• If you would like to get your account Verified, read this thread
  • The TMF is sponsored by Clips4sale - By supporting them, you're supporting us.
  • >>> If you cannot get into your account email me at [email protected] <<<
    Don't forget to include your username

religion ideas and oppinions oh my

That's the weirdest thing: he challenged anybody to prove him wrong - see his starting post.

About what exactly, is not clear.


I told him that provoking people that way could end up in a flame - but apparently we didn't move an inch from there.
 
This shouldn't be a debate at all, but a sharing of ideas based on the topic.

If theres a desire for this to be a debate rather than a conversation of minds, perhaps the thread should be made anew or refined with this focus in mind.

But I think its important that right now we all decide whether this is to be a debate or conversation, regardless of what it has been thus far. Getting that out of the way creates a stable environment and won't lead to preconcieved notions and preped opinions.
 
The whole problem about this thread is not the nature of the debate/conversation.

The problem is the terms JJ put it into:


jj8277 said:
"I have no problem with being reffered to as a cultist, or being labled as having a version of a faith as long as the person who says it has the tamerity to meet their soon to be intillectual demise at the hands of my keyboard, and if that's too much, then just stay in the clips section."

He *expected* some kind of opposition.
He dared people to face him in a "battle of wits" - knowing that people who shared his outlook and tenets would not prove him wrong, and all others would never care.

That's why I think we are being made fun of.

He *issued a challenge*, and he's been trampling the spirit of the forum's rules, claiming that human laws are flawed anyway.

So, I ask, do you think this individual is a friend to you and your faith?

I think he could jeopardise the respect you've gained so far; by associating with him you risk being branded a troublemaker - someone who would exploit religion to lure people into a nasty flame, the classic no-win scenario.

Am I too harsh? Probably so - but I did not provoke people into calling me a zealot.

The same cannot be said of JJ.
 
So...are we sharing our thoughts on religion? I'm scared to contribute until I know the territory is safe....*feels like Bambi* *A Bambi who doesn't want to contribute to possible flaming*
 
jj82277 said:
Is it so wrong to include someones personal ideas in an oppinion in a discussion. I thought that this was a place that was designed to bring us all here to interact as normal people would. just knowing that we all held a common thread. I don't see a point as some have suggested as to refrain from making certain connections or analogies that i truly and honestly believe to be true as long as everyone is free to make comments or not, and to read them or not.


Figured I would just mention, since I assume most posters here know why this thread and debate began... Check the forums.

Yes, here we can interact as you say 'normal' people would. This is General Discussion. My point is that this debate began in Tickling Discussion. The forums' names clearly denote what subject matter is meant to be discussed where. References to religion and ensuing debate seems to me meant for General Discussion (where we are now) and less so Tickling Discussion.

Just decided to add my $.02.

I hope I'm not being overly subtle. 😉
 
i wasn't talking to anyone but you kal. those are your words that i expressly used when I "issued a challenge as you put it. I don't remember the exact post, but i directly recall a serious of posts that you made that as i recall were basically the equivilant of pissing off an intillectual mountain top to what you percieved as insects (true believers). of all your off handed sly remarks, the idea that i would be making fun of or in any other way making fun of Vlad is just plain insulting. as vlad said he is a new associate of mine that i have a great deal of respect for. hoiw did i gain that respect for him sir, through heated debate. let him tell you, we went at it for about 3-4 days, lengthy post after lengthy post. And with every point i made and with every point he made, we didn't cry, moan or complain about, hey man you're going to start a flame. hey don't viciously defend your point. the comment he actually made to me was that he was happy to see someone with the actuall conviction to stand up and say what they meant. and that in my book earned him my respect. go back and look, at times it got a little personal i took a couple of shots at him, but it was all in fun and i hope that in time, it will result in a new friend of mine.

