Tickle orgasm

[jj82277]

lol ... Thanks , jj82277. I need all the help I can get.

hey baby, conservatism. helping people devleop meaningful skill sets is what i am here for baby.

 

[drew70]

Wow, suddenly I know how it feels to tell a room full of kids there's no Santa Claus.

 

[nostradamas]

Hey Bella

How do I say this with a straight face?

That article was the worst attempt at justification I've ever seen.

There's no scientific method.

There's no hard data.

Nothing.

Exactly what I didn't ask for.

Do you really expect us to take this seriously? I mean, come on. Knee and and nose orgasms!? WoW!!!

It's like saying you had lunch with Bigfoot and the Lochness Monster.

Alllll - Righty Then!!!

I'll take Sasquatch sightings and Alien abductions for 200, Alex.

You're certainly welcome to remain skeptical; personally, I know what my body is capable of, and you'll have to forgive me if I put the studies of an emeritus professor over nay-saying based on...what were you basing your stance on again...? 🙂

That's Okay Bella. Forgiving....It's something we all need to do.

My stance is based on exactly what I said it was: Physiological Phact.

 

[nostradamas]

Yeah ... RiiiiiiiiiiGHT!!!!

I am only 20, and I have had experiences where I have orgasmed without ANYONE TOUCHING ME AT ALL.

You must remember my friend, the mind is a VERY powerful tool.

If you trigger easy, or are easily aroused and exciteable.. being able to orgasm by voice alone, or even stimulation to other parts of your body (Jean brought up Feet.) CAN make you cum.

Not EVERYONE can do this..Yes, that IS true.

Sooooo You can CUM without anyone touching you...including yourself.

This ... I gotta see.

I have a nice video camera, and I'll make you a HUGE overnight YouTube Star, Baby!!!!

Not to mention a TMF LEGEND !!!

 

[Bohemianne]

I don't believe it either. Nobody orgasms without some kind of genital stimulation.

^ You won't believe, orgasm without stimulation is rare but it happens and it's not hoax, especially when one is currently subjected to a crucial condition/stress/situation or sublime focus. Mostly it happens when you least expect it and the sensation is longer.

 

[BellaRisa]

How do I say this with a straight face?

That article was the worst attempt at justification I've ever seen.

There's no scientific method.

There's no hard data.

Nothing.

Exactly what I didn't ask for.

Do you really expect us to take this seriously? I mean, come on. Knee and and nose orgasms!? WoW!!!

It's like saying you had lunch with Bigfoot and the Lochness Monster.

Alllll - Righty Then!!!

I'll take Sasquatch sightings and Alien abductions for 200, Alex.



That's Okay Bella. Forgiving....It's something we all need to do.

My stance is based on exactly what I said it was: Physiological Phact.

Ah. Apparently you're one of those posters who has to make jokes and attempt to be condescending when they know they're wrong. That's in poor taste but easy to forgive, no worries . Meanwhile, the authors above have decades of actual data and testing, done at respected universities, to back up what they're saying. The point of the brief article is to show that proper studies have indeed been performed. You're welcome to read their numerous books, including The Science of Orgasms published by the highly respected Johns Hopkins University Press, if you'd like to see the actual data and how the scientific method was applied. Unless you'd prefer to remain ignorant and continue mocking, which is probably more fun for you and would give you the attention you're seeking. Not from me, but surely someone else will come along in need of a fruitless debate And if you'd care to show your hard Physiological Phacts that disputes what these authors have shown, by all means post it. We'd all love to see 🙂

 

[Deleted member 66627]

Sooooo You can CUM without anyone touching you...including yourself.

This ... I gotta see.

I have a nice video camera, and I'll make you a HUGE overnight YouTube Star, Baby!!!!

Not to mention a TMF LEGEND !!!

I know it's a hard concept to grasp.

Just take solace that like you, they're other's out there who have a bland, unimagintive, mechanical sex life.

That are afraid to step out side of the box, and let your MIND work for you.

