New Sample Clip....Dad, Car Keys Please!

[chode]

I agree with Zen's comment.

And whoever " Hiei" is.......................you need to re-evaluate your thought process. Or better yet, go bang your sister, then have her tickle you. Because apparently you think its just dandy.

 

[badreligion]

soo whats next ... Dinner with Jeffery Dahlmer ?

 

[TickleSlaveinTn]

I think the reactions here are a bit harsh and judgmental. This video is not something I would watch and I am admittedly a bit repulsed by the thought but I thought the whole point of a community like this was that people could feel free to express their fantasies without being judged as a freak.

Well if the fantasy is just plain wrong.... you get what you get. Daddy tickle torturing daughter or vice versa--without the sexual content--would have been ok with me. But even if they're not actually related, to imply that they are and then to have sexual content in it, that's a big time no-no.

 

[Texas_Tickle]

Really? and the second someone posts a clip of a girl that looks under 18 (not that I'm into that) it's ok to bash them? And it has nothing to do with legality either.

I didn't watch the video, but per the images posted, (and this is only my opinion) she is meant to look under 18 years.

 

[Texas_Tickle]

I'll pass on this one... 🙂

TBH Tickling Studio...you should have seen reactions like this coming...video's like this are few and far...and for good reason...lol.

But it's like the old saying 'Controversy is the best form of advertising'

 

[jk666uk]

But it's like the old saying 'Controversy is the best form of advertising'

it work for you then

 

[Dussicar]

Dammit!

Here I'm thinking "WOW! Four pages of responses? This must be an awesome clip!"

I didn't watch it but considering the responses, I'm of a mind to suggest that the OP be better off posting this on a general porn forum.

 

[pinosavac]

Maybe I am a little conservative but this isn't type of jokes that I like. 😕

 

[CarlosSolis]

you all realize it's not her real dad right

 

[Texas_Tickle]

it work for you then

Not really. I didn't buy it.

 

[Grausam]

you all realize it's not her real dad right

that doesn't matter, the idea is what is messing with most of us (myself included). Her tickling him would have been just fine as previously stated by quite a few of you guys, but the rest is just fucked up

 

[CheshireCat131]

There is nothing wrong with incest as a fantasy or practice, as long as it is limited to adult consent people.

Stop being so close minded

 

[dethtims]

There is nothing wrong with incest as a fantasy or practice, as long as it is limited to adult consent people.

Stop being so close minded

awesome. ill wait for the "father rapes daughter, tortures her with a flaming hot butcher knife, then carves her corpse up like a thanksgiving turkey" fetish clip. dont give us that shit about being "closed minded". i saw the description (no i didnt watch the clip, and dont want ever want to), was repulsed, broadened my horizons and thought about it, and was repulsed again. being "open minded" doesnt mean you have to try to justify any and every action, it just means you should give everything the benefit of the doubt. then, if you still feel repulsed, who has the right to tell you you arent entitled to your opinion about the matter? i still feel disgusted by the idea of incest, and whatever you say about being "closed minded" doesnt matter because ill still feel that way and so will probably 95+% of the world.

and it doesnt matter that "OMG its not actually her dad." the concept behind this was incestual. its meant to be that way, otherwise the OP wouldnt have posted this with that description. saying that theres nothing inherently wrong with this clip because "its not actually father/daughter" is like saying someone attempting murder shouldnt be prosectued because "he didnt actually murder anyone".

stop trying to be so PC

 

[CheshireCat131]

awesome. ill wait for the "father rapes daughter, tortures her with a flaming hot butcher knife, then carves her corpse up like a thanksgiving turkey" fetish clip. dont give us that shit about being "closed minded". i saw the description (no i didnt watch the clip, and dont want ever want to), was repulsed, broadened my horizons and thought about it, and was repulsed again. being "open minded" doesnt mean you have to try to justify any and every action, it just means you should give everything the benefit of the doubt. then, if you still feel repulsed, who has the right to tell you you arent entitled to your opinion about the matter? i still feel disgusted by the idea of incest, and whatever you say about being "closed minded" doesnt matter because ill still feel that way and so will probably 95+% of the world.

