New Sample Clip....Dad, Car Keys Please!

[Hiei]

You negative responders are a bunch of assholes. Okay I'll agree, this is a tickling forum not a handjob forum. Thus, the video should revolve around tickling. But there have been handjob videos in the past that no one complained out. You call him sick for having a daughter/father video? I'm not into that kind of thing, but so what? You people are into some pretty fucked up things yourselves. Hell, tickling is regarded as weird in its own right. Stop being so hypocritical. You're treating the video maker exactly how you would hate to be treated by people without a tickle fetish.

 

[PainTrain]

What people object to is the fact that it portrays a daughter giving her father a handjob. Should be pretty fuckin' obvious to me. Tickling is considered a perfectly NORMAL form of foreplay. Always has been. Every single person I have ever told about my tickling fetish has thought nothing about it. Many people hype it up like it's some HUGE ordeal.


At least we don't get sexually aroused by pissing on peoples faces. Imagine breaking that one to her.

 

[tickledgirl]

You negative responders are a bunch of assholes. Okay I'll agree, this is a tickling forum not a handjob forum. Thus, the video should revolve around tickling. But there have been handjob videos in the past that no one complained out. You call him sick for having a daughter/father video? I'm not into that kind of thing, but so what? You people are into some pretty fucked up things yourselves. Hell, tickling is regarded as weird in its own right. Stop being so hypocritical. You're treating the video maker exactly how you would hate to be treated by people without a tickle fetish.

Incest is a strong taboo, violating it offends a lot of people. Pedophilia is not only taboo, it's extremely illegal. Spring (with no warning) a video of incest with hints of pedophilia on viewers? Lots of strong negative reaction. That's not hypocrisy.

If it'd been an incest video with some kind of warning in the title, I'd have passed over it and not thought anything of it. Next time give some warning, make it clear that everyone is adult, and remove the hints of (sexual?) child abuse. As is, I think it's fair to say this violates our "community standards."

 

[jetblackjeep]

Ok first and foremost the idea is wrong plain and simple. But the thing that I find semi amusing is some of you that put a post reply saying that it was wrong but after you had watched the clip. Now that is even more* disturbing!!!!!!

 

[rafael]

The issue lies in the fact that it's predominantly containing a broad jacking a guy off, with little to no tickling.

There are plenty of tickling clips containing sexual content, this one is more whack off then TK.

Thus the reactions that are being applied.

I can't speak to the motive behind your criticism but it seemed to me that this video received more negative and pointed attacks than other videos which contained little tickling. Those attacks seemed centered on the particular fetish being portrayed. So while there may be many fetishes that I find repulsive, I believe it to be hypocritical to consider anyone who has different fetish from mine as f**ked up.

 

[Deleted member 66627]

Ok first and foremost the idea is wrong plain and simple. But the thing that I find semi amusing is some of you that put a post reply saying that it was wrong but after you had watched the clip. Now that is even more* disturbing!!!!!!

I've said this before, I'll say it again:

The title of this thread could have been, 'Hot Anal Watermelon Stuffers', and people will *still* click on it, read the description, view the clip, formulate and post a reaction or opinion on the topic.

Even if it in no way is positive.

This is nothing new.

I can't speak to the motive behind your criticism but it seemed to me that this video received more negative and pointed attacks than other videos which contained little tickling. Those attacks seemed centered on the particular fetish being portrayed. So while there may be many fetishes that I find repulsive, I believe it to be hypocritical to consider anyone who has different fetish from mine as f**ked up.

My 'motive' was made quite clear.

Here we have a clip filled with slim to any tickling..which is featured at the end anyways. The selling point with clips on a forum like this is, what?

Tickling.

There has to be some sort of balance when introducing other fetish angles to a base fetish. This was done in a sloppy manner, hence all the critiscm.

I can't speak to any of the other videos that you mention, because I haven't seen any like this, if I had, my opinion would have been relatively the same.

If you're going to post videos/clips on a forum designated for tickling, and you fill a good portion of a preview with other things?

Not only is the clip probably not going to sell well, it will be met with much of the critique you see posted here.

 

[rafael]

My 'motive' was made quite clear.

Here we have a clip filled with slim to any tickling..which is featured at the end anyways. The selling point with clips on a forum like this is, what?

Tickling.

There has to be some sort of balance when introducing other fetish angles to a base fetish. This was done in a sloppy manner, hence all the critiscm.

I can't speak to any of the other videos that you mention, because I haven't seen any like this, if I had, my opinion would have been relatively the same.

If you're going to post videos/clips on a forum designated for tickling, and you fill a good portion of a preview with other things?

Not only is the clip probably not going to sell well, it will be met with much of the critique you see posted here.

You misunderstood. I should have been clearer. I meant I wasn't speaking to your motive since you mentioned the lack of tickling. I was bothered by those that just attacked the guy/girl (whoever it was that posted this) for being sick. That's what I found to be hypocritical.

 

[Deleted member 66627]

You misunderstood. I should have been clearer. I meant I wasn't speaking to your motive since you mentioned the lack of tickling. I was bothered by those that just attacked the guy/girl (whoever it was that posted this) for being sick. That's what I found to be hypocritical.

