non consensual tickling video

[NY ler]

this is probably the most controversial topic here and I am sure that I will get much criticism for even asking, but is there a way to get a real non consensual tickling video produced? of course anybody is free to answer, but I am mainly interested in hearing opinions from other fans of non consensual. just looking for some ideas on how it could be possible.

 

[LadyNerd]

Sounds rather illegal to me.

 

[NY ler]

once again I would like opinions of those who are into non consensual stuff

 

[LadyNerd]

Darlin', I am into non-consensual situations. However, I read about them rather than watch them. I highly doubt any producer would want to risk a kidnapping or sexual assault charge just because some folks want to get their rocks off watching a video of the real thing.

 

[NY ler]

let me rephrase my request, I would like opinions on how non consensual tickling videos can be made, please reply only if you are into watching non consensual stuff. yes we all know how is wrong it is, how immoral it is, I will go to church if I need to thank you

 

[The Last Laugh]

Not this again...

 

[NY ler]

befote other mother teresa's come down on me, let me bring this down one level and ask, not necessary non consensual, but tickling those who clearly hate it, and do it for whatever reason, such as the need for money. has anyone ever tried such?

 

[Korastus]

Open forum. You can say that you only want the opinions of people who agree with you all you want, but that doesn't, and won't, stop anybody from replying who feels like it.

 

[LadyNerd]

Korastus makes a very good point.

 

[StevePerry4Ever]

befote other mother teresa's come down on me, let me bring this down one level and ask, not necessary non consensual, but tickling those who clearly hate it, and do it for whatever reason, such as the need for money. has anyone ever tried such?

That have been done quite a few times. However, they know and agree, so as you know, it's not actually non-consentual.

 

[Deleted member 66627]

I think you need to brainstorm before you post a thread. I believe this is the second one that you've changed the question of right in the middle.. especially if people disagree w/what you're postin' about.

 

[LD_Tickler]

The old realtickling Of Sweet Suffering (the blonde girl) looked pretty close to legitimately hating it. It's what I dig up when I'm one of my more cruel moods.

 

[NY ler]

Crystal, you kind of have a valid point... At first I did want too ask about non con tickling, but after I posted, I realized that its too (can't think of the proper word...hated, or controversial) for this forum, so I then decided to bring it down from non con to getting tickled but hating it.

 

[Myriads]

You want as close to non-con on film as you can get?

Find a slave in service to a Master. Said slave must be in full contractual bonded life service. In short in a lifestyle property relationship with them. They have given their body, mind and will over to Master to direct as Master sees fit.

Said Master orders Their property bound nice and tightly.

Said Master then allows a third party to make use of Their property as the camera rolls.

Third party tickles the hell out of said slave disregarding any of the protests (they have no meaning as the slave has agreed to service of any sort to it's Master) for as long as they like.

There is your non con tickling filmed within the context of a consent.

Finding a lifestyle player that would allow such use of their property in a recorded medium will be highly difficult. Odds are far better to manage such a situation after becoming a trusted member of a D/s group that meets on a regular basis. Number of years to such a level of trust may vary based on group.

Myriads

 

[LD_Tickler]

You want as close to non-con on film as you can get?

Find a slave in service to a Master. Said slave must be in full contractual bonded life service. In short in a lifestyle property relationship with them. They have given their body, mind and will over to Master to direct as Master sees fit.

Said Master orders Their property bound nice and tightly.

Said Master then allows a third party to make use of Their property as the camera rolls.

Third party tickles the hell out of said slave disregarding any of the protests (they have no meaning as the slave has agreed to service of any sort to it's Master) for as long as they like.

There is your non con tickling filmed within the context of a consent.

Finding a lifestyle player that would allow such use of their property in a recorded medium will be highly difficult. Odds are far better to manage such a situation after becoming a trusted member of a D/s group that meets on a regular basis. Number of years to such a level of trust may vary based on group.

Myriads

I often wonder how this sort of thing would look in a legal battle.

 

[MaleTickleeDC]

You probably don't want to hear this, but it would be a lot easier to create this scenario with a male lee instead of a female lee. Get a couple of hot girls, have them strip down to bikinis, give them a video camera, and send them to the nearest beach. Have them proposition guys for an amateur fetish video they're making for their website. Tell him that they're going to tie him down, and what happens to him will be a surprise, but that it won't cause him any physical harm, and there will be a "happy ending" once it's all done. You're guaranteed to get some drunk party guy to go along for the ride. Once he's restrained, the girls can tickle him all they want, and the guy is probably going to tolerate it because of the happy ending. Voila, you've got your non-con video.

Now to get a girl to go along with this... almost impossible unless you want the cops showing up at your door. Myriads' idea above is probably your best bet there.

 

[NY ler]

Myriads, great response, thanks!

