• If you would like to get your account Verified, read this thread
  • The TMF is sponsored by Clips4sale - By supporting them, you're supporting us.
  • >>> If you cannot get into your account email me at [email protected] <<<
    Don't forget to include your username

Question for Tickle Central...

I don't get the connection between free clips and the sharing of full versions, either. The only explanation would be the following: Sales might be raised by stopping the release of preview clips because 1) some were already satisfied with the short clips or 2) people saw they wouldn't be satisfied with the full clip (which they would have bought hadn't it been for the preview.)

But that wouldn't be a direct link to the sharing of full versions, it would just be a general way of increasing sales that works just as well without clips being traded illegally. So it would be more like Brad passed on some money when he still released previews and now changed his mind to compensate for dropping sales. That's the only way his line of argumentation makes sense.

So far I couldn't manage to find out whether a lack of previews does the producers any good. One should think that only good producers can benefit from previews, but there are so many bad previews on here that I'm not sure about it.

Anyway, I have bought quite a few Ticklecentral clips and I can say that many, but not all of them, are good; above all tastes differ. So being a good producer in general doesn't make preview clips dispensable.
 
Francois, I would love to hear some of your negative stories.

I've actually went into some detail about that a number of times over the years, and I'd hate to sound like a broken record. Suffice to say that when you work on a project like mine, you soon have to deal with issues that you haven't thought of before, many of them unpleasant. To tell the truth, in the past I've often wished I could give it all up. But I couldn't, because I had invested too much in my project. Starting a tickling video company seems great at first. But then reality hits you in the face, and you realize that it has little to do with what you see and read on tickling forums. A lot of it is pure fantasy.

That's not to say that it's always bad. It can be fun sometimes. Personally, the things I like most about doing this is when I get positive comments from people who enjoy my work, as well as the satisfaction of having accomplished so much over the last few years. It has little to do with actual tickling, but it's still positive. Also, I'm sure some other producers have had better experiences than I have. But I can only speak from personal experience, and overall, I'm sorry to say that my project is often a burden. I wish people understood better what vendors have to go through to produce their material.

No, they don't have to offer preview clips...but I'm not buying their stuff.

That's fine, and understandable. But the thing is that no one's forcing you to. If you prefer to buy from producers who offer previews, by all means, look around, there are many who do. I just don't understand why some people feel compelled to complain about it on the forums. It doesn't serve much of a purpose, in my opinion.

Being disappointed that some producers don't offer previews is one thing. But some people seem to think that producers actually owe them something, like they have a responsibility to offer previews and are selfish jerks if they don't. I'm sorry to say that this is not at all the case. What producers do is their own business. If they feel they're doing ok without previews, there's no reason why they shouldn't be able to do things that way without people complaining about it. Please understand that I'm not referring to you, Mabus. But you do know that there are people who are very demanding about it. And that's just not fair.

Just think Capitalism, capitalism, capitalism!! Offer better quality, more clips, for cheaper than everyone else. You will be the top or near the top as producers.

So you're saying we should work even harder than we already do, make our material even higher quality than what our skill and equipment allow us to attain, and then we should sell it for even less money. That doesn't sound very appealing or very realistic.

You do realize that there's a limit to that what a producer can accomplish, right? Most of us are amateurs who do this as a sideline, a hobby. We have regular lives outside of our video-making activities. In many cases, regular jobs. Putting more time into the videos means taking time away from our everyday lives.

Also, it's not necessarily possible for us to offer super high quality material. Personally, I've no formal training, and I'm quite limited as far as equipment and money are concerned. I can't do miracles. But it's not like producers lower the quality of their material on purpose. I think it's reasonable to assume that most of us do the very best we can. If it's not good enough, well, I'm very sorry, but we can't do any better. I wish I could, but I can't.

Besides which, I already sell my clips for as cheap as I possibly can. Even if wanted to sell them even cheaper (which I doubt would help me make more sales), I couldn't, because the Clips4Sale.com system doesn't allow to set the price of a clip lower than a certain minimum amount for a given duration. It's not a totally flexible system.

In any case, I seriously doubt that working even harder and selling even cheaper would bring most producers to the top, as you say. I'm not anywhere near that, and I couldn't do much better than I do even if I nearly killed myself over my business. It's just not possible. I don't mean to be rude, but it seems to me that you're not very familiar with the realities of the market. If you gave it a try, you'd understand better.

Stop making the same thing over and over and over again!!!!!

