• If you would like to get your account Verified, read this thread
  • The TMF is sponsored by Clips4sale - By supporting them, you're supporting us.
  • >>> If you cannot get into your account email me at [email protected] <<<
    Don't forget to include your username

The Films We Hate...

Signs. And the Village.

Both films are one big build-up to what turns out to be a whole lot of nothing.
 
#3

Black Good Will Hunting (aka Finding Forrester)
Failure Rating: 26 shit-smeared gold stars

This "film" really doesn't deserve any further explanation. If you've seen Good Will Hunting, you've basically seen this movie. The key to understanding why it fails so offensively is a matter of substituting a few key elements.

For example:

Robin Williams > Sean Connery, long since he stopped giving a fuck. This man is about 40 lbs. shy of being the next Brando, back when he couldn't give a fuck either.

Math genius > awesome writer, which is somehow the same because the people who wrote this film are retarded.

Poor kid > poor kid...but he's also black (which would normally be racist of me to fixate on, except that this film permanently one-upped me on that front when Sean Connery humiliated himself by actually saying this line in perfect Scots-Ebonic: "Yoooor the man naow, dawwwg!").

Matt Damon > Rob Brown (one of whom has since won an Academy Award and starred in the Bourne trilogy, one of whom when on to play 'Delmon Lebreaux' in 20 episodes of something called 'Treme'...betcha can't guess who!)

Breakout, career-launching hit > massive festival of steaming self-indulgent rectal pus.
 
...Rob Brown ... one of whom when on to play 'Delmon Lebreaux' in 20 episodes of something called 'Treme'...betcha can't guess who!

Just FYI, 'Treme' is a new HBO show about to come out created by the guys who did 'The Wire' (AKA the greatest TV show ever).

It's about the City of New Orleans post-Katrina and the like.

It's supposed to be really, really good.

Otherwise I agree that FF was an awful flick.

Please, carry on with your awesome reviews. :goodjob:
 
#2

Splice
Failure Rating: 40 acres of failure, and then you get raped by a mule.

Splice is the most recent addition to this list. It's so recent that there's a remote possibility that you may still find it in theatres if you care to go looking. Don't ask for a ticket, though; saying the words "I'd like to pay money to see the movie Splice" has been known to trigger headache, vomiting, and rectal prolapse; three things guaranteed to ruin your evening, believe you me. Instead, if you must gaze upon this horror, buy a ticket to something innocuous and then just follow your nose once you're inside; Splice will always be playing in the cinema that smells vaguely of death. Officially it's an unsolved mystery why film projectionists continually hang themselves during screenings of Splice; officially there's no explanation for why 40% of audience members murdered their spouses after test screenings. Unofficially, the director has taken to sleeping with a loaded gun and a silver crucifix to ward off the evil he unleashed by making this movie, and sources have confirmed that stars Adrian Brody and Sarah Polley are definitely no longer in possession of their souls (though I question whether they ever had souls in the first place).

Splice fails and offends in so many directions at once that it's impossible to list them all in one review. As a science fiction movie, Splice is the worst I've ever seen, and I've seen Star Trek 5. Splice is the most boring science fiction film ever, and that includes Contact. As a horror film, Splice is more sleep-inducing than Bram Stoker's Dracula. It's got more unintentional humour than Troll 2. Splice has the worst acting ever captured on film, and I've seen Jennifer's Body (I do love Amanda Seyfried and Megan Fox, but they couldn't even convincingly lust after each other, and everyone in the world lusts after those two). Splice is less suspenseful than an episode of Glee; less realistic than an episode of Deep Space Nine; and contains more nightmare-inducing depictions of alien sex than the entire nation of Japan.

Why did I see this garbage? Well, here's the trailer:

<object width="640" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/pzPhtK7AYBw&hl=en_US&fs=1&rel=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/pzPhtK7AYBw&hl=en_US&fs=1&rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="640" height="385"></embed></object>
(or if that didn't work, here's the link...fuck the internets):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pzPhtK7AYBw&feature=channel

Holy shit, right? Looks scary as hell. Notice how we don't actually get to see that much of the monster. But that's probably just because it's too scary to be shown to TV audiences, right? No way could they be using cheap editing tricks to make the film seem like a terrifying action-horror, when it's really a boring psychological thriller with bland characters, little action, and a disturbing amount of weird, pseudo-incestusous alien sex, right?

