The Last Laugh
3rd Level Green Feather
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2001
- Messages
- 4,582
- Points
- 38
Hello everyone,
I'd like to know what you think is the best type of group to use for posting pictures. I mean groups like Yahoo Groups, Geocities, Imagestation, etc. People seem to complain a lot about many of the better known ones. Are there any that actually offer a good service?
A few months ago someone offered to post some of my pictures on his Yahoo group. A kind gesture, but unfortunately, while it was in no way this person's fault, I wasn't happy with the results. It seems Yahoo modifies the pictures when they're of a certain size. Mine were 320x240. When viewed on the group the pictures were a little smaller than the original. I mean a bad resizing job, so that they looked distorted and grainy. However, for some strange reason, when they were downloaded and viewed on a hard drive, they were actually a little larger than the originals, which made them look better than the small versions, but still not as good as the originals, since they were a tad blown up and looked fuzzy. No idea why Yahoo Groups handles pics in such a way. I was told that it might be due to the same of my pics, which were smaller than they should have been. That's entirely possible, but it doesn't make any sense to me. I mean, why would a free group have a problem with pictures being too small? How can they be too small? Anyway, I was quite displeased with what Yahoo was doing to my pictures. So the picture posting "project" was ditched.
I don't know the various types of groups very well and have no idea which I should use if I ever need to post some pictures. It would have to free, of course, provide a fair amount of disc space and, maybe even more important, accept a good deal of bandwidth use. It also should be tolerant when it comes to content. My material is very mild, but some people are so close-minded, you know. I wouldn't want a group that deletes my stuff for no good reason.
Besides that, browsing a bunch of pics should be easy for visitors. It would be neat if thumbnails were available (do all such groups have them?) Also, I personally find it really annoying when you click on a thumbnail to access a picture, only to have it open a new window with a larger but non-full-sized version of the pic which requires you to click on it or on a link to get the full-sized version. Why not link the thumbnails directly to the full-sized versions? Of course, those larger versions should appear at the same size and resolution as the originals.
I realize I seem to be asking for a lot, but I'm just describing an ideal type of group. It doesn't really have to be perfect. But it really shouldn't feature major annoyances like that stupid resizing thing I described earlier.
Besides pictures, I'd also like to know what group types are good for larger files for free, like clips or whatever.
Any suggestions are welcome. Thank you.
I'd like to know what you think is the best type of group to use for posting pictures. I mean groups like Yahoo Groups, Geocities, Imagestation, etc. People seem to complain a lot about many of the better known ones. Are there any that actually offer a good service?
A few months ago someone offered to post some of my pictures on his Yahoo group. A kind gesture, but unfortunately, while it was in no way this person's fault, I wasn't happy with the results. It seems Yahoo modifies the pictures when they're of a certain size. Mine were 320x240. When viewed on the group the pictures were a little smaller than the original. I mean a bad resizing job, so that they looked distorted and grainy. However, for some strange reason, when they were downloaded and viewed on a hard drive, they were actually a little larger than the originals, which made them look better than the small versions, but still not as good as the originals, since they were a tad blown up and looked fuzzy. No idea why Yahoo Groups handles pics in such a way. I was told that it might be due to the same of my pics, which were smaller than they should have been. That's entirely possible, but it doesn't make any sense to me. I mean, why would a free group have a problem with pictures being too small? How can they be too small? Anyway, I was quite displeased with what Yahoo was doing to my pictures. So the picture posting "project" was ditched.
I don't know the various types of groups very well and have no idea which I should use if I ever need to post some pictures. It would have to free, of course, provide a fair amount of disc space and, maybe even more important, accept a good deal of bandwidth use. It also should be tolerant when it comes to content. My material is very mild, but some people are so close-minded, you know. I wouldn't want a group that deletes my stuff for no good reason.
Besides that, browsing a bunch of pics should be easy for visitors. It would be neat if thumbnails were available (do all such groups have them?) Also, I personally find it really annoying when you click on a thumbnail to access a picture, only to have it open a new window with a larger but non-full-sized version of the pic which requires you to click on it or on a link to get the full-sized version. Why not link the thumbnails directly to the full-sized versions? Of course, those larger versions should appear at the same size and resolution as the originals.
I realize I seem to be asking for a lot, but I'm just describing an ideal type of group. It doesn't really have to be perfect. But it really shouldn't feature major annoyances like that stupid resizing thing I described earlier.
Besides pictures, I'd also like to know what group types are good for larger files for free, like clips or whatever.
Any suggestions are welcome. Thank you.




