• If you would like to get your account Verified, read this thread
  • The TMF is sponsored by Clips4sale - By supporting them, you're supporting us.
  • >>> If you cannot get into your account email me at [email protected] <<<
    Don't forget to include your username

LAST LAUGH GIMEL: free preview clip

The Last Laugh

3rd Level Green Feather
Joined
Apr 21, 2001
Messages
4,582
Points
38
Even though I've already released Last Laugh Beth earlier this month, I've decided to release a second tickling video real quick. It's LAST LAUGH GIMEL, my 27th one. The models are Kim and Gab, who make heavy use of my massage table and stocks combo.

llgimel_sample12.jpg
llgimel_sample20.jpg


As usual, you can read a detailed description, see several sample pictures and play/download a preview clip on my website: www.thelastlaughinc.com. If you prefer, you can also access the clip right here by using the attached link below. I've included the Last Laugh Beth preview as well, in case you missed it.

Thanks for taking the time to read this post!
 
Great clips,many thanks for posting them. 😀
 
Wow that was just great!

I loved the first 2 girls reactions and chemistry between them, you could really see that they were having so much wicked fun.

Thanks so much 😛oke3:
 
I loved the first 2 girls reactions...

LOL Sorry to show you up, hon, but it's the two same girls in the whole clip; not just one part of it. :jester:
 
theshire said:
LOL Sorry to show you up, hon, but it's the two same girls in the whole clip; not just one part of it. :jester:

Ohh sheesh, sod it! 😱 :blush: I could have sworn the second clip had a girl with blonde hair, buggering hell...whoops too many paint fumes today for me, soz! :imouttahe
 
slap'n'ticklee said:
Ohh sheesh, sod it! 😱 :blush: I could have sworn the second clip had a girl with blonde hair, buggering hell...whoops too many paint fumes today for me, soz! :imouttahe

Actually, one girl in the second clip does have blond hair. She's the main ticklee in that one. The girls in the Last Laugh Beth clip aren't the same as the girls in the Last Laugh Gimel clip. Each clip only features 2 models, but there's a total of 4 models when you consider both clips I posted. Maybe theshire thought you were only referring to the first clip (the Gimel one) because this thread is mainly about Last Laugh Gimel.
 
I definitely like the first clip better ( LAST LAUGH GIMEL ). The reactions seem a little more genuine ... not to mention the fact that Kim's long , luscious toes are simply mouth-watering!!! *drool*

Thanks for posting , Francois!
 
TKLMAN said:
I definitely like the first clip better ( LAST LAUGH GIMEL ). The reactions seem a little more genuine ...

I'm curious, do you mean more genuine in the sense that the reactions in BETH seem a bit fake, or just that the reactions in GIMEL are more quirky/intense?

It's weird. Personally I didn't think that GIMEL was that much better than BETH. But if the sales GIMEL made in its first day are any indication, it's definitely more popular than BETH.

It's not always easy for me to predict what videos will sell better. Frankly, sometimes I'm actually a tad disappointed to see one of my videos sell well when another video, which I feel is a better product, sells only a few copies. I guess we all have our favorites, even me.
 
Toe ties! Hot ticklees! Simultaneous tickling!

Nice one, Francois.

Just curious - which 3 videos are your best sellers?
 
Last edited:
Thank you

thank you for the free sample clips.

I really like that foot stock bed, and I hope you use it in many more of your productions....

thanks again.... 🙂
 
The Last Laugh said:
Actually, one girl in the second clip does have blond hair. She's the main ticklee in that one. The girls in the Last Laugh Beth clip aren't the same as the girls in the Last Laugh Gimel clip. Each clip only features 2 models, but there's a total of 4 models when you consider both clips I posted. Maybe theshire thought you were only referring to the first clip (the Gimel one) because this thread is mainly about Last Laugh Gimel.

Aw thanks for clearing that up for me 🙂 and yeah those girls were amazing, loved them both :justlips:
 
jaba said:
I really like that foot stock bed, and I hope you use it in many more of your productions....

