Tickle a Stranger?

[TicklishBlackGuy]

dude stfu and stop picking on pls dude, don't u have anything better to do

 

[bassman34472]

All those that had to suffer through this discussion, I do apologize. As my wife tells me all the time, I can not avoid rattling the cages of those that are dumb enough to fall for it. Half of what I put on here usually isn't what I really think, but if it will get a rise out of weak minded people, I can't avoid it. Clearly in this thread I have succeeded.

So to sum up my side of this argument. In my opinion, anyone on this site gets something out of tickling or they wouldn't be here. And for most on here, that something is sexual. The act of tickling a stranger in itself is not creepy on it's own if the tickler doesn't have the fetish and is truly just doing it playfully. As soon as you add the fetish and you are getting your thrill by touching a stranger, that is what makes it creepy. So to Prime, Bass, and DAJT, you are correct. Tickling a stranger with a brief stroke is not creepy in itself. However, sorry to inform you, you all are here which means you have a fetish. So in my opinion, you are creepy because you are doing it or thinking of doing it while having the fetish. Again congratulations to all 3 of you if you are able to complete this task and never get any negative results from it. However, even if you never get those negative results, you are and forever will be creepy to me.

Most people in the mainstream can't accept fetishes because they think it's creepy. That is why we are all here, as a family of people who share the same interest and the same fetish. I guess that puts us all in the same boat and if one person is a creep then we are all creeps. Now let's put this thread to rest.

 

[primetime]

All those that had to suffer through this discussion, I do apologize. As my wife tells me all the time, I can not avoid rattling the cages of those that are dumb enough to fall for it. Half of what I put on here usually isn't what I really think, but if it will get a rise out of weak minded people, I can't avoid it. Clearly in this thread I have succeeded.

So to sum up my side of this argument. In my opinion, anyone on this site gets something out of tickling or they wouldn't be here. And for most on here, that something is sexual. The act of tickling a stranger in itself is not creepy on it's own if the tickler doesn't have the fetish and is truly just doing it playfully. As soon as you add the fetish and you are getting your thrill by touching a stranger, that is what makes it creepy. So to Prime, Bass, and DAJT, you are correct. Tickling a stranger with a brief stroke is not creepy in itself. However, sorry to inform you, you all are here which means you have a fetish. So in my opinion, you are creepy because you are doing it or thinking of doing it while having the fetish. Again congratulations to all 3 of you if you are able to complete this task and never get any negative results from it. However, even if you never get those negative results, you are and forever will be creepy to me.

My issue has always been the severe amount of judging from the "morality police" when it comes to this topic. It is obvious that people will find it "creepy" and their opinion won't change. That is fine. If that is what you think, that is what you think. However, this group always wants to call people creepy and label them as the "boogeymen". What right does this group have judging people? Your wife even says not to judge, but she judges others. Would I go around tickling strangers even if it is one stroke? No, because that is not my thing. But, I will not overreact to someone and threaten violence if someone did that to me.

You see, there seems to be an absolutism from the "moral police" on how these things play out. But there isn't. That is why I always "argue" against those who think every single event results in the same thing. It will not happen like that so stop treating it that way. Why do you think in my first post in this thread, I warned the OP that he will see a major fracas? Here we are, 9 pages worth of this. So you will have your opinion, that is fine. But we are not all creeps. Cool?

 

[TicklishBlackGuy]

lol moral police? its you people who make use seem that all fetish folks are this bad? there is a point of control where you don't just go up to strangers and start tickling them especially if you don't know if they like it or not. maybe instead of getting mad at us "moral police" how bout learning to control your damn urges

 

[LargerWorld2577]

Everyone is a "moral police" then. Like I've said, we all have things we think are and are not okay.