Well, to clarify this, here's a scene from the actual film...

<object width="640" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/hY-U6ncHOEk&hl=en_US&fs=1&rel=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/hY-U6ncHOEk&hl=en_US&fs=1&rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="640" height="385"></embed></object>
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hY-U6ncHOEk

Notice two things: first of all, the 'monster' is not exactly what the trailer led us to believe, is it? Instead of an alien zombie-beast, this looks more like Jar Jar Binks' hot cousin. I would love to have been a fly on the wall as the director tried to explain his vision to the effects supervisor:

"I want her scary and alien-looking. I want her to have a giant stinger on the end of her tail, like a scorpion, and razor sharp teeth."

"Giant stinger, razor sharp fangs, I think I can cook something up."

"Good, good. But also...I want her to be hot, you know?"

"...You, uh...you want her to be hot?"

"Yeah, you know, like the chick from Species. Men have to want to fuck this creature; that's what puts asses in seats."

"So you mean she should basically look like a human woman, with the alien attributes hidden."

"No, no, she can't look human at all. I want her to be a real weird-looking horror-beast. This is scary shit."

"But Vinny, I don't think most men want to have sex with a weird, alien-looking creature who looks like it's about to kill them."

"What are you, gay?"

Also, this scene illustrates a common tactic the director uses to try to inject some false tension into this mess. Sometimes this requires no real action whatsoever; they just cut to the creature and play scary music. When something does happen, it mostly consists of cringe-worthy dialogue being broken up by moments of pseudo-action, where it seems like one of the characters might be in jeopardy for a moment, but then the tension is effortlessly resolved five seconds later. For instance, in the above scene, Sarah Polley hits Lady Jar-Jar over the head with a shovel before she can get away. End scene.

Wait, you ask, in this so-called horror film, an action sequence consists of a nubile fetus-with-tits stealing a key and getting whaled on by Sarah Polley? Yep, that's pretty much how it works. During 95% of the movie, Sarah and Adrian aren't so much fighting for their lives as they are physically and psychologically torturing a little girl. Splice is mostly about how these two robotic, emotionless humans cope with raising a daughter who's 'different.' Sort of like Mommie Dearest meets Alien Ressurection. Except not nearly as cool or as campy as that sounds. And I haven't even talked about the sex part yet.

Have you ever wanted to watch Sarah Polley being raped by her own alien daughter/son? What, I couldn't hear you, there was too much screaming at your end. No? Then you probably shouldn't watch this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ct_oa_4h62M

At this point, Adrian has already fucked his alien daughter/son, and she's already watched Sarah and Adrian fuck on a couch (for the sake of your sanity, do not ever watch a Sarah Polly sex scene; I swear to god, at the moment of orgasm, you can see the souls of all the men she's devoured writhing in agony behind her eyes).

<a href="http://photobucket.com/images/sarah%20polley" target="_blank"><img src="http://i146.photobucket.com/albums/r272/thorne132006/001/SarahPolley1.jpg" border="0" alt="Sarah Polley Pictures, Images and Photos"/></a>
"Oh yes. Give it to me."

Do not see this movie. I'm not even joking with you now. Do not see this movie, or I'm not responsible for the consequences.

What are you doing? Are you looking up showtimes? C'mon, seriously...okay, fine. Fuck you anyway. I never liked you. Everyone else is going to heed my advice. You just watch. You're about to look very foolish.
 
Another movie I can add to my list is a movie I saw today called Get Him To The Greek. I thought it was awful. Luckily, I had a free pass from Regal points I had accumulated, so it didnt cost me anything to get into the movie.

Mitch
 
Those cheesy Hulk Hogan films from the 80's, the acting never fails to make me cringe. And those awful one-liners, let me ask you this, do Hulk Hogan and Arnold Schwarzenegger share the same joke book?
 
Well lets run down the list shall we.

