Necro-thread Clean-up (TC video rant)

[TicklishRocker]

Ok, let me just say this; (most of you) are seeming to be extremely greedy and selfish ("don't give the free video to nondonators") I honestly believe that that is not right. The whole reason TC came up with this idea is TO distribute the video for free. It's a very special thing, and why should ANYBODY have to pay for the video? This is a very special video and it was meant to be distributed for free. The point of making this video is to distribute it for free. It is not meant to be charged. The point I'm trying to make is; People that do not donate have every right to get this video for free. The fact that you guys are telling TC not to distribute it for free even to nondonators makes you greedy and selfish. Give me one good reason nondonators shouldn't get the video for free just like everyone else? The answer is none. There is no reason why nondonators should have to pay for the video. Like I said; you tell TC to charge nondonators just shows that you are very greedy and very selfish. I'll tell ya what though; if you still think you have to charge nondonators; you at least shouldn't charge $60! Also, if I am understanding right, you are planning on sending the video on a DVD (or VHS, whatever). I think you should also make it available as a video like you get from clips4sale. If you make it in a video like you get from clips4sale, and if you have to charge for it, you should charge no more than $10 for it. I mean come on, a normal tickling video, from any video company doesn't usually cost any more than that. Why would you actually charge $60? It's just a video. No video in the world is worth more than $10-15. Hollywood movies don't even cost any more than that, and they ALWAYS star celebrities. Anyone that would spend $60 on a tickling video is either really really desparate and/or is just plain an idiot. Just saying.

I rest my case.

P.S. One person I would LOVE to see tickled is Carrie Underwood. Secondary choices would be Miley Cyrus and Taylor Swift. It would be amazing if you could get one of them. As a matter of fact, if you could get one of them, I would be willing to pay to see that (a reasonable amount of money)

 

[datickler]

way to drag up a 9 year old thread 🙂

 

[Comfort Eagle]

Ok, let me just say this; (most of you) are seeming to be extremely greedy and selfish ("don't give the free video to nondonators") I honestly believe that that is not right. The whole reason TC came up with this idea is TO distribute the video for free. It's a very special thing, and why should ANYBODY have to pay for the video? This is a very special video and it was meant to be distributed for free. The point of making this video is to distribute it for free. It is not meant to be charged. The point I'm trying to make is; People that do not donate have every right to get this video for free. The fact that you guys are telling TC not to distribute it for free even to nondonators makes you greedy and selfish. Give me one good reason nondonators shouldn't get the video for free just like everyone else? The answer is none. There is no reason why nondonators should have to pay for the video. Like I said; you tell TC to charge nondonators just shows that you are very greedy and very selfish. I'll tell ya what though; if you still think you have to charge nondonators; you at least shouldn't charge $60! Also, if I am understanding right, you are planning on sending the video on a DVD (or VHS, whatever). I think you should also make it available as a video like you get from clips4sale. If you make it in a video like you get from clips4sale, and if you have to charge for it, you should charge no more than $10 for it. I mean come on, a normal tickling video, from any video company doesn't usually cost any more than that. Why would you actually charge $60? It's just a video. No video in the world is worth more than $10-15. Hollywood movies don't even cost any more than that, and they ALWAYS star celebrities. Anyone that would spend $60 on a tickling video is either really really desparate and/or is just plain an idiot. Just saying.

I rest my case.

P.S. One person I would LOVE to see tickled is Carrie Underwood. Secondary choices would be Miley Cyrus and Taylor Swift. It would be amazing if you could get one of them. As a matter of fact, if you could get one of them, I would be willing to pay to see that (a reasonable amount of money)

Why.

 

[mabus]

Oh my God I can't wait til this comes out and they SHOULD use that new fangled clips4sale, that site may have, like, 100 stores one day, you never know!

and secondly......oh CRAP, I broke my sarcasm button....... har dee har hardees 🙂

 

[Sandrock74]

um....you DO realize that this thread was from 2002? A whopping 9 years ago???

 

[BigJim]

*wakes up with a groan and a howl*


Someone say something about coming back from the dead?

 

[The Last Laugh]

Jesus Christ, TicklishRocker, what's with you and reviving threads that are several years old?! This is only your 21st post and you've already done it at least twice. Think before you post, man!

 

[Flatfoot]

Indeed... someone's gotta TRY to find stuff this old! This is some obscure stuff, right here. Just thinking about it, though, I wonder if anyone lost significant money donating to this...

 

[Comfort Eagle]

Ok people, pretty sure we got the point across.

 

[Phineas]

I'll pretend I have a clue what this is about and just nod along.

 

[rhiannon]

Would anybody volunteer to explain to me what the hell this is all about?

 

[Comfort Eagle]

Would anybody volunteer to explain to me what the hell this is all about?

He had necrod a 9 year old post. For whatever reason, instead of just locking that thread, they pushed all the replies to a separate thread. So now instead of a lot of people bumping an old post to ask why one guy bumped an old post, it looks like we're all just dickheads.

 

[BigJim]

He had necrod a 9 year old post. For whatever reason, instead of just locking that thread, they pushed all the replies to a separate thread. So now instead of a lot of people bumping an old post to ask why one guy bumped an old post, it looks like we're all just dickheads.

We are though, aren't we?

I am, anyway...

 

[rhiannon]

So basically this is just a discussion about something that is long dead and gone?

 

[Sandrock74]

So basically this is just a discussion about something that is long dead and gone?

Exactly! The entire affair was handled, contributors got dvds from TC since the plan didn't work out. It's LONG since over and done with.

 

[MrTicklefeet]

Ok, let me just say this; Just saying.

I rest my case.

Well, after all that, he did say he was just saying.

 

[TicklishRocker]

omg, I guess I shouldv'e payed better attention to the thread before I posted in it. I didn't even realize it was 9 years old! :-o
It was an honest mistake though. I didn't even look at the date or anything. I guess it is a dead thread. Btw, so they didn't end up getting any celebrities? It didn't work then? Ah well, I guess we shouldv'e known it wasn't gonna happen.
I am sorry the I posted in a thread that was 9 years old. I honestly didn't notice that it was that old.
Sorry.

 

[Barney Stubble]

I believe you, guy. But just out of curiousity, how did you happen to find it? I mean for me at least, I only see the most recent threads. I've got to dig back if I want to see old ones.

 

[TicklishRocker]

I don't know, I guess I was just looking through the Tickling Discussion section and happened to notice it. I think it was only on like the 3rd or 4th page, at least not far from there.