Stock bed? Oh, you mean the massage table with the stocks strapped at the end. Yeah, I'll definitely be using more of it. In fact, it's appeared in most of my videos since my first one back in 2002. I do try to vary things a bit, but the table-and-stocks combo is really convenient, so I regularly go back to it.
 
hivoltage said:
Just curious - which 3 videos are your best sellers?

That's an interesting question, but it's not that easy to answer. I could simply say which three videos have sold the most copies, but that wouldn't be fair. For instance, my first few videos sold many copies compared to latter videos, but that's in good part because my catalog was so small back then. With fewer choices, they naturally sold more. A more recent video might be relatively popular but not sell nearly as much as those first few videos, simply because the situation isn't the same. Generally speaking, the more titles you have, the less copies of each you sell. Doubling one's catalog doesn't mean making twice as many sales.

There's also the fact that there are many more people selling videos nowadays, what with cheap good-quality camcorders, better software, and services like Clips4Sale.com. Under these circumstances, it's hard to sell as much as before.

One also has to consider the evolution of the various media and methods of distribution. It's hard to compare the sales of an older video that mostly sold on VHS, a later one that was released when DVDs were easier to make but downloadable clips weren't that popular or well known yet, and a more recent one that was released when clips were all the rage.

Still, I guess I could figure out which videos sold significantly more than the few that were released before and after them. You know, videos whose sales stand out compared to others that were release within a period of a few months. IOTA and XI did quite well, even though XI didn't sell nearly as well as some of the earlier videos. PHI also stands out, though not quite as much. CHI and PSI both did fairly well for recent videos.

While I could get a good idea of how much each title has made, it would take some work because of the downloadable clip format. But if I limit myself to physical videos (DVD, VHS and CD-ROM), my strongest sellers are ALPHA, GAMMA, and a tie between BETA and IOTA. But again, these are earlier videos, released when my catalog was still small. Also, I only sold physical videos back then (I started by selling VHS exclusively), so it's not surprising that they sold more copies than more recent titles.

For some reason, all my videos sold pretty well until KAPPA, my 10th tickling video. Not that KAPPA or the ones that came after it did that poorly, but there's a steep drop right after IOTA. I did expect the sales of each video to go down as my catalog got bigger, but I figured it would be more gradual. Another steep drop happened after PSI. While all videos up to that one sold at least 20 copies (physical videos), none of the ones after that sold more than 6. Then again, the latter are very recent, so it's hard to deduce anything from these numbers. Also, physical video sales don't mean nearly as much as before, since downloadable clips sell better than DVDs or videotapes. It's entirely possible that the drop isn't that big if clips are taken into consideration.

I'm sorry I couldn't give an easy, short and sweat answer.
 
The Last Laugh said:
I'm curious, do you mean more genuine in the sense that the reactions in BETH seem a bit fake, or just that the reactions in GIMEL are more quirky/intense?

Well , I don't want to use the word 'fake' ... because I believe Marie is actually ticklish ... but to me , it just seemed that she was embellishing her laughter a bit ( more so towards the end of the clip ). If I had to guess , it would be because Nadya might not be the most effective LER in the world.

I s'pose that's what I meant when I wrote that the reactions in GIMEL seemed more 'genuine' to me than those in BETH. Just my opinion. If I'm mistaken about Marie & Nadya ... it wouldn't be the first time. 😛
 
TKLMAN said:
Well , I don't want to use the word 'fake' ... because I believe Marie is actually ticklish ... but to me , it just seemed that she was embellishing her laughter a bit ( more so towards the end of the clip ). If I had to guess , it would be because Nadya might not be the most effective LER in the world.

Ah, no, see, I don't allow my models to fake or even to embellish their reactions. That's a big no-no, as it's very dishonest towards the customers.

What some people don't understand is that different people have different ways of laughing when being tickled. Some have unusual reactions, and in some cases it might sound like it's not entirely natural. I've been puzzled by candidates like that in the past. But it's really just how they laugh. Also, even if a ticklee isn't incredibly ticklish or her tickler isn't highly skilled, it doesn't mean the tickling isn't genuine. Frankly, I prefer real moderate reactions to semi-fake intense ones.