1) Anything with Megan Fox
2) Star Trek (90210)
3) The Fantastic Four (both of them)
4) Batman: the Dark Knight
5) Batman Forever
6) Batman & Robin
7) Superman IV: The Quest For Peace
8) Wanted (because it is nothing like the comic book)
9 The Matrix (woa, like, all of them)
10) House Keeping

That pretty much sums it up for now. I`ll wait until I actually see the A-Team movie before I say it sucks... and it will suck... believe me.
 
Splice

Splice fails and offends in so many directions at once that it's impossible to list them all in one review. As a science fiction movie, Splice is the worst I've ever seen, and I've seen Star Trek 5. Splice is the most boring science fiction film ever, and that includes Contact. As a horror film, Splice is more sleep-inducing than Bram Stoker's Dracula. It's got more unintentional humour than Troll 2. Splice has the worst acting ever captured on film, and I've seen Jennifer's Body (I do love Amanda Seyfried and Megan Fox, but they couldn't even convincingly lust after each other, and everyone in the world lusts after those two). Splice is less suspenseful than an episode of Glee; less realistic than an episode of Deep Space Nine; and contains more nightmare-inducing depictions of alien sex than the entire nation of Japan..

Ok first of all I don`t lust after Megan Fox`s. She is so stupid she lost her new wedding ring the day B.A.G. gave it to her. I would rather cut it off then sit next to that skeezy bitch on the bus. Next anthing Shatner is great so Star Trek 5 is great by proxy. I never saw Contact, so no comment. Monica Bellucci is in Bram Strokers Dracula ( and is the only reason I own the Matrixs films) so, so... nah! Never watched Glee, but I like DS9 so stop kicking Trek in the balls OK!!!!
 
Those cheesy Hulk Hogan films from the 80's, the acting never fails to make me cringe. And those awful one-liners, let me ask you this, do Hulk Hogan and Arnold Schwarzenegger share the same joke book?

Yes. Sly, Bruce Willis and countless others used it, too.

Some of said [overused] gems:

'I'm getting too old for this'
'Times up'
'That's why they call me/him [characters name]'
'[snide remark relating to the manner of how the main bad guy was just killed]'


You get the idea.
 
Slaver, I'm embarrassed to say, that I go to the movies often, but, of the movies you listed, I've only seen one. Batman and Robin, with a friend, when I lived in NJ, in 1997, and I agree with your assessment. I hated it!

Mitch
 
Just saw Valentine's Day and it was delightfully awful. I don't know if I hated it with a passion...
 
#1

The Girl Next Door
Failure Rating: Just...fucking...so much failure. Like, too much. Too fucking much.

They say that aspiring artists should sometimes expose themselves to bad art on purpose. Failure can be a great motivational tool. Watch a really bad movie, or read some terrible prose, and it can inspire you to go out and create something of genuine quality. You think to yourself: "I may be an idiot, but I can do better than that!" God knows how many masterpieces Plan 9 From Outer Space spawned; god knows how many acting careers were launched by the work of Billy Crystal.

But then there are some artistic efforts that are so bad that they can have the opposite effect. Instead of wanting to go out and succeed, these shit-monuments make you question the very value of success in the first place. They can make you abandon your faith in humanity. You start to wonder if there's any point living in a world where such abominations can exist and be released in theatres and on DVD. What could be the purpose of contributing to society when society is capable of such horrors? What use is 'talent' if it can only be used to entertain the soulless flesh-golems who consume this dreck? Should we just burn it all down and start again? Are there a few decent individuals who can be saved, or must they all die screaming? These films don't inspire creativity or artistic endeavour; they inspire us to find ways of weaponizing the herpes virus and injecting cancer into lollipops.

The Girl Next Door did all of these things and more. The Girl Next Door made me so angry that my cat had to take out a restraining order. This film is the root of my father's drinking problem, and he's never even seen it. After watching it, I considered going gay, because this film ruined tits for me. After watching this film, I attempted suicide just so that there would be one less person in the world who has seen it. As you watch this film, you can actually feel your soul bleed.

I hate this film so much.