I'll assume you're not referring to me in particular. I really do my best to vary the positions and situations as much as possible within the limitations of my humble apartment, which is the only convenient place I can shoot videos nowadays.
 
While it's nice that all the producers have chimed in, none of you have addressed the real question. Yes we all know that pirating happens and is bad. The business is tough with few rewards. Its great that you guys do what you do. But thats not what Mabus, myself and a couple others have asked.

T2D productions posted what is for lack of a better term a rant attempting to explain why he doesn't offer preview clips. He said it was because of clip trading, implied the connection was obvious and ranted some more about his "point"

What we are asking of T2D and I suppose to any other producers that will answer it is, What is the connection between preview clips and the trading of full clips? Can someone please clear up the mystery of how not releasing preview clips will stop trading of full clips? Is it just a punishment thing, or is there a logic to it that was absent from the post?
 
I really like TC clips

I for one really appreciate all the companies dedicated to the tickling fetish scene like Ticklecentral. I have been a customer of many of his clips and rarely have I been disappointed. He and other companies do a credible job in providing their products for us to consume and it is totally unfair for people to trade whole videos. Besides being illegal, its just wrong, period!! So keep up the good work TC and all the other reputable companies who are really trying to put out their best work for us all to enjoy. Just my thoughts.
Peace,
Musictkls
 
Quote:
Just think Capitalism, capitalism, capitalism!! Offer better quality, more clips, for cheaper than everyone else. You will be the top or near the top as producers.

So you're saying we should work even harder than we already do, make our material even higher quality than what our skill and equipment allow us to attain, and then we should sell it for even less money. That doesn't sound very appealing or very realistic.

Keep in mind one of the core tenets of capitalism is strict property rights. If the stuff you (producers) produce is not protected from theft, then there is no incentive to produce. So I agree with you, Francois 🙂
 
I for one post sample clips because I want every consumer to know pretty much exactly what they are getting. I do not care about who downloads or shares my previews, they are just previews. Go to my youtube if you want to see free previews, it's not the full length and it's a good way to spread the word about a video that I know is good. I actually tell fans/customers to re-post my samples as they wish. I am saying it now,re-post my samples wherever you want, the tickleabuse.com logo is on the video and I look at it as flattering that you have posted one of my samples on youtube or your myspace. I have to be real here, you in fact are doing me a favor! If someone really likes the preview, where do you think they are going to go?
 
While it's nice that all the producers have chimed in, none of you have addressed the real question.

Actually, the original question of this thread was why some producers don't offer preview clips, or have stopped doing so (more specifically TickleCentral). Now, a couple of different issues seem to have been mixed up in this thread, and I admit I don't quite understand some of the arguments myself. But I'd like to suggest that you're not seeing what's really important, here. Which is, even though customers understandably like to see preview clips, producers don't have to offer them if they prefer not to, and they don't have to explain their reasons. Brad and all the other producers who don't offer previews have every right to do things the way they want without having people interrogate them about it like they've committed some kind of crime. Let's face it, this issue has been discussed many, many times on the TMF (and most likely on the TickleTheater as well), and it hasn't accomplished anything. All it does is cause friction and hurt people because some people don't understand what it's like to run a business like this. So why don't we all drop this and let people live their lives in peace?
 
Actually, the original question of this thread was why some producers don't offer preview clips, or have stopped doing so (more specifically TickleCentral).

I agree this is the original question, which is why I'm confused and a little disappointed that some people have tried to turn it into an anti sharing thread. Sharing clips is wrong, but that doesn't mean threads should be derailed because of it.

But I'd like to suggest that you're not seeing what's really important, here. Which is, even though customers understandably like to see preview clips, producers don't have to offer them if they prefer not to, and they don't have to explain their reasons.

Well that is true, producers don't. That is their right.

Brad and all the other producers who don't offer previews have every right to do things the way they want without having people interrogate them about it like they've committed some kind of crime.

Well a basic fact of business is that the customer is always right, so one could argue that the customer has a right to inquire why the producer doesn't want to offer previews. There are many reasons and customers just want to know. Also I think interrogate is a bit strong don't you think? Here is a quote from the OP:

Question for Tickle Central...are you doing any preview clips at all anymore?

That doesn't sound like an interrogation to me. And if you are refering to the questions since Tickle Central posted his reply, I would say that if you "answer" the question with a crazy rant that has nothing to do with the question, people are going to ask more questions.

