An interesting hypothesis...

[Artoo]

Herein is my hypothesis.

Imagine a person who needs to pee. This person will, quite natually (well, debatable, but a topic for another thread) go in search of a toilet. I postualte that a persons need to go to the toilet has a factor of an inverse square law, based on the ever decreasing distance from the person to the bowl.

Discuss...

 

[venray]

So..If I understand this correctly (which would surprise me greatly) You are saying that the intensity of needing to pee diminishes the closer you get to the toilet....

If this is the case I must concur as can be demonstrated by the average road trip....

Whilst on the road and overcome by the urge to pee, noting the next rest area is several miles away, the urge will actually diminish as you finally reach the destination...

It may be due to a diminished stress factor as you realize that you are going to make it without pissing your shorts.....

 

[General Zod]

For further reading

40 yards to the outhouse,by Willy Makeit

Edited by Betty Dont😛

 

[Deleted member 66627]

Of course that's true.

Your thinking about how good that piss is gonna feel, and the toilet is close..


so...so close...so close..almost there...Ahhhhhhh......

 

[Bugman]

All i know is when i got to go i got to go,and you had best not stand in my way,it could get ugly!! 😉

 

[Artoo]

So..If I understand this correctly (which would surprise me greatly) You are saying that the intensity of needing to pee diminishes the closer you get to the toilet....

If this is the case I must concur as can be demonstrated by the average road trip....

Whilst on the road and overcome by the urge to pee, noting the next rest area is several miles away, the urge will actually diminish as you finally reach the destination...

It may be due to a diminished stress factor as you realize that you are going to make it without pissing your shorts.....

Whilst that may be true over long distance, I was referring to findings where the intensity actually increases the closer you are to the bowl. Literally within the last 40 or 50 metres or so...

 

[Excess]

Interesting logic...

But there is a flaw in it. A very big flaw. And that flaw is...if the need to pee diminishes, then why, once they reach the destination, do women flop down so quickly into it without putting it down first? This would mean that once women see it, they forget all else and can only think of the goal. Hence why there are apparently so many accidents and therefor, so much blame on us men.

This may only apply over long distances of course.

 

[subZer0]

I could stand a few metres away and still manage to get it in the bowl...

 

[TonyInMyThroat]

I could stand a few metres away and still manage to get it in the bowl...

… or not, as it were.

Doesn’t seem to be an essential objective for most at bars/restaurants or sporting/concert events.

 

[Bohemianne]

Herein is my hypothesis.

Imagine a person who needs to pee. This person will, quite natually (well, debatable, but a topic for another thread) go in search of a toilet. I postualte that a persons need to go to the toilet has a factor of an inverse square law, based on the ever decreasing distance from the person to the bowl.

Discuss...

^ Forget about Inverse Square (Decay)...unless you are rendering the raytraced light of the pee. 😱

It's a basic need...the more you see the toilet, the more the urge screams...

 

[subZer0]

… or not, as it were.

Doesn’t seem to be an essential objective for most at bars/restaurants or sporting/concert events.

Aha! But it does when there's a queue for the urinal. Beats having to wait in line, anywho.

 

[Gothika]

*peeing* ahhhhhhhhhhhh feel much better now😛

 

[Saeria]

This equation is true except you have omitted variables such as the person's state of sobriety, any physical abnormalities that may hinder his/her ability to make it to a toilet quickly, or the setting in which this takes place. If the environment were some Dali-esque "oh where oh where has my fishie gone" type place, there would then need to be clarification of these variables making the inverse square law a faulty method for determining distance vs. desire.

 

[TKpervert]

But there is a flaw in it. A very big flaw. And that flaw is...if the need to pee diminishes, then why, once they reach the destination, do women flop down so quickly into it without putting it down first? This would mean that once women see it, they forget all else and can only think of the goal. Hence why there are apparently so many accidents and therefor, so much blame on us men.

Not a problem.

Toto, the largest toilet maker on the planet (not the largest toilets, the largest MAKER),
makes toilets with seats which provide only 3/4 inch extra coverage on the sides, two inches on the back, and 1/4 inch on the front.
(that measly 1/4 inch explains why a guy's pecker freezes against the porcelain if trying to take a dump while even mildly aroused).
The designers at Toto wondered if an average US woman might experience problems when plopping down on one of their toilets while the seat was up.
They sent three of their best design engineers to cruise the aisles of several supermarkets in several different US cities. They concluded that they had a good foot to spare side to side and front to back on the bowl itself, so they started shipping as designed, without fear.

* ducks quickly toward nearest exit *

.

 

[penny lane]

So what would happen if someone were to turn on the water faucet?

 

[Snail Shell]

Having been on a road trip with Tickle Emperor, I can honestly say that I approve of this hypothesis. 😀

Snail Shell