CaptainQuantum said:
In the last parts of the clip, I guess no one knows if she was saying the safeword unless they speak French.
But I wanted to see what Insex.com was about from that previous post, so I looked them up. The company has been sold, and the new company is called hardtied.com. This is what it said at the new owner's website:
Where we differ from Insex, is we do not like models to be sad or unhappy -- we adhere to our SHOOT SAFETY CHECKLIST for all our shoots. We make sure it's all good kinky orgasmic fun for everyone. No one gets hurt, and every model leaves with a smile on her face!
So it sounds like safety wasn't a priority with the previous owners? Pretty dangerous, and pretty stupid if that's the case.
As a long-time meber of Insex.com (RIP), I feel I must respond to this thread.
It is quite evident that many of you have absolutely no concept of how the BDSM world works. Insex, like my other quality BDSM sites out there, are being forcibly SHOUT DOWN by the United States government. That is the ONLY reason Insex shut down.
If you go to Insex's new site, hardtied.com, you'll see that they are continuing their endeaver, only they've changed the spin on things. The new laws in place force BDSM sites to strip their content down. They put an emphasis on orgasms and "happy" models because they don't want to be a target for persecution. Anything mentioning the BDSM lifestyle could get them in hot water. I guess this makes makes the religious right happy. They feel they're "cleansing" the internet of what they perceive as "filth" when, in reality, all they're doing is oppressing an entire culture of people of whom they do not understand.
Having been a member of Insex.com for five years, I can tell you that every girl on that site was treated perfectly well. There was always a safeword in play, and when the model used it, it was respected. They stopped the scene right then and there (they sometimes had live feeds) and moved onto the next segment. Additionally, every new model that came to Insex was put through a "Test" session. They were also called "Canagirls" sessions. This was a basic introductionary session that included an interview with the model and LIGHT BDSM to feel out the model's limits, what they enjoyed, what they didn't. The models were also asked to fill out an online questionaire that outlined what S&M experience they had, what kind of edge play enjoyed, what they were curious about, and what their limits were. The models ranged from curious college girls to seasoned BDSM models. If the model liked this "Test" session, they would return for a more in-depth Insex session. If not, you never saw them again. The model's decision to return for a harder session was completely up to her.
Now, I know there are many of you on this forum that do not understand and outright reject the BDSM lifestyle. Many of you cannot understand how a woman or man can enjoy giving/receiving pain. I cannot explain that to you. It's like trying to figure out why one enjoys tying up a person and tickle torturing them (also another aspect of BDSM, whether you like it or not). As long as everything is safe, sane and consensual, we should all respect one another's interests.
For the ladies on the forum, keep in mind that Insex was an equal opportunity employer. Their sister site, InsexM.com, was a Femdom site. In fact, there are many Femdom sites that are just as hard as the Maledom sites out there. So please, don't cry wolf and claim that women are the only subs in the BDSM genre. Unfortunately, it seems both of these lifestyle websites are being hit equally as hard when it comes to these new laws governing our sexuality.