In a whole, yes, It is slightly hypocritical. But, due to the fantasy it was expressing and how that type of fantasy is highly criticized out of principle alone.. the comparison is slightly difficult to imagine being completely plausible.

 

[qweman]

The title is so wrong.

 

[XAsMoXDeUsX]

Amazing clip. More please!

 

[xionking]

Yeah...back to the drawing boards, I think, Tickling Studio.

I didn't watch it, I don't want to watch it, and Crystallight is right. This is a ticklingforum. Not some incest jack off bullshit.

In fact, as a community, we should be somewhat offended that a production company would put up something like this. Tickling can be a weird fetish to the vanilla crowd, but please don't insult us with your freakish rubbish again.

-Xionking

 

[xionking]

I agree that this is totally fucked up.....but geezus people if you think having a tickling fetish is normal you have a serious problem. Don't be so self righteous!

I'm not sure what world you were raised in, Buddy...but the tickling fetish is normal, regardless of the stigma behind S&M. I can confidently say that I am not an S&M person, but in saying that, I am not going to call someone who is into it "weird". You know why? Because it's normal to them.

In saying that, are you that disconnected from reality that you need me to list all the reasons why this video clip is wrong? The context of it? The morals? The values it teaches? Regardless of its prime motive, it's just wrong. A daughter jacking off her father, it's just inappropriate. Oh, yeah, it's also illegal.

And before people start calling me a hypocrite, I'm going to suggest reading the previous paragraph a couple more times.

Had I come across something like this when I was 14, trying to investigate my curiosity of tickling, I probably would have never visited these forums again.

Perhaps the mods should do more to filter out shit like this. Personally, I think it's uncalled for.

-Xionking

 

[avethibaltus]

This whole post is proof ...

It is not what you do but how you sell it that matters.

Maybe I could save it and use it in my next Internet Marketing class?

 

[jeffather]

Or in other words: "Watching the regular updates of women being restrained and basically raped against their will by a dildo stuffed so far up their vagina that they snort cum is better than watching a obviously fake father/daughter clip, but only because I said so."

Yeah whatever. No matter what you say you can't flip the argument.

 

[jeffather]

I think the reactions here are a bit harsh and judgmental. This video is not something I would watch and I am admittedly a bit repulsed by the thought but I thought the whole point of a community like this was that people could feel free to express their fantasies without being judged as a freak.

Really? and the second someone posts a clip of a girl that looks under 18 (not that I'm into that) it's ok to bash them? And it has nothing to do with legality either.

 

[tremonti]

that is totally sick....sorry but anyone who like this should consult a psychologist.

 

[P4E]

I'll pass on this one... 🙂

TBH Tickling Studio...you should have seen reactions like this coming...video's like this are few and far...and for good reason...lol.

 

[tku]

Or in other words: "Watching the regular updates of women being restrained and basically raped against their will by a dildo stuffed so far up their vagina that they snort cum is better than watching a obviously fake father/daughter clip, but only because I said so."

As thought evoking as this statement may be it doesn't actually make much sense.
a.) I'd have thought it obvious that nobody in a bdsm environment was being "basically raped against their will" because it's a consensual activity.
b.) If someone has serious fantasies about raping people, or they wish it was their parent/sibling/kid while they watch a sub get strapped down and fucked senseless I'd have the same view that they would be better off neutered.
c.) Of course it's "only because I said so"...it's an opinion. Last I checked my mind wasn't for rent, hence I speak from my own viewpoint. My mind's not closed either by the way...bring on the debate.

To be honest, it's pretty hilarious to see a minority of you tossing people with a kink or fetish into the same boat as people who fantasise about fondling their parents/kids. It's hardly puritanical to draw a fat red line in front of incest.

/end rant

 

[Comfort Eagle]

?

I honestly don't see why liking tickling and thinking this is weird is hypocritical. At all. The notion of "fetish=fetish , and bottom line it doesn't matter what it is" seems stupid to me.

 

[Deleted member 66627]

To be honest, it's pretty hilarious to see a minority of you tossing people with a kink or fetish into the same boat as people who fantasise about fondling their parents/kids. It's hardly puritanical to draw a fat red line in front of incest.

QFTW.

 

[ZenTickling]

I honestly don't see why liking tickling and thinking this is weird is hypocritical. At all. The notion of "fetish=fetish , and bottom line it doesn't matter what it is" seems stupid to me.

Exactly. There are individuals who are sexually turned on by murdering other people, but that doesn't mean that we don't have the right to criticize them because we have tickling fetishes.

 

[jk666uk]

that is totally sick....sorry but anyone who like this should consult a psychologist.

fuck man its not REAL

 

[erik11]

Incest.

Uh incest is incest. Gross.

 

[Goodieluver]

Heh the new flame war to replace the underage issue

"Is it wrong to view\watch videos like this\wont mods do something?!"

 

[Deleted member 66627]

Heh the new flame war to replace the underage issue

"Is it wrong to view\watch videos like this\wont mods do something?!"

Hush you. We've actually not hit flames. It's been a rather surprisingly calm discussion.