Im not into porn! Im into tickling more!

[tummyfan2003]

My friend greg today(he's 18 and im 19) we were watching porn on our comp and he asked if he burn two porn clips off the comp and onto a blank cd so he could watch them on his dvd player so i said uh sure Go ahead... But i dont feel right about him(watching porn on our comp and burning them onto a cd in My parents house!! im NOT a porn freak at all i'd rather watch tickling clips or something else besides porn. Is this alright? or normal? even though im a 19 yr old male??

i need your thoughts on this Guys & Gurls both

 

[Neutron]

By most Definitions..

Tickling vids are considered porn. But I know what you mean. No there is nothing wrong with you. When I was 19 I didn't like porn, and at 41 I still don't like it.


Tron

 

[Myriads]

So many layers here. Let's start.

For you, tickling videos may well be porn. Porn is simply material made to sexualy arouse.

For your friend it seems to be plug-n-socket sex does the trick

For you it's tickling.

You both get aroused by different things. They are both porn.

As to feeling funny about duping copies in your parents home, that's a valid thing to feel odd over. It's their home, their rules. If you feel odd I wager you know they wouldn't be cool with it.

As to being normal, I wouldn;t worry. You just have a strong preference for non typical sexual interactions. In this case tickling. So long as you can enjoy regular sex also, you have no problems.

Myriads

 

[TickledToDeath]

Tickling vids considered porn?
I think that is a gray area if anything.
Porn for the most part consists of sexual acts whereas tickling in and of itself is not a sexual act per say.
What exactly makes a tickle vid porn?
This could definatly become somewhat of a debate but be it not me to start a war of words and differences of perception as far as this goes.
Your typical porn has one two or more having different styles of sexual acts of fornication but to classify tickling in that catagory is in my opinion, misplaced.

TTD

 

[Neutron]

Yes It Is Considered..

Porn by just about every legal statute there is.


Tron

 

[TickledToDeath]

Re: Yes It Is Considered..

Porn by just about every legal statute there is.


Tron

That is just plain Wrong and definatly misjudged, mis catagorized and mislabeled.

Tickling should not be grouped with smut.




TTD

 

[asutickler]

From the 1996 edition of Merriam-Webster's Dictionary of Law...


pornography [pôr-'nä-gre-fe]: Material that depicts erotic behavior and is intended to cause sexual excitement.
Note: Pornographic material is protected expression unless it is determined to be obscene. However, child pornography is illegal under federal and state laws prohibiting the depiction of minors in sexual acts.

 

[guitman69]

Don't be too worried about being "normal" Tummyfan.

Most teenagers are way too obsessed with trying to fit in, to be normal. Being normal is an illusion. Everybody is different. Just because the majority does something one way, or likes something, doesn't make it right.

If you're not hurting people, or yourself, be proud of what makes you different.

 

[U.N.Owen]

The dictionary definition and the legal definition are two different things. In order to legally qualify as pornography, an image or video must depict explicit sexual acts and/or explicit nudity.

Simply being designed to cause arousal is not legally sufficient. Lingerie ads are meant to cause arousal. They are not porn. The Sports Illustrated swimsuit issue is meant to cause arousal. It is not porn. Half-clad women on beer billboards are meant to cause arousal. They are not porn.

In tickling, legally, an image or video is not porn unless it involves nudity or explicit sexual acts. An image of a clothed girl tied and tickled is not legally pornographic. The recent videos featuring vibrators and orgasm most certainly ARE legally pornographic.

The exact borderline is a grey area, not likely ever to be properly defined -- the authorities have plenty of real sickness to worry about without debating the nature of tickle vids.

Where we draw the line is therefore really up to us. I do NOT agree with those who simply call all tickling material porn. I do NOT see tickling as inherently sexual: the two can merge, but by no means have to -- and I detest any and all media in which they do merge. For me, that overlap is something to be explored ONLY in private, with a partner, not in videos, pictures, or stories. That is, of course, merely a matter of taste.

I know that some consider any denial that tickling is porn to be evasive and dishonest. But I would ask those that say that to consider that others may simply view tickling differently than they do.

 

[Texas_Tickle]

Re: Re: Yes It Is Considered..