and it doesnt matter that "OMG its not actually her dad." the concept behind this was incestual. its meant to be that way, otherwise the OP wouldnt have posted this with that description. saying that theres nothing inherently wrong with this clip because "its not actually father/daughter" is like saying someone attempting murder shouldnt be prosectued because "he didnt actually murder anyone".

stop trying to be so PC

Rape is non-consensual. That is the reason rape is wrong. Incest doesn't necessary have to be non-consensual if it is between adults.
Being open minded means not judging people by your gut, but trying to understand them.
Is you are repulsed by something, it's solely your problem. Every person has the right to practice any form of sex as long as it is consensual. A person can f*** up a tree for all I care, it's not my business.

 

[fettik2]

Where's the border? Isn't it quite hypocrite to rightly refuse minor related content, and on then the other hand accept incest-related stuff like this one "because it's consensual and -off all quotes- because it's not her REAL dad ... Is this a sick attempt trying to be "original" or what? Then what's next? Is this really all you got??

There is nothing wrong with incest as a fantasy or practice, as long as it is limited to adult consent people.

Stop being so close minded

Haha, "stop being so close minded", you really didn't steal your name, didn't you? And the number 10 must stand for your age I guess? In my opinion this has nothing to do with being close minded at all. Can't believe my eyes, you really wrote that there is nothing wrong with practising incest?? Jeeeeez wtf

 

[DimpleToes]

There is nothing wrong with incest as a fantasy or practice, as long as it is limited to adult consent people.

Stop being so close minded

If that is your kink you have sex with your sister, mother, aunt, cousin. exc.. no ont can stop you. You say to be open minded, look at it in a different light from those who were introduced to tickling or what ever by incest as a child that was not consentual. I believe the outcries ppl have posted about is from knowing the horror and often times perminate scar's physically, psychologically and emotionally such actions have on the victim. Incest and rape is a bad thing no matter what age you are.. it is just wrong.
I am not judging you, only asking you to be open minded to look at it from a survivors perspective. Yes, I am a survivor of incest which had all the above affects an no I did not watch the clip and wont.

 

[GC4AH]

Yea I'm gonna give this clip a miss if that's ok. It's a little bit too much incest for me. Not really into daughter's wanking their dads off. Sorry

 

[tickledgirl]

There is nothing wrong with incest as a fantasy or practice, as long as it is limited to adult consent people.

Stop being so close minded

I'll "stop being so close minded" if you'll try actually reading what you're commenting on. Drugging someone and tying them is *not* a consenting relationship. And it's broadly hinted that the girl is doing this because of what her father "used to do to her", presumably before she was an adult.

I'd also disagree that there's "nothing wrong" with incest even between consenting adults, or that it should be depicted without a warning tag on this forum. But that's not relevant to the inaccurate argument you were trying to make.

 

[GC4AH]

I'll "stop being so close minded" if you'll try actually reading what you're commenting on. Drugging someone and tying them is *not* a consenting relationship. And it's broadly hinted that the girl is doing this because of what her father "used to do to her", presumably before she was an adult.

I'd also disagree that there's "nothing wrong" with incest even between consenting adults, or that it should be depicted without a warning tag on this forum. But that's not relevant to the inaccurate argument you were trying to make.

I agree tickledgirl. This clip does not seem consenting and the implication that the history of the story involves minors is just wrong. Place a warning on this thread please.

 

[Comfort Eagle]

There is nothing wrong with incest as a fantasy or practice, as long as it is limited to adult consent people.

Stop being so close minded

 

[GC4AH]

HAHAHAHAHA This is hilarious

 

[CheshireCat131]

OK,
first of all, I'm personally not into incest, but I'm also not against it.

Second, aside from DimpleToes' argument about damage, the rest of you just did one of the following:
1) Made jokes - that can be done about any fetish around there.
2) Screamed "IT WRONG" without reason.

In practice, besides "it sick!" - which is a personal opinion and not a fact, there is nothing to say against consensual incest.

Now about the damage argument: As I said, rape is definetly wrong, so is statutory rape. Thus, non-consensual incest is wrong even without being incest.
That said, I can understand why incest rape can be more damaging, but in that case incest effects the rape situation and is damaging as a factor.

