Oh for Petes sake. There is no 'evidence'.
One of the biggest annoyances of the web is the inability to prove jack about anyone on it.
Some folks are exactly what they say, some are a mix of fact and fantasy, and others are total fabrications.
We've seen (and still see) all three sorts here on the TMF.
Sadly the 'reality police' who make it their duty to turn over all fakeness here, attack all the young women with pretty much the same method. By yelling "you are too good to be real' as soon as they offer an image.
Often they are correct. They found a fake. The faker drops the ID and creates a new one to try again. Why? Who cares, it's how they choose to enjoy their life.
But I know of at least two cases in the past two years where the 'reality police' managed to drive off two very real, and very nice members who were exactly as their images presented. I know, because I got to know these women over time, usually after the events that drove them from here, stemming from their discussions of it with me. I'm left to wonder how many others who left fall into this group.
It's forum policy to let people choose to present themselves as they choose. If you find a case of image theft, provide us with solid proof of the location of where the images being used arise from, and we'll kill the images.
It's the web folks. Believe things as you will, but keep in mind that without time, contact and personal interaction, everything is and can be fluid. It's a very big example of let the buyer beware.
Myriads