
slacker2114 said:Like I said in another thread....take the SOB to Dallas and put a muzzle on him so I don't have to hear the news flooded with TO drama. I hate players like him. All that talent and the attitude to match. Fits right in with jackasses like Keyshawn, Warren Sapp, Ray Lewis and Bill Romanowski. And after this past season, I may be adding TJ Houshmanzadah to my 'guys who run their mouths too damn much' list.
Enjoy him while he's happy, Dallas fans.
gargoyleofdusk said:I am no longer a Cowboys fan.
Started with Keyshawn, now they have a bigger ego to deal with.
Now T.O.? We are done...you know he'll piss off Purcells, and Bledsoe.
![]()
slacker2114 said:Honestly, I hope things work out for him in Dallas. He is without a doubt one of the best receivers of all time and it would be a shame to see his career go to waste. But I'm just hoping he keeps the drama to himself if there is any. I don't want to hear about TO going head to head with Parcells.
ticklingfeet4fu said:Terrell Owens will create problems for Dallas fans as he has everywhere else. It is his nature. He will NEVER grow up. The reason Keyshawn did not create problems in Dallas is that he was coached by Bill Parcells for 3 years. I think he respects Parcells and wouldn't do anything to upset that. Terrell has no respect for ANYONE ( and please don't tell me I don't know him ). If you can rip teammate publicly and the coach as well you have NO RESPECT for authority. I really question how long it will take for Parcells to get tired of that Owens character and bench him. Parcells will NEVER stand for what Andy Reid did. I do have a couple of questions though, it was stated that Owens wants to win, who does not want to win??? And if he wanted to win so bad then why did he create the problems he did a year ago? He wanted MONEY!!! The MONEY was MORE IMPORTANT than winning. That is Owens bottomline. Now that he is getting his money maybe he will buy himself a MUZZLE!!!
Considering the fact that he makes MILLIONS of dollars and I don't what would you like me to compare that too??? If I recall, Joe Namath didn't make millions of dollars in this sport nor did Bradshaw or Unites or Dawson. To my knowledge neither did Riggins, Dorsett or Campbell. What makes Crybaby Owens better than them??? What is the matter??? Can't feed himself on $5,000,000 a year??? I would play the game for $50,000 a year. And, at least, I would show the fans MORE HEART than Crybaby Owens and the rest of these prima donnas. I might not play like Owens but I would give the fans a 1000% effert and I would play and never threaten the fans or the team that I would purposely ruin their season as Crybaby did last year in Philadelphia. Or are they all Divas these days. I know Crybaby IS a diva.Tickle_Fiend05 said:T.O. is one of the top two receivers in the league. Why shouldn't he have wanted more money? Would you work for anything less than your market value?

ticklingfeet4fu said:Considering the fact that he makes MILLIONS of dollars and I don't what would you like me to compare that too??? If I recall, Joe Namath didn't make millions of dollars in this sport nor did Bradshaw or Unites or Dawson. To my knowledge neither did Riggins, Dorsett or Campbell. What makes Crybaby Owens better than them??? What is the matter??? Can't feed himself on $5,000,000 a year??? I would play the game for $50,000 a year. And, at least, I would show the fans MORE HEART than Crybaby Owens and the rest of these prima donnas. I might not play like Owens but I would give the fans a 1000% effert and I would play and never threaten the fans or the team that I would purposely ruin their season as Crybaby did last year in Philadelphia. Or are they all Divas these days. I know Crybaby IS a diva.![]()
HE DID NOT take Philly to the Super Bowl. How many catches prior to the Super Bowl did he catch in the playoffs??? Answer that for me. How many catches did he have in the last 4 games of the regular season did he have??? Do your research and PLEASE get back to me. I would love to hear the response. 😎Tickle_Fiend05 said:I'm saying would you work for less than you are worth? Yeah you can't compare you salary to his but who can? Different occupations command different salaries. If your talent or experience commands such a high number why work for less? I wish I could earn the minimum salary in the NFL but we don't play sports. And T.O. did give Philly his all on the field. Took them to the Super Bowl and outplayed every receiver on the team combined(even this year he outplayed them in seven games). When he and McNabb were having there "no speaking" period he went out there and did his job, did it damn well too. No one has ever questioned T.O.'s work ethic, it's all about off the field stuff. He had problems in Philly but there were other people involved. T.O. had some teammates on his side as did McNabb so he must not have been too wrong. And T.O. is one of the greatest receivers of all time. Don't know if you can really compare two different positions but, in my opinion, T.O. is better than a lot of those old guys you mentioned, but they were great too. Players back in their day didn't make the money players do today but it's probably the equivalent to their salaries.
