• If you would like to get your account Verified, read this thread
  • The TMF is sponsored by Clips4sale - By supporting them, you're supporting us.
  • Reminder - We have a ZERO TOLERANCE policy regarding content involving minors, regardless of intent. Any content containing minors will result in an immediate ban. If you see any such content, please report it using the "report" button on the bottom left of the post.
  • >>> If you cannot get into your account email me at [email protected] <<<
    Don't forget to include your username

the naked tickler

Taking your clothes off, breaking into a house and tickling people is definitely a disturbing fetish.
 
Fortunately it’s the same article from Aug, 2006. I was afraid we had another guy out there making us look bad again.
 
From my perspective, guys like this don't make us look bad at all. I've yet to see a thread here from somebody bragging, "Hey guess what I did! I broke into a random house and tickled a hot babe against her will! Is that cool or what?"

He's a rapist who happens to dig tickling. Does it really stand to reason that all rapists are going to be vanilla?
 
Rapist is a bit harsh. The dude is still a morn and needs some serious help, but unless he's actually raped any of these girls, I don't think that term is quite appropriate.
 
From my perspective, guys like this don't make us look bad at all. I've yet to see a thread here from somebody bragging, "Hey guess what I did! I broke into a random house and tickled a hot babe against her will! Is that cool or what?"

He's a rapist who happens to dig tickling. Does it really stand to reason that all rapists are going to be vanilla?

That's a good point. However, I'm afraid most people don't see it that way. Since they're not into tickling and just don't get it, the tickling factor is what strikes them the most. That's what makes the guy a freak in their eyes. They don't really separate the naked breaking and entering assault from the tickling. Not that they wouldn't be shocked if no tickling was involved, but somehow it's the tickling part that makes this story especially creepy to them. So yes, it does make us look bad. It's totally unfair, but that's how most vanilla people see things.
 
Rapist is a bit harsh. The dude is still a morn and needs some serious help, but unless he's actually raped any of these girls, I don't think that term is quite appropriate.
I'll agree that nonconsensual tickling is not synonomous with rape. If a guy walks up to a strange woman in a shopping mall and starts tickling her, that's not rape, because it isn't sexual.

But breaking into a woman's house, and assaulting her while naked. To me, that is sexual assault, which is pretty close to rape in my book.

You can argue that my calling the naked tickler a rapist is technically inaccurate, but I don't see how you can say the term is too harsh, given the heinocity of the man's crime.
 
That's a good point. However, I'm afraid most people don't see it that way. Since they're not into tickling and just don't get it, the tickling factor is what strikes them the most. That's what makes the guy a freak in their eyes. They don't really separate the naked breaking and entering assault from the tickling. Not that they wouldn't be shocked if no tickling was involved, but somehow it's the tickling part that makes this story especially creepy to them. So yes, it does make us look bad. It's totally unfair, but that's how most vanilla people see things.
I hear what you're saying Francois, and I agree that many people will see it that way. My opinion is that such people are likely to see it as creepy regardless of whether it's done by a naked guy breaking into a house or by someone at one of our gatherings.

I guess what I'm saying is that I don't see a reasonable person forming a negative view about our community based on this guy's actions. As for unreasonable people, they are a different story, but I find myself experiencing a serious lack of concern for what they think.
 
Honestly, I am more concerned with this man's mental health. For someone to break into another person's home, NAKED, and touch them while they're just asleep, shows an OBVIOUS lack of understanding that what he's doing is wrong, or at least a high level of difficulty comprehending what's happening. Now, he runs when they wake up. This might mean he knows that what he is doing is wrong, or he might just be scared that they scream at him.

It seems like he's got the mind of a child. When we were very little, we were curious like this, only we didn't have sexual urges to couple with that curiosity.

Breaking an entering isn't a MAJOR crime, all things considered. He touched them against their will and that's VERY wrong, but I am less inclined to want to lock him away and more ready to evaluate his mental health. I almost feel bad for the guy, as he obviously is missing a few marbles.
 
It's Milagros! 😀

Happily, I do know that you're joking. 😀

As I've said in many other threads, there are numerous legal ways to indulge in tickling, and there is no need to be a criminal about it. :sowrong: The guy described in the article belongs in jail.
 
He's a rapist who happens to dig tickling. Does it really stand to reason that all rapists are going to be vanilla?

Sorry, going to have to disagree with ya there. Most people would consider tickling faaaaaaaaaaaar more vanilla than rape. Most people enjoy a good tickle sometimes, I doubt many enjoy a playful rape...
 
If a guy walks up to a strange woman in a shopping mall and starts tickling her, that's not rape, because it isn't sexual.

I wouldn't say that too loud! If it is sexual to him, it very well could be looked at as being sexual assault! To me, it would be!
 
drew70 said:
If a guy walks up to a strange woman in a shopping mall and starts tickling her, that's not rape, because it isn't sexual.
I wouldn't say that too loud! If it is sexual to him, it very well could be looked at as being sexual assault! To me, it would be!
In the scenario I describe above, how would the police know it was sexual to the guy? How would they go about proving it? In the eyes of the law, the assault itself is either sexual in nature, or it isn't. It doesn't vary from person to person. At least that's how it works here in the US, which is where this incident occurred.
 
I work for the US Army in Germany, and we have "Sexual Assault Training" once a year (I personally think that is pretty stupid....I know how to sexually assault people... :woot: ), and in that one even touching your colleague on the shoulder is sexual harrassment. So if a stranger in a shop starts to just tickle me and I report it, I can't imagine that would be anything else than that! You just don't walk up to someone you don't know and touch them without an invitation, no matter how!
 
We're not talking about UCMJ sexual harrassment. We're talking about a civilian environment, a shopping mall. A woman is reaching for a product on a high shelf. A man she doesn't know walks up behind her and tickles her sides through her shirt. He doesn't touch her breasts or any of her "privates."

I think we both agree that this is assault, and that it's not cool. But you said before that if the tickling was sexual to the guy, that makes it sexual assault. I ask you again, how would the police or the district attourney prove that it was sexual to the guy, thereby qualifying the assault as a sexual one?
 
The UCMJ does not apply to me, I'm civilian. 😉

I don't know how sexual assault is classified to be honest, especially not in the US. I am just saying I wouldn't be too sure that something like that will never be called sexual assault.
 
What's New
4/13/26
Visit Clips4Sale for the webs largest selection of fetish clips.

Door 44
Live Camgirls!
Live Camgirls
Streaming Videos
Pic of the Week
Pic of the Week
Congratulations to
*** Kratos Aurion ***
The winner of our weekly Trivia, held every Sunday night at 11PM EST in our Chat Room
Top