, there is a huge problem. I don't care how much I like tickling, kids would ruin it in a hurry!!!

 

[Noeyes]

you drew a twin edged sword out

first of all the law is the law. sites like this one must comply to it of find ourselves without this fourm. that would be a crime. in some parts of the world the age of consent is less then in the US.its not that there are no tickle sites for the underage. they used to exist and most likely still do hidden in the dark folds of the internet.

the other edge of that is that almost all the ticklfilles i have ever spoken to can trace the roots of thier fetish to childhood. it might have been inocent at the time but 10,20,30 yrs on it becomes less childish fasination and more into what it is a fetish.

the fetish community is ripe for abuse and makes a handy target for those who lack the tolerence or understanding of average people.some of them would love nothing better them to tar all fetishists with the same brush. so it is sometimes better to take the high road.

some time ago we had a problem here in BC Canada. we got a justice minister who figured child porn was not such a bad thing and struck down the laws here about it. the fallout was almost instant. needless to say he is now out of a job and the laws were re established but the speed of the companies who came and set up in BC becouse of the law change even frightened the experts.

even now the age of consent here is 14 not 21 or 18 like in most of the rest of north america. it is not that we look down on chilhodd tickling we jusr see it for the multi headed hydra it can grow into in a heart beat.
Just my opinion Noeyes

 

[method11236]

the TMF is a market place and discussion forum for PORNOGRAPHIC materials...


end of story.

 

[tcklft]

Amazing how this topic seems to get brought up every few weeks.

 

[Iggy pop]

Guys you understood me wrong...I didn't say anything about this specific forum. I was complaining(not really complaining...just remarking) that underage tickling is totally forbidden on all the forums/sites I know and there are no underage tickling videos. Personally, I see tickling more as a friendly and funny stuff...not as a sexual thing.

It's kind of hard to believe this, because you did set an age limit. You stated in your orginal post that you like to see 12-17 year olds. If it is just a friendly thing then why did you stop at 12? What about 4 year olds can't that be friendly and funny stuff? How about 80 years old can't that be friendly and funny thing too?

 

[goddess_nemesis]

It's real simple why there's no underage tickling material on this forum and many have explained it very well. This is an adult fetish forum. It may not be a big deal to you to watch a video of two 14-year-olds playfully tickling each other, but the problem is this is a sexual fetish site. No matter that you do you like playful tickling, that doesn't change what this site is.

It's not only the rule. It's the law. It would only take one person to ruin it for all. If you have something like that posted on here, someone else could see it and report it to the proper authorities and the TMF wouldn't exist anymore.

 

[The Last Laugh]

How old are you, Tickish Boy?

 

[ViperGTS]

How old are you, Tickish Boy?

This topic always winds up being revived by people who I personally suspect of being underage, but of course, nothing can be proven, so I keep my mouth shut.

 

[Stage Whisper]

Y'know, there are lots of tickling videos over on Youtube that involve newborns, little kids, families, and teenagers tickling each other. I don't find the content at all arousing, just cute or sometimes funny.

That aside, I can understand- and support- the TMF's policy for no underage stuff. This is a FETISH forum, and you walk down a very slippery slope when you start to put up material with underage people in it. Sure, at first it could be "Oh, she's seventeen, close enough! Besides, it's just cute. >.> *Fapfapfap*" And after that, maybe it's a sixteen year old, and so on.

You can easily find stuff with underage, innocent tickling elsewhere, if that's what you want to look at. But for my part, I totally support the no underage material here on the TMF. When I look for clips here, I expect to find fully grown adults teasing and tickling each other.

 

[ticklish boy]

How old are you, Tickish Boy?

I am 24 years old

 

[chicago]

I am a big fan of this site and I'd really not want it to be shut down because of an underage tickling video taken the wrong way by someone. The only way to make sure that doesn't happen is to not allow any content featuring minors.

Fin

 

[Lord Doctor]

Just to reafirm some other statements.

IT HAS NO PLACE HERE.

To answer the question, taking it literally... and do please read it all!
There is no such thing as "underage tickling" but there are good or bad intentions of the tickler and "acceptable" or bad reactions from someone who might be witnessing the event by whatever circumstances/circumstanses?.

Between parent/child, siblings or close relative;s, it is what it is, playful, parent/child bonding etc. A five second tickle and home video of this between family or close friends and the voicing of the words "how cute" isn't an issue assuming nothing sinister is going on. In that sense, yes it might be misunderstood, people do have varying opinions on all things afterall.

BUT...

Produced and Marketed tickling videos, however, is another thing altogether. Marketed tickling material involving kids with or without bondage is wrong and cannot be misunderstood. It is a video of prolonged tickling. Even if the child involved had agreed (more likely coerced/tricked) to be tickled for a long time as is the general setup for tickle vids, it would quickly become far too much for the aforesaid and would therfore be abuse and would/could be phsycologically damaging. And there is no way of knowing what else that kid/s might be being forced to do.

At that level, it is not misunderstood, not by me. It is wrong and that's that.
I know there are cartoons with prolonged tickling of kids in, but they're cartoons and are aimed at kids and are probably a warning as to what a "stranger" might do to them.

I hope that clears it up, and may I suggest this topic be shortly closed to posting but perhaps left to be viewed. Just in case tempers start to boil because THIS IS AT THE POINT WHEN PEOPLE GET MISUNDERSTOOD and the flaming starts.

 

[cloudgazer2k]

sorry, ticklish. i doubt you'll find videos involving minors being tickled on other forums for the same reason the TMF doesn't. if you want to watch videos of minors tickling/being tickled, perhaps it's time you really reflect on your life and see what is wrong with that choice.