Myriads said:Jim,
For those readers who are a touch confused, and might prefer a flash card of some of your core concepts, how about providing some digest answers to the following:
I keep forgetting; several of the repliers here are new to this series of stuff. I have outlined this before of course, but they may not have seen it.
Myriads said:Who rules the world? By this I mean what is the current titular name for ‘Them’ and from where do they operate? A simple X controls Y who controls 1,2,3 will do. Who’s on top? Give us an outline to the best of your knowledge.
I've heard several names for "them". The two most memorable ones are the Illuminati and the Global Elite. I prefer the second one because it's not so hokey or cliched. People tend to assume I mean some weird cabal of Freemasons or something similar, but this isn't true. These people operate from all over the world, through all countries and governments, all races, all religions, through financial institutions, the military, the top of media and the medical and scientific professions. Secretive organisations like the Freemasons are just another instrument through which the overall agenda is implemented, not the agenda itself. At the top of all industries, institutions and societies, they interconnect and co-operate. This often means controlling both sides in a war, and playing them off against each other. World War 2 was a classic case. Germany was left destitue by the incredibly unfair "peace" treaty, with hideous, economy destroying reparations laid down by France and Britain. After 15 years or so of death by starvation, Hitler walks into the German people's lives and becomes somewhat of a savior figure because they can eat again. Not only that but Germany becomes massively powerful on the world stage and begins to garner an empire. This attracts the attention of the "good guys" in Britain and America who fight the bloodiest war in History to dethrone him. What the public often don't know is that Hitler was funded largely from America, and in no small part by Henry Ford and Prescott Bush, the grandfather of the current President. They did this through something called the Union Banking Corporation which channelled money through the oil and steel empire of Fritz Thyssen. The same people who were supposed to be Hitler's enemies funded and controlled him.
Myriads said:At what point did this group assume ‘control’, and begin sculpting world affairs to aid themselves?
This "group" is actually a relatively small gathering of families and they've controlled humanity since the beginning of recorded history. Two of the most prominent families involved are the Windsors, currently Britain's royal family; and the Bushes. George W. Bush is a cousin of Prince Charles. He was also a cousin of his alleged "opponent" in the 2000 election, Al Gore. Both Bush and Gore can trace their lineage back through the nobility and royalty of Europe as far as Charlemagne and Alfred the Great of England. I havn't had time to trace the lineage of John Kerry, but I could guess that his blood is bluer than ink as well.
Traced even farther back this world controlling bloodline ruled the civilisations of the ancient world such as Egypt, Greece, Rome, Sumer and Babylon. Since time immemorial they have been obsessed with interbreeding with each other, keeping their bloodlines pure and unsullied. Thar's gold in that thar DNA! Perhaps it would explain why 34 of the 43 men who have been President of the United States can also trace their heritage back to Charlemegne and the cake-burning gimboid. The others had lesser links and were usually married to someone whose bloodline was connected; Bill Clinton being a good example.
Myriads said:What is their reason for doing this? Ruling the planet and managing world events seems to be a real pain in the ass. So the payout must be something that one can’t get more mundane ways. What is it?
Why is any person who gets into politics suddenly infested with the desire for power? These people have been controlling humanity for a long time now and they pretty much regard it as their birthright. Monarchs of Europe sometimes refer to their "divine right" to rule. Even though such is not openly spoken of in America, it seems very prominent there too.
Controlling people has become increasingly difficult over the years. Fewer and fewer people are just accepting their lot in life and bowing and scraping to their lords and masters. People protest their governments in greater and greater numbers, ordinary citizens stand up for what they believe in and be damned to the consequences.
The agenda now is aiming at greater centralisation of power, in fewer and fewer organisations and hands. The push is towards a world government, a world army, a world currency and a microchipped population. Most people would hate the idea of any of those, so the "Elite" use a technique that has been termed problem-reaction-solution. You want to introduce something to give you more power, but you know the people would tell you to get stuffed. It can be laws that give the military and police greater and greater powers, a central market economy, a run on a currency, whatever. So you introduce a problem. Take my example from earlier, that of the Second World War. Following the devastation the people very understandably say, "Something must be done! We can't go on like this!". Unfortunately the very next thing people said was... "What are they going to do about it?"
What "They" did about it was to introduce the United Nations, a stalking horse for world government that wasn't as toothless as it's predecessor, the League of Nations; and with the advent of the manufactured Cold War, NATO. (The stalking horse for the world army.) These were pushed on the people by telling them that preventing another war depended on it. Over the years they swell and gradually turn into something far more sinister and unilateral. Best example of that is the European Union, which now dictates to it's member nations, regardless of the fact that the gits doing the dictating weren't elected by the people. This evolved from the common market of the 50's, which was foisted on the people by telling them they'd sarve if they didn't join it.
"Just a free trade area people, no need to worry about sovreignty."
Some bloody laugh that was. The EU is as far from a mere free trade area and as close to a communist dictatorship as you could get. Ted Heath must be proud.
Myriads said:Short answers to some of these might help many here understand what viewpoint you are bringing to your writings.
Myriads
*sighs*
I tried to be as short as I could, but I just knew that quick-fire bullet points wasn't going to be my style.