• If you would like to get your account Verified, read this thread
  • The TMF is sponsored by Clips4sale - By supporting them, you're supporting us.
  • >>> If you cannot get into your account email me at [email protected] <<<
    Don't forget to include your username

Tickling should be porn free

tickling porn free?

I know that I am new to TMF but I rather have porn in my tickiling to keep the adult content. To me tickling has a youthful playfullness which is why I believe that people want to leave it porn free but to my personal taste. I'd rather not blur that line.

TBear
 
I've seen alot of tickling on the net,alot of differant sites and in the old days some magazines.I think all porn should be left out,tickling should be just that TICKLING and nothing more.Nudity shouldn't be apart of tickling a bra and panty is fine or bathing suit is ok,but the video producers should leave the porn out.If I wanted to see a girl get off having a orgasem there is more than enough internet sites to go to.There are plenty of porn sites,lets not mix them into the few tickling sites we have.MTP,Dungeon maidens,FM Concepts are just a few sites that might do better without the porn.This is me,but I don't care about a nude girl getting her ass tickled or her vagina feathered I can get this about anywhere.
There isn't enough tickle sites as it is.Anyway this is my own personnel opinion for what is is worth.Tickling should be just that tickling and all the tickle spots or should I say the good ones you can get to with her clothes on.Lets leave the vibrators to the porn producers.
The Musician

I agree with you 110%!!!! It makes me sick how this forum is turning out! Tickling is tickling and Porn is porn! I can tell you this there are going to be some new videos made within the next year with REAL laughing and with NO PORN! REAL TICKLING FOR REAL TICKLE LOVERS. They will be made by two of our fellow forum members. There will be nothing fake in these videos. I just want to add this....I think it is great to know that other members feel the same way about tickling.
 
I agree with you 110%!!!! It makes me sick how this forum is turning out! Tickling is tickling and Porn is porn! I can tell you this there are going to be some new videos made within the next year with REAL laughing and with NO PORN! REAL TICKLING FOR REAL TICKLE LOVERS. They will be made by two of our fellow forum members. There will be nothing fake in these videos. I just want to add this....I think it is great to know that other members feel the same way about tickling.

Guess what, this is a North American based site, and people faught in wars so other could have freedoms to choose what they like. The forum goes out of it's way to keep illigal content of the board (aka under age content, and good on them), if you don't like what's here get lost, but don't tell others what they should or shouldn't be aloud to enjoy. I like tickling, and I like porn, and guess what tickling has been part of my sex life in the past. I think it's pothetic that a buntch of prudes feel they can come along and tell me what I can or can't post on the forum just becuase it offends them when others enjoy it.

If you want such a site, no porn, well I got new for you a tickle fetish site is porn. What ever turns you on can be considered porn. I could right a about somebody tickling a womans feet, and I'll tell you somebody will have a hard on or wet panties over it. People like you make me sick.
 
Guess what, this is a North American based site, and people faught in wars so other could have freedoms to choose what they like. The forum goes out of it's way to keep illigal content of the board (aka under age content, and good on them), if you don't like what's here get lost, but don't tell others what they should or shouldn't be aloud to enjoy. I like tickling, and I like porn, and guess what tickling has been part of my sex life in the past. I think it's pothetic that a buntch of prudes feel they can come along and tell me what I can or can't post on the forum just becuase it offends them when others enjoy it.

If you want such a site, no porn, well I got new for you a tickle fetish site is porn. What ever turns you on can be considered porn. I could right a about somebody tickling a womans feet, and I'll tell you somebody will have a hard on or wet panties over it. People like you make me sick.

Remember, folks: don't feed the troll!
 
Guess what, this is a North American based site, and people faught in wars so other could have freedoms to choose what they like. The forum goes out of it's way to keep illigal content of the board (aka under age content, and good on them), if you don't like what's here get lost, but don't tell others what they should or shouldn't be aloud to enjoy. I like tickling, and I like porn, and guess what tickling has been part of my sex life in the past. I think it's pothetic that a buntch of prudes feel they can come along and tell me what I can or can't post on the forum just becuase it offends them when others enjoy it.