ticklingfeet4fu said:HE DID NOT take Philly to the Super Bowl. How many catches prior to the Super Bowl did he catch in the playoffs??? Answer that for me. How many catches did he have in the last 4 games of the regular season did he have??? Do your research and PLEASE get back to me. I would love to hear the response. 😎
So if they won both playoff games without him in the lineup then he DID NOT get them to the Super Bowl. Am I right or am I wrong??? How do you say he carried them to the Super Bowl if he did not play??? That is like saying that Troy Aikman lead you to the Super Bowl in 1977 when he did not play ( but then again maybe he did. I am sure he was cheering on the Cowboys from his living room. ) It is stupid to think because he was on the team that he made the difference when he did not play. You lead a team when you are on the field. Not when you are not playing. If that is the scenerio then Donovan McNabb had NOTHING to do with leading the Eagles to the Super Bowl. It was all because of the guy on crutches. He did it. He threw the ball. He caught the ball. He made tackles from the sidelines. I forgot only one man plays a team game. My bad.Tickle_Fiend05 said:Without him they went to three straight NFC Championship games and lost them all. T.O. joins the team and finally gives them a receiver to throw to and they had the best season in team history. Their offense ranked higher with T.O. and this year, well you can guess what happened. And they actually only won two games without T.O., both in the playoffs. T.O. got hurt in week 15 against Big D and they lost their last two games of the regular season and still finished 13-3. T.O. came back from the injury and kept carrying them in the Super Bowl when no one else stepped up. Do you remember how productive the Eagles receivers were the year before T.O. If not, pay close attention to how well they play this upcoming season and you'll find out.
Scary thought Primetime!!! We agree again. I agree with EVERY SINGLE WORD in this post. By the way, great sig pic. Not a big fan of Deion but a VERY good player. Nice touch primetime.primetime said:it's funny, TO signs with Dallas and the Cowboy fans sing his praises. word of advice Cowboy fans...
TO is a tremendous receiver. any team that has him has a phenom at receiver. BUT, he will "behave" his first year in Dallas. he will say all the right things, he will get a bunch of stats and Cowboy fans will sit back and tell the masses "SEE!!! TO isnt such a bad guy!".
then if the Cowboys lose in the playoffs because Drew Bledsoe didnt throw him the ball and Bledsoe throws another pick to end the game, TO WILL show his true self. history folks, HISTORY.
in SF, he had one of the greatest catches of all time. his winning TD catch against Green Bay elevated him to superstar status. he followed Jerry Rice and now he was the undisputed #1 receiver in SAN FRANCISCO, a 5 time SuperBowl winner. ask yourself, why isnt he in SF anymore?
then he goes to Philly, says McNabb and him are best friends and they are a perfect match. fans love him, he smiles and TO is Philly's #1 loved guy. TO gets hurt, the Eagles WIN WITHOUT TO and still make the SuperBowl, however he plays magnificently in the Superbowl, but they lose. now ask yourself, why isnt he in Philly anymore?
it is only a matter of time. enjoy the 2006 season. but believe me, he will show his true colors again. find this thread in the future and you will sit back and think, "gee, they were right."
as for Keyshawn Johnson. i HAVE MET THE MAN and he is an asshole. i am still hoping he breaks his leg, ending his season. i cant stand him and watching him run his mouth and producing nothing is wonderful. he was the #1 draft pick, but yet, he isnt anywhere near the top of outstanding receivers. he is now a ROLE player. TO and Keyshawn are one in the same, except TO is a much better athlete.
primetime said:it's funny, TO signs with Dallas and the Cowboy fans sing his praises. word of advice Cowboy fans...
TO is a tremendous receiver. any team that has him has a phenom at receiver. BUT, he will "behave" his first year in Dallas. he will say all the right things, he will get a bunch of stats and Cowboy fans will sit back and tell the masses "SEE!!! TO isnt such a bad guy!".
then if the Cowboys lose in the playoffs because Drew Bledsoe didnt throw him the ball and Bledsoe throws another pick to end the game, TO WILL show his true self. history folks, HISTORY.
in SF, he had one of the greatest catches of all time. his winning TD catch against Green Bay elevated him to superstar status. he followed Jerry Rice and now he was the undisputed #1 receiver in SAN FRANCISCO, a 5 time SuperBowl winner. ask yourself, why isnt he in SF anymore?
then he goes to Philly, says McNabb and him are best friends and they are a perfect match. fans love him, he smiles and TO is Philly's #1 loved guy. TO gets hurt, the Eagles WIN WITHOUT TO and still make the SuperBowl, however he plays magnificently in the Superbowl, but they lose. now ask yourself, why isnt he in Philly anymore?
it is only a matter of time. enjoy the 2006 season. but believe me, he will show his true colors again. find this thread in the future and you will sit back and think, "gee, they were right."
as for Keyshawn Johnson. i HAVE MET THE MAN and he is an asshole. i am still hoping he breaks his leg, ending his season. i cant stand him and watching him run his mouth and producing nothing is wonderful. he was the #1 draft pick, but yet, he isnt anywhere near the top of outstanding receivers. he is now a ROLE player. TO and Keyshawn are one in the same, except TO is a much better athlete.
ticklingfeet4fu said:So if they won both playoff games without him in the lineup then he DID NOT get them to the Super Bowl. Am I right or am I wrong??? How do you say he carried them to the Super Bowl if he did not play??? That is like saying that Troy Aikman lead you to the Super Bowl in 1977 when he did not play ( but then again maybe he did. I am sure he was cheering on the Cowboys from his living room. ) It is stupid to think because he was on the team that he made the difference when he did not play. You lead a team when you are on the field. Not when you are not playing. If that is the scenerio then Donovan McNabb had NOTHING to do with leading the Eagles to the Super Bowl. It was all because of the guy on crutches. He did it. He threw the ball. He caught the ball. He made tackles from the sidelines. I forgot only one man plays a team game. My bad.
stloldg said:I say Parcells will take Owens in the pre-season, by the half way mark of the season Owens will be ready to quit.