Incest between consensual adults is a legitimate choice, and people have no right to judge it more then say, homosexuality or tickle fetish.
As long as only consensual adults are involved, anything goes.

 

[tickledgirl]

OK,
first of all, I'm personally not into incest, but I'm also not against it.

Second, aside from DimpleToes' argument about damage, the rest of you just did one of the following:
1) Made jokes - that can be done about any fetish around there.
2) Screamed "IT WRONG" without reason.

No, I pointed out that your argument was completely inaccurate, that this is non-consentual and doesn't seem to be between adults. You've completely ignored that.

In practice, besides "it sick!" - which is a personal opinion and not a fact, there is nothing to say against consensual incest.

Now about the damage argument: As I said, rape is definetly wrong, so is statutory rape. Thus, non-consensual incest is wrong even without being incest.
That said, I can understand why incest rape can be more damaging, but in that case incest effects the rape situation and is damaging as a factor.

Incest between consensual adults is a legitimate choice, and people have no right to judge it more then say, homosexuality or tickle fetish.
As long as only consensual adults are involved, anything goes.

Sorry, but I have the right to judge as I please. You're free to disagree with my judgements if you wish. You're even free to continue being blind to the facts before your eyes if you wish. In other words, you're quite free to be wrong. In this case you are.

Even in your idealized purely consentual adult relationship, I'd say sex between a parent and child is very problematic. Even after the magic age of 18, children tend to be dependent on their parents. That imbalance of power makes a sexual relationship complicated at best.

And telling a parent that it's just peachy to screw their kid the day after their 18th birthday is wrong too. A father who's lusting after his 15-year-old daughter shouldn't just keep himself under control for a few more years and then jump her bones. He should acknowledge that his desire is deeply unhealthy and dangerous for his daughter. If he's unable to deal with it himself, he should get professional help. Telling him that his desires will be perfectly natural and acceptable once she turns 18 is wrong.

 

[theshire]

This is the most fucked up thing that's ever been posted here, just ahead of the "mistress" who was advertising videos depicted naked, bound, gagged and blindfolded men being kicked full-on in the balls. I don't think that one stayed around long enough to accumulate five pages of posts, though.

 

[CheshireCat131]

No, I pointed out that your argument was completely inaccurate, that this is non-consentual and doesn't seem to be between adults. You've completely ignored that.

Sorry, but I have the right to judge as I please. You're free to disagree with my judgements if you wish. You're even free to continue being blind to the facts before your eyes if you wish. In other words, you're quite free to be wrong. In this case you are.

Even in your idealized purely consentual adult relationship, I'd say sex between a parent and child is very problematic. Even after the magic age of 18, children tend to be dependent on their parents. That imbalance of power makes a sexual relationship complicated at best.

And telling a parent that it's just peachy to screw their kid the day after their 18th birthday is wrong too. A father who's lusting after his 15-year-old daughter shouldn't just keep himself under control for a few more years and then jump her bones. He should acknowledge that his desire is deeply unhealthy and dangerous for his daughter. If he's unable to deal with it himself, he should get professional help. Telling him that his desires will be perfectly natural and acceptable once she turns 18 is wrong.

First of all, by your logic of going into the "non consensual scenario of the clip", you should also judge half all the clips posted here as sexual assaults. If you come from the logical point of view, meaning that there is nothing more wrong in consensual incest then regular consensual sex, then the shift to non-consensual clips of "forced orgasms" are no different then this.

You are free of course to use your freedom of speech to bash the legitimate sexuality of others, just don't be surprised if later you are bashed for your fetishes.

The parent-child scenario being problematic is a case-by-case scenario. If someone is being abused or manipulated, it is wrong even after he is 18, incest or not. But let me give you another scenario: say a brother and a sister, both over 20 years old, decide to have sex. Who are you to de-legitimize their sexuality? you don't like it? don't watch. But they still have the full right to do it.

Just a few decades ago, homosexuals were also told to "go seek professional help". As long as the person in question doesn't rape anybody, he has no reason to seek professional help. More then that, many people here have a fantasy of tying somebody up, maybe without consent (at least in their fantasy) and tickle them. But they have no right to tie random people without consent. Thus, it is the same as in you father-daughter scenario.