Let's face it, this issue has been discussed many, many times on the TMF (and most likely on the TickleTheater as well), and it hasn't accomplished anything.

Perhaps its because no one gives a good answer. If the reason T2D doesn't do previews anymore is because of some unknown connection between previews and full clip sharing, all he needed to do was explain it clearly without ranting. That would settle the question. Heck, he could have replied with a simple, "No I don't do previews anymore" But when a person gives a crazy rant, instead of an explanation, it brings up more questions.

All it does is cause friction and hurt people because some people don't understand what it's like to run a business like this. So why don't we all drop this and let people live their lives in peace?

No one asked other producers to get involved. This thread was a simple question for T2D that received a complicated answer that people are asking for more clarification. No offense to the other producers, but they have actually obfuscated the purpose of the thread with their posts, because none of them have commented on the connection between previews and clip trading (and cause none of them can read T2D's mind). While its interesting to hear about the struggles of clip producers, that's not what this clip is about. There is no need for producers to rush to defend T2D from "criminal accusations" because no one has made them. If someone has the magic answer to the question of the preview/sharing connection, then let him speak, but otherwise we are just waiting for T2D to provide it for all of us to dumb to decipher it from his last post.
 
I repeat the question for people at the back of the room....why is ticklecentral not doing anymore preview clips???


3 pages,not 1 answer,I thought the question was pretty clear!!!:upsidedow
 
Well a basic fact of business is that the customer is always right,
Actually that is most definitely not a fact, just and overused phrase. Quite often, the customer is a fucking idiot. That is not a shot at you Jim or anybody commenting on this thread, I just find humor every time I hear a customer bark that out, because they are usually just trying to find an excuse to get something that a store rule contradicts. But again not a shot at you Jim, just the phrase. :triangle:

Back to the thread. You all know very well, deep down, no matter what Brad says, it will not appease you. Honestly, he's not offering clips, which he is in no way required to do, and that will upset you no matter what answer he gives. I know his answer may not make sense to you, but even if it did, would you really be happier and buy his clips if you are from the "I won't buy without clips" camp? Be honest with yourself. The answer is "fuck no Dog, I don't buy clips without previews". So demanding an answer over and over, as far as I can tell is just an attempt to make him somehow "come to his senses" and say "you guys are totally right, I've been misguided. Here they are." He is pissed people are giving his shit away for free (look and James post above, he gives an example of not a preview being traded, but the full clip) and doesn't want to go through extra hassle to make clips to be rewarded with that kind of horseshit. Do the two correlate, especially to loyal customers not sharing his stuff? No, not really, but it's his company to do with what he pleases. I've bought clips from him for 4 years now, and there have been some that I didn't care for, as with every company I've bought from. But that has happened just as many times from other companies with clips also. Like a previous poster mentioned, some times companies put the best part in a preview and you can still get fucked over anyway. So I'll always take the chance with proven companies that I've enjoyed way more times than I didn't.

I say blunt stuff sometimes, but unless someone is a habitual asshole, I like everybody on the forum. I always think highly of people's contributions here as it's what make the forum great. I know quite a bit of the people have a very limited budget on what they can or allow themselves to spend on material and I respect that. But the bottom line is that there is no answer that Brad can give that will suffice for most people asking for a definitive answer, and in the end, he doesn't owe an explanation to anyone if he chooses not to offer previews. Peace to you all and thank you to the producers for offering their insights and keep up the great material. :twohugs:
 
Well a basic fact of business is that the customer is always right

I'm sorry, but that old cliche is simply not true. A vendor has the responsibilty to offer a decent product and good service, but beyond that there's no reason to tolerate abuse from unreasonable customers.

No one asked other producers to get involved.

So basically you're saying "Butt out, you've no business contributing to this thread", is that it? I'm sorry, sir, but I every right to post my comments if I want to, no matter what you think.

Digressions aside, the fact is that producers, Brad or any other, can decide not to offer preivews if that suits them, and they don't have to explain why. There's no need for this thread.

While its interesting to hear about the struggles of clip producers, that's not what this clip is about.

So now you're deciding what this thread (and not this clip) is about?

There is no need for producers to rush to defend T2D from "criminal accusations" because no one has made them.

Now you're just twisting my words, and are losing credibility because of it.
 