That is just plain Wrong and definatly misjudged, mis catagorized and mislabeled.

Tickling should not be grouped with smut.




TTD

Exactly. Tickling should not be even in the same category as porn and smut. My best friend and I got into a debate over that, when he kept saying "tickling is just porn, under another name"

Well, to me, porn constitutes penetration and other "sexual acts". Tickling videos, for the most part, do not fall into that category.

But my friend is insisting that it is nothing more than porn, under a different name.

Of course I allow him to believe what he wants. We all know the truth. Just because one person has a pre-concieved notion that is is nothing more than porn, does not mean that everybody else on Earth share that narrow-minded opinion.

 

[Texas_Tickle]

Don't be too worried about being "normal" Tummyfan.

Most teenagers are way too obsessed with trying to fit in, to be normal. Being normal is an illusion. Everybody is different. Just because the majority does something one way, or likes something, doesn't make it right.

If you're not hurting people, or yourself, be proud of what makes you different.

Mark Twain said it best....."A Million people can say a stupid thing, but that does not make what is being said any less a stupid thing"

 

[Myriads]

What are tickling videos made for?

I tend to think that most tickling videos are made with the expressed purpose of causing sexual arousal in their viewers. For most viewers they are being used as Porn. I'm sure some people find them simply fun. But I bet the majority of people spent the cash for them so they could either get off, or get aroused with a partner watching with them, so they could make mad monkey love soon after.

Material designed for sexual arousal and enjoyment. Simple.

Most folks call that Porn.

Myriads

 

[Texas_Tickle]

What are tickling videos made for?

I tend to think that most tickling videos are made with the expressed purpose of causing sexual arousal in their viewers. For most viewers they are being used as Porn. I'm sure some people find them simply fun. But I bet the majority of people spent the cash for them so they could either get off, or get aroused with a partner watching with them, so they could make mad monkey love soon after.

Material designed for sexual arousal and enjoyment. Simple.

Most folks call that Porn.

Myriads

I have to respectfully disagree. Like somebody pointed out, what about the Victoria Secret catalog? Does that excite? Hell, yes. Is it porn? No.

I do not think that it is fair to classify it as porn, simply because it gives you a "woody".

There are many ladies out there who can arouse gentlemen, and be fully clothed. I see many good-looking women every day.

Just because it causes arousal, does not mean it falls into the category of "porn".

 

[kyle]

Victoria Secret catalogues are designed to sell women's underwear, tickling videos are designed to get someone off. Although both may arouse, one is specifically designed so a guy can whack off to it.

 

[Mimi]

Those that argue tickling videos are not porn should consider one thing: Bondage. If there is no nudity or sexual acts within said tickling video to place it under a pornographic title, the bondage will do so. You do not see bondage in Sports Illustrated, Victoria Secrets, or in beer ads. Bondage and tickling is no longer a playful, innocent act. It then falls into a BDSM catagory, which I feel all can agree, is porn.

Mimi

 

[Texas_Tickle]

Victoria Secret catalogues are designed to sell women's underwear, tickling videos are designed to get someone off. Although both may arouse, one is specifically designed so a guy can whack off to it.

So? If you are aroused by it, that justifies calling it porn? By that term, anything that arouses you is porn, right? Sorry, Kyle but I must disagree with you, on that one.

I can get aroused by seeing fully clothed women, but that does not mean it's porn though.

Porn is porn. Tickling is tickling. If there was any penetration or other sexual acts, then yes, it is porn. But since there are no (for the most part) sexual acts or penetration, it is not porn.

 

[kyle]

Tickling videos are designed specifically to get someone off. Victoria Secret catalogues aren't. See the difference? The tickling video companies did not decide to go into business for the .01% that buys videos and does not get off to them.

 

[tummyfan2003]

Uh thanks Guys.... But i didn't mean to start a debat over this whole TOPIC!! all i simply asked is if its normal for me Not to be into porn and that im into tickling more.. Sorry for the whole up roar over this subject I'll choice my words carefully next time hehe

Bye

 

[Texas_Tickle]

Uh thanks Guys.... But i didn't mean to start a debat over this whole TOPIC!! all i simply asked is if its normal for me Not to be into porn and that im into tickling more.. Sorry for the whole up roar over this subject I'll choice my words carefully next time hehe

Bye

Well, I am into tickling, but not so much the hard-core smut. So in my opinion, you do not have to be a "porno-holic" in order to enjoy tickling.