I recently did a shoot with two models that cost me a lot of money. One of them had so-so reactions, but more than that, I didn't find her very convincing at all and had strong suspicions. Very disappointing. At the end, while discussing the shoot, she actually more or less admitted to acting a bit, even though it did tickle somewhat. The nerve! She said that acting comes naturally to her. She actually thought she was doing a good job. HA! Well, even though I decided not to make a big fuss (even though I feel I would have been perfectly justified in refusing to pay her), I decided not to use the part of the shoot where she's the ticklee (the other ticklee was ok). This means I wasted a few hundred dollars, which I can barely afford right now. But I still think it's better than using material that might be at least partially fake.

I know you didn't mean any harm, but when someone suggests that one of my models might be faking or forcing her laughter, I can't help but be a bit upset, like my professional ethics are being questioned. Considering all the work I put into shooting and producing these videos, including worrying like hell about how ticklish the models will be, hoping they'll at least be moderately so, well, it's kind of discouraging. Believe me, if I actually wanted my models to do a bit of acting, I'd have them act more intensely.

Sorry for sounding so defensive. It's just an issue that I take very seriously.
 
The Last Laugh said:
What some people don't understand is that different people have different ways of laughing when being tickled. Some have unusual reactions, and in some cases it might sound like it's not entirely natural.

Yes. I'm a big boy ... I understand that there are many , many different ways of laughing/reacting when being tickled ... not just one , universal response.

The Last Laugh said:
I know you didn't mean any harm, but when someone suggests that one of my models might be faking or forcing her laughter, I can't help but be a bit upset, like my professional ethics are being questioned. Considering all the work I put into shooting and producing these videos, including worrying like hell about how ticklish the models will be, hoping they'll at least be moderately so, well, it's kind of discouraging. Believe me, if I actually wanted my models to do a bit of acting, I'd have them act more intensely.

Sorry for sounding so defensive. It's just an issue that I take very seriously.

No prob , Francois. I didn't mean for it to sound like I was suggesting some sorta tickle-conspiracy on your part , or anything like that. You asked me to expound on the comment I made about the 'genuine-ness of Marie's laugh' in the BETH-clip & I just wanted to give you an honest & respectful reply. If that came off to appear as me questioning your integrity and/or your professional ethics , then I apologize for it sounding that way.
 
TKLMAN said:
Yes. I'm a big boy ... I understand that there are many , many different ways of laughing/reacting when being tickled ... not just one , universal response.

My apologies. I didn't mean to sound rude or patronizing. It's just that there are some people (not you) who are pretty ignorant about such variety, possibly in part due to the various clips and stories posted on the forums. Nothing wrong with it per se, of course, but some act like they know everything about tickling.

Now, I don't pretend to be a tickling expert, far from it. But I have done a large number of tickling shoots and auditions, personally witnessing the reactions of literally hundreds of people. I like to think that I have a good idea of the wide range of reactions people can have. And yet I can still be surprised in some cases. Just because a ticklee laughs in a weird way, or doesn't react much, doesn't mean that she's not ticklish, nor does it mean that she's acting.

TKLMAN said:
If that came off to appear as me questioning your integrity and/or your professional ethics , then I apologize for it sounding that way.

No need to apologize, I didn't take it that way. Like I said, I know you didn't mean any harm. My reaction wasn't aimed at you in particular, anyway. I just can't help but become defensive whenever the notion of faked or forced reactions is brought up when referring to my work. I tend to take it very personally. It doesn't happen very often, but I do get such comments once in a while, and I can't deny that it gets to me me. It's not a big deal in your case, you were just sharing your impressions, which is just fine. But some people are more rude or arrogant about it.

It's something that can annoy me even when the comments are about another producer's material. In some cases I agree that it looks totally fake. But other times I can see that a ticklee just has unique reactions. The model can't help it, the producer can't help it, it's actually totally genuine, but someone calls it fake and is convinced that he/she is right. I have to admit that it's one of my pet peeves. When it happens, I know how the producer must feel, because I know how it is to work with models that don't react exactly the way that some people expect all ticklees to react. I also know how it is when someone claims to know more about your own models than you do.