If you want such a site, no porn, well I got new for you a tickle fetish site is porn. What ever turns you on can be considered porn. I could right a about somebody tickling a womans feet, and I'll tell you somebody will have a hard on or wet panties over it. People like you make me sick.

FU*K YOU I did not tell anyone what they can or cant watch or see asshole I just made a statement!!! SOOOOO you can get the fuc* lost!!!!!!
 
FUCK YOU I did not tell anyone what they can or cant watch or see asshole I just made a statement!!! SOOOOO you can get the fucK lost!!!!!!

I don't know it sure red that way to me. Speaking of red, I would say everything you had to say came across kinda' red, if you know what I mean.

ultimateticklee said:
I agree with you 110%!!!! It makes me sick how this forum is turning out! Tickling is tickling and Porn is porn! I can tell you this there are going to be some new videos made within the next year with REAL laughing and with NO PORN! REAL TICKLING FOR REAL TICKLE LOVERS. They will be made by two of our fellow forum members. There will be nothing fake in these videos. I just want to add this....I think it is great to know that other members feel the same way about tickling

-it makes you sick how the forum is turning out.
Why because people are having fun?
-Tickling is tickling and porn is porn.
So who went and mad you master of the univers, to decide what I can watch?
-No Porn! REAL TICKLING FOR REAL TICKLE LOVERS
Now I'm not a real tickle love because I like some T&A with my tickling?
-I think it's great to know other members feel the same way about tickling.
Yes I'm sure you do, because their is nothing we all like better then a pinco-comie aliance telling us what we can and can't enjoy with our fetish.
 
As I said..... I never told anyone what to watch so GET OVER IT AND MOVE ON!!!! AND just as you can state what you want so can I! GROW UP AND GET A LIFE!!!
Not everyone thinks of tickling as porn or sexual! That's the only point I stated, So go jerk off or something and get over this!
 
Now that my sister has used my online name to respond to the last statement it is my turn to save my name in here....I don't care what anyone watches or does in here to each his or her own so please don't PM me screaming that I am to get lost too. Just PM my sister *ultimateticklee*
Thank you.
 
As I said..... I never told anyone what to watch so GET OVER IT AND MOVE ON!!!! AND just as you can state what you want so can I! GROW UP AND GET A LIFE!!!
Not everyone thinks of tickling as porn or sexual! That's the only point I stated, So go jerk off or something and get over this!

I'm not the one who started this thread, and I have as much right to express my views on the topic as every body else does. To damn bad if you don't like it. When someone remarks on something and says it shouldn't be this or that I speak up and say that it should be. And I have new for you, most of the members of this forum are male, and I would bet good money that most of them think of tickling as sexual. So go buy some lube ya prude.
 
Now that my sister has used my online name to respond to the last statement it is my turn to save my name in here....I don't care what anyone watches or does in here to each his or her own so please don't PM me screaming that I am to get lost too. Just PM my sister *ultimateticklee*
Thank you.


Sorry Angeleyes, didn't know it was your sister.
 
I'm not the one who started this thread, and I have as much right to express my views on the topic as every body else does. To damn bad if you don't like it. When someone remarks on something and says it shouldn't be this or that I speak up and say that it should be. And I have new for you, most of the members of this forum are male, and I would bet good money that most of them think of tickling as sexual. So go buy some lube ya prude.

YOU ARE ONE HELL OF A STUPID SON OF A BITCH!! AS YOU STATED THAT YOU CAN RESPOND TO A THREAD WELL SO CAN I, AND THAT IS ALL I DID. I JUST STATED MY VIEWS, IF YOU DON'T LIKE THEM OH WELL, I AM NOT HERE TO PLEASE YOUR SORRY ASS. I AM NOT AGAINST PORN I JUST THINK THERE ARE ENOUGH PORN SITES OUT THERE SO GET OFF MY FUCKING ASS
 
I've seen alot of tickling on the net,alot of differant sites and in the old days some magazines.I think all porn should be left out,tickling should be just that TICKLING and nothing more.Nudity shouldn't be apart of tickling a bra and panty is fine or bathing suit is ok,but the video producers should leave the porn out.If I wanted to see a girl get off having a orgasem there is more than enough internet sites to go to.There are plenty of porn sites,lets not mix them into the few tickling sites we have.MTP,Dungeon maidens,FM Concepts are just a few sites that might do better without the porn.This is me,but I don't care about a nude girl getting her ass tickled or her vagina feathered I can get this about anywhere.
There isn't enough tickle sites as it is.Anyway this is my own personnel opinion for what is is worth.Tickling should be just that tickling and all the tickle spots or should I say the good ones you can get to with her clothes on.Lets leave the vibrators to the porn producers.
The Musician

absolutely not. Porn is art, art is expressive. people do what people want with porn
 
Here's my "porn test."