 

[Lostcause13]

Screw tue moral issues there's also pretty big legal issues to that

 

[Babbles]

You should pray you do find Mother Theresa first...

this is probably the most controversial topic here and I am sure that I will get much criticism for even asking, but is there a way to get a real non consensual tickling video produced? of course anybody is free to answer, but I am mainly interested in hearing opinions from other fans of non consensual. just looking for some ideas on how it could be possible.

let me rephrase my request, I would like opinions on how non consensual tickling videos can be made, please reply only if you are into watching non consensual stuff. yes we all know how is wrong it is, how immoral it is, I will go to church if I need to thank you

I'm no Mother Theresa, 🙄 but it's actually (still) disappointing you didn't get more criticism "for even asking" for cruel & unusual torture, kidnapping & criminal assault.

But I'm not surprised anymore.

Supposedly there are a few real non-con videos out there, and there are others who've perhaps "blurred the lines", and there are definitely other viewers who've also literally asked for the real thing

It's always pleasant to get additional confirmation that there are those who will trick & torture as long as they can get away with it.
Rephrasing later doesn't cover the stench, bro.

In theory & FANTASY it's fine, not so much in your basement. As far as the slave suggestion --- I'd guess it depends upon the "Contract", though surprising someone who's never dealt with tickling and has no idea it's a possibility ---
---and who finds out s/he can't deal with it for more than 30 seconds
--- might be the end of both the "Contract" and the relationship.

And yes, it would be very interesting to see how that plays out in court.

If I had a dime for every post where it's been said sooooo many "pain sluts" can't take the maddening sensations of tickling...

For the sake of your would-be victim, since you're obviously not letting this go, I'll share this: a friend of mine told me he (ASKS and) tickles a woman for a few minutes in the worst possible ways (oil and brush on feet, whatever, but he lets her experience the worst of what he REALLY wants to dish out),
----and then if she AGREES, even if she can't take it, but AGREES to try, now REALLY UNDERSTANDING what's involved, that's upped to 15-20 minutes,
---with a safeword.

THEN ---- if she's in a betting mood, and he bets for, say, 10-20 minutes, with no safeword....

And if she's willing to risk that, and loses, she's stuck.
-----BUT SHE KNOWS what she's agreeing to.

No, she's not necessarily happy about it, and literally "suffers" a great deal, from what he's told me since it's extreme
(some come back for more, forgetting how unbearable it was, or maybe they did enjoy it, others never do...)

But at least she won't be your fucking victim at that point.

-- A video, however, is something else.
You might get someone to agree if they wear a small mask, a wig, or if you offer enough money, I don't know. (After getting informed consent, I obviously need to add...)

Of course, you might want to keep in mind, if you drive someone a little too crazy without INFORMED consent
they might have a valid temporary insanity defense
(or they might come from a family with connections... )
when they return to mutilate you so that you can never do that to anyone else again....

The Church, whichever one you're referring to 🙄 , won't be able to help you if you pick the wrong victim.
(Now *that video would be entertaining...)

 

[Myriads]

Before the post directly above mine sets off yet another argument:

Don't.

Leave it alone.

Every time Non-Con comes up the same arguments pop out and people bicker. Not this time.

Non-Con is a fantasy that many members of the forum have. They KNOW its fantasy. They KNOW the difference between right and wrong and don't need the lectures.

Everyone knows that a real Non-Con video would be illegal and wouldn't stand release. So the best anyone will ever see are fantasy versions that are marketed with blurred lines, or loophole videos like the one I described using slaves in service that are not into tickling, but will take a nasty one in the name of service.

So before the bats come out. Lets leave that topic on the ground.

Maintain the topic of how could a viable non-con looking video be produced.

Myriads

 

[MaleTickleeDC]

Given the above post, I have to reiterate that I only support non-con if it's in the context of an individual being informed that some kinky stuff is going to happen to him or her once tied down, with the kinky stuff being the surprise. This really isn't all that controversial. Heck, there was even a fairly recent mainstream clip from one of those MTV or VH1 shows where they brought out a hot female porn star (or whatever she was) and gave her the opportunity to have fun with some men. One of the men allowed himself to be tied up so that she could do whatever she wanted to him. She chose to tickle him all over. They only showed the tickling for a few seconds but it hit the mainstream clips section, as I recall.

That was a non-con tickling scenario, and there were no lawsuits or bolded phrases or freaking out. In fact I've seen that very same scenario on other reality-esque shows too. I think there was an episode of one of the Big Brothers, maybe the British version, with a domme who gently tickled a contestant while he was tied down for the purposes of generic kinky stuff. I don't see why this is so controversial, as long as the person isn't drugged and tied down against their will, and as long as they know that kinky stuff is going to go down when they agree to it.

 

[MaleTickleeDC]

Oops, sorry Myriads, I posted that before I saw your last post.

 

[giggle-maker]

The old realtickling Of Sweet Suffering (the blonde girl) looked pretty close to legitimately hating it. It's what I dig up when I'm one of my more cruel moods.

Do you happen to know the video name or people in it?

 

[rhiannon]

I don't see why this is so controversial, as long as the person isn't drugged and tied down against their will, and as long as they know that kinky stuff is going to go down when they agree to it.

If you want to know, send me a PM or hit me up on Yahoo Messenger since we're not supposed to discuss it on here. 😉

 

[rhiannon]

I often wonder how this sort of thing would look in a legal battle.

The contract would not be valid.