Is underage tickling understood wrong?

[NavelTickler75]

While its fun to have a tickle fight, this is a fetish site, which means sexual, even though for me, fetish does not mean I have to give into it.

That being said, any kids here would be put under the microscope by the right minded and the perverts as the whole place could be considered sick by the vanilla world. So leave the tickle fight to youtube, and DO NOT PUT IT HERE.

 

[Andromalius]

It's kind of hard to believe this, because you did set an age limit. You stated in your orginal post that you like to see 12-17 year olds. If it is just a friendly thing then why did you stop at 12? What about 4 year olds can't that be friendly and funny stuff? How about 80 years old can't that be friendly and funny thing too?

Agreed.

If you add videos of minors being tickled, then there is going to be problems no matter who is turned on or not. Sure, one guy may find it innocent and playful, but if it's just innocent and playful then why post it on a fetish site?

 

[jim66e]

It's kind of hard to believe this, because you did set an age limit. You stated in your orginal post that you like to see 12-17 year olds. If it is just a friendly thing then why did you stop at 12? What about 4 year olds can't that be friendly and funny stuff? How about 80 years old can't that be friendly and funny thing too?

I agree with almost everyone in that underage tickling has no place here because of all the sexual stuff, but I have a slight nitpick. You can show 80 year old tickling on here, because 80 year olds are older than 18. He wasn't saying 12-17 is the only age group he wants to see. He simply discussed tacking those years onto the already accepted range.

 

[Deleted member 66627]

Because I am a fan of more sensual and erotic tickling, I get uncomfortable if there we're videos of under age tickling, but like tickling my son and everything like that is ok, because well hes my SON but as far as wanting to or looking for those types of videos I don't personally agree with.

 

[Wolf]

Nitpickin' on the wrong head, there....

I agree with almost everyone in that underage tickling has no place here because of all the sexual stuff, but I have a slight nitpick. You can show 80 year old tickling on here, because 80 year olds are older than 18. He wasn't saying 12-17 is the only age group he wants to see. He simply discussed tacking those years onto the already accepted range.

I think the point Iggy was trying to make was that ticklish boy did in fact specify that he thought not allowing videos showing age 12-17 was wrong, and that he didn't mention any other ages. I think Iggy was saying, "If you meant all ages, why didn't you say all ages, instead of 12-17?" Which I think was a pretty good point.

If I'm wrong, Ig, feel free to chastize me. I'm often wrong, but I'm rarely uncertain.

And, yeah, these posts show up periodically. Nature of the beast, I suppose.

 

[Iggy pop]

I think the point Iggy was trying to make was that ticklish boy did in fact specify that he thought not allowing videos showing age 12-17 was wrong, and that he didn't mention any other ages. I think Iggy was saying, "If you meant all ages, why didn't you say all ages, instead of 12-17?" Which I think was a pretty good point.

If I'm wrong, Ig, feel free to chastize me. I'm often wrong, but I'm rarely uncertain.

And, yeah, these posts show up periodically. Nature of the beast, I suppose.

You got it. I guess I was not clear in my first post, so thanks for clairfying.

 

[Coda]

It's definitely possible for videos including tickling between minors to come into existence and to be posted somewhere on the Internet. As Stage mentioned, this is done fairly frequently on YouTube and so on, and I don't think it occurs to most of them that they're doing anything that could be construed as sexual. (I think a lot of the forum's members grew up thinking that tickling was merely intriguing or fascinating before it was sexual.)

As a couple of the others mentioned, the Forum-- while not requiring it-- consists largely of adult content, and it wouldn't be inaccurate to refer to it as pornographic in general. When a clip involving children-- even an innocent one-- is found in that pool... and even in the highly unlikely event that <I>every</I> TMF member enjoyed it in the innocent spirit in which it was posted... the potential for misunderstanding by others (including those concerned with legality) would be extremely high.

So, to answer your question: <I>yes</I>, I'm sure that innocent tickling clips can be misunderstood and taken as immoral even when they're not. But resolving the misunderstandings after they've occurred would be very difficult, and probably not in everybody's interest. Keeping those worlds apart-- preventing such misunderstanding in the first place-- is by far a much easier, surer, and safer way for us to use and enjoy this place freely.

 

[WorkInProgress]

I think it's also well to remind ourselves of the definition of the word "fetish": It means that we, the people who have a given fetish, are sexually aroused by the object by much most people aren't. And with that in mind, we really don't have the luxury of having it both ways with tickling. To the general populace out there, tickling is either cute fun or horrible torture. We're different from the general populace out there. To us, it's very sexual. We thus need to leave minors out. And indeed, part of it is PR: we have to be able to tell our prospective critics--truthfully--that we don't have anything on our board which even remotely borders on what any reasonable person could call kiddie porn.

 

[innocentsexcat]

Kitty thinks you are picking on this person for just asking a simple question. He never suggested that under age tickling was a turn on for him. He asked some questions is all.

 

[method11236]

I clearly said "End of story". in my last post. Why are people still posting?

_________________________________________________________________

but since we is: there is currently a video in the vids section of a woman tied down, flogged and forced to orgasm. If you feel comfortable posting clips of minors on the same website, then method says "check please".

 

[asutickler]

If the TMF allowed images of minors, no matter how "innocent" people claimed that they were, this site would quickly become a haven for guys like this:

No thank you.