Pick any tickling video that you like. Now imagine yourself sitting on the couch and watching it with your mother, your children, or your boss. Is that a comfortable scenario?

Or contemplate replacing one of the models with a child. Would that still be all good?

If not, then chances are that video has a lot of sexual connotations for you. It doesn't matter if the models are completely clothed and there's not a vibrator in sight - if you'd really rather not explain your interest in such things to a coworker, child, or parent then that says something. If the idea of seeing a child in such a video makes you cringe then there's a reason. It means that at some level you know what that video is really about: sex.

And it seems to me that there's only one good way to describe a video that serves primarily as a vehicle for sexual content: pornography.
 
What a logical explanation Drew...the boundary.

As an artist, when there is a blank space to fill and the mind is free-flowing, any constraint can diminish the output. No, it's not about simply selling or earning money, it's all about what you want to portray + there are special people who have relevant requests that are compatible to your own passion...

For me it's the over-all output. There is always evolution to anything possible.
 
Here's my "porn test."

Pick any tickling video that you like. Now imagine yourself sitting on the couch and watching it with your mother, your children, or your boss. Is that a comfortable scenario?

Or contemplate replacing one of the models with a child. Would that still be all good?

If not, then chances are that video has a lot of sexual connotations for you. It doesn't matter if the models are completely clothed and there's not a vibrator in sight - if you'd really rather not explain your interest in such things to a coworker, child, or parent then that says something. If the idea of seeing a child in such a video makes you cringe then there's a reason. It means that at some level you know what that video is really about: sex.

And it seems to me that there's only one good way to describe a video that serves primarily as a vehicle for sexual content: pornography.

i think people, whether or not they like tickling, still associate it with a form of sex
 
well...

so much for the terrible 'fetish' forum guild eh? such inept idiots....

lets try that porn test but with one detail difference.

get a tickling vid of lets say you and your friends doing regular tickling..for example lets try this youtube.com/watch?v=I3w59gb61_Q...and not something some jackass producer stupidly jerry-rigged with some paid models including novelty fantasy bondage, so called 'torture', perversions, other eyesores and monstrosities including complete disregard. pretty much, get rid of the 'jacking off and having sex with this' mentality and get your head out of your ass.

the remaining steps, do the same.

then what?

thing about tickling mixed with porn - shit gets in the way, looks bad and the attention is no longer about the tickling. and people would be like 'why the fuck do i want to buy/watch your shit? the tickling SUCKED anyways.'

and you know what? regardless of what the rest of you guys do. well thats your behavior; bad habit and wrongful attitude.

that would be pathetic. and you gotta do better than that.
 
Last edited:
so much for the terrible 'fetish' forum guild eh? such inept idiots....

lets try that porn test but with one detail difference.

get a tickling vid of lets say you and your friends doing regular tickling..for example lets try this youtube.com/watch?v=I3w59gb61_Q...and not something some jackass producer stupidly jerry-rigged with some paid models including novelty fantasy bondage, so called 'torture', perversions, other eyesores and monstrosities including complete disregard. pretty much, get rid of the 'jacking off and having sex with this' mentality and get your head out of your ass.

the remaining steps, do the same.

then what?
Yes, then what? Sit down with your mom, fire up YouTube, and show her a video that the poster describes as "merciless tickling torture of my feet by my boyfriend." And explain to her what you like about a video that shows nothing but a pair of feet being tickled by a pair of hands. It should be an interesting conversation. Let us know how it goes.
 
Since this thread is several pages long I only read the first post. I personally would like to see more "ticklesex". Thats just me and my 2 cents.
 
