• If you would like to get your account Verified, read this thread
  • The TMF is sponsored by Clips4sale - By supporting them, you're supporting us.
  • >>> If you cannot get into your account email me at [email protected] <<<
    Don't forget to include your username

Which One Does It For You?

MercilessOne

Registered User
Joined
Apr 16, 2001
Messages
48
Points
0
OK! Here's a question for all "ticklers" out there. What gives you a bigger rush, tickling a person who is consensual or a person who is non-consensual? I have found both to be exciting but my vote swings toward non-consensual because how else are you going to get a non-consensual person to go the other way? I love the desperate begging! Yes. The floor is open and go easy on the moral lectures. Just kidding!!!

MO
 
Well ...

Most of my stories are nonconsensual. But for real life, I'd go with consensual. Forcing someone to do something they don't want isn't my bag.
 
Consentual is the way to go, yo.......

Well.........I've found that in life, you'll have more fun, and you'll have more chances to tickle, if your victims are consentual. That way, it's more likely that they'll come back for more......and while I'm at it, about the chat room, let me just remind everyone that you should act the same in there as you do in real life (I mean, would you just walk up to someone you don't know, and tie them down and tickle them?). Consentual is the only way that really works in real life, unless you count those little rib poking attacks as non consentual (those can be fun). Well, I've said enought for now, I'll see you guys around. Later........
 

Attachments

  • 5048.jpg
    5048.jpg
    30.7 KB · Views: 22
Better?

Most (95%) of my encounters are consentual, and knowing my ticklee is enjoying the situation plays a big part in my enjoyment.....

However....

Playing in the bondage and D/S worlds has often afforded me the chance to tickle people in what is basically a nonconsentual situation without any worries of legal problems (a bound slave offered by their Master for my amusement, to use as I will). And there is indeed a big kick in working over someone who clearly doesn't want it, and doesn't like it.

Big plusses in both types, like apples and oranges though. I wouldn't want to choose.
 
I'd much rather tickle a girl who enjoyed it, especially one who wanted to tickle back. In the realm of fantasy, I enjoy non-consensual as much as the next guy (and in fact, all but one of the stories I've written falls under that heading). But in real life, I don't think I'd have the stomach to full-out tickle torture someone I knew hated it.
 
To consent, or not to consent- that is the question!

This is the murkiest of gray areas within the realms of ticklish delights (and s/m as well)... and it gets wider and deeper every day. Nice though to see some intellgent, well thought out posts on the subject,from both sides: playful AND s/m areas... and not attacks.

(Takes deep breath)...ahhhh... Nice, clean air. Yummy!

Heres some food for thought....

There's so many variations on it. If you have a sleep-over, and there's a foot poking out of a blanket, and you laugingly give it a tickle.. and everyone laughs.. that qualifies to some degree as non consensual, right? But I doubt you've emotionally harmed anyone unless they're off their Prozaac. Just like burying a friend at the beach and tickling, or even tossing a friend into the pool at summer- where was the consent? BUT take away those elements of "loss of control" and surprise...and the fun's gone! I feel the same about tickling (not all the time, but some times)

Do I take it too serious? I dunno. Not really. Just another level. I try to make more out of it because it's limited in so many ways: you ticle- they laugh and scream. The surprise is over because they know its going to be a "tickle thing" now, and they know exactly how they're going to feel and react- and some can even turn it off at that point!

Not that other styles aren't fun at times- but being into a deeper level of it for many years, I myself prefer the more torturous version. Which one can only get from a more unsuspecting victim. And THATS the gray area! Unlike rumors passed about me, I do NOT mean people that are tricked by falling thru a trap door outside my home, or those who are grabbed out of parking lots at faires. And I certainly do not use a baseball bat to club them behind the head either- not with the price of wood these days at least.

No, what I mean is a person who may be into the realm of s/m and bondage- but not really aware of the tickling world or that tickling may be a part of it...and may not even want tickling: it's the last thing on their mind. Subs are great because they expect to recieve torture, yet do not ask the what's and the how's which would ruin it a tad. Also, they simply take bondage better than most ticklees I know other than Ticklegal. For a demo or a party, seldom do we choose from the usual tickling world (there are some exceptions, Josie and Adam come to mind) because those calling themselves "ticklees" tend to "want it" and even ask for it... sometimes they fall into the "koochy-koochy-koo" types of play that really wouldnlt mesh with what we have in mind. Just imagine any Inquisition or Palace torture victim saying to the tormentor "please sir, can I have some more???"... naw, that takes the edge off it as far as it being a torture.

Torture is defined as "pain or torment inflicted against one's will, usually that person being restrained".

Ipso-facto, "tickling torture" must have some element of non-consent or it doesn't qualify really as torture... not if you're asking for it and the one in control of it.

KUJparty.jpg



The above type described playstyle can lead to a HOT scene, and great (but safe!) reactions of real panic and real begging (the kind every tickler really wishes to see secretly) like this the above pic from our events.... yet, actually, it was very consentual- just not expected.

