• If you would like to get your account Verified, read this thread
  • The TMF is sponsored by Clips4sale - By supporting them, you're supporting us.
  • >>> If you cannot get into your account email me at [email protected] <<<
    Don't forget to include your username

Senseless Nudity

Well, if the goal is to produce erotica, then presumably the producer wants to put erotic stuff into it. Some people find nudity erotic, so that really isn't so senseless. It'd be senseless only of most of the people who buy it didn't like it. And in that case the producer will stop doing it pretty soon, one way or another.
 
I know what you mean Belly. One of the dumbest types of clips in my opinion is a naked chick in stocks. Stocks is obviously a foot tickling position, so the nudity is unnecessary.

They're just throwing some porn in to get some extra buys. It's just business.
 
Last edited:
I appreciate a little mystery. Clothing works better for me, too (except in my own bedroom with my own honey).
 
Hi all,

For me, it depends on the scenario. A fully naked lee surrounded by one or more fully clothed ler(s), adds a psychological effect of extra vulnerability. So, in that sense, it works.

However, that said, I also agree with another poster's comments.... if the area is naked, by all means, tickle there too. There is definitely not enough of that being done.

Cheers!
 
P[a]pi said:
I know what you mean Belly. One of the dumbest types of clips in my opinion is a naked chick in stocks. Stocks is obviously a foot tickling position, so the nudity is unecessary.

They're just throwing some porn in to get some extra buys. It's just business.
Click to expand...


So if a man loves the way a lovely nude woman's bare breasts jiggle and sway while she's having her feet tickled...?

Fellas, as I've said: just because something is unecessary for you doesn't make it gratuitous or 'porn'. It probably means someone who isn't you likes it and it may even be a specific part of their fetish. Just as many of you love a woman's facial expressions while she's being tickled, many of you also love the way her various bare body parts and muscles move during a session. I've been known to put my hair up so one 'ler could see the muscles move in my bare back and bare lower-body while he worked my feet over. Trust me, that nudity is FAR from unecessary even though his tickling focus is my feet :xpulcy:

They're definitely adding nudity to get more sales; sales from those who (gasp!) enjoy a woman's naked body with their kink 😉

Bella
 
The_belly_god said:
I'm not opposed to nudity in tickling (well I draw a line at a point) but I'm tired of senseless nudity in tickling pictures, clips and stories...
Click to expand...
First, "senseless nudity" is an oxymoron 'round these parts. I suggest that if you're tired of viewing adult fetish pictures and videos, you should stop viewing adult fetish pictures and videos. I understand your objection to be "why have a model completely nude if the tickling is only focused on the feet." The answer, of course, is that most of the people viewing the pictures or videos have an imagination, and are keen to use it. I have a hard time understanding why your objection would surface in the first place, unless you have some general aversion to nudity that drives you to be bothered by unjustified nakedness. Maybe a good starting point would be to turn your focus inward and ask yourself why. You might find that nudity is really not so bad. There are far worse things than a naked person.
 
It's all a matter of preference I think. I get into situations that seem more realistic; a naked woman strapped to a table, crying and begging for release, does not seem realistic to me. However, most fantasies aren't realistic by any means, so that may be your cup of tea.

For me, I prefer clothes. There's something about tickling through or under clothes and still unable to get away. Most of my tickling experiences have had me in similar positions (although I have been completely nude a few times).

Just because the models are nude in some productions doesn't make it bad. It's just not for me.
 
Vae said:
It's all a matter of preference I think. I get into situations that seem more realistic; a naked woman strapped to a table, crying and begging for release, does not seem realistic to me.
Click to expand...
It's very realistic. Welcome to the world of BDSM. I'll grant you that most producer's videos are sterile, in the sense that they do not depict what is actually experienced by people for whom the basic scenerio is real. The videos aren't shot in club settings or home settings or private dungeon settings. There's no intimacy between the participants, for the most part. Over-lit, over produced - that isn't real. Every now and then something real will come our way. Certain people really appreciate that, but most people go for the over-produced, under-sexed stuff that most producers make.
 
I suppose there is a time and a place for everything, but personally I don't mix naked bodies with tickling. Tickling is too much fun. If I wanted everyone to be naked, I would just watch straight porn, but to each his own.
 
The_belly_god said:
I'm not opposed to nudity in tickling (well I draw a line at a point) but I'm tired of senseless nudity in tickling pictures, clips and stories. What I mean is if it's going to be shown then have the exposed area tickled. It's an awful shame to see a nude person being tickled and the only place that gets tickled is the feet. What a waste! Maybe I'm missing something?
Click to expand...

You're obviously missing whatever factor makes the display of nudity appealing to others.
 
BellaRisa said:
So if a man loves the way a lovely nude woman's bare breasts jiggle and sway while she's having her feet tickled...?

