amalelee4u
TMF Regular
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2006
- Messages
- 158
- Points
- 16
Lers and lees which kind of bondage do you prefer? Some people prefer a struggle. Some prefer zero resistance. I prefer total immobility. Soooo whats everyones opinion?
When I want a no-holds-barred, all out tickle-good-time, I love immobility!

When I want a no-holds-barred, all out tickle-good-time, I love immobility!
*Almost* total immobility - to be comfortable I'd need to be able to move my head a little, and I wouldn't want my ankles or wrists to hurt (assuming that that's where the restraints are placed). But the idea of being completely at the mercy of the tickler, unable to move out of the way, or to stop the tickling in any way, doubles (maybe more) the intensity of the tickling. If the tickler adds teasing banter assuring me that there's nothing I can do to make her (it has to be a her) stop, and that she has no plans to stop for many hours, at least until tomorrow sometime, if even then.... And if, when I beg her to stop, she just laughs and says that I've just turned tomorrow into the next day... And if, when I plead, "oh no, not there, that's much too sensitive!" she says, "oh yes, *there* is exactly where I need to be right now..." And if, come to think of it, she has a dozen sorority sisters who would just *love* to join in the fun, and guess what, they'll be here in five minutes.... Well, that's my fantasy.
I've never experienced complete immobility. I don't think I'd hate it, but it doesn't really appeal to me. I kind of like having a little bit of room to struggle. I'm not crazy about light bondage, either. I guess I'm a moderate bondage fan - all four limbs secured in one way or another, but none of this knee, thigh, waist, elbow, upper arm forehead kind of bondage. That's just not necessary for me. The only exception is toe ties. I have a major love/hate relationship with that glorious bullshit. Above all it needs to be comfortable.