Why'd you have to remove it, out of curiosity?
A few years after the shoot they called me to tell me they weren't comfortable with their video being for sale anymore and asked me to remove it. I can understand that. Legally I didn't have to, but I don't want the models I work with to be unhappy, so I answered that I'd be willing to do it as long as they paid back the money I paid them. They agreed. Unfortunately, when we met to take care of it they suddenly decided to pay back only half, breaking our agreement. They also served me some BS like they were young and naive when they accepted to do the shoot, trying to guilt me into giving them a break. They were over 18 when we did the shoot, so supposedly they were old enough to make a decision by themselves. I also always go to great lengths to make sure the models understand everything about my project, what the videos are for and how they're distributed so they can make an informed decision. But no, apparently I was to blame for their mistake. Their argument for paying only half back was that they didn't have much money (boo hoo) and that I had made money from selling the video. Well, duh! That was the arrangement. We signed a release saying that. Their change of mind doesn't change that.
I could easily have refused and told them to get in touch with my lawyer (it seems they themselves talked to a lawyer about this, sheesh!), and I told them so. I had my own copies of the signed releases, after all. But quite frankly I really didn't want to make a fuss, so I let it go. If that makes me a pushover to some people, then so be it. In any case it was a frustrating experience, especially with them trying to make me the bad guy. I was perfectly willing to remove the video. There was no need to get nasty about it.
Of course, this doesn't happen most of the time. I've only had to remove two foot shoots (no tickling ones, thank god) from my catalog at the request of two other models, and they were a lot more reasonable and understanding about it.