-
If you would like to get your account Verified, read this thread -
The TMF is sponsored by Clips4sale - By supporting them, you're supporting us. -
>>> If you cannot get into your account email me at [email protected] <<<
Don't forget to include your username
"Man seeks ticklish woman for research experiement"
- Thread starter ctrl190
- Start date
What would you call it? It certainly sounds like a one-night stand type of thing to me.
Oddjob0226 said:
If he wants to get his rocks off with some young woman who could be his daughter, the least he could do is be up front and get a hooker like most folks. And I said what my main issue with it is already, by the by.
berlinerbaer said:
That's all well and good for them, but I have my right to be freaked out by a man looking for a quick fling with a woman young enough to be his daughter.
berlinerbaer said:
He wants a woman young enough to be his daughter to indulge his fetish for a one-night stand, but he's not being up front about it, like Rhiannon has said. When folks on this board want to hook up like that, regardless of their ages, they're completely open about it. "I want to do this, this, and this to you, and I'm going to be really turned on by all of it. Okay?" "Okay." Plain and simple.
He's lying, outright, to trick someone into fetish play. Call him "creative" if you like (despite the fact that it is both painfully transparent and stunningly unoriginal), but when it comes down to it, if he gets what he's after through this ad, he's a fraud, and even if he doesn't, he's most certainly a creep.
berlinerbaer
TMF Regular
- Joined
- Mar 26, 2002
- Messages
- 159
- Points
- 18
LadyNerd, rhiannon, Korastus: What makes you so sure that the gentleman is lying? Do you know him? What research have you done to be sure that mentioned script can not be existing under any circmstances? How do you derive your judgement that the guy does have a tickle fetish and is fully clear about it?
BTW: Even if he did ly the way you are suggesting. So what! Any woman who agrees to this kind of research without any suspicion that some kind of arousal on the side of the guy might be involved can no be one of the brightest. She would probably be the kind who follows a guy for a coffee invitation at 3am to show her his stamp collection, only to then be totally surprised that the guy wants her horizontal eventually. *roll eyes*
BTW: Even if he did ly the way you are suggesting. So what! Any woman who agrees to this kind of research without any suspicion that some kind of arousal on the side of the guy might be involved can no be one of the brightest. She would probably be the kind who follows a guy for a coffee invitation at 3am to show her his stamp collection, only to then be totally surprised that the guy wants her horizontal eventually. *roll eyes*
Oh, come on. Playing Devil's Advocate is all well and good, but you can't seriously believe this is legitimate.
As for the rest, I'll agree that someone who would fall for this is probably not the sharpest tool in the shed, but being unintelligent doesn't mean a person deserves to be deceived any more than anyone else does.
The Last Laugh
3rd Level Green Feather
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2001
- Messages
- 4,582
- Points
- 38
Oh, you have GOT to be kidding me. You're suggesting there's a chance this is actually be for real? Seriously?!
Common sense!
Common sense! Who would want to see that? "For some reason, she's in a bikini for most the time of the script". Yeah, whatever!
But then...there was "Baywatch"... 😀
Do you know how many young women follow "model scouts" and get ripped off? Do you know how many poor old ladies pay money to someone they do not know because the person claims that their grandchild is in trouble? So what you are saying is, if you fall for a fraud, it's your own fault because you were too stupid to realize, not the person who committed the fraud?
berlinerbaer
TMF Regular
- Joined
- Mar 26, 2002
- Messages
- 159
- Points
- 18
"You're suggesting there's a chance this is actually be for real?"
"Common Sense"
Common Sense is thin ice for accusations like those expressed here. I suspect that you are seeing this too narrowly from the persective of someone who is well aware of the existence of what we call tickle fetish, like someone who reads for example the TMF forum regularly.
Maybe you have always in your life understood that you have a tickle fetish. Others - like myself - are less lucky. It took me several years to understand that my curiosity with regards to situations in which someone was tickled is actually due to a fetish. Had I been reading a script like that during those times, I am sure I would have reacted in a way that might look sneaky to someone who at the same time is aware of tickling fetishes (and especially of his/her own).