Now if the bottom has total control over the scene, via safewords or simply stopping every second for something- then where's the realism and who's actually controlling it? The tormentor or the tormentee?? Therefor, in my humble opinion, an unsuspecting victim or non consensual one (to some degree) provides the most honest reaction (not putting it on or embellishing for the ticklers watching) and the most fun.

Of course thats in an ideal situation. Everyone needs to go their own way and abide by what makes them fly high...limits and so forth. If playful is your way- and it is for us too at times depending on who we're playing with- then by all means explore it! Actually I suggest people try BOTH sides of the coin! You may be happily surprised.

Remember to have trust first! A good top watches...and knows when is enough...w/o having to be told!
 
Well! I for one am honored to see a reply from the one and only Kujman. And thank you Sir for the fantastic added photograph. Thank you Kuj you are the Tickle Master.

MO
 
questionable

Although the problem at hand may seem one unique, if you break it down to its most primal pattern, it is comparable to most other problems. Sure the pull of "the Dark side" will always be there; we all have the ability and the inclination to be evil, but within the design of society today the path from evil thoughts to evil actions is long and barely traveled. Everyone has given thought to the idea that he or she could do something evil. Few ever commit to those thoughts. Which brings the idea of tickling a person non-consensual as one that will be explored in great detail through story and thought, but rarely ever in action.

But there arises a conflict in the idea of consenting and non-consenting, that being, what is the rule that divides the two? Example. In high school a lady friend of mine and I would often poke each other occasionally, such as in math or so when one would sit behind each other. We never really gave each other permission to, but because we continued to throughout the year, did that qualify us consensual or non-consensual?

Example. That same friend was sitting on my lap at a party (as part of a game). The game had slowed and she announced to the rest of us that if something didn't happen soon, she would fall asleep. She started counting down, and when she reached one, I decided something had to happen and started tickling her sides😱, making her laugh and squirm. My arms were hugging her stomach so she couldn't go anywhere but the tickling didn't last for more than a couple seconds.
Now, if the previous poking we'd exchanged before in school had been considered consensual since we both expected it, did this more aggressive tickling fall under the category consensual since the poking made a precedent of what to expect between us, or did the poking only qualify consensual poking between us and not an extended side tickling?

Unfortunately our relationship never had us tie each other down and tickle the daylights out of each other 🙁, and this is what I think really matters when we talk about consensual and non-consensual tickling. Tickling has much less weight on the matter since it isn't so serious, as in my relationship with that girl where we were just friends. But tickle torture is where this discussion is really concerned since it usually is connected with a serious relationship (with consensual) or fantasy (non-consensual).

Which leads into the last question. I cannot speak for everyone here about the matter, but my view is that Tickling is to me as sex is to the average American. Therefore, is non-consensual tickling the equivalent of rape? (Sex:Consensual Tickle Torture::Rape:Nonconsensual Tickle Torture?)

I'd really enjoy hearing everyone's opinions on the matters I've talked about.
 
Well Tickle_Type I guess if you view tickling as sex then yes non consensual would be rape in a sense. I think non consensual falls more in the catagory of assult. The same as if you grabbed someone and started battering them about the head and face. While coming up to someone you know and playfully hugging them or patting them on the back would be consensual. I have tickled non consensually BUT NEVER with someone I didn't know. Now I will say this and I'm sure a lot of ticklers will agree. If I came upon a Woman buried in sand on a beach with feet exposed, or a Woman in traction or a body cast with again feet exposed, or a Woman in stocks, or like the girl whose feet were stuck in a picket fence when I was 7 years old. If I came upon these people and didn't have a clue who they were and I'm 1 on 1 with them? I'm tickling baby. All out tickle torture.It would be too tempting. And you know they'd go nuts. The traction scenario is a big thing with me. I know a girl I went to high school with that's a Nurse in an Orthopedic hospital that has admitted tickling the feet of traction patients that were pains in rear. She would tell them it was to test their reflexes. I told her I'd pay to come and watch but you know how hospitals are. I guess everybody has their own interpretations of what consensual and non consensual are and that's what makes tickling great.I just received an e-mail from a Gal in Texas who I e-mailed a story to involving her and her cousin tickling two guys and being revenge tickled. She said I could tickle her anytime and anywhere. I guess taht would be consensual. It's in the planning stages though so if it happens great, if not oh well!

MO



😎 😎
 

Attachments

  • DSCN3899.JPG
    DSCN3899.JPG
    3 MB · Views: 492
  • IMG_20221215_171028_1~2.jpg
    IMG_20221215_171028_1~2.jpg
    313.5 KB · Views: 23
i prefer consenual, but with roleplaying where it may seem as though it isnt consenual, but it really is..does that make sense??
 
This is exactly why I prefer to be the ler! I have never been restrained before. I've been curious about it, but have concerns about being that much out of control. That would make it a non consensual experience for me whether I consented to it or not.

I hope that doesn't sound wierd, but that's why I never agreed to it even though I'm very curious. One day I'll get the nerve, but just not right now :wow: .
 