Ticklecentral's material is and has always been ( in my opinion) of excellent quality.
I am happy to buy their material without a preview now as I know from past experience the material will be outstanding.
Many thanks T2D
 
Here's another that was puzzled by the T2D response. It had points and even some clarity if the ranting parts are stripped out, but both the rant and the reasons had no clear connection to the original question about previews.

Many producers seem to understand that short clips can whet appetites and lead to more business. They can also head off dissatisfaction and bad blood by helping people know what they are getting when they buy the full clip. I appreciate preview clips. I do purchase clips from sites that don't do previews, but I am of course more cautious and thus they get less of my business. In my case, I know I purchased more TC clips back when they had previews than I do now that they don't.

I'll agree that TC clips are generally of good quality and their descriptions are of the less-hyped and more-accurate variety. It is of course their right if they want to not produce previews, but it seems wrong-headed to me. I'm still hoping T2D will post again and give more coherent reasoning. As it is, I'm forced to conclude that TC lost their temper after discovering some piracy and responded in an emotional and nonbusiness-like manner by ditching something that had nothing to do with piracy.
 
But again not a shot at you Jim, just the phrase. :triangle:

Back to the thread. You all know very well, deep down, no matter what Brad says, it will not appease you.

No problem. I was just looking for some response to the position that a producer has no responsibility towards his customers and that was what popped in my head. While a producer could just tell everyone to go screw up (and technically this is his right to do) it probably wouldn't be a smart decision. There should be cooperation, not a feeling of Producers vs. customers, like some posts in this thread have fostered. As to not being appeased, thats not true. If Brad posts again explaining what he meant in his first post, or even retracts it and says there is no connection, I'll have my answer and be satisfied. While I would like to see preview clips, he doesn't have to make them. He doesn't have to explain his reasons. I just think that if he chooses to explain his reasons, he should do so in an understandable form.

I'm sorry, but that old cliche is simply not true. A vendor has the responsibility to offer a decent product and good service, but beyond that there's no reason to tolerate abuse from unreasonable customers.

The OP asked a simple question "Do you offer preview clips" I think that hardly counts as abuse from unreasonable customers. And by hardly counts I mean doesn't count at all.



So basically you're saying "Butt out, you've no business contributing to this thread", is that it? I'm sorry, sir, but I every right to post my comments if I want to, no matter what you think.

While that interpretation of my statement is possible, thats not what I meant. Your comments about such things as taking abuse from unreasonable customers and being interrogated like criminals conveys a sense of being forced into this discussion about a separate company from your own. I was merely reminding you (in what was probably a blunter form than was needed) That this thread did not originally concern you and you were not forced to get involved. You chose to get involved and make statements which provoked counter statements, just like myself and others. However afterwards, you implied that the thread should stop. I'm just saying you involved yourself, until producers started posting I don't believe anyone even mentioned a producer besides Brad.

Digressions aside, the fact is that producers, Brad or any other, can decide not to offer previews if that suits them, and they don't have to explain why. There's no need for this thread.

While this could have technically been done over e-mail, the OP just asked a simple question. I don't think that is crossing any lines. The OP knew that in the past Tickle Central had produced preview clips and wanted to know if that process had been discontinued. Most of the comments after that have resulted from an incomprehensible post and people asking for clarification, the same as what would happen in any thread.

For example, say ticklerlover783 posts a thread asking if people like college football. Crazy189w33 responds with, "No I hate college football because the NFL pays its players too much" Other posters may ask, whats the connection between college ball and NFL salaries. There are possible answers and Crazy could come back and explain. Thats what happened here.

So now you're deciding what this thread (and not this clip) is about?

No, I'm letting the OP do that. True his original question has been answered, but I consider asking for an explanation of a confusing post answering the question to be in the spirit of the OP. Can you honestly say that posts bemoaning the difficult of tickle producers (posts 22 and 27) are in the spirit of the OP?



Now you're just twisting my words, and are losing credibility because of it.

Am I twisting your words? You did say that producers are interrogated as if they were criminals and subjected to abuse by unreasonable customers. And no less than four other producers have entered the thread. What have they posted on? Did any of them answer the yes or no question is Tickle Central making any preview clips now? No they did not. Did any answer the question, what is the connection between previews and full clip trading? No they did not. They instead posted about the problems of clip trading, and the difficult and frustrating life of a tickle producer. By seconding the difficulties alluded to by Brad the producers are defending him.