Shame on me for thinkin' a majority of people out there understood that the mind is a very strong, and sometimes strange thing.

As far as seein' or tapin'?

I only go for men who are creative, open and capable of bringing a women pleasure with out referring back to yawn in-ducing pussy lick, and a blase' missionary sex fuck. 🙂

Appreciate the interest, though !

 

[punker]

Tony, if you were compassionate you wouldn't be a conservative. The goal of conservatism since World War II has always been to find a moral justification of greed.

nice quote

 

[drew70]

^ You won't believe, orgasm without stimulation is rare but it happens and it's not hoax, especially when one is currently subjected to a crucial condition/stress/situation or sublime focus. Mostly it happens when you least expect it and the sensation is longer.

Evidently it's rare everywhere but amongst the members of this forum.

Generally speaking, I'm a pretty open minded guy. I may not jump at the chance to buy swamp land in Florida, but I'm often open to extreme possibilities that are otherwise labeled as paranormal, and are considered bullshit by the majority. I've seen some things I can't explain. I am slow to dismiss or discount ideas that are foreign to me. There are very few things in this world on which I will slap a label of "impossible."

Having an orgasm with absolutely no genital stimulation? Okay, perhaps it's not impossible in the sense that it will never ever happen in a million years. But if it does happen, it's going to be a rare anomaly, like spontaneous human combustion, not something that's going to occur with any regularity except for people born with some kind of abnormality. The human body just isn't wired that way.

Crystal mentioned that she had an orgasm without ANYONE TOUCHING ME AT ALL. Well yeah, I would imagine that most of the rest of us have experienced this as well. Scientists refer to this phenomenon as "masturbation" or "autoeroticism." Self stimulation is still stimulation though. Difficult for guys to get away with in public areas (just ask Pee Wee Herman), but for many women, all they need to do is cross their legs. In high states of arousal sometimes all it takes is just a little squirming to achieve the minimal stimulation required to trigger the O.

Some have mentioned orgasm during sleep or "wet" dreams. Well who can account for their own body movements while they are sleeping? In such high states of arousal we're not talking gymnastics here, just enough gentle pelvic motion to spark that shuddering shangri-la. I maintain that even sonambulistic orgasms require some measure of genital stimulation.

If I may be permitted a slight digression here, I've noticed something during discussions such as this one. It's clear that there are some people who are way obsessed with sex and orgasms. For me, sex is like air. It's no big deal unless you're not getting any. But on forums such as this you're going to find one or two people who've based their entire identity and their own sense of self worth around it. Such people are easy to spot. They carry themselves with an air of conceit. They speak as though their expertise on the subjects of sex and fetish is a given and anybody raising an objection simply likes to argue and isn't worthy of the privilege of their continued participation. I personally find such egotistical snobbery counter-productive to meaningful discussion, and reflects badly on the community.

 

[drew70]

Re-adjust your bullshit meter.

Okay, done. Let's test it.

The goal of conservatism since World War II has always been to find a moral justification of greed.

<img src='http://img.villagephotos.com/p/2008-2/1299759/bs-meter.gif' >

Hey, what do you know. Still works like a champ!

 

[Oddball]

I think we are reading too much into technicalities and semantics. Having an orgasm without any physical stimulation of some sort is really hard to swallow.

Technically speaking, there is always some sort of stimulation, but hey, if you can lay on your back, not move at all, and orgasm with pure thought consciously, then more power to you and I'm happy to be wrong.

Drew already stated the whole wet dreams part, and etc etc etc, BUT I will say one thing. I have met a woman who could orgasm without genital stimulation.

I really was just about hitting those sweet spots a specific way that pushed the state of arousal past that Big O line. And honestly, it's great fun to do with your girls (and girl with your guys, since it CAN be done). Nothing beats watching your girl sweat, moan, and lose it when you haven't even started with sex lol.

God bless foreplay, and the wonders it always brings.

 

[Bohemianne]

Evidently it's rare everywhere but amongst the members of this forum.