as for the origional intent of this post, it was not to in any way offend any of the believers on this forum. quite the contrary. it was to call out people like you and of your ilk that make sly off handed remarks that directly insult our faith. I just got through reading posts where people are openly calling the bible stupid, and making christioans look stupid. where is the moral high horse there of preserving the peace. what about the fact that that might offend me. is this really about trying to keep everything honkey dorry, or is about shutting up anyone who believes anything similar to what you heard all of growing up and don'e want to hear anymore. comeon be honest, we are past the point of bsing. hold on wait i already know the answer.

the purpose of bringing up the idea of silencing me was because you developed this really cute way of hinting about the lineancy of the maderators of this forum, and one can only take that to imply some sort of edit. I was in no way trying to compare myself to christ. once again you misunderstand what i am saying because you don't have the same level of training that i have on the topic, which is why i tried to talk around you instead of making you engage in a debate that you would mostly not understand. to walk along side of ouir lord means that the rest of the world will hate you. lets not forgett they did not just kill christ. they killed all of his followers that he could find. and Paul himself was basically the Hitler to the Christians of the age. why was this. because we are truly not liked for the same reasons that he was, and the more so the closer you are to him. because we are wrong, no. because we are positive. because we have hope from following the light of the world that we are not condemed to the same fait that the rest of the world has already resigned themselves to. because we KNOW, without a shadow of a doubt, that all the sin in thousands of our lifetimes could not scratch the surface of God's mercy and love for us. And that no one, I MEAN NO ONE, can tell us that we are unworthy of proclaiming the freedom and power that was besstowed upon us by the ultimate price that our master paid for us in his holy blood, as long as we accpet our sacrafice, because we know that the ideas of Christianity do not need, sects, do not need cradles, and do not the visible institutions of men to survive, because the only church that matters in the one that we carry around in our hearts and keep sacred from the tyrany of the world. and that no matter how many feeble arguments we get from the evilness of men describing the misguided works of those falsely claiming our name that we hold steadfast to the sight of the works of our master, led by the ideals of truth, and the promise of justice, because no matter how may times we are stoned, talked bad about, and labled a trouble maker by those with no understanding that we will hold or heads up high above all those that do not have the confidence to look themselves in the mirror, because when things look bad, and we are presented with what all would see as a problem, we find ways to make it into a positive, because when all others only accept failure and mediocraty, we strive above and lead by true belief strive to accel, because when we are threatened by man we hold steadfast to our faith. Is it because these charecteristics are bad, no. It's because without a holy provider these are things that they can not manufacture on their own. no matter how good they might sound at "COCCK TAAAIL PAAARTIESSS" my dog milhouse, represent.

and i do have respect for the intent behind this forums rules, that's why i broke off into this post in the generall section to begin with, and not to burden those loking for tickle related material in our previous post. but if you are implying that i should lay down or anyone should lay down what they believe more than anything else to be true because someone says so? come on Kal. and i still can't believe you tried to turn Vlad against me. if he doesn't agree with me on this, that's fine, and if he wants to distance himself from me that's fine, i don't think that he does, but that would be his choice. but to imply that i was moching him, when all this came aboutdue to the fact that people were upset because in the spirit of goodwill, honesty, and love for his fellow man, he gave of himself in the best spiritualy related advice that he could give to that girl. knowing that it might fall on deaf ears. knowing that some might come around and say that he was making trouble or that he was going off topic. knowing that it might only reach one or two people but exposing his ideas anyway. you say nothing to those people, who couldn't just say Vlad thank you for your oppinion, i may not agree but i know it comes from your heart. and then you imply that im making fun of him for trying to stick up for him. I'm honestly insulted.
and all this after i said, you know what, im just not going to go the negative route, and im just going to politly agree to disagree and go try to reach out to some peopel that might be feeling reluctant about coming here, or being on this forum. to come back to this.
honestly, how much time and effort do you put into trying to help people develop quality relationships on this forum. to help people out of the closet. to show them that hey, there are people all over in this community for them. that there are lots of happily married ticklephile couples.
or like Vlad offer any constructive ideas on alternativs to a longterm relationship. or is most of your time just spent making sure that there are no flames.
think about which one is more important. then you tell me which one of us has greater respect for this forum. not for its rulebook, but the purpose it could serve.