"So what you are saying is, if you fall for a fraud, it's your own fault because you were too stupid to realize, not the person who committed the fraud?" - Nope.
"Common Sense"
Common Sense is thin ice for accusations like those expressed here. I suspect that you are seeing this too narrowly from the persective of someone who is well aware of the existence of what we call tickle fetish, like someone who reads for example the TMF forum regularly.
Maybe you have always in your life understood that you have a tickle fetish. Others - like myself - are less lucky. It took me several years to understand that my curiosity with regards to situations in which someone was tickled is actually due to a fetish. Had I been reading a script like that during those times, I am sure I would have reacted in a way that might look sneaky to someone who at the same time is aware of tickling fetishes (and especially of his/her own).
"So what you are saying is, if you fall for a fraud, it's your own fault because you were too stupid to realize, not the person who committed the fraud?" - Nope.
So what exactly are you implying here:
We are seeing it from an informed perspective, therefore realizing right away what's going on. The person posting that add in craigslist is very well aware that most people might not be suspicious if they don't know something like a tickling fetish exists, and he might also trust that there are a lot of young women who just go blind for anything suspicious when they read something like "script".
berlinerbaer
TMF Regular
- Joined
- Mar 26, 2002
- Messages
- 159
- Points
- 18
No damage is done to the women who respond to the ad unless he prevents them from leaving when they wish so. That is different from a situation in which - to stay with your example - by the time the old lady understands what's going on she will have been damaged irreversably already.
Right. Now I would like to know who informed you about this guy being aware. Did you talk to him or one of his close friends?
I don't know....I believe being used for someones kink without knowing does indeed do damage. I know, there's a lot of people here who say "Well, if they don't know, it doesn't matter", but I say - why even veiling your true intentions? If it wasn't so bad what you want, you could as well be upfront - or do you think people wouldn't go for it if you told the truth? And if you believe that, why don't you think they'd go for it?
If you have to lie to get something, there might be something wrong!
You know, the more I talk to you about this, the more I believe that it was you posting this ad! 😀
berlinerbaer
TMF Regular
- Joined
- Mar 26, 2002
- Messages
- 159
- Points
- 18
You are making progress!
You finally got it!
Certainly not. I would have asked for a young guy 19-30!
It was me!
Just kidding.
I wanted to address the misleading aspect here. For all we know he really is curious about tickling. We don't know for sure that he actually has a fetish for it. But if he does so what? Is it any different than a guy that hopes to marry a woman someday asking her out to dinner? His true intentions is to marry her, get her pregnant, move into his house yet he only asks for dinner. Would it be best for him to be up front and let her know his true intentions? How is it different? If a female platonic friend asks me out for drinks with the intention of seducing and sleeping with me that night is it wrong that she didn't tell me that up front?
Is it weird? Yes! If I were getting a massage at a spa from a guy and he was getting aroused i wouldn't be happy. But in the end I can't control what he's thinking. As long as it doesn't interfere with our original arrangement "he giving me a quality massage" we're good. I think the same applies to this ad. As long as she's tickled and nothing more....then no harm no foul.
GQ
I want to talk about comments in this post. So I will 😀 .
That being said, there is, and always has been, a question about whether full discloser is what we should put out, or if it's ok when it comes to tickling that nobody knows about it so long as we don't hurt anybody. As I have gotten older, i've learned that honesty is not always the besy policy. However, one can not dismiss honesty in it's entirety because of the problems that arouses from it.
In the case of the individual who is being used here, I would say there is an issue with them being dishonest in their approach. In a case like this, a female could very well apply to help them out, be bound and tickled, and then later on find out that the play in question does not exist. I can only speak for myself, but if I was to offer my time and efforts into research for a play, I would likely look that play up, afterwards or before. If i found out that such play did not exhist, I would indeed be angry at being duped, and if I felt my actions had gone towards sexually thrilling a person, I would be more upset then before. There is a difference between being used and being courted.
however, in this case the tickler is suggesting that the tickling will be in regards to research for a play. Now, if that play does indeed exhist, then all is fine and well. However, if it does not exhist, then there is something more to the events in question.