I'm not the one who started this thread, and I have as much right to express my views on the topic as every body else does. To damn bad if you don't like it. When someone remarks on something and says it shouldn't be this or that I speak up and say that it should be. And I have new for you, most of the members of this forum are male, and I would bet good money that most of them think of tickling as sexual. So go buy some lube ya prude.

Oh man the language I thought this forum was cencored...LOL
 
You know vsa7a, whenever I read your post, I'm almost close to ruminating on the silent lucidity of my drafting table, lol...but as a grown person and normally functional, I stick to my sensibilities dealing with very few female (less than 1% or so) customers...:dropatear

I find all the univeral porn everywhere mostly amusing...You know, my husband and I had been after "how the set had been ridiculously made". When you are stumbled into something funny...yep, they are pervertedly funny. I worry for some of them, especially the hygiene. 😀

The world never fails to amaze me! Life is short, if I'll not see the nastiest, then might as well be a first order "sister" or priestess.

To SlaverTickler: LOL, I just wonder why...in this adult forum...the "males" are quite...uhm more conservative ...than me (?) AAAAAAAAAAAARG! LOL, except you (joke) 😀 😱
 
Redmage, I hope you don’t mind me playing devil’s advocate here. Without being disrespectful, I feel compelled to challenge the validity of your “porn test."
Here's my "porn test."

Pick any tickling video that you like. Now imagine yourself sitting on the couch and watching it with your mother, your children, or your boss. Is that a comfortable scenario?
I have collected many F/M clips posted by Terri-Tickle on AMT. These clips are of clothed guys (although some were shirtless) being tickled by fully clothed women. If I thought my mother, boss, or my son were at all interested, I’d watch any of those videos with them in a heartbeat. Why not? It’s just a girl tickling a guy. I may personally find it hot, but that doesn’t change what the video is, or how it would be viewed by the public at large. However, one of those F/M videos features a topless tickler. That particular one would make me uncomfortable, because it would introduce an element of pornography.

Or contemplate replacing one of the models with a child. Would that still be all good?
That’s not a valid criteria for pornography either. There are many things in which I would not wish to see a child participate that have nothing to do with sex. Consider the scene in Pulp Fiction in which John Travolta shoots heroin. If one was to replace his character with that of a child, I would find it considerably more disturbing. By the test you propose, that makes any scene involving the shooting of heroin a pornographic one.

If not, then chances are that video has a lot of sexual connotations for you. It doesn't matter if the models are completely clothed and there's not a vibrator in sight - if you'd really rather not explain your interest in such things to a coworker, child, or parent then that says something.
There are many things we prefer to keep to ourselves, for a variety of reasons. Sometimes things like pride, envy, and jealousy make us reluctant to “explain our interest” in any particular venue. I submit that a reluctance to disclose personal feelings about a topic does not in itself qualify that topic as pornography.

If the idea of seeing a child in such a video makes you cringe then there's a reason. It means that at some level you know what that video is really about: sex.
That’s quite a leap there, Redmage. That any scene involving a child that would make us cringe….is about sex. I honestly can see no justification for such a blanket statement.

And it seems to me that there's only one good way to describe a video that serves primarily as a vehicle for sexual content: pornography.
True. But is sexual content intrinsically so? Or is it considered sexual only based on people’s perceptions? If a color blind person looks at a green object and sees red, does that mean that since one person views it as red, the rest of us must also regard it so? Similarly, if a handful of people such as us regard tickling material as something that’s sexually stimulating, does that mean the rest of the world must regard tickling material as pornography, even if, as you say, the models are completely clothed and there’s not a vibrator in sight?

Here’s a much better test to determine if a particular video is pornographic. Take any tickling clip you want, and imagine that it was proven to have been downloaded by a high ranking government official. ABC decides to do a story on it. Assuming that time constrainsts aren't an issue, would they be able to air the clip uncensored in its entirety on network television? You see, the networks would judge such a clip strictly by whether or not the CONTENTS of it meet established criteria for standards of decency. They wouldn’t care if TMF members found it erotically stimulating.

Pornography should always be determined by its content, not how uncomfortable it makes certain people. A scene showing a nude woman masturbating is a good example of pornography. A scene showing Wilma Flintstone tickling the feet of her husband buried in sand at the beach is not.
 
