How are you so sure the men the clips described are even average. What if they're below average? Not to mention, I don't see too many guys complaining about how Tickle Abuse uses way too many hot models in their videos. Even if you prefer average women, you can't deny that a lot of men buying porn are looking for the hottest girls they can find.
I wouldn't deny that at all. But, what's "hottest" is going to vary person to person.
Then how do you know the girls you prefer are average? How do you know whether others are hot? For this to happen you have to recognize that the girls you really enjoy watching are typically considered less attractive than the ones in some other clips. If beauty couldn't be defined, you wouldn't know this and would just think that the average girls are the most beautiful. You state in one sentence that you know the difference between average and hot, then you try to tell us that beauty is some sort of mystical ideal beyond human comprehension. Of course we can't exactly quantify beauty as it is subjective for each individual, but there are general trends in every culture of what's typically considered beautiful between the genders. It would be easy for produces to take this qualitative information and apply it towards finding better looking men for clips.
What I meant is that trying to find a definition of beauty that everyone can agree on is not going to happen. That said, I know there are certain societal standards that are seen as norms of beauty, for both men and women. I don't agree with them, nor do many others. I know that many women I find incredibly attractive would not be considered so by mainstream standards. Contrarily, I can think of a lot of women who are generally considered beautiful that I think are very unattractive.
These women aren't generalizing or projecting as far as i can tell, they're just asking for some hotter guys in their tickle vids. The men who are trying to make them feel bad about wanting more attractive men are the ones who seem to be projecting their insecurities 😉
I don't see the analogy at all. Could you explain? To me, a better analogy would be that it's as though there were no attractive women between the ages of 18-28 appearing in clips. The men post to the forum asking for some younger/better looking models and the women respond by saying "YOU SHOULD JUST ENJOY THE TICKLING! WHY DON'T YOU APPRECIATE THE BEAUTY OF THE AVERAGE WOMAN?"
But the women here are happy to let us have our hot, young lees, because they don't think they should be telling us how to enjoy our porn and you should extend the same courtesy back to them.
I'm not trying to make anyone feel bad. This is an extremely supportive forum, which is why I'm flummoxed to see this topic. I believe Doll when she says she wasn't trying to be rude, but I'm still at a loss as to how this topic could be broached tactfully. Would anyone seriously deny the fact that if this topic were made by a male about female lers or female lees, that there wouldn't be some very different, substantially less courteous responses? That's my big issue here.
Also, bringing out my comments on 4 clips shows nothing at all. I've got gigs of clips from over the years, featuring women (and men) of every shape, size, ethnicity, whatever. If you'll notice, 2 of the 4 comments make reference to the tickling or scenarios, rather than the girls. Which is the primary reason I buy clips. Ticklishness and places tickled come first. Upperbody tickling is my thing, and if any of those clips were solely foot tickling, they would neither be commented upon, nor bought, because that's not my thing, regardless of how attractive I think the women are.
