TICKLERBOY123
TMF Regular
- Joined
- May 16, 2001
- Messages
- 177
- Points
- 0
Okay - this post is going to contain a word that is not aloud on this forum. But please bare with me.
If you go to the Yahoo clubs search area - go to yahoo.com and click on clubs - and type into the search engine words such as tickling girls, or tickling teens, you will find that there are at least a dozen clubs featuring oiginal pictures of young girls and young boys being tickled. Now personally i do not really like this. I think it is verging on the boundary to being paedophillic. Yet, it exists. So i ask this forum one question. If yahoo.com can host club pages with titles such as "ticklingteengirls" and adverise these clubs as "being the definitive source for all tickling pictures of girls aged 12-17£, then why can't the tickling forum even mention the words "underage", "minor" "children" etc. in relation to tickling.
Surely like yahoo - no one person is responsible for the content of these pages and if some silly woman - usually a fat ugly american who lost both her children in some sort of freak accident and feels she must rectify the situation by making the world a "better place" - if some silly woman decides that we a violating the innocence of childhood by even talking about young people in the context of tickling then we can tell her to f**k off and that we are entitled to free speech. And if some authority threatens us - we point them in the direction of yahoo.com and say start there!- or else we simply surreptitiously remove it!!!
We i don;t know f my ramblings have made sense- but i am infuriated!!!
If you go to the Yahoo clubs search area - go to yahoo.com and click on clubs - and type into the search engine words such as tickling girls, or tickling teens, you will find that there are at least a dozen clubs featuring oiginal pictures of young girls and young boys being tickled. Now personally i do not really like this. I think it is verging on the boundary to being paedophillic. Yet, it exists. So i ask this forum one question. If yahoo.com can host club pages with titles such as "ticklingteengirls" and adverise these clubs as "being the definitive source for all tickling pictures of girls aged 12-17£, then why can't the tickling forum even mention the words "underage", "minor" "children" etc. in relation to tickling.
Surely like yahoo - no one person is responsible for the content of these pages and if some silly woman - usually a fat ugly american who lost both her children in some sort of freak accident and feels she must rectify the situation by making the world a "better place" - if some silly woman decides that we a violating the innocence of childhood by even talking about young people in the context of tickling then we can tell her to f**k off and that we are entitled to free speech. And if some authority threatens us - we point them in the direction of yahoo.com and say start there!- or else we simply surreptitiously remove it!!!
We i don;t know f my ramblings have made sense- but i am infuriated!!!