Wow. Just... wow. :wow: Fifteen pages. Really? Fifteen pages dedicated to this? I mean, I started at page one and figured, "Hey, this can't go on that long... They must have struck new ground on the topic, gone off on a tangent or something..."

But no. Aside from a few dust-ups between the passionate on definitions of pornography and such, it's pretty much stayed on topic and is in the same place as it started.


Let me save you all the suspense on how this thing ends...

These are the fundamental realities you're going to hit again and again:


1. I know they're clichés, but true: Different strokes for different folks. Agree to disagree. Variety's the spice of life, people. Understand that, appreciate it.


2. You have the right to express yourself and your views, you have the right to disagree with some and find kinship in others, you have the right to be offended and express that, but in no country on Earth, nor on this website or any other, nor in any reality that I know of, will you ever be afforded the right of freedom from being offended.


3. Nothing's going to change with regard to this matter in terms of how this site is run. I think that's been made clear:

a. Instituting new labelling policies for users sharing content is a losing fight against the trends of diminishing returns for any rules beyond what they have already, and user carelessness with respect to even established rules, and it would just make more work for Mods. That's not gonna' fly.

b. Forbidding banner ads that may involve nudity ignores economic reality.​



Now, you can keep butting heads about how much you like chocolate alone or chocolate combined with peanut butter...

...you can keep working on what constitutes peanut butter, and quibble about "crunchy" versus "creamy" versus "smooth" versus whathaveyou...

...but it's not going to change the three points above, you'll wind up at the same place, and people will still eat what they like.

Now some are just here because they're passionate and have fun debating points, and that's cool too, but because it'll all wind up the same, please remember, it's not worth getting acrimonious.



Here's something I love:

I agree with you 110%!!!! It makes me sick how this forum is turning out! Tickling is tickling and Porn is porn! I can tell you this there are going to be some new videos made within the next year with REAL laughing and with NO PORN! REAL TICKLING FOR REAL TICKLE LOVERS. They will be made by two of our fellow forum members. There will be nothing fake in these videos. I just want to add this....I think it is great to know that other members feel the same way about tickling.

A bunch of people read this and got their shorts in a knot. But she has her views, and she's entitled to them. I'm guessing some chafe at the indirect suggestion that they're not "REAL TICKLE LOVERS", or the notion that what they like makes "ultimateticklee" sick...

Those are her views. Maybe she stated them in a less than diplomatic fashion. Maybe you disagree. Cope.

People, if you're here, feel free to find folks of similar interests and bond with them! Nobody requires you to do otherwise! Ultimateticklee, I hope you find more folks you can relate to, as I wish the same for all of you!



Here -- let me make it easier for you all to ID yourselves...

From "The Book of Mad", Ch. "Tickling should be porn free", Post #223:

"Verily I say unto thee, there shall descend from The Great Congregation of The TMF, Two Tribes."

And unto Tribe the First spake The Cap'n, "Thou shalt be called the 'Purists', for in thine own views and in keeping with thine own custom, Tickling, unalloyed by other pursuits or pleasures is among thy great Earthly joys and little shall sway ye from this thy path."

And unto Tribe the Second spake The Cap'n, "Thou shalt be called the 'Mixists', for in thine own views and in keeping with thine own custom, Tickling shalt not be limited to it's own pleasure alone, but welcomes others to join it, and this confluence is among thy great Earthly joys and little shall sway ye from this thy path."

And lo, there was a schism within each of the Two Tribes, and from Tribe the First there was born a small New Tribe.

And unto this New Tribe spake The Cap'n, "Thou shalt be called the 'Ultra-Purists', for in thine own views and in keeping with thine own custom, Tickling, unalloyed by other pursuits or pleasures, and forsaking even bondage, is among thy great Earthly joys and nothing shall sway ye from this thy path."

And from Tribe the Second there was born a yet another New Tribe.

And unto this New Tribe spake The Cap'n, "Thou shalt be called the 'Strixtly-Mix'dly', and it shall be a silly name, but you shant f@*king care, and in thine own views and in keeping with thine own custom, Tickling shalt never be limited to it's own pleasure alone, but demands others join it, and this confluence is among thy great Earthly joys and nothing shall sway ye from this thy path."

