Question about tickle pornography

[ticklebear2]

yes, when you say that "my show is an open discussion of the up most importance and may include discussion of adult situations" As for me you are saying that you are not promoting, but you are just discussing the crime, trial and outcome of the trial and different peoples opinions on the trial but you are not condoning the crime of murder. just like you would not be promoting pornography.

 

[rhiannon]

If I give a playboy magazine to a gay man I might as well be giving him a people magazine. I guess what I am saying is wouldn't a mainstream movie with tickling in it have the same affect as porn with t ickling in it

You don't seem to understand what I am saying. A mainstream movie with tickling in it - I don't know, when I was younger every little bit of tickling turned me on. That is not the case anymore as there is so much material out there and I've gotten pretty peculiar about what turns me on, but still - a mainstream movie was NOT produced for people to jack off to.

Tickling clips are produced for people to jack off to - therefore, tickling clips classify as porn! It's the intent behind it.

 

[ticklebear2]

There is more to tickling than just the clips people use to jack off to. For me yes tickling can turn me on, but it has be with some one I am in a relationship with. I first was turned on to tickling by looking for an alternative to medicine for high stress, adhd and anxiety.

 

[GuldenVleugel]

For me tickling is porn. I find it a pity that so few tickling videos involve fucking (and only some do involve orgasms). Tickling makes me so horny I must be able to get off.
I think I know why. Many people have been attracted to tickling since they were a kid, this is why some struggle to equate tickling with sex, even on tickling fetish forums. I myself was only 5 since I liked tickling. I was a kid and already a tickling fetishist.
By the way, and this might sound wrong, I have had erections since I remember, before I hit puberty at the age of 11 I already had boners.

It had nothing to do with sex back then and while I always enjoyed tickling girls (even before my sexual activity) I only knew definitely about myself that I was a tickling fetishist at the age of 14 (I made the definite switch then), this was when I equated tickling with sex. Before I just enjoyed tickling (and only tickling girls for that matter).

People struggle with seeing tickling as sexual due to their childhood memories, I think.

 

[rhiannon]

There is more to tickling than just the clips people use to jack off to.For me yes tickling can turn me on, but it has be with some one I am in a relationship with. I first was turned on to tickling by looking for an alternative to medicine for high stress, adhd and anxiety.

That doesn't make tickling clips less porn. I highly doubt someone produces them with the intent to make them available for psychotherapy!

 

[tickleteasing]

I think the point I am trying to make here is we can debate forever on what constitutes porn. What I am concerned with is what constitutes promotion of porn. I mean am I promoting tickling porn if I am say interviewing a fetish model who finds tickling sensual and she says why?

 

[ticklebunny 2]

No, I don't think you are really promoting porn if you decide to interview a tickle fetish model. To me that does not really constitute porn. It is like ticklebear2 said and like I have told you-discussion is not promotion. Along with you working on making a disclaimer saying that your show has no nudity, has no illegal activity, does not promote pornography-but open discussion of up most importance-which can possibly include also adult material/adult situations. That is covering yourself. That is not promoting porn.

You interviewing a tickle fetish model-a female tickle fetish model giving her view that she finds tickling sensual and tells why-that is not promoting porn. That view point is emotion based. That is just giving an adult view point or personal preference. That is what the disclaimer is for. Long as it stays tame, don't show no pornographic videos, no sexual pics, no pornographic magazines and no sexual acts in movies. This is not porn.

So I think you would be fine with interviewing a tickle fetish model because like I said the disclaimer before the show -introduction before the show starts-would forewarn that some of the show's content can at times be adult content-not saying pornographic, just mature and adult in nature. Not really geared to be PG friendly , not really suitable for teens. That discussions can at times along w being helpful -also be adult situations on the show-mature adult discussions at times. I hope this helps. I would run a example disclaimer to the software people -this show contains no nudity, no illegal activity, and does not promote pornography. That this show does contain open discussion of up most importance-which may include mature adult situations/mature adult content in the disclaimer. Viewer discretion is advised. Really hope this helps. Run it by the software people when you have a disclaimer made up for introduction and see how they view it. Go from there to be sure.

Also it will help to make sure your guests/viewer audience understand the rules and follow the rules. Always gently but firmly make it known you are in charge of the shows, what content is going to be in the show to your guests and viewer audience-especially your co-hosts you wish to team up with to help you create the shows. Once you establish the rules-stay solid to the rules and make sure the rules are taken seriously and that thin invisible line of pushing boundaries-beyond what is allowed-is not crossed.

 

[ticklebear2]

One final point I have to make. When you do a show and it is going to contain an adult situation you could post a disclaimer with the link and if you are doing a show that for a general audience then you don't need to use a disclaimer. Also you could use the rating system for movies if you wanted to like G=general audience, and so on.

 

[Flatfoot]

It's all about context. What do you hope to achieve by incorporating tickling into your radio show? Given your biased position on the topic (You like tickling more than the average person.), I think it'd be VERY difficult to incorporate it in a way that didn't display some form of endorsement of something people view as a sexual fetish, and can probably get your show yanked for violation of the terms of service. Whoever you're going through has to cover their butts legally, and odds are, if something smells fishy, it's probably fish, and will be treated like fish, even if the fish happens to look different from other fish. They'd probably yank it to protect themselves. The simple fact is, people fap to this stuff. I don't know if YOU do, or if tickling is just something you "really like" without the sexuality attached, but many people register here because tickling SEXUALLY AROUSES them. If I were you, I wouldn't try to dance around the terms of your agreement, thinking, "Well, technically it's not pornography."

Your association with this crowd will not help you in an argument with a company about why your show got pulled because of its content. I don't know what you plan to do, but you're reaching into some gray areas.

 

[ticklebear2]

I have say I do agree with Flatfoot on the issue. The company you purchased your software from is going to cover there butts best as they know how and so you might have hard trouble find away around this legal issue. Knowing how you feel on the issue of tickling and how sexual it is to you it might be a hard show to do. You would have most definitely stay away from showing any tickle porn clips during your show.

 

[TickleMeP1nK]

I guess it would be considered porn in alot of ways especially after you watch a tickle video. It gets you pretty damn turned on, the girl is half naked or is completely, and you have the tickling and teasing. The bondage part has alot to contribute as well. Being tied up or restrained somehow would be pretty explicit Not all videos are that bad though.

 

[rhiannon]

I think the point I am trying to make here is we can debate forever on what constitutes porn. What I am concerned with is what constitutes promotion of porn. I mean am I promoting tickling porn if I am say interviewing a fetish model who finds tickling sensual and she says why?

You'll find out after the fact!

 

[DontAskJusTckle]

Tickling clips are not necessarily porn. Many are completely non-pornographic. The ones that are pornographic are the ones that have sexual themes to them such as nudity and genitalia stimulation. Those that have fully clothed people tied and tickle tortured by other fully clothed people are not pornographic.