Fellas, as I've said: just because something is unecessary for you doesn't make it gratuitous or 'porn'. It probably means someone who isn't you likes it and it may even be a specific part of their fetish. Just as many of you love a woman's facial expressions while she's being tickled, many of you also love the way her various bare body parts and muscles move during a session. I've been known to put my hair up so one 'ler could see the muscles move in my bare back and bare lower-body while he worked my feet over. Trust me, that nudity is FAR from unecessary even though his tickling focus is my feet :xpulcy:

They're definitely adding nudity to get more sales; sales from those who (gasp!) enjoy a woman's naked body with their kink 😉

Bella
Click to expand...

I guess I could have added on another "in my opinion" on the end of me saying "nudity is unnecessary." Well anyway I think nudity is unnecessary in tickling clips, that is my opinion, which I know others do not share. That is just my preference.
 
They drive me nuts too!!!

The_belly_god said:
It's an awful shame to see a nude person being tickled and the only place that gets tickled is the feet.
Click to expand...

I agree, it seems to me to be a waist. If you've got a beautiful woman (or good looking guy if that's you thing) why would you stick to the feet if the entire body is at your mercy. I've writen stuff, and I try to use the lee's entire body as it becomes exposed to the ler. Then again I've always felt foot guys were a little wonky to begin with.
 
its just business to make money. i cant believe that perverts fall victim to such but owell..not that i care... for me, nudity just looks fake and make the tickling not for real. if i wanted nudity myself, i would be like that one guy 'fuck this! i like fetish porn better!' bullshit.... also someone mentioned bdsm which is not the case. bdsm or not. its just business. shit business.
 
really?

SlaverTickler said:
Well I've never seen a dime of this money you speak. I write my stuff becuase I like it, and people see to enjoy reading.
Click to expand...

do you sell your stuff? i can write up something and get people to read myself. what about the TMF with all that porn ads banners? its there so they support paying to keep and maintain the forum. they dont really make a profit since its all used for that purpose.
 
I dont dislike seeing nude models but i agree with some here, its seems at times contrived and fake. And I think most here are talking from personal prefrence and not from a what generates sales perspective. I sort of like seeing somthing that makes me feel I could be doing that too. I dont feel it when all the woman look the same all the time in hose being tickled by 2 other woman who are skinny and in hose.
 
I don't think anyone will EVER hear me say something along the lines of: "Will someone PLEASE tell that gorgeous young woman to go and put some CLOTHES on?!?"

Ya know? 😛
 
SlaverTickler said:
I agree, it seems to me to be a waist. If you've got a beautiful woman (or good looking guy if that's you thing) why would you stick to the feet if the entire body is at your mercy. I've writen stuff, and I try to use the lee's entire body as it becomes exposed to the ler. Then again I've always felt foot guys were a little wonky to begin with.
Click to expand...


Lol - I am 100% in agreement with Slaver. I wonder if the original poster was thinking of the fm concepts stuf where you always have very attractive models who are often naked but never seem that ticklish or that well tickled and usually only have their feet tickled. I guess there the producer thinks the extra flesh compensates.

Like Slaver, I have written fiction for this forum too. When the lee has her shoes and socks removed, her feet get tickled. When her shirt and bra come off, do her pits, belly, ribs and breasts get tickled? You bet your life they do.

I would rather see all over tickling. Yeah, it might be nice to see jiggling breasts when feet are being tickled but since we are all about tickling round here, if it's there then tickle it! There are plenty of other places to see jiggling breasts on the net (or so I am reliably informed. 😀 )
 
There is also the possibilty that the clips or pics that are posted here are not the entire video or pic collection. The 'ler probably DID get to the 'other' exposed areas of the 'Lee's nude body, but was not posted here.
Viewing 10 seconds or 2 minutes of a clip is not the FULL video. That's why they are called CLIPS. The scenes that are posted here (or anywhere else) are 'clipped' out from the full version & posted here.

Now as far as nudity in & of itself in a tickle video is concerned, I can kind of understand your frustration when the 'Ler doesn't go anywhere NEAR the 'other' areas. I've watched (& downloaded) clips of this nature & felt that the 'Ler could have explored the other exposed areas of the 'Lee. But, does it bother me? Hell no. I am SO appreciative of ANY clips posted here (or anywhere else) & the hard work put into producing some of them.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
What's New
10/1/25
Visit Door 44 for a great selection of tickling clips!

Door 44
Live Camgirls!
Live Camgirls
Streaming Videos
streaming tickling videos on demand at the TMF!
Tickling videos on demand!
Pic of the Week
Pic of the Week
Congratulations to
*** brad1704 ***
 The winner of our weekly Trivia, held every Sunday night at 11PM EST in our Chat Room
Back
Top