And The Cap'n said to all the Tribes, "Go forth, be fruitful and multiply... ...that is, if you're into that sort of thing." 😉

And The Cap'n saw that it was good... ...or at least tolerable for the time being. 😀


I love all you crazy people! Now be nice to each other! Peace! :bouncybou
 
Last edited:
Yes, then what? Sit down with your mom, fire up YouTube, and show her a video that the poster describes as "merciless tickling torture of my feet by my boyfriend." And explain to her what you like about a video that shows nothing but a pair of feet being tickled by a pair of hands. It should be an interesting conversation. Let us know how it goes.

okay. i did. FULL SCREEN. we just laughed and no doubtly unlike you

1) we didnt pay any attention to the title or description. hell my mom didnt notice and i didnt even notice until you told me it
2) i just simply told her 'nothing like tickle teasing that girl and making her giggle like the silly little girly she is.'
3) UNLIKE your ridiculous 'porn' it only lasted some few seconds. we just laughed and commented how silly the girl is and moved on.

and no my mom didnt think much of it. she does not have a tickle nor foot fetish bullshit and neither do i. you think you can do better than that?

doesnt faze me nor my mom. if you still think tickling is porn. you need to come up with a better story than that.
 
Last edited:
Redmage, I hope you don’t mind me playing devil’s advocate here. Without being disrespectful, I feel compelled to challenge the validity of your “porn test."I have collected many F/M clips posted by Terri-Tickle on AMT. These clips are of clothed guys (although some were shirtless) being tickled by fully clothed women. If I thought my mother, boss, or my son were at all interested, I’d watch any of those videos with them in a heartbeat. Why not? It’s just a girl tickling a guy. I may personally find it hot, but that doesn’t change what the video is, or how it would be viewed by the public at large. However, one of those F/M videos features a topless tickler. That particular one would make me uncomfortable, because it would introduce an element of pornography.

That’s not a valid criteria for pornography either. There are many things in which I would not wish to see a child participate that have nothing to do with sex. Consider the scene in Pulp Fiction in which John Travolta shoots heroin. If one was to replace his character with that of a child, I would find it considerably more disturbing. By the test you propose, that makes any scene involving the shooting of heroin a pornographic one.

There are many things we prefer to keep to ourselves, for a variety of reasons. Sometimes things like pride, envy, and jealousy make us reluctant to “explain our interest” in any particular venue. I submit that a reluctance to disclose personal feelings about a topic does not in itself qualify that topic as pornography.

That’s quite a leap there, Redmage. That any scene involving a child that would make us cringe….is about sex. I honestly can see no justification for such a blanket statement.

True. But is sexual content intrinsically so? Or is it considered sexual only based on people’s perceptions? If a color blind person looks at a green object and sees red, does that mean that since one person views it as red, the rest of us must also regard it so? Similarly, if a handful of people such as us regard tickling material as something that’s sexually stimulating, does that mean the rest of the world must regard tickling material as pornography, even if, as you say, the models are completely clothed and there’s not a vibrator in sight?

Here’s a much better test to determine if a particular video is pornographic. Take any tickling clip you want, and imagine that it was proven to have been downloaded by a high ranking government official. ABC decides to do a story on it. Assuming that time constrainsts aren't an issue, would they be able to air the clip uncensored in its entirety on network television? You see, the networks would judge such a clip strictly by whether or not the CONTENTS of it meet established criteria for standards of decency. They wouldn’t care if TMF members found it erotically stimulating.

Pornography should always be determined by its content, not how uncomfortable it makes certain people. A scene showing a nude woman masturbating is a good example of pornography. A scene showing Wilma Flintstone tickling the feet of her husband buried in sand at the beach is not.

CONCUR!

well said drew. so much for redmage's nonsensical inane test. some test. more like an excuse for his wood. i did exactly as his test said and it failed to prove that tickling is pornography.
 
Last edited:
What's New
11/14/25
Visit Door 44 for tickling clips of all types!

Door 44
Live Camgirls!
Live Camgirls
Streaming Videos
Pic of the Week
Pic of the Week
Congratulations to
*** brad1701 ***
The winner of our weekly Trivia, held every Sunday night at 11PM EST in our Chat Room
Top