 

[vsa7a]

you know what..let me chastise this right on the ass of everyone now.

as far as underage tickling whatever and the playful humorous tickle fights and whatnot goes. they are only good to view as a one-time joke. but other than that, the fact of innocence and the whole thing is forgotten.

the forum is in its dictionary definition denotation is a tickling media forum. however, there are adults here who quite over the ages and may as well be an old fart for whatever dumbass reason have gotten so obsessed with arousal over objects of various namely 'fetish'. they are now like animals spun out of control and cannot behave like decent human beings no more no matter what. and thus their bad habit also makes assumption that all here are such perverts. which of course is false. as TICKLING is NOT PORN! only these said sexual fiends are the ones making it look like porno because they are the only ones who are interested in such and make believe as such and i find it quite amusing that any idiot would fall easy prey for such bullshit.

anyways the various tickling media here excluding the ones that contain pornography or let alone is porn and not even tickling at all are posted here because all here are gathered to see such and perhaps multiple times. i myself find no way am i to see it more than once or twice if its really that good. and i throw it into the joke stash tank and probably never see it again.

i dunno bout the rest of you guys but i dont have the patience or the time to be looking at it especially everyone of them all the time.

<b>underage tickling/playful humorous tickling=view once and delete. 1-time joke.

tickling media found on TMF=people who like tickling or instead who are obsessed with it and sexually frustrated they couldnt do it in real life and just simply view their 'fetish' more than once or even all the time.</b>

 

[SonOfTickula]

Maybee that's the real problem with the TMF : It's supposed to be a forum for discuss tickling, including playful tickling. Instead, it's (or it becomes) more of a "fetish" porn website. With the ridiculous consequences that even harmless material (even cartoons ! ) is considered "porn" once posted here...

 

[ticklish boy]

...

Guys sorry about the "12-17 years old" thing...I guess most of you understood me wrong. I was just giving an example of age. However...it would be weird seeing a 2 or 3 years old kid being tickled...while I think a 16 or 17 year old teenage would be...ok (I say once again that I didn't ASK for underage tickling...I know the laws. I was just wondering if the age limit is correct).

 

[TKForce]

I clearly said "End of story". in my last post. Why are people still posting?

We're most likely still posting because your not the Tzar of the TMF,
Myriads is.

Oh, I quite agree we can't have any content with minors here
but this discussion seems quite legal.

My two cents is,
The more something is baned the more people will want to see it.
So there's a danger in banning and a danger in legalizing, with most things.
There's always danger on both sides of a fence if you know where to look.

 

[Iggy pop]

Guys sorry about the "12-17 years old" thing...I guess most of you understood me wrong. I was just giving an example of age. However...it would be weird seeing a 2 or 3 years old kid being tickled...while I think a 16 or 17 year old teenage would be...ok (I say once again that I didn't ASK for underage tickling...I know the laws. I was just wondering if the age limit is correct).

If it is non-sexual and just harmless fun then why would it be wierd for a 2 or 3 year old being tickled? It's very common. Parents do it all the time.

Not that I think it belongs here, because this is a sexual forum.

 

[ViperGTS]

If it were just about fun, Iggy is right...the age wouldn't matter to you at all. As subtle and vague as it might be, your own posts suggest that you get the slightest of sexual arousal out of seeing 12-17 year olds being tickled.

 

[Scinsor]

Look TicklishBoy, I think I speak for nearly everyone here when I say that the idea of images of children on any kind of fetish site (such as this one) is disturbing. I do think that some people get a bit too uptight about it sometimes (like with the whole "ageing" thing with fictional characters, something that still vexes me), but the major thing here is that to have pictures or videos of anyone under 18 on this kind of website is ILLEGAL. The last thing the owners of this site want is a lawsuit involving child pornogrophy. Its something best left alone.

 

[GirlWhoLikes2Laugh]

I think that underage tickling is fine because there are plenty of videos of kids tickling each other on www.youtube.com. Tickling between kids isn't sexual.

 

[chicago]

I think that underage tickling is fine because there are plenty of videos of kids tickling each other on www.youtube.com. Tickling between kids isn't sexual.

Of course, but it crosses the line from being cute to being disturbing if posted on this website.

 

[WorkInProgress]

I agree. Thing is, again, to the people out there who are different from us, tickling is just casual fun play. We're the people who get off on it. The key is what tickling is to us, not what tickling is to the people out there. They don't get off on it. We do. A video of kids tickling each other can very appropriately be linked from a family fun website. I wouldn't feel comfortable with it here--again, because we're the people who get off on tickling.

 

[Markoni]

I agree. Thing is, again, to the people out there who are different from us, tickling is just casual fun play. We're the people who get off on it. The key is what tickling is to us, not what tickling is to the people out there. They don't get off on it. We do. A video of kids tickling each other can very appropriately be linked from a family fun website. I wouldn't feel comfortable with it here--again, because we're the people who get off on tickling.

That's a logical fallacy. Posting content on here does not in any way change the content itself, nor the intentions it was created with.

The only argument against underage content that really holds water is the fact that it would create a monetary market for that content, which would lead to child exploitation and abuse.

 

[WorkInProgress]

I think you may be missing my point, Markoni. No, posting a link on this board to a video of kids tickling each other doesn't change the content or the intentions or the video: it just damages our PR as a community. We need to be able to tell our prospective critics, and truthfully, that our board is all adult. Again: the point is that we can't have it both ways.

 

[vsa7a]

the bottom line is these many perverts that ruin such here.

other than that it would be fine. but even so it would only be good as a one-time joke and then none would actually look at it again.

 

[Andromalius]

The major point: If there's an age-limit to be a member, then there's an age limit on what can be posted here.