For me, ticklishness outweighs looks. This is also why I personally feel my interest in tickling is an unhealthy curse of sorts. It doesn't matter how beautiful a woman is (inside or out), if she isn't ticklish I have zero interest. There's just something wrong with that in my opinion, but that's how I'm wired unfortunately. There are many other aspects that I look for in a woman, but not being ticklish is unfortunately an absolute deal breaker.
But to answer the question of the post, it should come as no surprise I've rather have a 7 on the looks scale and a 8 on the ticklish scale. I'd definitely take a 5/10 over 10/5.
As a woman, I notice that questions such as these are usually geared towards male lers and their perception of attractiveness to ticklishness and vice verse in regards to women. However, I have not seen any questions that address this issue from a lee's perspective. Meaning could a lee's ticklishness or willingness to be tickled by a ler relate to how attractive the lee may find the ler to be?
As a woman, I notice that questions such as these are usually geared towards male lers and their perception of attractiveness to ticklishness and vice verse in regards to women. However, I have not seen any questions that address this issue from a lee's perspective. Meaning could a lee's ticklishness or willingness to be tickled by a ler relate to how attractive the lee may find the ler to be?
If a man treats a woman as an object, that's not going to be too attractive to most women...unless the guy is hella attractive physically.
On the other hand, if a woman feel safe with you and comfortable; if she thinks that you are into her as a person; if it feels good to her to hang out with you or otherwise be with you...I think that can count as an attraction...even if it is not totally a sexual one or one based on sex.
I think a willingness to be ticklish or be tickled does relate to how attractive the lee may find her ler to be. If a lee doesn't like you, probably he or she is not going to let themselves be tickled by you.
...I have not seen any questions that address this issue from a lee's perspective.
Indeed. There is certainly no reason why there shouldn't be a 'tickling ability vs. physical attractiveness of ler' thread. And what a shame one could not make participation compulsory for those who have adopted a slightly sanctimonious tone in this thread. So they would have to say either (a) "Ok, the (physical) attractiveness/unattractiveness of my ler does matter to some degree and here's my attempt to quantify its importance" (which, of course, would make them TREMENDOUS hypocrites), or (b) "I really don't care what my ler looks like because looks aren't important" (which is such an outrageous claim that no one could possibly believe it).
I have had a lee reject playing with me because I am a man of size... It didn't feel good at all... I always try to make people feel good about themselves, and as far as tickling goes, when I was still switching I wouldn't have cared what my ler looked like... But now I am a ler I just want to tickle the ticklish!!!!