MDTickling
Guest
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2012
- Messages
- 26
- Points
- 0
Removed
Removed
Removed
Last edited:
You know that thread, where the OP asked, "Why aren't there more women on the Forum?"...
I don't see a point in arguing with someone whose sig points out that they are biased against larger people, he, and others like him (and I'm assuming it's a him from the joke), are not going to change their views on this matter, which is a shame really, because they are everything that is wrong with this fetish.
That's right, advocates of non consensual tickling, you are a disgrace.
That's casting kind of a wide net. Not all of those who find the idea or the fantasy of non-con are like that. The undeniably brilliant C.A.B. is a case in point. A huge part of his art is non-consensual. But it's fantasy.
Kinda like those old scary movies where the theatre made people sign a release, in case of "Death from Fright?"Thank you, Sir. I always advise to keep fantasy between your ears. Its pretty obvious to most that when a person is accosted against their will, it is, without question, outright assault. So play safe and sane and consensual.
On another note, if one wanted to market a video or upcoming videos with a big controversial splash to create buzz, one can claim all the non-con they want. Then, with a wink and a smile, and arm-in-arm with the 'fully consensual models', laugh all the way to the bank.
Like I said, folks. P. T. Barnum said it best.
<---- Bingo! GIVE that man a Kewpie Doll!Kinda like those old scary movies where the theatre made people sign a release, in case of "Death from Fright?"
I could care less, I'll get him to send me the video via PM if it bothers you so much.Wow....you're a negative nancy if you respect other people's boundaries! You know, people who actually support something like this should be tied down themselves and then have something done to them that they don't like! Just to show them how it feels!
I could care less
I could care less, I'll get him to send me the video via PM if it bothers you so much.
Right. I know we're in danger of slipping down another non-con rabbit hole, here; but I'm generally a conformist within my non-conformity, so I'll chime in with a couple of points.I think if it needs to be said publicly, yes. I think 99.9% of the tickle fetish and BDSM community does NOT condone, and condemns in the strongest measure, real-life non-consensual assault. In my 30+ years active in both communities, very rarely have I ever suspected a whackadoo condoning it for real. Those folks usually end up having a long lunch with the FBI. Victim pressing charges or no.
Let me go ahead and clarify that in no way, shape, or form do I condone the unwanted physical assault of anybody, especially child or female. This is borderline rape, yes? And the consequences of such actions will often warrant jail and prison time. The thread starter pointed out that the girl was pissed off, and he had to pay her to be quiet. Fucked up.Wow...that says a lot right there.
The thread starter pointed out that the girl was pissed off, and he had to pay her to be quiet. Fucked up.
Right. I know we're in danger of slipping down another non-con rabbit hole, here; but I'm generally a conformist within my non-conformity, so I'll chime in with a couple of points.
1: I think a lot of us have a great to desire to not want to seem weird, so when someone starts trumpeting things that are totally unacceptable within the general "don't hurt others" aspect of the social contract, it's annoying, and even a bit threatening. It's bad enough feeling like a freak, sometimes; the last thing you want is to get lumped in with these clowns.
2: I think the most vocal advocates of genuine non-consensual behavior get off just as much on playing that role, and shocking the other members, as they do on the non-consensual scenarios.
Agreed. Just as ( and forgive me if I'm mistaken,) Paradise Vision promoted their 'non-con' videos some years back, I think our resident sage, the lovely and talented Rhianon, put it best in this paraphrase, "Only a FOOL would actively advertise that he has committed a real-life felony." Which brings us back to Thomas Harris. We forked over our cash in droves to see if Hannibal Lecter would gourmand on the flesh of a census-taker with a nice Chianti... but he didn't, and never will. Because its make-believe.
tsk tsk tsk LOL! I fear that would grievously move us way 'off topic' on this silly thread, Wolf. Let's be polite and sit back and watch what others have to say.Although it must be said that Brian Cox was the original Hannibal Lecter, and far better than Sir Anthony. There. Maybe that'll start some conflict.