You just don't get it do you Slaver? Let me put it to you as simple as possible. I will ignore you once you stop posting in WWE threads and making an ass out of yourself. So it looks like I'm not going to ignore you am I?
Nope, it sure doesn't.
primetime said:
You ARE following the product if you keep reading about what's going on and listening to some show. If you didn't follow the product, you damn sure wouldn't be listening/reading anything about the WWE. Simple logic. Yet, you continue to post in WWE threads and make asinine comments.
The only person being an ass is you. Keeping tabs on something isn't the same as following it. Following the WWE product would be sitting infront of the tv and watching it's programing and Ordering it's crappy DVDs. I am keeping up on thing every so often so I can find out when it's cleaned up it's act. Perhaps geting unionized or having some 3rd party intervention that keeps it clean of drug abuse and roids, like a comition on Pro Wrestling, not just for the WWE but TNA, RoH and any indie promotion that are active.
primetime said:
As for the Guerrero family. How ignorant are you? You mean to tell me that when anyone dies, the family should not honor them in any way? So when Eddie died, no one is supposed to do anything? Just put a graphic up despite the fact he was an important part of their storylines as the time? No!! Again, I ask, exactly how is Vince making money off of Eddie's death? Explain it.
They honoured Eddie Guerrero during the RAW and SmackDown show's the week following his death. Anything that happened after that was exploytation. The fact that they went on to do an angle with Rey, Chavo, and Vickie in a stupid attempt at a raitings grab is how Vince was trying to make money off of Eddie's death. Raitings means viewers, and the more viers they have the more money the WWE gets for Advertising spots. Thats how TV works, or didn't you know that. I don't know if it did him any good, but it was still wrong for them to do it. Besides Rey should have been pushed based on his ability not some lame angle based on his friends death, nor should he have agreed to it.
primetime said:
You never will because you have no clue on what you're talking about. Besides, how is Vickie doing wrong now, considering her "character" is mentioning nothing about Eddie Guerrero? Hate to break this to you, but this whole "Vickie is GM" storyline is NOT about Eddie Guerrero, yet you call her a ***** and making money off of Eddie's death. You sir, are not the sharpest knife in the drawer are you?
When was Vickie brought in to the WWE, during the "Do It For Eddie" angle correct, so that blow everything you just said out you ass... where your brain is located... hope you didn't lose to many IQ point's it's not like you can spair them at this point.
primetime said:
So, what you're saying is, all those professional sports teams that had a teammate die are trying to make a buck by having decals on their helmets or armbands of their fallen teammates right? The Washington Redskins organization exploited Sean Taylor's death by selling t-shirts and decals honoring his memory right? They are only doing the same thing McMahon did after one of his employees died.
Like I said their is a difference between honouring somebodies contrabution to their field, and exploiting their death. I do know the WWE put together a package for fans (I think it was a DVD, T-Shirt, and Arm Band) and the money went to his family. That was a pretty cool thing to do, but then he turns around and spend a year exploiting his death in the above mentioned angle. If it was a simple matter of selling T-Shirts that said something like "In Memorie of Eddie Guerrero" that would be find, but to continue using his name in an Entertainment form isn't much different then when Jose Huertas Gonzalez (aka the Invader) used the murder of Bruiser Brody as an angle in WWC back in the 80's. It's a little different only because Eddie wasn't murderd, but it was still wrong.
primtime said:
Another thing I don't understand about you is that your own HERO has "given his blessing" for his family to work for McMahon, yet you still despise everything McMahon does. If your own HERO can work with McMahon again, then why are you still bitter? Bret would "hate" McMahon more than you because he was PERSONALLY involved. Why do you have such a moronic hatred of McMahon? Go get some damn therapy.
Bret is my wrestling hero, but he isn't my master. I don't base all my judments in life on what the people I admire do or don't do. Unlike you I don't let popular opinions dictate my actions, nor do I make petty excuses for when the people I do admire make bad choices, other then that they are human. Vince, in the grand sceam of thing, is a bad person, and when you suport his company you are saying i(at the very least) that you don't mind his lack of morality because he does it in the name of buisness. I wan't the guy's in the buisness to be treated like people not Circus Animals. Hell if Vince treated an animal like he treated his wrestlers PETA and ever other animal rights group would be banging on his door. The Wellness program is a joke. Don't be suprised if another 50 wrestlers are dead by 2017, not that you'll care, because you'll have been entertained.
![P[a]pi](/data/avatars/m/45/45669.jpg?1704922715){kind=avatar}