I keep going back to the fact that you tried to turn a friend of mine against me because if you were here in the states this would not have been a discussion. were a bunch of cowboys remember.
 
I don't want to offend you; I try to avoid doing so on forums. But I am having a difficult time reading your post due to numerous errors. You should run it through spell check in microsoft word and then repaste it here so I can follow this unfolding debate more clearing. What you say will flow better with fewer gramatical mistakes.
 
-> JJ

As I said, I have the utmost respect for Religion. My Religion. Vlad's Religion. Any Religion.

I find rather funny that you keep referring to me as kind of non-believer; you whole post is clearly aimed to provoke people into reacting.

In the other subforum I politely suggested that you rephrased your posts, and minded your words better.

In my posts I kept saying that your conduct was questionable - not your religious tenets.



Only Vlad can express his opinion on you as a new-found associate.
Since you clearly despise my point, and mock my outlook, I would not call you a friend.

I made my point perfectly clear, so I won't repeat myself again - and again, and again, and again.



I'll be ignoring your remarks about my faith, my upbringings and my allegiances.
I'll let you shoot the last bullet, "cowboy", so people will see why I questioned your motives so far.



Let me point out something, though; this one really catches the eye.

jj82277 said:
I keep going back to the fact that you tried to turn a friend of mine against me because if you were here in the states this would not have been a discussion. were a bunch of cowboys remember.

I have yet to see Vlad taking point position to defend you - he could easily have; just check the posting times.

Ask him why he hasn't.



Oh, btw, in Italy we are a bunch of mobsters. 😉



Arrivederci.
 
He doesn't need to ask me, Kalamos. This has become ugly, and over a subject I care about. I really don't want any part of this if the situation cannot improve.
 
-> Vlad.

I must agree matters turned ugly - against my better intentions.

I wish to apologise to my fellow users: I had you endure this, while trying all the time to avoid it.


You have been called wise, Vlad; so, I'll follow an advice you used to give out often, in the past.

I'll walk away from this argument, before things turn really sour.



Reg's.
 
For my part, I don't see how freedom of speech can possibly be hampered on an internet forum - what real consequences could there be other than to upset the staff and have your post deleted?

But religion has always been an interest of mine, though I do have a real problem with organised religion and churches of any kind. I have never been able to accept the presence of another person who supposedly stands as mediator between myself and the Divine. To me, if I cannot have a direct, heartfelt relationship with God, what is really the point. So the Idea of The Kingdom of Heaven within is far more of a motivating force for me.

Nor can I accept that the Bible should be the final word of God, and that the purpose of our life is to live in accord with it. All the churches that proclaim this were founded at a time when the holy books of other civilisations were unavailable in translation - these have really only been properly circulated in the past 60 years or so. And I would like to know what gives any christian the right to look down on so-called heathen civilisations, when even the famous Ten Commandments appear over a thousand years before Moses in the book of Hamurabi from the Babylonian civilisation.

And until the churches begin to take seriously the discoveries and interpretations of the Dead Sea scrolls and Nag Hammadi documents, and not try to ignoree them because they do not conform to accepted doctrine, I cannot take them seriously, because I really have a problem with any institution putting its need to maintain doctrine before its search for spiritual truth.

If we take the many personal accounts of religious experience that exist today, the Near-Death experiences, the channeling, the various healing arts and the experiences of reincarnation, I find it an anomaly that the institutions supposedly responsible for the spiritual wellbeing of their believers should just pass all this over in favour of traditional theology that is getting increasingly remote from human experience.

Why, in the townships of South Africa, where people should really be grateful for the help and advice of a good priest, I checked on the course of study of the upcoming preachers. In a two-year program, the bulk of all content was theology, which really interests only specialists, certainly not the congregation, and, after asking if they have any courses in counselling, I was told that they have a two week practical.

So, if people want religion to become something that moves others again, they will have to find access to real human experience rather than to believe that what moves them also has relevance for others.
 
I don't think that i have ever felt closer to Milhouse than just now.

do they sell the New York Times in Italy?
 