 

[smokinj]

lol moral police? its you people who make use seem that all fetish folks are this bad? there is a point of control where you don't just go up to strangers and start tickling them especially if you don't know if they like it or not. maybe instead of getting mad at us "moral police" how bout learning to control your damn urges

Did you even read Primetime's post? He said tickling strangers was not his thing. There sure is morality police here. Sanctimonious, holier then thou people that love to tell others what's wrong and right. It's human nature I suppose but doesn't make it ok.

For the record, I'm not on board with tickling strangers either but I'm not gonna blast people who do. If they get away with it, good for them. Makes for a hell of a good story later!

 

[TicklishBlackGuy]

I don't give a fuck about whether its his thing or not, the point of the matter is that its wrong, i don't care how you faze it, its wrong!It makes us all look bad, i've deal with this shit in real life, feeling embarrassed to even have my fetishes because of people like that. So seriously i don't give a shit who thinks we are moral police, it is WRONG!

 

[Park CollegeO]

what strikes me as odd is that the OP and co do not realize that it matters less what they perceive their actions to be/mean/make a stranger.

touch 8 strangers you ve never met from a group of 10 and they will feel violated, no morale police here.

You want to take your chances you'll fall on the other 2, be my guest. Just dont expect your logic/perception of the situation (harmless,non threatening, funny etc...) to work on the person at the other end of the equation

 

[Wolf]

Most people in the mainstream can't accept fetishes because they think it's creepy. That is why we are all here, as a family of people who share the same interest and the same fetish. I guess that puts us all in the same boat and if one person is a creep then we are all creeps. Now let's put this thread to rest.

Dude, Relax.

People get groped by creeps all the time; on the subway, on the street, basically anywhere a creep can feel he's got enough of a chance for a safe getaway, before someone points out that he's a fucking creep. It happens.
That doesn't mean they're going to associate it with with a tickle fetish, or that they're going to hold one random creep's lame-ass thrill against what their partner is into (unless, of course, their partner is into creeping on strangers).
Most of the time, the unwilling recipients probably don't even think of it as tickling. It's just a fucking creep being creepy. The thought that the creep was trying to tickle them doesn't make it any more or less creepy.
Putting your greasy mitts on someone you don't know, with no thought to their space, boundaries, or issues, while hiding behind the safety of anonymity in a crowd or a speedy getaway is creepy. Happens a lot, sadly.
But it doesn't reflect on what people do with their partners, or even what they do with someone they barely know, face-to-face. That's different.
If the creeps themselves weren't aware on some level that it was creepy, they wouldn't need the anonymity, and the safe getaway.

 

[primetime]

lol moral police? its you people who make use seem that all fetish folks are this bad? there is a point of control where you don't just go up to strangers and start tickling them especially if you don't know if they like it or not. maybe instead of getting mad at us "moral police" how bout learning to control your damn urges

*sigh* another guy who just comes busting in and doesn't stop, rationalize, then post. Let me break it down for you. If you read CAREFULLY, I said you would have your opinion if you think what the OP wants to do is wrong. Can't change it, no one plans to change it, keep it in your mind forever. No one gives a flying fuck.

Here is the problem. NO ONE has the right to judge others. You know why people are called the "moral police"? Seriously, think about why that term is being used. There is a certain group of people who instead of simply disagreeing with the topic like the OP's, they rain down their emotion on the person. Here's an example of what should happen, and what the "moral police" does....

Poster: Hey everyone! I plan on tickling a stranger. Not jump on them, just a quick little tickle of some feet sticking out the window. Anyone else done this before?

Normal person who disagrees: Hey dude, that is probably not a good idea. The person may not like it. You want to be careful doing stuff like that.


(Now, same poster, moral police response)

Poster: Hey everyone! I plan on tickling a stranger. Not jump on them, just a quick little tickle of some feet sticking out the window. Anyone else done this before?

Moral police: ARE YOU CRAZY??!!! HOW DARE YOU VIOLATE SOMEONE'S PERSONAL SPACE LIKE THAT!!! You are a CREEP and if you did that to me, I would resort to serious violence against you!! What you are doing is wrong and you give all of us a bad name! Very creepy dude!!! I would take you to court for assault!!! Doing that is THE SAME as touching a woman's breasts!!! It is THE SAME as RAPE!!!!!!