TicklishSinner said:
i prefer consenual, but with roleplaying where it may seem as though it isnt consenual, but it really is..does that make sense??


Glad I read the whole thread cause that was exactly what I was gonna say LOL Basicly just roll play the non consent...thats what gets me goin!
 
kis123 said:
This is exactly why I prefer to be the ler! I have never been restrained before. I've been curious about it, but have concerns about being that much out of control. That would make it a non consensual experience for me whether I consented to it or not.

I hope that doesn't sound wierd, but that's why I never agreed to it even though I'm very curious. One day I'll get the nerve, but just not right now :wow: .

doesn’t sound weird to me! but, strangely enough, that panic is a big part of the attraction for me. it makes everything in me want to run for the hills… but I don’t want to be able to stop it once it starts. and the second it does stop… I wish it hadn’t.

guess that’s what makes you a ‘ler and me (mostly) a ‘lee, huh? lol

so… I guess my answer is that consensual has enough of that non-consensual ‘feel’ to it for me.
 
Good point, and I'm sure you're not alone in that view...

kis123 said:
This is exactly why I prefer to be the ler! I have never been restrained before. I've been curious about it, but have concerns about being that much out of control. That would make it a non consensual experience for me whether I consented to it or not.

I hope that doesn't sound wierd, but that's why I never agreed to it even though I'm very curious. One day I'll get the nerve, but just not right now :wow: .
I used to feel the same way, but as you get to know the folks in the community, they get to feeling like extended family, and with that comes the absolute trust in some who you'd be comfortable letting them restrain and get you. I've tried it, and it doesn't suck, lemme tell ya. But everybody is different. Those of you familiar with "Head Space" already know where I'm going with this... for instance, with me, I *can* be tickled, but when I'm restrained, it goes away. Or at least it has the few times I've tried it. But that's bondage-restraint. Apparently, somewhere in the dusty corners of my brain, there's a distinction between being tied up and being held down, because the one time I got jumped by several gals at a Gathering, I got the bejabbers tickled outta me. Still restrained, but different. I dunno. Go figure. When I'm tied up, it just *goes away*. I don't pretend to understand it. But you're never gonna try it at all until you've got that sense of comfort and safety. Which I highly recommend. 😉


As for myself, I've done a little bit of each, non-con and willing. 🙄 There's appeal to both. But I have to say that I get a bigger kick out of it (sometimes literally, if I'm not careful) when it's someone who WANTS to play. There's something really cool about tickling someone who loves to be tickled. The joy of sharing the experience is a great high. So I vote for mutual, consentual, tickling. Yum!
 
chrisheaven said:
consensual I find is better- and less likely to get one in trouble!

chris...how in the WORLD did you resurrect a 3 year old thread??? LOLOL sweet lord....i saw a reply there from kujman and thought, what hes back????? then i saw the dates and said come on.....
 
Evil Personified

Non-consensual, hands down...I just LOVE seeing the horrified look in their eyes, their trembling all over, choppy breathing, hysterical laughter. The "Please! Oh, no, oh, pleeease Noooo!".

I got a one-way ticket to Hell, don't I? 😉
 
I think I need a cold shower after reading that, MsDiva! 😀 :woot:
 
Re: Evil Personified

MsDivaNYC said:
Non-consensual, hands down...I just LOVE seeing the horrified look in their eyes, their trembling all over, choppy breathing, hysterical laughter. The "Please! Oh, no, oh, pleeease Noooo!".

I got a one-way ticket to Hell, don't I? 😉

*kis makes personal note in journal*

Never, ever have a tickling session with MsDiva! But would be glad to observe and glean tickle tips from a master!:devil:
 
Non-consensual is a good fantasy, but in real life it doesn't end up being as good as you'd think. Videos like TC's where Priss tickled the living crap out of a friend of hers after tying her up on the pretext of taking photos, show rare examples of someone actually sating their tickling urge in a noncon situation.

With a non-con the chances of it going any real length of time are much lower. As for the begging, well you get plenty of that out of a consensual victim if you try hard enough.

Situations like Myriads describes would be seriously cool for most of us evil lers, but comparitively rare, even given the rarity of real tickling encounters.

KJ also brings up a similar point to Myr which is pertinent. As it says in Michael Moran's book Erotic Tickling, there are those in the BDSM scene who you can flog, nipple-clamp and electrcute through the genitalia for hours and they just grin and look cheesy; but start tickling and they're screaming for mercy in three seconds flat.

Personally I think an unsuspecting and quasi-noncon victim such as Myr and KayJay have tickled in the past would be my favourite too. I'll write a letter to Santa right away asking for it. Failing that I'll write one to the Sandman and ask him if he can make me dream it. lol
 
What's New
5/9/25
Do you remember what it felt like to first find us here? Share your memory in the Tickling Discussion Forum!
Door 44
Live Camgirls!
Live Camgirls
Streaming Videos
Pic of the Week
Pic of the Week
Congratulations to
*** brad11701 ***
The winner of our weekly Trivia, held every Sunday night at 11PM EST in our Chat Room
Back
Top