My 2 cents
I have no idea what's happened to Tickle Central - but if
this is more than just gossip, it's probably nothing to do with piracy. Who knows
😛
It really is! What we did is we took the fight back and started exposing people and suing them. Just about everyone chose to settle rather than go to court over it. It sends a message and I would hope more producers start taking a more pro-active approach to that issue.
Bottom line, if people are unwilling to pay, why do it at all? The community at large will just end up screwing themselves at that rate and perhaps thats exactly what needs to happen.
Sorry Darth, but the reason more businesses don't use that tactic is that it has
virtually zero effect on piracy and in niche markets alienates your already small customer base (many of your legal customers are very possibly the same people who download files too *shock horror*). I've been in similar situations myself and have no desire to make your problem worse ...so I'm not going to go into methods, but its trivial to find tens of sources of hundreds of
recent clips, with minimal effort and often accidentally. If you can change that you might get somewhere, but you won't and cannot do it by suing people - it's quite simply a technical, not a legal, issue and a consequence of dealing with digital goods in a global marketplace. That's not defeatism - it's the reality for anyone who trades in bits and bytes online.
On the subject of settlement shakedown letters, that practise requires huge wilful or actual ignorance to be considered "taking the fight back". Frankly, it's an irresponsible intimidation tactic offered by shady law firms who know they'd get very possibly get nowhere in actual court, but they know they can bypass due process and milk people who don't know better. Let's put aside the guys who aren't from the US or subject to your legal system, or the guys who know how to obfuscate and spoof their connection who are entirely out of your reach (ie. the blackhats who raid clips4sale stores and membership sites and are the root of the actual problem) - because if you are throwing legal threats around these
aren't the guys you are targetting.
Whether you do the work yourself or employ the services of a company to do it for you - there is no reliable way of identifying an individual from an ip address. You are reliant upon chasing down internet account holders, which if tickle clip piracy is like video game, movie, music or any other variety that I am familiar with (I suspect it is) it means you are going to end up issuing bully boy legalese letters to a load of kids and teenagers exploring their sexuality, confused parents/partners who have no idea what their kids/other half are up to, people who have had their wireless tapped and people who wouldn't have paid for your stuff anyway - not the blackhats and internet savvy people described in the previous paragraph.
Over the years I have seen you post and in what little correspondence we have had you have seemed like a person motivated by minimising potential personal losses caused by the apparent moral shortcomings of others, but no amount of rationalising is going to make crudely "exposing people and suing them" in a scattershot fashion a good or ethical business practise. You can't maintain the "anti-piracy" moral high ground, whilst ignoring that an
ip address is not a person and acting such that if innocent people are collateral damage - so be it.
Anyway, it's late but I thought I'd play devil's advocate on this subject a little
🙂