In order to do research for this last, festering entry, I broke a sacred oath I swore six years ago: I watched this shit for a second time. See you all in hell, bitches.

A few thoughts occurred as this cavalcade of suck marched across my TV screen, soiling both my DVD player and my spirit:

Even before the opening montage is over, I immediately remember why I hated this film so much: it paints a picture of high school existence that doesn't even attempt to come close to something resembling reality, for anyone. Everyone in this school is not only impossibly attractive (that's any high school movie), but they're all so deliriously happy and self-satisfied that it sets my teeth on edge. Most teen films tend to depict high school as, at best, a waiting game with raging hormones spicing things up; a tedious exercise that mostly sucks, but holds the promise of better things to come. Even in films where the kids are happy, they're never happy to be in high school. But this depiction of high school life is positively worshipful. At this school, everyone is apparently drunk as a monkey, threesomes with cheerleaders are just a regular Tuesday, and there are definitely never any bouts of soul-crushing depression, bullshit pressure, or teenage angst which most of us associate with goddamn high school. I guess this is somehow meant to make us identify more with the geeky, everyman protagonist, but the thing is he's such a fucking pussy that you almost want to watch him get his underwear pulled up his ass. So right away, I don't know who I'm supposed to be rooting for. So I choose no one. I root for no one in this movie.

Also, what's with the subplot about the Cambodian math genius? We're expected to believe that everyone has to raise money so he can come to this generic American high school and study what, 12th grade calculus? WTF? Is this high school supposed to also be MIT? I'm beginning to suspect that this was originally meant to be a college movie, but the director is functionally illiterate and borderline retarded, so he set in a high school instead, and no one ever bothered to correct him. If this were a college, that would also explain why everyone who goes to school here is at least 25.

Nope, sorry, I can't do it. 18 minutes in, and I can't stand any more. This DVD goes out my window, and now I have to disinfect my whole livingroom. I'll do the rest of this review from memory (fuck, I hate bringing up repressed memories...uncle Jack, you shouldn't be massaging me while I'm in the bathtub, I don't care how stoned you are...)

Okay, first let's talk about the only reason this movie was popular: Elisha Cuthbert, and she plays a porn star. Holy fucking wow. Now, leaving aside the question of whether or not her character is supposed to be in high school herself, which would make her 17, she must have been doing porn for a couple years at least, so even if Elisha happens to be legal at the time of the film, it's more than implied that she was fucking on film when she was a child. So that adds a 'creep' factor directly proportional to the 'hot' factor.

Also, please note that she never gets naked in this film (you do see the side-boob of a clumsily-cast body double, though). This fact seems to escape almost everyone: I've talked to lots of guys who seem to have subconsciously added nudity to this film in an attempt to enjoy it. In fact, many of my friends think of this film as some kind of celebrity fuck-tape: they seriously believe that because Elisha plays a porn star in this mainstream movie, that means that she literally did porn. Yes, my friends are all idiots who should probably seek some kind of counselling.

<a href="http://photobucket.com/images/the%20girl%20next%20door%202004" target="_blank"><img src="http://i49.photobucket.com/albums/f268/kelspot/2004_the_girl_next_door_002.jpg" border="0" alt="the girl next door Pictures, Images and Photos"/></a>
FYI, these two are not actually fucking

Another problem is that nothing anyone does in this picture makes any sense, objectively or even in the skewed universe of this film. The main conflict is between Elisha's asshole boyfriend and the prepubescent whelp. At one point, asshole-boyfriend withdraws all the money that Whelp has collected for the Cambodian dude and drives away in his awesome car. In the real world, this is called fraud, and is a crime. But rather than go to the cops, like a person would, Whelp believes he'll somehow get into trouble because someone stole his money, so he borrows money from a porn producer to make a pornographic film to recoup his losses. Haven't we all been there? But then, asshole-boyfriend comes back, see, and he takes the tape they have made and tries to squeeze more money out of the kid. What does he threaten him with, holding the tape that represents his entire debt to a dangerous loan shark? "I'll destroy this tape right now, and then you're a fucking dead man." Wrong. That would make sense. Here's his threat: "I'm gonna tell you're mommy and daddy on you, and then you're gonna be in big trouble." Fuck. Was this film written by a high school student too? Did the writer take a lawn dart to the head when he was 10 and it locked him in that mental age forever? Can someone please act like they are not retarded in this fucking film, please god? It's really creepy for a film with so much tits-and-ass-and-fucking to be targeted specifically at 12 year-olds. What was anyone thinking when they were filming this abortion?

