Actually that is *also the point.
I'm responding to the topic -- just what you mentioned, "tickle torture."
And the statement you made previously that "you don't care" whether you're viewing real distress as opposed to someone willing.
When you're discussing "pure tickle hell," "brutal tickle torture... without mercy..." there DOES need to be a statement clarifying you're not looking for "abuse,"
and you do finally separate that later --
But don't write that you don't care and then wonder why someone like me protests.
This thread began with a request for REAL tickle torture,
which is written as a literal request similar to what you refer to,
which has been argued from both sides in terms of
(whether that literal abuse was what was asked for)
and several responses towards the beginning especially seemed to support that request, literally, disturbingly.
so when you write of "no mercy, women tickled brutally, hell," (earlier post) and "not caring,"
and having personally enjoyed having your "limits" ignored against your will,
it's perfectly reasonable for me to respond with the statement
that we DO NEED to be careful with what we ask for,
with what's produced,
or how models are treated; that they're NOT subject to literal abuse,
and that if they are, that's not acceptable
All I said otherwise was -- if the model REALLY knows what s/he is in for,
fully informed, safeguarded & willing, THEN that request is valid.
We need to be careful and responsible with these requests.
Dandy Jack said:Personally I don't care how the video is obtained with consent or without, nor is it my business... I just know that I love to see a extremely ticklish female being tickled without mercy. I love the sounds the expressions and the memory of seeing it live.
I also can remember being jumped by girls as a child held down and being tickled way past my limits.
It helped me to love tickling so much that to me it's one of the best parts of being on earth.
Dandy Jack
Dandy Jack said:Why assume that the tickling experience is all bad. Maybe for some it is. However I thought that we were talking about seeing a video of someone being tickle tortured.
It's the video I want to see... if i stipulate to all of your comments... then the bottom line is i want to see and pay for videos that have models, or real people really in tickle hell. It is my choice of what I would like to see.
I don't have to know how a video is made to pay and view it. I assume that people are not breaking any laws when making them.
Most of the comments about people being abused is not what I am addressing. That is the subject for another tread.
Dandy Jack
I'm responding to the topic -- just what you mentioned, "tickle torture."
And the statement you made previously that "you don't care" whether you're viewing real distress as opposed to someone willing.
When you're discussing "pure tickle hell," "brutal tickle torture... without mercy..." there DOES need to be a statement clarifying you're not looking for "abuse,"
and you do finally separate that later --
But don't write that you don't care and then wonder why someone like me protests.
This thread began with a request for REAL tickle torture,
which is written as a literal request similar to what you refer to,
which has been argued from both sides in terms of
(whether that literal abuse was what was asked for)
and several responses towards the beginning especially seemed to support that request, literally, disturbingly.
so when you write of "no mercy, women tickled brutally, hell," (earlier post) and "not caring,"
and having personally enjoyed having your "limits" ignored against your will,
it's perfectly reasonable for me to respond with the statement
that we DO NEED to be careful with what we ask for,
with what's produced,
or how models are treated; that they're NOT subject to literal abuse,
and that if they are, that's not acceptable
All I said otherwise was -- if the model REALLY knows what s/he is in for,
fully informed, safeguarded & willing, THEN that request is valid.
We need to be careful and responsible with these requests.