• If you would like to get your account Verified, read this thread
  • The TMF is sponsored by Clips4sale - By supporting them, you're supporting us.
  • Reminder - We have a ZERO TOLERANCE policy regarding content involving minors, regardless of intent. Any content containing minors will result in an immediate ban. If you see any such content, please report it using the "report" button on the bottom left of the post.
  • >>> If you cannot get into your account email me at [email protected] <<<
    Don't forget to include your username

(Vaguely tickle related) BDSM fetishes are abuse; consent means nothing.

It's just someone's opinion apparently based on what they personally experienced. I swear to you, tomorrow the sun will still rise, crops will still grow, and babies will still be born. Let them have their fun and we can have ours.
 
Opinions of those who aren't of the mindset .. like telling someone who suffers from depression to just get over it, when they themselves have never been depressed. It's awful, insulting, and incorrect, but they are entitled to their own, uninformed opinion as are the rest of us.
 
If it wasn't consensual or if they were tricked into participating under false pretenses, then yes they are a victim of a sex crime and my heart goes out to them. If two consenting adults allow their partners to do any act of BDSM upon them, then that isn't sexualizing violence. Violence is a social construct which is determined by certain factions of society. Who are they to say that spanking, scratching, or even tickling can be viewed as sexualizing violence? If both parties are into the same "kink" then the "kink" is deemed as normal from the point of view of both parties. They don't view it as a violent act. This sounds like an experience gone horribly wrong. Instead of demonizing the BDMS community as a whole, they should demonize the individual for treating him or her in a way other than the way the participating party wished to be treated. This has nothing to do with certain sexual acts, but instead has to do with a mind set of the perpetrator. We should educate everyone about what consent means and how they need said consent to go through with any sexual act.
 
Consent is consent... if no one gets hurt, then whats the big deal... ant-bdsm activists... bullshit. Spend your energy making the world better people, not making it stupid.
 
If it wasn't consensual or if they were tricked into participating under false pretenses, then yes they are a victim of a sex crime and my heart goes out to them. If two consenting adults allow their partners to do any act of BDSM upon them, then that isn't sexualizing violence. Violence is a social construct which is determined by certain factions of society. Who are they to say that spanking, scratching, or even tickling can be viewed as sexualizing violence? If both parties are into the same "kink" then the "kink" is deemed as normal from the point of view of both parties. They don't view it as a violent act. This sounds like an experience gone horribly wrong. Instead of demonizing the BDMS community as a whole, they should demonize the individual for treating him or her in a way other than the way the participating party wished to be treated. This has nothing to do with certain sexual acts, but instead has to do with a mind set of the perpetrator. We should educate everyone about what consent means and how they need said consent to go through with any sexual act.

I love your summary: "Social construct" and "consent," and that is very true. Consensual-ism leading the charge, and "social construct" to follow - as long as it is voluntary.
 
I guess that's what you get if you meet up with people who don't know how to play right.
 
What's New
2/8/26
There will be Trivia in our Chat Room this Sunday eve at 11PM EST.

Door 44
Live Camgirls!
Live Camgirls
Streaming Videos
Pic of the Week
Pic of the Week
Congratulations to
*** brad1701 ***
The winner of our weekly Trivia, held every Sunday night at 11PM EST in our Chat Room
Top