Also...oh god, you know what, that it. I'm done. I can stomach no more thoughts of this ghastly heap of flaming fucktarded shit. If you want to know what I think of this film, just consider any one particular aspect of it right now. Yes, I find that particular aspect to be an affront to my intelligence, my reason, and my dignity. And never send me thought-pictures using your mind again, it feels really weird.

There you have it, folks, the five films I hate the most. Hope you had as much fun as I did. Pardon me while I vomit for about nine days straight.:xlime:
 
Last edited:
oh! also!

i hated "once". i loved loved loved the music, but the movie didn't do it for me. which makes me sad, because i really wanted to like it.
 
I signed up for a free trial of Netflix and I was on a spree of adding movies that have names I've seen around FOREVER but never bothered to watch. Happy Gilmore was one of them, and since it was going to be taken down soon, I pressed play. Oh. My. God. I hated it. It was so bad, I let it keep playing while I got up to clean. Yes, I preferenced cleaning over watching this movie.
 
A little unsatisfied by the #1 pick, but I love the way you skewered it (which is an understatement).

I'd like to hear #'s 6-10. :goodjob:
 
I apologize in advance, but I have to bump this thread because I just watched a film which was so bad I can't hold it in...

The Other Boleyn Girl

Now, I thought this would suck, because it didn't get good reviews, most period pieces are bad, I despise Scarlett Johansenn and Eric Bana is awful, but...

I mean, I love Nat P. So I HAD to watch it. (So by TKO, penis defeats brain once more.)

*sigh*

Big mistake.

This film is insulting. It's a dumbed down, wannabe romantic, Americanized version of a story that should be reserved for stage.

It's so historically inaccurate it's comedy.

Scarlett Johansenn looks like a Resident Evil Zombie.

Eric Bana looks NOTHING like Henry VIII.

Portman is hot and acts okay, but... WHO CARES?!

Then I looked up the film and found out they made a better version in 2003 with the smokin' hot Natashca McElhone and a guy who ACTUALLY LOOKS LIKE HENRY VIII!!!

I'm baffled. I'm exasperated. And despite Nat P, I'm flacid (which I'll be forced to remedy by watching 'Hotel Chevalier' again).

I have, of my own free will, wasted two hours of my life.

And worst of all, I will do it again when the next crappy Natalie Portman movie comes out.

And the cosmic ballet goes on.
 
It's funny, c7, that I asked you about this on the weekend, and since you told me in person, I never bothered to look until now.

now I'm glad I did.

and I'm glad that I've never seen this movie, nor will I.
 
I apologize in advance, but I have to bump this thread because I just watched a film which was so bad I can't hold it in...

The Other Boleyn Girl

Ha! That movie sucks my balls! Also...

Scarlett Johansenn looks like a Resident Evil Zombie.

Yes! I could never figure out what she reminded me of all these years!

<a href="http://photobucket.com/images/scarlett%20johansson" target="_blank"><img src="http://i128.photobucket.com/albums/p181/azuremyth/scarlett-johansson_spirit_l.jpg" border="0" alt="Silken Floss Pictures, Images and Photos"/></a> <a href="http://photobucket.com/images/resident%20evil%20zombie" target="_blank"><img src="http://i686.photobucket.com/albums/vv229/DarkMudkip/resident-evil-zombie.jpg" border="0" alt="resident evil zombie Pictures, Images and Photos"/></a>

It's uncanny. :shock:
 
Yes! I could never figure out what she reminded me of all these years!