Generally speaking, I'm a pretty open minded guy. I may not jump at the chance to buy swamp land in Florida, but I'm often open to extreme possibilities that are otherwise labeled as paranormal, and are considered bullshit by the majority. I've seen some things I can't explain. I am slow to dismiss or discount ideas that are foreign to me. There are very few things in this world on which I will slap a label of "impossible."

Having an orgasm with absolutely no genital stimulation? Okay, perhaps it's not impossible in the sense that it will never ever happen in a million years. But if it does happen, it's going to be a rare anomaly, like spontaneous human combustion, not something that's going to occur with any regularity except for people born with some kind of abnormality. The human body just isn't wired that way.

Crystal mentioned that she had an orgasm without ANYONE TOUCHING ME AT ALL. Well yeah, I would imagine that most of the rest of us have experienced this as well. Scientists refer to this phenomenon as "masturbation" or "autoeroticism." Self stimulation is still stimulation though. Difficult for guys to get away with in public areas (just ask Pee Wee Herman), but for many women, all they need to do is cross their legs. In high states of arousal sometimes all it takes is just a little squirming to achieve the minimal stimulation required to trigger the O.

Some have mentioned orgasm during sleep or "wet" dreams. Well who can account for their own body movements while they are sleeping? In such high states of arousal we're not talking gymnastics here, just enough gentle pelvic motion to spark that shuddering shangri-la. I maintain that even sonambulistic orgasms require some measure of genital stimulation.

If I may be permitted a slight digression here, I've noticed something during discussions such as this one. It's clear that there are some people who are way obsessed with sex and orgasms. For me, sex is like air. It's no big deal unless you're not getting any. But on forums such as this you're going to find one or two people who've based their entire identity and their own sense of self worth around it. Such people are easy to spot. They carry themselves with an air of conceit. They speak as though their expertise on the subjects of sex and fetish is a given and anybody raising an objection simply likes to argue and isn't worthy of the privilege of their continued participation. I personally find such egotistical snobbery counter-productive to meaningful discussion, and reflects badly on the community.

^ ...because it happened to me unexpectedly while in high school taking a very stressful national examination. My answering was taking like eternity though the test was not so hard, when the examiner asked to pass the papers, we were given some minutes to finish, then it happened so innocently without any stimulation or expectation. It is the stress that triggered it. It's not ego or what, in fact it felt odd and a bit scary. Believe me it never occured again at my current age or maybe it will be hard if you are aware or conscious of it.

 

[drew70]

^ ...because it happened to me unexpectedly while in high school taking a very stressful national examination. My answering was taking like eternity though the test was not so hard, when the examiner asked to pass the papers, we were given some minutes to finish, then it happened so innocently without any stimulation or expectation. It is the stress that triggered it. It's not ego or what, in fact it felt odd and a bit scary. Believe me it never occured again or maybe it will be hard when you think of it.

I believe you, Bohemianne, and just to clarify, you don't even come close to the type of person I was describing. I've found your posts to be wonderfully insightful, compelling, amusing and completely devoid of the elitist snobbery of which I spoke.

 

[Bohemianne]

I believe you, Bohemianne, and just to clarify, you don't even come close to the type of person I was describing. I've found your posts to be wonderfully insightful, compelling, amusing and completely devoid of the elitist snobbery of which I spoke.

^ Thanks. All in all I have 3 occasions of that but I was still a child but all due to stressful situations. One is when I was 11 in school (sports time), I was tying shoes and we were so rushed. When I bent down, it can't seem to get done, then it happened. Then the last one is when I was 12 years old seated next to a stranger (handsome man) at a commuter train. He was just moving his thigh and it innocently scraped mine in very subtle manner very unexpectedly, it triggered. Made me so guilty and pathetic.

At this age, it will be big leagues or maybe impossible.

 

[TonyInMyThroat]

Okay, done. Let's test it.

Tony, if you were compassionate you wouldn't be a conservative. The goal of conservatism since World War II has always been to find a moral justification of greed.

