• If you would like to get your account Verified, read this thread
  • The TMF is sponsored by Clips4sale - By supporting them, you're supporting us.
  • Reminder - We have a ZERO TOLERANCE policy regarding content involving minors, regardless of intent. Any content containing minors will result in an immediate ban. If you see any such content, please report it using the "report" button on the bottom left of the post.
  • >>> If you cannot get into your account email me at [email protected] <<<
    Don't forget to include your username

The SICKEST MOVIE EVER MADE is now on DVD!

Amnesiac

Verified
Joined
Oct 13, 2002
Messages
1,259
Points
0
Alright, here's MY challenge to you hard-hearted callous-skinned cinephiles.

Last week Tuesday, the sickest movie ever made was finally released on DVD after years of finagling with the estate of the long late director: Salo, or the 120 Days of Sodom (Salo O le 120 Giornate Di Sodoma) I've been waiting 2 years for this release and got my copy Friday.

Salo.jpg


Released in 1975, it's a film that's long lived on in reputation more than actual viewership. Not only because it's in Italian, but because of the difficulty in distribution.

As LeeAllure might be the first to tell you, it's a modern-day adaptation of the Marquis De Sade's The 120 Days of Sodom, the ultimate precursor to all BDSM fiction ever written. Then-famed Italian director Pier Paolo Pasolini, known for his optimistic adaptations of Chaucer, took De Sade's novel and transplanted it from 17th Century France to 20th century Fascist Italy, and created cinematic infamy.

The film takes place in Mussolini-era Italy in the last days of WWII, where four sociopathic city magistrates known as The Libertines, with the aid of their well-endowed machine-gun toting militia, lure a group of 18 young men and women to a hidden manor house in Salo countryside. There, they craft elaborate and sadistic games to debase, rape, and torture their victims in innumerably perverse ways over the course of 120 days. But what will they do when they grow bored of their frivolities?

The film became universally reviled for it's graphic and stomach-wrenching content. Pasolini, an openly gay Marxist, was killed by a street prostitute shortly after production wrapped and editing was underway, making this his last film, and according to some, the victim of an assassination for making it.

Throughout the decades, it's been banned, censored, and refused distribution, and it seems that only in the U.S. was it ever allowed to remain intact--of course, this didn't mean it was allowed to be SHOWN. Relegated to the obscure art-house circuits of the metropolitan U.S., Salo's been the dirty secret of shock cinema despite the fact that it was meant as the most subversive of works of art rather than a gore-bucket trip.

The visuals have so overwhelmed the content that to many viewers, there seems to be little point to it. Pasolini decided to make the film in response to the 1968 student demonstrations that quickly turned into a chaotic revolt. Disgusted with the self-indulgent melee that followed, he decided to make a commentary on the modern world and it's consumerist ways by taking De Sade's work and using it's content to metaphorically represent capitalist excess, government corruption, and the herd mentality of the global populace. Of course, this is the basic explanation; the film's subtext is so complex that even 38 years later, people who can sit through the whole thing still find new meanings to interpret.

sodoma.jpg


Salo is the ultimate torture-porn movie (even though it's not supposed to be). This film makes Hostel 1 & 2 look like The Little Mermaid. It's the only film I've ever seen that actually LOOKS like a psychopath made it. I couldn't eat for 2 days after I saw this for the first time, and I actually hesitate to push "play" when I do. It has copious amounts of homoerotic overtones and over 88% of the movie doesn't have a single scene without mass nudity in it. Even after all this time, it's still a movie that would shock and sicken the hardest gorehounds. I would go into a little more detail about what you might find in it, but it would dilute the challenge.

I will say that one of the chapters of the movie is called "The Circle of Shit" and that's as far as I'm going right now.

...and it's not even a horror movie either. Go fig.

Salo was originally released in the U.S. on DVD in 1998, but a dispute with Pasolini's estate over licensing rights quickly turned the first printing into the last printing. The only 2,000 copies of the first printing are now valuable collector's items and it's circulated as bootlegs for the last 10 years. But now it's been restored, upgraded, and re-released by the legendary Criterion Collection for all to...vomit upon watching.

