OK, here's where I put on my scientist hat. I think I've mentioned before that I used to work in a drug-testing lab. So when I read this report on Benoit my first thought was "that's the problem with trying to discuss science in a newspaper." It's almost impossible to do it without simplifying the results so much that misperceptions like this creep in. To really explain this needs more technical information.kis123 said:He had 10 (that's ten) times the theraputic dose of STEROIDS in his system. Whether or not it's the smoking gun, I certainly suspect it was a catalyst along with the anti depressants and other drugs in his system.
See, no one bothers just measuring testosterone levels by themselves when they're trying to detect steroid use. A man's body produces testosterone naturally, and it's indistinguishable from the stuff they inject. Just to complicate the picture further there really isn't a "normal" level of testosterone in men. There is a normal RANGE into which almost all men fall, but it's fairly broad.
So what they do instead is measure two things: testosterone and another natural steroid called epitestosterone (T and epi-T for short). Epi-T is a byproduct of the same metabolism that produces T, so when an athlete takes artificial T the ratio of T to epi-T in his blood goes up. It's that ratio that gets measured and reported to establish that he's been doping.
Even so, the T/epi-T ratio varies from man to man. The AVERAGE ratio is 1 to 1, but for example my own personal T/epi-T ratio is 4.5 to 1 - well above average but still within the normal range of variation. And I've never used anabolic steroids in my life.
Because of all this scientists who do this sort of testing don't feel that there's evidence of doping unless an athlete's T/epi-T ratio is greater that 6 to 1, because very, very few men have a ratio that high naturally.
I would bet a large amount of money that the news report that Benoit's T- level is "10 times normal" was based on a measured T/epi-T ratio of 10 to 1. That is 10 times higher than the AVERAGE ratio, but it's only a little more than twice mine, and only about 60% higher than the upper end of the normal range. It's still solid evidence that Benoit was doping (which surprises no one I'm sure), but it looks a lot less sensational when you understand it than it does when a reporter simplifies it down to "10 times normal" and leaves it at that.
As for whether it played a role in Benoit's death, there's just nothing to indicate that. You can suspect it was a "catalyst," but that doesn't really mean anything without some rational connection between Benoit's behavior and the way steroids are alleged to make people behave. We don't have that.
If it truly didn't make any difference then they wouldn't have done the tests. It can't bring them back but there's value in understanding what might or might not have caused this.What difference does it really make-steroids, anti-depressants, whatever drugs were in his system? He killed his wife and son, then the miserable SOB killed himself! All the speculation in the world won't bring any of them back, will it?????