<img src='http://img.villagephotos.com/p/2008-2/1299759/bs-meter.gif' >

Hey, what do you know. Still works like a champ!

Thanks for getting that in Drew. I’m on page seventeen of my response and still going, and I’m exhausted …

 

[Sleepy Jean]

Okay, done. Let's test it.




<img src='http://img.villagephotos.com/p/2008-2/1299759/bs-meter.gif' >

Hey, what do you know. Still works like a champ!

That needle is on HIGH permanently whenever you're in the vicinity, Drew. As someone who lives in farm country, I know bullshit when I smell it. You Drew, would make me reach for the clothespin every time.

Compassionate conservative=myth

Orgasm without clitoral stimulation=real (for the lucky few of us)

 

[DimpleToes]

This is what i hate about the publuic educational system. they don't teach science. if they did, then the world would be a better place. the least understood part of the human anatomy is the human female genitals. the ability for females to climax has only grown more complex as time progresses. there is no proven scientific method taht isolates the stimulation to orgasm. to speak of one is just plain ignorant.

the scientific process as a whole is based on something called DIRECT OBSERVATION. that means that when you have someone that has an orgasm from just being tickled with no genital stimulation then however imporbible or recessive then it is possible period.

in the dark ages, this would have been some point of contention. but now that we know about the g-spot and how complex the clitoral system of nerves is then it makes perfect sense. the clit was once thought to be a single bud, in all actuallity it is a hub of very complex nerves that terminat primarily in the clit. this system of nerves is dynamic not static. meaning that the complexity and location of the nerve fibers vary from woman to woman. in some cases there are actually strands of nerves that suround the entire set of lips, in some cases there are extended fibers that decend down the leg and terminate in the soles of the FEET. there are non ticklephile women who have talked about having sexual climax from foot massaging toe sucking etc. the act of tickling is so intense coupled with bondage that if combined with a woman who has extra erogenous nerve endings in the soles of or close to the soles of her feet that are connected to the clitoral system then climax is a math problem and not a rarity when talking about tickling that area, jsut ask jean.

also, just FYI the female also has more neural pathways connecting the left and right sides of the brain which facilitates their ability to process emotions a lot better than we do and why their thought process is more emotionally based. so they are not being irrational or emotional, they are being women. you on't change them, you learn to communicate on a meaningful level understand and provide an environment that that makes them feel comfortable with their emotions and sexuality. the first thing to do is to learn to LISTEN. like when a woman tells you WHAT MAKES HER CUM. typical over left brained male, well honey this is what makes me cum and we say well that doesn't comply with my left brain thought process so i am going to invalidate your input...

so sad...

and please. the PR forum is just that. maniac, tony, i am as conservative as anyone and i can testify wholeheartedly that jean has a generous dislike for our ilk. that is her personal perogative and god given right. lets not poke at it with a stick (she bites). in this venue lets just stay on topic and appreciate responses at face value. don't worry. there is a field to engage all people in the political arena of ideas, this is just not it.

that's my son.... nice wording JJ..... you did Momma proud.... hugsssssssss

 

[DimpleToes]

Hey... beeing a woman.. I do have to say it is possible for a woman to have an sexual experience without beeing touched sexually... tickling is an erotic experience if the ler is well knowledged in the said area of touch. Does not have to even be in a sexual area. You can turn a woman on by touching her feet, arms, sides,, anywhere they are ticklish.. it is how you tease her verbally and what tools you use or your methods of tickling.. If the ler is awsome at what they do, even if there is no physical attraction between the two people, the shear act of beeing tickled coupled with the atmospher of the teassing and interaction can cause a spontanious volcanic eruption.