So...

Now that the sickest movie ever made has finally been released in a pristine condition...

Who here has the balls to watch it?...it's on Netfliiiiix!

*oh and a final note: the film isn't pornography. Some of the cast and crew were then-respected filmmakers. The music was by legendary Oscar-winning composer Ennio Morricone (who did music for everything from the Clint Eastwood Dollars trilogy to John Carpenter's The Thing, to Bulworth) and the sets were designed and built by Oscar-winning industry powerhouse Dante Ferretti, who also built the sets for Gangs of New York, Cold Mountain and Sweeney Todd.
 
sounds like fun for the whole family

lol i will try to check it out soon
 
I'll See Your Balls and Raise You Two More

Salo is a fantastic movie that takes no prisoners, so to speak. It may be infamous, but it's also beautifully shot and makes an important point that's still shocking to many today. There are people in this world who revel in this treatment of other human beings, and this ultimate ritualized pleasure in the degradation of others is what's so shocking about the film. Fascist tortures and complete disregard for human life is, of course, well documented, but you can also, from time to time, read news items about severe child abuse and tortures of other human beings. That's why Salo can still remain relevant today.

BTW, a close second would go to the movie The Baby of Macon by Peter Greenaway, another superbly-made and extremely disturbing film having some trouble with distribution.
 
Barnes and Noble have it now. Hmmmmm......I wonder if it is as sick as Blood Sucking Freaks or When Satan Was A Nazi?

And they call these "Art Films".🙄
 


Last week Tuesday?!?!?! Criterion/I've had that thing out since ages ago. This is a re-release with 2 discs. The original went outta print.

Funny you mention this film, I just watched this a few days ago. I actually thought it was really boring. After a while you just get numb to it, which I think might be the point.
 
I'm surprised you'd be interested in something like this, Amnesiac. You always struck me is somebody with very high standards for entertainment media, and very low tolerance for questionable plot lines. Yet from your own description of the movie's premise, it sounds like it's beyond sucking and has found some new depth of anti-quality even below the worst of the worst.

Perhaps that's what has you fascinated? That a single movie could be that awful?
__________________

<a href="http://s367.photobucket.com/albums/oo119/70drew70/?action=view&current=DREW70-small.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="http://i367.photobucket.com/albums/oo119/70drew70/DREW70-small.jpg" border="0" alt="Photobucket"></a>
<a href="http://drew70.thumblogger.com"><img src="http://i367.photobucket.com/albums/oo119/70drew70/drew70piano.gif" border="0" alt="Photobucket"></a> <a href="http://s367.photobucket.com/albums/oo119/70drew70/?action=view&current=3dancers.gif" target="_blank"><img src="http://i367.photobucket.com/albums/oo119/70drew70/3dancers.gif" border="0" alt="Photobucket"></a>
 
I'm surprised you'd be interested in something like this, Amnesiac. You always struck me is somebody with very high standards for entertainment media, and very low tolerance for questionable plot lines. Yet from your own description of the movie's premise, it sounds like it's beyond sucking and has found some new depth of anti-quality even below the worst of the worst.

Perhaps that's what has you fascinated? That a single movie could be that awful?

He does have high entertainment standards (for movies only, heh), but that doesn't speak for his ginormous porn collection.

I love you Teddy Bahr!
 
I will download this prob but also based on being a sick movie, its something i have yet to hear of in any cult circles

I have seen cannibal holocaust and Odishon tho and hell, the dude from cannibal holocaust was arrested the day he released it for a snuff film
 
You always struck me is somebody with very high standards for entertainment media, and very low tolerance for questionable plot lines. Yet from your own description of the movie's premise, it sounds like it's beyond sucking and has found some new depth of anti-quality even below the worst of the worst.
- drew70
Actually, Pasolini and his contemporaries were quite intellectual, and some of the most respected film critics (including Roland Barthes) have written lengthy essays and even small books on the academic content of the film. As I mentioned, even 38 years later, people still find new things about it.