That kind of thread can be : instructive / flaming. But as it's more close to the second option, it'll soon be another religion thread closed.
Once again ..... hey it's not a playground here 😉
 
jj you appear to be giving the impression that you are better than others contrary to you saying otherwise, and i think this will eventually cause trouble with other "hardcore" religous people who disagree with your views. I also disagree with your views, but then i am a non-beleiver, a heathen to some no doubt.

I personally don't understand why people continue to engage in this argument when there is no right or wrong as the most of the facts(of christianity for instance) are based on a book that is questionable to say the least, that is not to say the bible is fiction, but that it cannot be proven to be the truth.This is also the same for other religions.

If i offend anyone i do apologise, i do respect peoples beliefs but at the same time i expect the same in return.

Also, ericmartin its refreshing to see a christian with views like yours and i hope others see the sense in your argument, and not ridicule it.
However i agree with Kalamos that this thread is going to turn ugly as is the norm for these threads. But i do hope that the future replies on this thread are civilised
 
why do you take the impression that i feel better than anyone?

what have i said that makes it seem as though i think less of anyone.

Was it I who reeffered to themselves as most enlightened?
was it i who termed believers cultists?
was it I who deemed everyone unworthy to look upon God because of sin?

no that was Kal in his sarcasm. I started this post in respone to those remarks from another post. I must admit that it gets under my skin a little the way that he subtly tells you what he could say but won't because he is restraining himself.

what did i say? I said that didn't think we should freak out when someone interjected personal spiritual oppinion into a conversation. why, because i didn't like the vibe i got when Vlad mentioned God in his post. Also, because i always here little snippets of ani-christian banter that go uncheked. you never hear me name call against jews, muslims, or those who don't share my faith. that's what starts real hardcore agrguments, not simply stating an oppinion that is abstract.

can religion be proven beyond any human doubt, no. that is why we all have faith. no matter what you believe you have faith in something. that doesn't mean however that there is not evidence, for and against. I personally am what i term a classroom convert. i was raised as an athiest, taught as an athiest, fought for abortion, hated religion. then i got to highschool level biology and learned where i had placed my faith. the rest could be read in my posts. do i aim to convert everyone, no. but i will not hesitate to counter or balance out people that do name call and undermine my faith directly if unprovoked. Is that so wrong?
 
Dude..JJ..you might as well kiss this thread goodbye, cause its gonna be closed soon. Only cause Kal and Vlad have walked away and you keep on bashing the K-man for something that two of the better posters on this forum have already dropped. Id say get over it and you will keep this thread or keep it up and the mods will close it for good. Just my advice bro.
 
Hiya 😎
I think this could be interesting, though of course i wasn't there for what started the debate. I don't know, I guess i feel that if we do feel something strongly in terms of our faith or beliefs or opinions then we at least have to accept that others will feel just as strongly about a different point. I guess the important thing then is not so much to "prove" someone else wrong, but to work hard at listening to what another is trying to get across. I find it really helpful when i take a step back and assume that whatever i think another person said, may not be what they meant. It helps me ask questions for clarification -not like i'm cross-examining- which very often reveal that i didn't fully understand what the person was trying to say.

Being a good listener is often much more important to me than being right. I find that approach usually brings greater openness and understanding between me and whomever i'm speaking with.

I do sincerely hope you guys find satisfaction in your search for effective communication on such a deeply important issue for you.

Many blessings to you all! 🙂
Chickles_🙂
 
Argh! They revived the rotting hulk of a deceased thread!

😀 😀 😀


Somebody bring a cleric along! 😉
We got an undead situation here...


J/k...

😉
 
Oil upon Troubled Waters

Well said, Chickles.
 
What's New
10/28/25
Visit Clips4Sale for a huge selection of tickling clips!

Door 44
Live Camgirls!
Live Camgirls
Streaming Videos
Pic of the Week
Pic of the Week
Congratulations to
*** brad1701 ***
The winner of our weekly Trivia, held every Sunday night at 11PM EST in our Chat Room
Top