Do you see the difference? You can disagree with someone wanting to do something and even think it is wrong. But when you chastise someone, call them names, and "wag your finger" at them like they are a child, you are now acting like you are "morally superior" and if someone disagrees, you now chastise them with the most outlandish responses. Had the OP came off like a total jerk like saying things like....

Poster: Look everyone! I am going out today to the beach and I am going to tickle torture some women I don't know. I will jump on them, and tickle them for several minutes and get my thrill! I don't even care what they say, I must have their feet!!!


You get that kind of post, then the "moral police" style responses would be more fitting. But that is not what happens. The OP could be a young person who is still maturing, and makes a post he thinks is innocent. Then you get these people just wailing away at them with wild and crazy responses. As though what they feel and think is what EVERYONE should think. That is why they are called "moral police" because they feel their way is the way it should be. There is no other variation, just THEIR WAY!

Does any of this make sense to you? Probably not judging by your response, but I tried anyway.... In other words, it is how people RESPOND to threads like these that causes friction.... Pay attention to my first post in this entire conversation and I even warned the OP that he will get certain types of responses. I wasn't lying was I?

 

[LargerWorld2577]

By saying certain types of responses would be more fitting for this type of behavior versus that, essentially one is being a "moral police" themselves. Sure, the behaviors may not be comparable, but it's still all a matter of opinion. No, I don't agree with just plain threats of violence and labelling, but I also don't think people should have to limit their responses to "that's probably not a good idea". People are allowed to heavily criticize something they feel is wrong just like you might if you were discussing something you thought was wrong.

 

[primetime]

By saying certain types of responses would be more fitting for this type of behavior versus that, essentially one is being a "moral police" themselves. Sure, the behaviors may not be comparable, but it's still all a matter of opinion. No, I don't agree with just plain threats of violence and labelling, but I also don't think people should have to limit their responses to "that's probably not a good idea". People are allowed to heavily criticize something they feel is wrong just like you might if you were discussing something you thought was wrong.

You just said so yourself. You don't agree with plain threats of violence and labelling. That is also a reason why the term "moral police" was thrown out there. To provide a counter to the labelling of certain posters that love the term "creepy" and use it incessantly. If it is ok for them to label someone "creepy", then it is ok to label them "moral police". What is fair is fair right? But people don't like being called "moral police" do they? Well, look in the mirror and see if you are also doing labelling as well. Just like someone in this thread says "don't judge", yet they have judged from the outset.

You can disagree with someone, but to act like you can do no wrong, and that is the tone of the "moral police's" posts, you will get a counter reaction. How about being civil FIRST, and if the person then responds with venom, then act accordingly. That is NOT what we see when these topics come up. Certain people come guns blazing from the outset and these threads go pages long.

Again, think about what is being said to you....

 

[LargerWorld2577]

I agree with you about the threats and labelling. I don't do that. I DO say that something is wrong with conviction or tell someone what I think of them and their actions, but I then explain why I think so. That should be acceptable. That's all I'm saying. I hope should you ever discuss something you think is wrong, you would act the way you want others to act: no threats of violence, namecalling, etc. unless of course they're being rude.

 

[primetime]

I agree with you about the threats and labelling. I don't do that. I DO say that something is wrong with conviction or tell someone what I think of them and their actions, but I then explain why I think so. That should be acceptable. That's all I'm saying. I hope should you ever discuss something you think is wrong, you would act the way you want others to act: no threats of violence, namecalling, etc. unless of course they're being rude.

I totally agree. People should learn to try and have civil discussions. That is why this topic always gets out of hand. For the word "go" people come in and label and lambast the OP. Because it starts out that way, the thread derails and becomes more heated, more emotional. Hopefully the next time this topic comes up (and it will) it will be a peaceful one....

 

[Myriads]

I think this is done.

Myriads