But since the brutality and cruelty of the characters is part and parcel of one of the many subtexts and meanings of the film, it cannot only refuse to show it, it also refuses to dilute it, as so many other Hollywood movies do. Because of it's unflinching nature, it's almost impossible for the unseasoned viewer to see past the nauseating visuals and try to decipher it's complex meanings. That's what makes it a challenge, and also what makes it subversive. I can't tell you how much additional research was necessary for me to even figure out half of what was being implied, and even then I needed a critical essay to point me in the right direction...and I was amazed to see that there actually WAS as much complexity to this film as there was to most Stanley Kubrick films, but they're like subliminal pictures: you can't see them if you get distracted by the surface image.

If you ever want to see just how subliminally complex Kubrick films like The Shining and Eyes Wide Shut can be, check out the following YouTube clips:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eUavRrCMUZ0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P95NWAHWLrc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pj7Hw6OnbH8

And that's just SOME of the uncovered details about those movies. Salo is at LEAST as complex as that, but with even MORE obscure reference material. It would take a De Sade scholar to uncover most of HALF of it.

Even if it weren't for that, the plot alone is actually amazing--it'd make a hell of a tickling fiction story if it weren't for the ending--and works for any number of genres. I think you might have the impression of Salo as one of those paint-by-the-number Italian gore flicks of the 1970s by Fulci and Argento, but like I said, it's NOT a horror film and was actually meant to say something...but not without effort put into finding it.

That's my intellectual defense of it.

Aside from that, my description of the content is designed to make a point in and of itself. In the wake of all these torture-porn movies that everyone under the age of 20 seems to think is awesome and sick, they have no idea that all of these movies pale in comparison to the effect that Salo would have on them. I find it amusing that a film many consider to be "old" and dated by today's standards (as so many 70s films are) would actually OUTSHINE the stuff produced today, and to be able to retain that kind of power after almost 40 years is admirable to the point of bragging.

So I tried, in my description, to make it a challenge to those with strong constitutions to try to sit through it all the way. I know that i thought I was ready for it when I sat down the first time, and was humbled by the experience. I figure I might as well share it...but I gotta make it look good.

That said, I seriously doubt that LeeAllure (a fan of De Sade) could sit through it. And that gives me a one-up on her.
 
Last edited:
Even if it weren't for that, the plot alone is actually amazing--it'd make a hell of a tickling fiction story if it weren't for the ending--and works for any number of genres.

That's all I was thinking of while I was watching it.

That's a very, very good review on the film btw. I don't have the 2 disc, what's on the other one?
 
Mostly retrospective documentaries and makings of. I haven't watch them all though.
 


Just found out that on both editions, the 1 disc and 2 disc, there's 25 seconds that were deleted before the marriage.

Considering the rest of the film, I'd be afraid to know that 25 seconds consists of.
 
I think the second disc is the blooper reel.


Maybe if it's ever at Hollywood Video I'll see it. By your description that doesn't sound likely.
 
If he didn't enjoy making this, it might be a valid Wake Up Call.

--- As long as it's not a visual How-To Manual just chock full of Suggestions.
But then again, all those sick options are available at a "click" anyway, I suppose...

The description provided was more than adequate, I have no desire to watch this and start spitting blood,

but from here I *might be able to see the VIVID point you say this film was supposed to make,
hopefully in no way gleefully,

that -- as Robin Williams' (character) said in another movie whose title I can't remember --
referring to & re-enacting a(n in)famous psychological experiment...

human beings are too often "sheep," either going along with
or far worse, enjoying the extreme misery/torture of others
when they're in a comfortable position to watch it
or participate without worry for themselves.
:Grrr:

Just look at all the schmucks who ask for real Non-Con
screaming-crying-actually-painful tickle torture,
or who never think to question it when they're convinced they're buying it...

The Roman Coliseum in one's own living room, what more could a bastard ask.
:rant:
 
Last edited:
Do I have the balls to watch said movie? Yes.

But do I have a brain smart enough not to subject myself to such filth...? Yes.

Maybe if you got me drunk enough I'd watch it, until then I say---NYET!
 