Of course as you are fond of saying, it is Brad's right not to make preview clips if he doens't wnat to. He doesn't even have to explain his reasons. But if he does choose to explain, which he did, he then becomes open to questions about his explaination. Can he choose not to answer? Sure, no one is going to force him to post on the TMF. But should he explain himself? I think so. It will clear up the confusion that anyone who reads this thread is feeling right now.
 
The OP asked a simple question "Do you offer preview clips" I think that hardly counts as abuse from unreasonable customers. And by hardly counts I mean doesn't count at all.

Oh, you think I was referring to the OP? Or any other person in this thread? No wonder you disagree with what I'm trying to say. No, I don't have a problem with the OP's message. It was a legitimate question. I was talking in more general terms, as there's definitely a tendency for people to criticize some producers for not offering previews. A few people clearly believe producers owe them regular free previews, for some reason, and feel that if they don''t they're being unfair. That's just not right. Chakett_76 is a good example, of this, by the way.

As for abuse, I again wasn't referring to anyone here. You said that the customer is always right, and I disagree with that. The fact is that there are cases of abuse from some unreasonable customers, and when that happens, producers don't have to take it. Frankly, this applies to any type of business. It doesn't just concern tickling video producers. Some people genuinely believe the "customer is always right" thing, but that's just a load. There's a limit to what any self-respecting business person should tolerate. I don't suppose you run a business of your own? If you do, are you in the habit of tolerating customers when they're being rude for no good reason and are making unreasonable demands? If so, why?

You did say that producers are interrogated as if they were criminals and subjected to abuse by unreasonable customers.

Which is sometimes true. Not here specifically, but it does happen. That's my point. If you feel that you or any other person in this thread was targetted, well I'm sorry, but that's your problem, not mine.

And no less than four other producers have entered the thread. What have they posted on?

To defend producers who don't offer previews and who have every right to do things that way, bringing my personal oponion to the thread. If you can share your opinion, so can I.

Of course as you are fond of saying, it is Brad's right not to make preview clips if he doens't wnat to. He doesn't even have to explain his reasons.

And yet some people keep insisting for an answer, or in some cases, demanding previews from producers because they feel they have a responsibility to do so, for some reason (or maybe they're just plain selfish and want more free stuff). I don't know if you've noticed similar threads, but this is far from the first time this has been discussed, and some of the other threads have been much heavier in tone than this one. So just because no one said anything particularly demanding in this htread doesn't mean it never happens. And it's getting very tiresome.

In any case, I'm done with this thread. Some people just won't listen to reason. Further discussion is a waste of time (and can potentially lead to unfortunate name-calling). Have fun continuing your debate.
 
Oh, you think I was referring to the OP? Or any other person in this thread? No wonder you disagree with what I'm trying to say.

Ah foolish me for thinking you were posting on topic and not derailing the thread to preach for a soap box. Yes I figured that since you posted negative comments about people asking producers questions in a thread asking a video producer a question, you were talking about the subject at hand instead of something else. What could I have been thinking?

As for abuse, I again wasn't referring to anyone here.

As before, of course I should have realized you weren't talking about the thread you were posted in.

Which is sometimes true. Not here specifically, but it does happen. That's my point. If you feel that you or any other person in this thread was targeted, well I'm sorry, but that's your problem, not mine.

Do you often do into threads and make several strong posts on a different topic but in such a way that it implies you are actually on topic? Or is this a first for you? If you wanted to get on a soap box you could have easily started your own thread.

To defend producers who don't offer previews and who have every right to do things that way, bringing my personal oponion to the thread. If you can share your opinion, so can I.

Now see this is puzzling. You say, and I agree that the producers are in the thread defending Brad. In fact I told you that in Post 34 "There is no need for producers to rush to defend T2D from "criminal accusations" " But you told me in Post 38 that that sentence was twisting your words and I was losing credibility for it. Yet you admit in the quote post above that you did use the phrase interrogate like they are criminals, and that the producers are defending Brad. So how was I twisting your words?


I don't know if you've noticed similar threads, but this is far from the first time this has been discussed, and some of the other threads have been much heavier in tone than this one. So just because no one said anything particularly demanding in this htread doesn't mean it never happens. And it's getting very tiresome.

As I said before, no one asked you to read and comment on the thread. That you choose to do so is good, but it didn't concern you, and if it's that tiresome, maybe you should just stick to threads about your own company. This isn't an attack on you, you can post wherever you want, but you shouldn't involve yourself in a thread then complain about what an effort reading and responding is.