This is especially frustrating when the person criticizing a clip claims to have a lot of experience and to be able to tell when a model is faking. You (the producer) have talked to the models personally, got into a professional but friendly relationship with them, did some tickling tests, worked with the models for a few hours, maybe even did some of the tickling yourself. You *know* that the models aren't faking and that their reactions are genuine. But this person makes a judgement based on a short clip made up of little bits of footage, and tries to tell you that your models are actually faking. Can you imagine how frustrating that is? Of course, you know for a fact that this "expert" is wrong, which makes you wonder if there is such a thing as a person who can tell real from fake most of the time. I mean, if you know the person is wrong when judging your models, he/she could very well be wrong about the work of other producers, right?

This makes me think of those posts in which someone talk about the various "signs of fakeness". I can't help but roll my eyes at that. For example, I've seen some people claiming that if a ticklee doesn't move her toes when having her feet tickled, she's not ticklish there. Then a bunch of people reply, agreeing with this. Well, I'm sorry to disappoint these people, but even though one might expect the toes to move, it's most definitely not always the case. Oh, several ticklees do react by wiggling and scrunching their toes. It's natural. But many others don't. I don't know why not, it doesn't seem to make much sense, but they just don't. In fact, some very ticklish people barely move at all when tickled. Some are even more or less paralyzed. Like I said, I've seen the reactions of hundreds of people, so I know this is true. So I find it hard to take these such posts seriously. They generalize too much. In reality it's just not that simple.

Sorry about the rant, but it just feels good to vent some steam sometimes, you know? This seemed like a good opportunity.

I also want to be clear that none of this is aimed at you, TKLMAN. I'm commenting in a more general way. This post also serves as an explanation for why I reacted so defensively to your post (even though I realize that I shouldn't have).
 
The Last Laugh said:
That's an interesting question, but it's not that easy to answer. I could simply say which three videos have sold the most copies, but that wouldn't be fair. For instance, my first few videos sold many copies compared to latter videos, but that's in good part because my catalog was so small back then. With fewer choices, they naturally sold more. A more recent video might be relatively popular but not sell nearly as much as those first few videos, simply because the situation isn't the same. Generally speaking, the more titles you have, the less copies of each you sell. Doubling one's catalog doesn't mean making twice as many sales.

There's also the fact that there are many more people selling videos nowadays, what with cheap good-quality camcorders, better software, and services like Clips4Sale.com. Under these circumstances, it's hard to sell as much as before.

One also has to consider the evolution of the various media and methods of distribution. It's hard to compare the sales of an older video that mostly sold on VHS, a later one that was released when DVDs were easier to make but downloadable clips weren't that popular or well known yet, and a more recent one that was released when clips were all the rage.

Still, I guess I could figure out which videos sold significantly more than the few that were released before and after them. You know, videos whose sales stand out compared to others that were release within a period of a few months. IOTA and XI did quite well, even though XI didn't sell nearly as well as some of the earlier videos. PHI also stands out, though not quite as much. CHI and PSI both did fairly well for recent videos.

While I could get a good idea of how much each title has made, it would take some work because of the downloadable clip format. But if I limit myself to physical videos (DVD, VHS and CD-ROM), my strongest sellers are ALPHA, GAMMA, and a tie between BETA and IOTA. But again, these are earlier videos, released when my catalog was still small. Also, I only sold physical videos back then (I started by selling VHS exclusively), so it's not surprising that they sold more copies than more recent titles.

For some reason, all my videos sold pretty well until KAPPA, my 10th tickling video. Not that KAPPA or the ones that came after it did that poorly, but there's a steep drop right after IOTA. I did expect the sales of each video to go down as my catalog got bigger, but I figured it would be more gradual. Another steep drop happened after PSI. While all videos up to that one sold at least 20 copies (physical videos), none of the ones after that sold more than 6. Then again, the latter are very recent, so it's hard to deduce anything from these numbers. Also, physical video sales don't mean nearly as much as before, since downloadable clips sell better than DVDs or videotapes. It's entirely possible that the drop isn't that big if clips are taken into consideration.