 

[Bohemianne]

This is what i hate about the publuic educational system. they don't teach science. if they did, then the world would be a better place. the least understood part of the human anatomy is the human female genitals. the ability for females to climax has only grown more complex as time progresses. there is no proven scientific method taht isolates the stimulation to orgasm. to speak of one is just plain ignorant.

the scientific process as a whole is based on something called DIRECT OBSERVATION. that means that when you have someone that has an orgasm from just being tickled with no genital stimulation then however imporbible or recessive then it is possible period.

in the dark ages, this would have been some point of contention. but now that we know about the g-spot and how complex the clitoral system of nerves is then it makes perfect sense. the clit was once thought to be a single bud, in all actuallity it is a hub of very complex nerves that terminat primarily in the clit. this system of nerves is dynamic not static. meaning that the complexity and location of the nerve fibers vary from woman to woman. in some cases there are actually strands of nerves that suround the entire set of lips, in some cases there are extended fibers that decend down the leg and terminate in the soles of the FEET. there are non ticklephile women who have talked about having sexual climax from foot massaging toe sucking etc. the act of tickling is so intense coupled with bondage that if combined with a woman who has extra erogenous nerve endings in the soles of or close to the soles of her feet that are connected to the clitoral system then climax is a math problem and not a rarity when talking about tickling that area, jsut ask jean.

also, just FYI the female also has more neural pathways connecting the left and right sides of the brain which facilitates their ability to process emotions a lot better than we do and why their thought process is more emotionally based. so they are not being irrational or emotional, they are being women. you on't change them, you learn to communicate on a meaningful level understand and provide an environment that that makes them feel comfortable with their emotions and sexuality. the first thing to do is to learn to LISTEN. like when a woman tells you WHAT MAKES HER CUM. typical over left brained male, well honey this is what makes me cum and we say well that doesn't comply with my left brain thought process so i am going to invalidate your input...

so sad...

and please. the PR forum is just that. maniac, tony, i am as conservative as anyone and i can testify wholeheartedly that jean has a generous dislike for our ilk. that is her personal perogative and god given right. lets not poke at it with a stick (she bites). in this venue lets just stay on topic and appreciate responses at face value. don't worry. there is a field to engage all people in the political arena of ideas, this is just not it.

^ I agree with DimpleToes. JJ has spoken enormously on women's complex sexuality and radiating nerve endings. Women who have confidence in their body will basically express how they want to be pleasured and real men listen to them. Listen deeply and get INSIDE a woman with DEPTH, it's right in them and not in cold statistics you come across around that mislead about female sexuality. Good sex and impossibilities happen when two people DO IT OUT OF LOVE and not out of emptiness, arrogance, and selfishness.

 

[nostradamas]

This may shock you, but...

I'm having an O-yeah ... riii iiii iiii ght NoW!!!!!!111

Just from reading this excellent thread.

So many names... I just don't know where to start....

Thank You.


I have seen the light!!!

 

[monkeydick]

I think it just depends on the person. My girlfriend has one when I tickle her feet, but my older sister never did, despite being Super ticklish.

 

[kis123]

Hey... beeing a woman.. I do have to say it is possible for a woman to have an sexual experience without beeing touched sexually... tickling is an erotic experience if the ler is well knowledged in the said area of touch. Does not have to even be in a sexual area. You can turn a woman on by touching her feet, arms, sides,, anywhere they are ticklish.. it is how you tease her verbally and what tools you use or your methods of tickling.. If the ler is awsome at what they do, even if there is no physical attraction between the two people, the shear act of beeing tickled coupled with the atmospher of the teassing and interaction can cause a spontanious volcanic eruption.

Wow! Hit the nail right on the head sista'!!!!

My only tickling "session" with two TMFers was nearly three years ago in a hotel room in Texas. The gathering was pretty much over, but I hung out with these two gentlemen for nearly three days and we bonded. So while we were cleaning up, my curiosity was sent over the roof and I decided to play. Man, am I glad I pushed past my fears; we had a great time! All the while this thought was in the back of my mind; I'm in a hotel room with two men I've only known two days and they're touching and tickling me. I have to admit that was a huge turn on! It wasn't necessarily sexual because I was too busy laughing and trying to handle all that was going on to be turned on that way. Plus I got a nasty leg cramp because my stubborn ler instincts kicked in and I didn't want to submit. But if things would've gone much longer, who knows? And that's the biggest turn on to me.......the what if's and the possibilities you can cook up in your head. Sex starts in the head before it ends up in the bed IMO so the hotter the fantasy, the hotter the.....well, you know!