In any case, I'm done with this thread. Some people just won't listen to reason. Further discussion is a waste of time (and can potentially lead to unfortunate name-calling). Have fun continuing your debate.

Thanks, I intend to have fun. Its not that I'm not listening to reason, its that the reason that you are writing is not germane to the topic at hand. If it was in a relevant thread I wouldn't be arguing nearly as much, because a lot of what you say is correct.

What I really hope is that Brad comes back and explains his enigmatic comment, because I would like to know what he was trying to say.
 
I for one post sample clips because I want every consumer to know pretty much exactly what they are getting. I do not care about who downloads or shares my previews, they are just previews. Go to my youtube if you want to see free previews, it's not the full length and it's a good way to spread the word about a video that I know is good. I actually tell fans/customers to re-post my samples as they wish. I am saying it now,re-post my samples wherever you want, the tickleabuse.com logo is on the video and I look at it as flattering that you have posted one of my samples on youtube or your myspace. I have to be real here, you in fact are doing me a favor! If someone really likes the preview, where do you think they are going to go?

Exactly. I got a sense of bitterness when I read the response. A few hurt the industry and all of us are punished. This started out as a "preview" discussion and turned into piracy. I agree with Mabus, I don't buy clips unless I see the preview, because pictures don't tell the whole story and I've been burned too many times.
 
There is bitterness in the thread, but I have no idea why it comes from the producers. A simple question was asked, and no answer given.

Let me elaborate why the CUSTOMERS are bitter. Aside from everything I and a few others described, (Pictures of girl's laughing, who aren't, loud music in background, bad video quality or camera work, overtalkative tickler, etc. etc.) once you buy a clip - YOU CAN'T GET A REFUND. I have purchased clips, watched the clip. There's no laughter, or laughter so fake it's horrible!
And I'm sitting there thinking, "I just lost $10. Wonderful...." And I'm sure at some point someone will say "Tough luck, so what if you lost your $10?!"

Because I was trying to support the producers. Now I buy far fewer clips than before because I've been burned so many times. It really sucks to delete a clip you paid $7 or $8 for, because it's unwatchable.
I think many producers need to go re-read some books on capitalism.

When we ask for free clips, we only need a few seconds, it doesn't have to be super quality video footage either - we just want to see if the girl is laughing or not, and if there's some element in the background that will distract us from enjoying it. That's it! Thanks for the understanding of this, Francois. I know some people just want a preview clip so they don't have to buy the whole thing, but that's them, none of us can do anything about it. I don't look at it as "owing us" anything, I look at it as simply advertising your product in a fair way. As I said before, a picture can show the girl laughing her ass off, and she isn't making a sound in the video.
And none of us can rely on user criticism, that's all based on opinion. Some people will say every video is great, even if it sucks, and some will say every girl is faking the laughter, even when they aren't.

I don't like the adverserial nature a lot of producers have taken to their customers these days. I miss the old days of TIB in his golden years, before he left the community, and even before the whole vibrating=tickling bend his videos have taken. He's provide nice little previews of every video, he's listen to criticism, if people suggested scenarios, he tried to accomodate us. You'd ask for pantyhose, a few weeks later he made a few pantyhose clips. Ask for a certain outfit or position, he'd try to do it. Now you ask, you're ignored, or they just rant "I only do what I want to do!!" Alright, alright! We're just requesting something different! We just want you to make something we'll buy and like, jeez! I've already said before, in you guys want to make more money, offer a more varied product! If every video you make is like the old RealTickling website, "girl tied down to board and tickle/vibrated to orgasm," you will only have those customers who like that. If I was a producer.... I'd do pantyhose tickling (of course!) but also barefoot, socked tickling, show removal, different outfits, different stories and scenarios, different positions and equipment (stocks, chairs, feet on desk, etc.) ..whether I liked that scenario and outfit or not. Shit, I want to make money! I also wouldn't be terrified of the girls as most producers seem...if I'm paying someone over $100...an HOUR ...to do something, they damn well better be asking "What do you need?" instead of "I don't want to wear pantyhose..." or this is stupid..." or whatever the hell they're doing to you guys.

I have no idea why people trade or steal clips. I have no idea how to stop them. Yes it sucks, but I have no idea what you can do to stop it, and I think they're bastards for doing it. I believe, TickleCentral and everyone else, that you guys deserve money for your hard work. We feel the same way when someone steals something we have or made.
But please understand our side, which I've tried to explain here.
 