<a href="http://photobucket.com/images/scarlett%20johansson" target="_blank"><img src="http://i128.photobucket.com/albums/p181/azuremyth/scarlett-johansson_spirit_l.jpg" border="0" alt="Silken Floss Pictures, Images and Photos"/></a> <a href="http://photobucket.com/images/resident%20evil%20zombie" target="_blank"><img src="http://i686.photobucket.com/albums/vv229/DarkMudkip/resident-evil-zombie.jpg" border="0" alt="resident evil zombie Pictures, Images and Photos"/></a>

It's uncanny. :shock:

SJ MAY be hot, I don't know... but I do know she wasn't hot in 'The Other Boleyn Girl' (sadly, this is the best she looked in the film, too):

18874246-18874253-large.jpg



Then again, at least she looked like Mary Boleyn.

Seriously, WTF was Eric Bana cast as Henry VIII?!?!

Would it have killed them to hire an actor like Paul Giamatti who actually resembled the guy???

Fucking Hollywood.
 
More then a little off topic I know but...

Scarlett Johansenn looks like a Resident Evil Zombie.


Portman is hot and acts okay, but... WHO CARES?!

Ok, so you think that Scarlett Johansenn look is ugly, and Natalie Portman is hot... thats about as close to being a Homosexual a man can be with out actualy being a homosexual. Even in that picture you posted of her from The Other Boylen Girl she looks more womanly then Portman ever has. Natalie and Scarlett both have beautiful faces, but Porman has all the curves of a 12 year old boy.
 
I love old horror movies a lot. I like to watch old Bela Lugosi films. So I was doing research of his movies online. I found one that suppose to be his only color film called Scared to Death (1947). I found the full movie online and it was so low budget and bad I couldn't finish it.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0039800/

<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/uRfTCC4P7IE&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/uRfTCC4P7IE&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>
 
Ok, so you think that Scarlett Johansenn look is ugly, and Natalie Portman is hot... thats about as close to being a Homosexual a man can be with out actualy being a homosexual. Even in that picture you posted of her from The Other Boylen Girl she looks more womanly then Portman ever has. Natalie and Scarlett both have beautiful faces, but Porman has all the curves of a 12 year old boy.

Perhaps I'd be more attracted to SJ if I had a thing for albino's. :jester:

More seriously, while SJ can look fairly good on average (with alot of makeup and a hairstylist), she seriously looked horrible in the movie I mentioned. She was boney and borderline emaciated.

I could have overlooked such things if the movie wasn't excruciating and in constant need of forced entertainment.

Also, let me just say, per the point of subjectivity, some guys find Meghan Fox very, very attractive (because she also 'has curves'). I'm not one of them and I know you aren't and I certainly don't think you're a 'homo' for thinking (knowing) she isn't hot.

So please, call me an idiot or an asshole for disliking SJ, I won't mind a bit because I am often such things.

But if I'm a 'homo' for desiring Nat P, then I don't want to be whatever you think heterosexual is.

P.S. DO NOT WATCH 'The Other Boleyn Girl'! It's wretched. If you desire to see a movie w/ SJ, just pause the opening frame of 'Lost in Translation'. I guarantee it's infinitely better.
 
:sarcasm:
Y'know, I'm skinny like Miss Portman, so I gotta take offense there. She has lovely curvy girly hips (http://viploft.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/natalie-portman-nude.jpg <-- bam) , and I've been told all my life (mostly by bigger girls) I'm not much of a girl 'cause I'm shaped that way.

And surprisingly enough, none of the men I've dated have been 'almost-homosexual'. They've all loved my body. You'd never get away with saying something like that about a fat girl, just sayin' =/

You're beautiful the way you are! And yep, if I was a lesbian and had to choose between the two, I'd totally go for Natalie. She's beautiful.
 
You're beautiful the way you are! And yep, if I was a lesbian and had to choose between the two, I'd totally go for Natalie. She's beautiful.

So that explains it---I'm a lesbian!

:jester:
 
What's New
9/29/25
Visit our Chat Room, free to all members, and always busy.

Door 44
Live Camgirls!
Live Camgirls
Streaming Videos
Pic of the Week
Pic of the Week
Congratulations to
*** brad1704 ***
The winner of our weekly Trivia, held every Sunday night at 11PM EST in our Chat Room
Top