Yeah, I too have heard about this film. Its infamey compells me.

However, 'The Girl Next Door', still to this day takes the cake as the most disturbing film I've ever seen.
 
hmm.. not for me... yall watch it and let me know what ya thought.
 
I read 120 Days Of Sodom (a translated version, can't remember whose translation) and whilst there are parts of it that make you think "hang on a minute..." and parts of it which just make you feel outright dirty after having read them, the majority of it is hilariously funny. I doubt it was meant to be sardonic, a la Chastity Chastened and Vice Rewarded or whatever those books were called, but the way I read it it just seemed like some sort of catharsis for a sex-starved old man rotting away in a jail. It is however responsible for a few of my favourite lines ever written, namely "He fucks a cow, which conceives and gives birth to a monster. Monster though it be, he fucks it", which conjures up such riotously ridiculous images in my head that I don't think any film would ever really be able to do it justice. I'm actually quite interested to see how the director portrayed that particular point to be honest, though the more cynical aspect of me suspects strongly that it has been omitted along with much of the other more preposterous ravings in favour of making the film as shocking as possible. We shall see.

In other words I feel having read the man's writings I probably have the balls to watch the film. Probably.

EDIT: Most shocking film I've ever seen? Either "Scum" or "Henry: Portrait Of A Serial Killer".
 
There a plenty of video nasties out there (released or unreleased) that are bound to evoke the same disgusted reaction that this Sodom is hoping to achieve. Without listing these films, are any of them actually good movies?

I've seen my fair share of "straight to video" horrorporn.

I went through a stage where I was compelled to want to watch all these movies, to see what the hype was. To see the motivation behind these films. Of the dozens of these kinds of movies that I've seen, there's only really one film that for me is half-decent.

Irreversible

'American Psycho' was a challenging book to read; not because of its graphic nature, but the style in which it is written. Those who have read it might be able to understand where I'm coming from.

Look, if you want to watch a film that has some shock value, not too 'horrorporny', but ultimately is really quite a good movie, I'd reccomend 'Irreversible'.

And since we're in the whole "do you have the guts to watch this movie' frame of mind, I'm just gonna rewrite something.

DO YOU HAVE THE GUTS TO WATCH THIS MOVIE?it's only a movie.
ARE YOU PREPARED TO SHIT YOUR PANTS TEN TIMES OVER????...i'm sure these actors get paid quite well.
CAN YOU HANDLE IT?...irreversible is in french just in case people don't like foreign language films. shit, i keep changing the spelling of irreversable.
I DON'T THINK YOU CAN SIT THROUGH IT. I'M GOING TO LAUGH AT YOU AND GIVE YOU A HARD TIME, BECAUSE YOU CAN'T HANDLE WATCHING YOUNG BOYS GET SODOMISED, OVER AND OVER AGAIN...but it's an "arthouse" film, Henry...gosh, friggn idiot...........wait a minute...wasn't the boy being sodomised in that other movie? you know the guy...the actor guy...
ARTHOUSE OR NOT, PREPARE TO WITNESS THE SICKEST SHIT EVER!
EVER!!!!





i really should lay off the hooch...


no boys are sodomised in irreversible.
 
Here is some chocolaty goodness for you to feast on while watching your brand new copy of Salo. 😉

Sallos.jpeg



Okay, on a serious note, I looked up the plot/spoilers to this movie on Wikipedia and I think I'm going to skip this one. I'm becoming a wuss in my old age, methinks. I had a hard enough time watching The Cook, the Thief, His Wife & Her Lover...even though it's a visually stunning film, it was just too much.

Regarding American Psycho; it was one of the few books I couldn't finish. The movie version is very toned down.
 
What's New
1/31/26
Visit the TMF Chat Room and meet your fellow members in real time!

Door 44
Live Camgirls!
Live Camgirls
Streaming Videos
Pic of the Week
Pic of the Week
Congratulations to
*** brad1701 ***
The winner of our weekly Trivia, held every Sunday night at 11PM EST in our Chat Room
Top