I think it is reasonable for customers to want free preview videos to get a sense of the videos before they buy, reasonable for producers to choose to provide these and reasonable for producers to choose not to provide the free previews.

If customers choose not to buy because of no free preview, that is reasonable as the customer must set their own personal rule set on what warrants a buy.

There's a level of effort on the producer's side to make the previews. Some choose to and some don't.

As a consumer, I personally ask producers of videos to provide free previews so I can determine whether I will buy, for all the reasons stated by others.

I personally like providing the free previews from ShyAndWildTickling.com because I think it contributes to my sales and gives a fair sense of what's really inside. Some of my older (vintage) video have lower production quality. i think that providing previews of these videos educates the customer so I get less customer service problems.

By the same token, producers who choose not to provide previews are within the 'capitalistic' rights too.

JD
 
One thing I don't like about a lot of ticklecentral clips is that very few of them feature shoe removal (or at least it doesn't say that it does in the descriptions). This is one of my favorite parts of tickling, as it adds to the anticipation and ensures that the tickle is "fresh" so to speak. I have purchased a few hoping to see some shoe removal, but never found it in any of their otherwise very well done clips. If you could indicate in your descriptions as to whether shoe removal was in the clip I would appreciate it. This goes to all producers of tickle content (nylontickling excluded, they're great!)
 
you're kidding right? lol

One thing I don't like about a lot of ticklecentral clips is that very few of them feature shoe removal (or at least it doesn't say that it does in the descriptions). This is one of my favorite parts of tickling, as it adds to the anticipation and ensures that the tickle is "fresh" so to speak. I have purchased a few hoping to see some shoe removal, but never found it in any of their otherwise very well done clips. If you could indicate in your descriptions as to whether shoe removal was in the clip I would appreciate it. This goes to all producers of tickle content (nylontickling excluded, they're great!)

the next time I see a blurb about shoe removal in a description about a tickling clip...will be the first time🙂 If you see it in the clip at all...BONUS I say!
 
I don't post much, but I must chime in here.

A question was posed by the OP, and that question was 'addressed' by the person who should address it, but was not fully answered.

IMO, not posting a preview clip is a mistake. Its like a movie studio, like WB, talking about how great X movie is, but then not having a screening for critics, or releasing a trailer for the movie. They can talk about its greatness all they want, but if there's no preview and no impartial reviews, no one is going to see the movie.

To put it bluntly: There is no connection between stealing full clips and releasing a preview clip. That's like saying the whole Napster situation was brought about because a person heard a sample of the song on Amazon.com. Its plain nonsense.

The only explanation for not releasing a preview clip is a producer not wanting to put the time into it. Simple as that. If a producer makes a quality product, the preview can only assist in generating sales. If you don't want to release a preview, hoping someone will buy a clip in which they can't see specific content, that's fine.

I will come out and say it: Tickle Central, at one point, offered a quality product. The girls were ticklish (typically at least a 6 on a scale of 10), and the content was excellent...new ideas, new scenarios, etc. But, I'll admit, the last few clips I have purchased have been relative disappointments. The girls, while not COMPLETELY acting, don't seem to be as ticklish as they pretend to be. Reactions are a lot more subtle and/or forced, and the latest round of female ticklers are pathetic in their methods. On top of that, the same scenario has played out in the last dozen clips they've released (2 girls tickle a bound girl). I just refuse to buy any more of their clips, based on the fact that I've been burned the last couple times.
 
I don't give a shit what anyone here says

It just strikes me as odd that someone is a business would have that attitude. I have bought videos from you in the past and found them to be very good but personally, after that comment I wont by any more from them, previews offered or not. I understand that you are upset and have the feeling that reposting and trading the previews is a form of stealing and I respect that. However that statement makes me wonder, if someone has a legitimate issue with a video and you have the the mindset of "not giving a shit what anyone here says" how much help would you be willing to give to get the problem resolved? To me that doesnt seem like good business practice. If I misunderstood your meaning of that statement I apologize. That is just what it seems like to me. If I didnt misunderstand then you are going to ignore this post and I wish you the best.

Sincerely,
Steve
 
What's New
6/28/25
See some spam? We appreciate when you report it. The report button is on the lower left of all posts.
Door 44
Live Camgirls!
Live Camgirls
Streaming Videos
Pic of the Week
Pic of the Week
Congratulations to
*** likeasong ***
The winner of our weekly Trivia, held every Sunday night at 11PM EST in our Chat Room
Back
Top