Shortly after the TX gathering, I had a brief relationship with a SO who found my ticklishness simply fascinating. He would be amazed how he could get me going to the point he could just blow on certain parts of my body to get me in hysterics. When he tickled me to the point of sheer frustration, he rewarded me with that very special something. Then, I would be laid out to the point that he'd watch me writhe in orgasmic bliss.

Man, those were some really good times!

 

[kis123]

^ I agree with DimpleToes. JJ has spoken enormously on women's complex sexuality and radiating nerve endings. Women who have confidence in their body will basically express how they want to be pleasured and real men listen to them. Listen deeply and get INSIDE a woman with DEPTH, it's right in them and not in cold statistics you come across around that mislead about female sexuality. Good sex and impossibilities happen when two people DO IT OUT OF LOVE and not out of emptiness, arrogance, and selfishness.

Wow! This is right on point as well!

When I was a young woman, I always let the man lead. I really didn't know what I wanted sexually so I thought it would be best to let him make the descions. Well, after 10 years of marriage to a man who got himself off without making sure I was pleased, I had enough. I met a man who started asking me questions and making me think about my sexuality. What did I like?? What pleased/pleasured me? We'd experiment with techniques and positions, and had an awesome time. He'd never been orally pleasured before; he was 39 at the time........isn't that a shame? Welll, by the time I got to him, he found out that he loved it, and I found out he was pretty good too!

Now that I'm substantially older than my twenty something goddesses, I've learned a lot about me. Sex has a completely different meaning to me; I used to see it as a duty. You know, you have so many dates, you have sex. You're married now, so sex is part of the equation. But I never got any real enjoyment from it. Now, I have great sexual experiences because I know what I want, need, desire, and demand in a sexual relationship. Better late than never, I say...........

 

[kis123]

Riiight...This is the "knowledge" one gets by "getting out more" to titty bars and strip clubs, as opposed to us introverts who stay home and read books. That's what I like about you Shadow, you're always good for a laugh, pal.

Guys, I know a lot of you like to fantasize about orgasm from tickling alone, and I'll agree it makes a good storyline but if we're talking about the real world, it just doesn't work that way. This is a proven scientific fact. Apart from the rare mutant, this is pretty universal. I know many of us like to think we're special, we're different, or really great ticklers but our brains and bodies really aren't that different from one another.

I don't claim any expertise, but whenever I hear anybody say they've given an orgasm from tickling alone, my built-in bullshit meter raises a red flag. This is one of those things people want you to believe because it boosts their ego, or they're just looking for popularity.

Sorry drew, but it looks like you're in a unique minority!

Now, I'll be the first to admit that I do need a little more than tickling to orgasm, but there are too many women out here who are more sensitive than me and the tickling is more than enough to climax. For you to depict that as BS is pretty closed minded IMO!

A woman's body is sensitive and complex; you simply can't mentally write things off just because they don't agree with you. Today's woman knows what she wants, needs, and desires for pleasure. It's not like the old days where the man assumes he knows what pleasures a woman. Nowadays, women are able to communicate exactly what they want in the bedroom and men get to decide if that's something they want to do.

 

[drew70]

Sorry drew, but it looks like you're in a unique minority!

LOL. Why apologize to me? You are more than welcome to believe what you want. I may yet come across some evidence or proof that will make me change what I believe, as nothing is etched in stone. Until that happens I'll just quietly sit back and chuckle.

I don't have any illusions about what I need to bust a nut. If you feel that genital stimulation isn't necessary, then by all means, throw that vibrator in the trash and be liberated, girlfriend! I'm behind you one hundred percent!