 

[tummyfan2003]

Well, I am into tickling, but not so much the hard-core smut. So in my opinion, you do not have to be a "porno-holic" in order to enjoy tickling.

I agree with Ticklemaster i mean yeah ive watchd porn on the comp a few times with my Friend as you know. But i do NOT need that in my life! i dont want it in my life! yes a girls naked body is a beautyful thing but not in the way the porn videos pertray it to be. Id just rather watch bikini videos or something else other then porn all togethor but thats only my view point

 

[TickledToDeath]

Victoria Secret catalogues are designed to sell women's underwear, tickling videos are designed to get someone off. Although both may arouse, one is specifically designed so a guy can whack off to it.

Now that statement is somewhat stereotyping. Not all guys wack off to a tickle vid and not all tickle vids are designed for men.
Women watch them too and do they masturbate to a tickle vid?
Do all who watch them masturbate?

Owen said it best. There are many provocative ads and catalogs that are designed to arouse, even womens underwear and the like. However they are not considered pornographic.
Is Maxim Magazine porn? No.
The key is explicit sexual acts and tickling is far from being a Sexual act whether or not it arouses one.

TTD

 

[TickledToDeath]

Those that argue tickling videos are not porn should consider one thing: Bondage. If there is no nudity or sexual acts within said tickling video to place it under a pornographic title, the bondage will do so. You do not see bondage in Sports Illustrated, Victoria Secrets, or in beer ads. Bondage and tickling is no longer a playful, innocent act. It then falls into a BDSM catagory, which I feel all can agree, is porn.

Mimi

So what you are also saying is that a scene in a cartoon or any movie whether it is rated G PG13 or R, where someone is held captive and tied up to a bed or whatever, is a pronographic scene?
I think NOT. Misinterpetation has caused many wars and major disagreements and or arguements in the worlds history and has had the domino effect into other catagories. Some think that abortion is murder but by NO means should one person or a group of people dictate what is right or wrong for the whole or any other individual or group.
Period.

When I woke up this morning, we were still in a democracy and are still governed by the Constitution which has been revised once or twice since its' conception. Even the so called Bible has had to be rewritten!
It's is all up to the individual to make his/her own interpetition and judgement.
That's life. Any different would make us a controled robot-like society.

TTD

 

[TickledToDeath]

Tickling videos are designed specifically to get someone off. Victoria Secret catalogues aren't. See the difference? The tickling video companies did not decide to go into business for the .01% that buys videos and does not get off to them.

Think again my friend. Victoria Secret Catalogues are definatly designed to get someone off. Sexy clothing for women to wear to make their mate sexually aroused and for the women who wear them to feel sexier and gain sexual and sensual satisfaction.

If tickling is porn then so is that and ads and catalogues alike.

TTD

 

[Myriads]

Porn is not in the construction of the material. It's in how the material is used by the individual.

Little Billy grabs the Sears Catalog and goes to the bathroom and wacks off to images of women in bras. The Sears catalog is not porn by design, but in this instance it's being USED as porn.

Porn is all about the user, and the use. Not the producer. Somethings are made specifically to be used as porn (ticklign videos for example) others are not, but shoehorned into the role. (The Victoria secret catalog)

The entire point of my first statement in this thread is that porn is simply material that arouses a person. Because of that subjectiveness it's always a topic of argument and debate. To me Playboy is a harmless art magazine. To a Southern Baptist, it's hardcore porn.

Myriads

 

[TickledToDeath]

The entire point of my first statement in this thread is that porn is simply material that arouses a person. Because of that subjectiveness it's always a topic of argument and debate. To me Playboy is a harmless art magazine. To a Southern Baptist, it's hardcore porn.

Myriads

Probably why you don't see any Southern Baptists making tickle videos!
However, you may see them tickle one another from time to time and they may even get aroused doing it to their significant others or getting tickled themselves!
Do they think they are partaking in lude,explicit and or pornographic acts?
No. Probably not. To them and other fire and brimstone religious groups, ignorance is Bliss.


TTD