vampirecult
TMF Master
- Joined
- Feb 13, 2005
- Messages
- 963
- Points
- 0
It's almost the NBA Playoffs (April 23th i believe). and we're still having this on going topic about the soap saga of Shaq and Kobe? 🙄
ticklingfeet4fu said:Vampirecult- good topics die hard. I just found it today and thought I should throw my 2 cents worth into it since I am an advid sports fan. 🙂

primetime said:but always remember this, the Lakers may be down, but we WILL be back. how many of you others can say that with confidence?

Primetime I respect a lot of your posts but why aould Kobe say anything? Charged with rape( never proven ) chases the Big fella out of town by stating if he is here I am out of here. Then rips into Karl Malone one of the most respected players in the league. Then you call Shaq lazy? Correct me if I am wrong, Who worked hard enough to get his team to the playoffs? Who got the Lakers to the Finals last year through all the controversy? And who created that controversy? I believe if Kobe would have kept his sexual activites to just his wife then these problems never occur to begin with. The problem is Kobe wants to be the man. He just isn't though. If Shaq wins it all this year with the Heat then he proves he can win without Kobe. Can Kobe say the same without Shaq? I say know. It is just an opinion right now. I hope it becomes fact in June. I HATE the Heat. But this one year I will root for the Heat just so " silent Kobe" is proven wrong.primetime said:the Shaq-Kobe feud keeps going because the media wants to keep it going. Shaq is always blasting the Lakers, the media keeps hammering on it, the ONLY person in this feud that doesnt talk about it is Kobe Bryant. considering the fact that everyone seems to hate Kobe, you have to admire the way that he has handled himself. he doesnt say anything negative about Shaq (if it were me, i would blast that lazy bastard every day) and he just wants to play basketball.
but always remember this, the Lakers may be down, but we WILL be back. how many of you others can say that with confidence?


I want you to know that I have defended Shaq and those stats back me up for my defending him. I want to say thank you. Very well done. I like your ending too. He sleeps around on his wife then he gets jealous? Give me a break. Kobe is a spoiled brat who cares about nobody but himself. Well like I said earlier, Kobe can watch Shaq in the playoffs with Miami. I am not a fan of Shaq or the Heat but I will root them on to win it all. And even if they don't we already know Shaq is the MAN. He got his team to the playoffs while Kobe got his team an early vacation. I will take Shaq over Kobe and find myself a winner everytime. I must stress once again I am a Knicks fan who was and still is a Patrick Ewing fan. Everyone blames Patrick for not getting the Knicks a title but what everyone forgets is that the Knicks don't make the playoffs without Patrick Ewing. Kobe and the Lakers took the big man for granted. When you score 30 points and 15 rebounds a game you just can't replace those numberstickletoy3 said:Ok, I've heard "Shaq doesn't carry a team" and "If not for Kobe the Lakers get swept in the Finals" and finally "Shaq is a liability".. ok folks, here are some stats and facts from last year's Finals. After seeing the FACTS and STATS you be the jury and tell me who actually showed up.. Shaq or Kobe?
Game1: Shaq had 34 points and goes 13-16. The remaining Lakers go 16 of 57 for 28%. They took only three more shots than Shaq actually made. Kobe had 25 points on 10-27. In other words, he took 11 more shots (that's 22 potential points) than Shaq and scored 9 points less. Mitch are you watching?? The Lakers still lose.. hmm.. wonder why people?
Game 2: The game Kobe supposedly "won" with last minute heroics to keep LA from the brooms. Try this: After their listless performance in Game 1, one had to wonder whether the Lakers had enough left for a comeback. Lost in the excitement of Bryant's heroics was Shaquille O'Neal's bucket and a Ben Wallace foul with 35.9 seconds left.
Shaq, who's shooting .427 from the line for the playoffs through Game 1, hit the free throw to bring the Lakers within three and set up Bryant's shot. O'Neal is 17-for-26 (.654) from the line in the Finals.
So Shaq misses the free throw and there IS NO KOBE SHOT and there is no overtime. Hmm.. and he's a liability? Can't hit from the charity line when it counts? ok.. (scratching head)
In this game Shaq scored 29 points, breaking Michael Jordan's record of 20 straight FINALS games with 25 or more points. Yeh, that's a liability for you. Mitch are you actually watching this game?? Shaq was 10-20 and Kobe was 14-27 from the field.
Game 3
Shaq 14 points on 14 field goals. His worst ever in the playoffs. Kobe? 11 points. The Lakers shot 27 three pointers (Kobe was 0-4 from 3pt land) that game as the rest of the Lakers (after Shaq) shot just 22% for the game. Shaq was 7-14 while Kobe was 4-13. Mitch are you watching?? Admittedly, this was a terrible game for Shaq (even though he did still shoot 50%). The "rest of the Lakers" have no room to complain. Look at the stats.
Game 4: Shaq 36 points and 20 boards. That's freaking awesome. The ONLY other player to do that in the finals was Tim Duncan. Kobe? 20 points, 32% on 8-25 shooting. Shaq was 16-21 while Kobe was a whopping 8-25. Hello?? MITCH ARE YOU ACTUALLY WATCHING THIS GAME?? Yes folks, the Lakers still lose. Seeing a pattern yet?
Game 5: This is the ONLY game other than game 2, where Kobe's play was comparable to that of Shaq. Large partly because of Shaq's early foul trouble. Shaq had 20 points going 7-14 (50% from the field with 6 free throws) where Kobe had 24 on 7-21 (33%) shooting and 10 free throws. Note: after Shaq had early foul trouble and was sitting the bench - the Pistons scored 8 straight points and led 15-14. Hmm.. can't blame that one on him. Then again if he's a "liability" would it matter he was on the bench? At this point, I really think Shaq had the attitude of "To heck with it. Why am I busting my ass if the rest of the guys don't even show up?" And you really wonder where he gets his attitude? Wouldn't you get tired of busting your chops when every game you are shooting 50+% and the rest of the team shoots 20+%?? Gee go figure that one.
Did Mitch Kupchek even watch the Finals? Did Laker management?? And they actually said "We will do whatever is necessary to keep Kobe." ???.. NO WONDER Shaq had the attitude he did. I think I would have told them where to go too! If Shaq would have had any help at all, the Lakers would still be world champs. Look at the stats above people, that's FACT. If Kobe had hit anywhere near half of the shots he took, and the rest of the Lakers had bothered to show up, the outcome of the finals might have been a different story. No one player alone can win you games (see proof above), but certain players can carry teams. For LA - Shaq was definitely that player. Compare the stats and facts people. Now if you had to choose between Shaq and Kobe who would you HONESTLY pick? Look at the stats in the Finals - when the games count most of all - and decide. Then, tell me who carried this team.
Even Phil Jackson said he would choose Shaq to begin a dynasty. The man has a 72% winning percentage as coach. His record is 832-316. His 175 playoffs wins are the best ever. His 71% coaching success in the postseason is the NBAs best. His nine NBA titles tie the record for the most - and he did it with different teams - and different players. My point? Umm.. I think he knows what he's talking about when it comes to players.
Also as a side note (this has nothing to do with basketball).. how can Kobe complain that Malone is flirting with his wife.. and Kobe is sleeping around behind her?? WTF??
