A spinoff from Artoo's thread. It occurred to me as I read some of the responses it in fact is not the action, but the reaction which people take into account for their responses. Makes me wonder if in fact it's a matter of being tickled or being ticklish.
So I'm curious to know from those who answered affirmatively (or close to it), would you still consider it unmanly for a man to be tickled, if:
-The man was not ticklish/didn't react?
-The man's reaction is simply to squirm a little bit?
-The man's reaction is only a deep, masculine chuckle?
-The man's reaction is just becoming extremely sexually aroused?
-The man stops reacting after a very short period?
-The man can mentally control his ticklishness?
So I'm curious to know from those who answered affirmatively (or close to it), would you still consider it unmanly for a man to be tickled, if:
-The man was not ticklish/didn't react?
-The man's reaction is simply to squirm a little bit?
-The man's reaction is only a deep, masculine chuckle?
-The man's reaction is just becoming extremely sexually aroused?
-The man stops reacting after a very short period?
-The man can mentally control his ticklishness?




