If a free adult man in normal Western society cannot find a woman with whom to have sex for love or money, and uses this to justify turning to men for relief instead, he's bisexual. In contrast, in general, and in my own experience women's sexuality is more fluid.
The same applies to this fetish.
Nothing wrong with that, but let's call a spade a spade.
To address your other questions/observations:
I have tons of respect for you so I feel like doing a little joke just for fun
Now we know some people have a certain like for spanking. We both know certain guys have a certain like for spanking beautiful women (lucky them).
Thank you, but if she didn't insist, and if the reaction was not so delightful, I wouldn't nearly as much.
I would just like to ask:
If said guys ever get into a fight with other guys and start dominating and punching a poor fellow.....should we logicaly proclaim these guys to be either gay or bi
Depending on the degree of provocation, perhaps no, or perhaps yes, or perhaps the assailant is merely suffering from Tiny Cock Syndrome.
Again, if said people ever discipline a child by very mild spanking...should we call them pedophiles? I think we may rather call them child abusers (based on the amount of spanking) but we need to research a bit more before we can say they have other interests in children.
The average child is spanked by the average parent only as much as a normal person would judge necessary solely because he or she is being an unreasonable little shit or doing something dangerous or potentially so. I didn't like being hit when I was little but will have to concede, as any 'normal' adult would in retrospect, that sometimes it was an unfortunate necessity.
Things can have very different context.
Absolutely and see immediately above.
Even sex can!
Let us see for instance the idea of sex for business. Well, that one we know as prostitution and with good reason. But we also know they mostly dont feel "romanticaly" involved with their customers, whatever gender they may be and whatever talent they may have in phisically arousing the "professional". We also know that they can perform normal sexual relations with a boyfriend / girlfriend and still be "in business".
Firstly what is done for money is a slightly different case from that done strictly for pleasure, and secondly using an extreme exception to validate the mundane isn't logical, no matter what the deconstructionists say.
Should we also discuss Acting in general and sex scenes in particular?
OK, in my first Equity play (i.e. professional and for pay) aged 22, I played a full frontal nude love scene with an 'older woman' of 26 who was similarly unclad, and who not only had no interest in me sexually, but was even having an affair with the assistant stage manager
ess. Six evening performances and two matinees per week for the length of the run we convinced the audiences that we were absolutely crazy about one another. It was done for the benefit of the paying public, not our own, and as any professional will tell you, remembering lines, moves and timing either every night on stage, or on a film set with about 30 crew members running around doing their jobs extracts any vestige of sexuality from the proceedings.
Should we discuss massage therapy?
A qualified masseur/masseuse studies for a very long time to gain the qualification, and would be highly unlikely to risk disbarment by offering or acceding to requests for 'extras'.
So, can we agree to disagree that humans are way complex and can deal with their bodies in plenty of ways that you probably dont want to be aware....me neither for some of them might I say.....but I know its just me and my education and not my "fully developed human mind" (should I have a fully developed one).
Yes, we can agree to disagree. But I still hold fast to my opinion.