I'm sorry I couldn't give an easy, short and sweat answer.


LL Episolon and Zeta are 2 of my favorites, and it is because I love Marie Eve and her laugh....

I also wanted to thank you for the variety of scenes and detail in each sample tickle clip.....I know exactly what I am getting when I get the LL movie.....

I tend to buy based on the laugh of the tickle model, and if a featured bondage position appeals to me.....so I'm sure that I would have purchased many subsequent movies that featured Marie-Eve, or other LL tickle ladies that I liked and are my favorites.....but I realize that it is the variety and new tickle models that appeal to most buyers....
 
The Last Laugh said:
I like to think that I have a good idea of the wide range of reactions people can have. And yet I can still be surprised in some cases. Just because a ticklee laughs in a weird way, or doesn't react much, doesn't mean that she's not ticklish, nor does it mean that she's acting.


It's something that can annoy me even when the comments are about another producer's material. In some cases I agree that it looks totally fake. But other times I can see that a ticklee just has unique reactions. The model can't help it, the producer can't help it, it's actually totally genuine, but someone calls it fake and is convinced that he/she is right. I have to admit that it's one of my pet peeves. When it happens, I know how the producer must feel, because I know how it is to work with models that don't react exactly the way that some people expect all ticklees to react. I also know how it is when someone claims to know more about your own models than you do.

This makes me think of those posts in which someone talk about the various "signs of fakeness". I can't help but roll my eyes at that. For example, I've seen some people claiming that if a ticklee doesn't move her toes when having her feet tickled, she's not ticklish there. Then a bunch of people reply, agreeing with this. Well, I'm sorry to disappoint these people, but even though one might expect the toes to move, it's most definitely not always the case. Oh, several ticklees do react by wiggling and scrunching their toes. It's natural. But many others don't. I don't know why not, it doesn't seem to make much sense, but they just don't. In fact, some very ticklish people barely move at all when tickled. Some are even more or less paralyzed. Like I said, I've seen the reactions of hundreds of people, so I know this is true. So I find it hard to take these such posts seriously. They generalize too much. In reality it's just not that simple.
.


Ha ha....that "tickle paralysis" is the thing I like about Marie Eve' reactions....its just her laugh that does it for me, not her thrashing around (or in her case, her LACK of thrashing)

I have found in many cases (this is in no way a critique of any other post here) that a determination of "lack of ticklishness" of a particular model may just be the lack of a preferred reaction by the evaluator......a person that prefers a "screaming, wild thrashing" ticklee may find "fake" any reactions other than that one....and that can be due to lack of much actual "tickle experience" of the evaluator, or just the lack of acceptance of any other reactions by the ticklee as "authentic".

That being said, with the flood of tickle movies and clips in the market today, the reactions of some "tickle models" are so forced, fake and "over the top" that folks here with any level of tickle experience, or even a complete lack of tickle experience, can spot the imposters with relative ease....
 
About Kim and Gab

Thanks for the clips. Kim and Gab really appealed to me because when even when one had the other at her mercy, both girls laugh. For some reason I don't notice that too much in tickling videos - the tickler laughing almost as much as the ticklee.

What fun girls Kim and Gab seem to be. Do they disrobe more in the video? How interesting that a woman would consent to appear in a tickling video but refuse to wear a bikini or some such revealing attire.

I'd like to see less of the zooms and camera movement. I wish those who shoot these videos would let us see the faces of the tickler and ticklee and the parts of the bodies getting tickled at all times.
 
I loved it near the end where the one girl had lifted some of the shirt of her friend and was tickly tracing her tummy.
 
What's New
11/19/25
Visit Clips4Sale for the Webs largest one-stop tickling clip location!

Door 44
Live Camgirls!
Live Camgirls
Streaming Videos
Pic of the Week
Pic of the Week
Congratulations to
*** TikleFightChamp ***
The winner of our weekly Trivia, held every Sunday night at 11PM EST in our Chat Room
Top