US Code Title 18 Definition of child pornography...
(8) “child pornography” means any visual depiction, including any photograph, film, video, picture, or computer or computer-generated image or picture, whether made or produced by electronic, mechanical, or other means, of sexually explicit conduct, where—
(A) the production of such visual depiction involves the
use of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct;
(B) such visual depiction is a digital image, computer image, or computer-generated image that is, or is
indistinguishable from, that of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct; or
(C) such visual depiction has been created, adapted,
or modified to appear that an identifiable minor is engaging in sexually explicit conduct.
(9) “identifiable minor”—
(A) means a
person—
(i)
(I) who was a minor at the time the visual depiction was created, adapted, or modified; or
(II) whose image as a minor was used in creating, adapting, or modifying the visual depiction; and
(ii)
who is recognizable as an actual person by the person’s face, likeness, or other distinguishing characteristic, such as a unique birthmark or other recognizable feature; and
(B) shall not be construed to require proof of the actual identity of the identifiable minor.
The picture in question is a cartoon.....It does not in any way depict a "person"...It does not fall under the legal definition of child pornography under US statutes...
The Rules here on the forum were created by the admins. If they choose to make an occasional exception to their own rules you can whine all you want but it means nothing.
I noticed that your myspace rant has been removed.....page deleted....and your thread at tickletheater has also been deleted.....
Seems no one really cares what you think because your argument has no substance in the world....real or internet.....
Have a nice day......