You talk about some interesting things in this post, mainly the responsibility of full disclosure, and what we owe to a total stranger in this regard. First, I should point out that none of us knows this man, and can honestly say if the play they are talking about is false or real. I would prefer to give him the benefit of the doubt, but that is me.
That being said, there is, and always has been, a question about whether full discloser is what we should put out, or if it's ok when it comes to tickling that nobody knows about it so long as we don't hurt anybody. As I have gotten older, i've learned that honesty is not always the besy policy. However, one can not dismiss honesty in it's entirety because of the problems that arouses from it.
In the case of the individual who is being used here, I would say there is an issue with them being dishonest in their approach. In a case like this, a female could very well apply to help them out, be bound and tickled, and then later on find out that the play in question does not exist. I can only speak for myself, but if I was to offer my time and efforts into research for a play, I would likely look that play up, afterwards or before. If i found out that such play did not exhist, I would indeed be angry at being duped, and if I felt my actions had gone towards sexually thrilling a person, I would be more upset then before. There is a difference between being used and being courted.
however, in this case the tickler is suggesting that the tickling will be in regards to research for a play. Now, if that play does indeed exhist, then all is fine and well. However, if it does not exhist, then there is something more to the events in question.
Yes! So if the volunteer does it for the sake of research and there is no project then she is being duped! False pretenses. The equivalent would be asking that girl out to dinner with the intention of marrying her, making 3 babies and moving her away from her family....but at dinner asking her to pay for our meal. Her goal might have been a free meal because that is what I proposed but in the end she got nothing. She was duped! But if she gets her free meal...becomes my wife, gets knocked up and moved to Idaho....has she been duped? well haha maybe a little. Jk. No.
This guy is offering tickling and a part in research. The volunteer should expect both. If he has a sexual passion for his research...that's ok...as long as it doesn't make her feel uncomfortable. That wasn't part of the bargain. Just as asking that girl out to dinner doesn't include anything rude. It's just a meal. It's just tickling.
GQ
This guy is offering tickling and a part in research. The volunteer should expect both. If he has a sexual passion for his research...that's ok...as long as it doesn't make her feel uncomfortable. That wasn't part of the bargain. Just as asking that girl out to dinner doesn't include anything rude. It's just a meal. It's just tickling.
GQ
I'm not entirely sure what your saying at parts, but if the person is lying about the reasons for tickling her, then yes, he is duping her. If he is being honest, then no, he is not.
I'm saying that as long as the guy delivers on his promise to tickle and include her in his research....then he is harming no one...even if he gets sexually excited by the experience. Just as, as long as the guy pays for dinner no one is getting duped. Even though the guy has ulterior motives.
GQ
Ok, i think I agree with that. Nothing wrong with mixing some business with pleasure. So long as he is not lying about the whole doing research for a play, then it's reasonably ok with him getting off on doing the research.
But this would mean that there actually would have to be a research or a script, and I am pretty sure there is not! There is just a guy who wants to get his hands on a young woman on a bikini.
Uhm...yeah! And do you really believe there is this play? 🙂
I know the internet is full of lies. But who really cares about the backgrounds? Maybe it's real. Maybe not. We will never find out what it really is. And to be honest I give a ... about that.
Why are most of us in this forum? Because they want to find tickle partners! So why is it worth to make such a fuzz about this advert?
I guess there are many people looking for freakier things than tickling. And I guess they find more others who agree than we might think. Even if not, so what?
Me myself, only some days ago I had to wonder again (!) about a woman who dated me and liked the idea of tickling. They ARE there. Not in hardcore forums with such duscussions, but they are there ;-)
For god's sake!
Why are most of us in this forum? Because they want to find tickle partners! So why is it worth to make such a fuzz about this advert?
I guess there are many people looking for freakier things than tickling. And I guess they find more others who agree than we might think. Even if not, so what?
Me myself, only some days ago I had to wonder again (!) about a woman who dated me and liked the idea of tickling. They ARE there. Not in hardcore forums with such duscussions, but they are there ;-)
For god's sake!
chrisheaven
Level of Lemon Feather
- Joined
- Aug 20, 2001
- Messages
- 12,381
- Points
- 0
"page not found" appears if you attempt to reply to the ad!
