• If you would like to get your account Verified, read this thread
  • The TMF is sponsored by Clips4sale - By supporting them, you're supporting us.
  • >>> If you cannot get into your account email me at [email protected] <<<
    Don't forget to include your username

Tickling should be porn free

OMG.......

steph said:
God, no doubt. I'm so aroused, wet, hot after being tied up nude and tickled forever by someone talented, all I want to do is use my tongue stud on them to return the favor. I'm guessing the poster is a guy (I'm sorry for the ignorance, I'm new to the board) but if you've not been a girl w/a pierced clit (me) and had a vibrator or tongue slid across your love button you cannot possibly CONCEIVE of what you're missing out on. (In case you think I'm lying, try listening to one of us being pleasured like that...) I swear my neioghbors can feel my orgasms and I know they can sure as heck hear me, even with doors and windows closed...

oh....ooh.....ooooh.....omg....omg....oommmgggg.....oooommmmmmgggggggggg ...brief silence accompanied by gasping; eventually somewhat normal breathing resumes ....then...*soft, but still robust, singing is heard*..."sweet mystery of life...at last I've found yyooouuuuuuu".....

I'm spent...I need a cigarette...!!

Peace, Love, Happiness....

oh and...Happy Holidays from Storm, Bear, Lady (horse), Moose, Lady (dog)...(how's that for originality...naming two of my pet's the same name, although they ARE different species)
 
Last edited:
Archie Bunker: Pimp Daddy

Hmm. Ya' got me coming and going, Drew. On the one hand, I'm this shameless libertine, on the other, a rabid, right-wing extremist.
`Tis you who are being the sexist bullheaded pig. I'd like to hear your answer to SlaverTickler's excellent question. My point, which Bella picked up on, is that women can be anything they choose these days, and that's a terrific thing for our society. You'd choose to side with the Andrea Dworkin feminists, who are now all but vanished because--tada, Pussy wins by default! I will practically guarantee you that the vast majority of users at this site visit at least in part as a sexual-fetish release(and this is a good thing!). The fact that you have such hang-ups about even simple, beautiful nudity would surely suggest some issues of your own. A distaste for the hardcore action I can understand and share, actually.

Now, onto your dream of tickling as an anti-depressant panacea. I have one very crucial question for you, and it's important that you answer truthfully: Are you a `ler or `lee? I am willing to bet the farm that you're primarily someone who prefers to tickle. I would point you to an excellent article that was featured in Smithsonian on our favorite subject(but damned if I can seem to find the issue--it was from the late `90's, I believe). Not always, but in a vast number of cases, a person being tickled doesn't want to be tickled. This is not something you're going to be able to change by presenting a non-sexual image of tickling. It's the natural reaction to the creepy-crawly feeling of someone touching you in spots that make you flinch(and yes,laugh). A little tickle is fine, and a fun form of foreplay. Hell, I don't know, maybe it doesn't arouse you like it does me.

Oh, yeah. On the Muslims. Please see my comment about Ashcroft above. I'll be awaiting the deluge of angry emails from the many Islamic members of the TMF(if there were any...).
 
Originally posted by Dr. Bill Kobb
Hmm. Ya' got me coming and going, Drew. On the one hand, I'm this shameless libertine, on the other, a rabid, right-wing extremist.

Those are your labels, doc. Not mine. We're all more complex in our views than can be expressed in such simple terms.

`Tis you who are being the sexist bullheaded pig. I'd like to hear your answer to SlaverTickler's excellent question.

And I'd like you to point out to me where any question, excellent or otherwise, appears in Slaver's post.(??) I've reread it several times and find no question whatsoever. Here's an idea. You ask me a question, and I'll answer it. Fair enough?

My point, which Bella picked up on, is that women can be anything they choose these days, and that's a terrific thing for our society.

I certainly agree with this statement, but I saw nothing of this sentiment in your previous statement "What used to be percieved as degradation of the female is in fact empowerment." If a woman can be anything she wants (and indeed she can), why would she choose a career in hardcore porn? Exactly what does commercial cocksucking empower a woman to do? Hold her breath longer?

You'd choose to side with the Andrea Dworkin feminists, who are now all but vanished because--tada, Pussy wins by default!

Sorry, I've never heard of Andrea Dworkin and consequently can't comment.

I will practically guarantee you that the vast majority of users at this site visit at least in part as a sexual-fetish release(and this is a good thing!).

I don't necessarily deny this conjecture, but why is it a good thing?

The fact that you have such hang-ups about even simple, beautiful nudity would surely suggest some issues of your own. A distaste for the hardcore action I can understand and share, actually.

Translation: Since we both dislike hardcore, you're okay there; but because you don't share my preference for nudity, you obviously have hang-ups and issues.

Now, onto your dream of tickling as an anti-depressant panacea. I have one very crucial question for you, and it's important that you answer truthfully: Are you a `ler or `lee? I am willing to bet the farm that you're primarily someone who prefers to tickle.

Wrong. I'm 100% Lee. Always have been.

I would point you to an excellent article that was featured in Smithsonian on our favorite subject(but damned if I can seem to find the issue--it was from the late `90's, I believe). Not always, but in a vast number of cases, a person being tickled doesn't want to be tickled. This is not something you're going to be able to change by presenting a non-sexual image of tickling.

Wrong again. I've done this very thing. If you're interested in the details, they are in my post on this page:

http://www.ticklingforum.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=37927&perpage=15&pagenumber=2

People can change their minds about things they don't like. It's my belief that most people who dislike being tickled do so because of bad experiences with it. By introducing good tickling experiences, many people can learn to like it.
 
Q&A

Forgive me. I was referring to SlaverTickler's hypothetical situation with the job applicant when I asked about your answer to his question. What would you say to the woman? Would you at least give her the opportunity to work for you if she was qualified?

Also, my answer was a bit deceptive on the hardcore action. I've seen some that was fantastic, majestic, glorious pleasuring between two people, and then I've seen some that was closer to your attitude toward all of it. Things like bukkake, fisting, and such are beyond me, but loving, lustful screwing is sweet to see.

But nudity, in and of itself as bad? I am dumbfounded. Leaving out entirely any sexual aspects, the human body is such a marvelous machine to behold. What if I had a dream of nudity becoming socially accepted in the churches, the schools, and the institutions of everyday life? It would never fly, and for the same reason your pipe-dream will never jibe with the general consensus. I will say, it's going to be a tad difficult to tickle those tootsies with shoes on(well, you did say no nudity, yes? Does it pertain to everything but feet?).

Okay, another theoretical scenario: You miraculously campaign to introduce tickling into the mainstream, mayhaps as a bizarre sort of anti-depressant therapy(I've found that recieving a blowjob from a skilled lady can do wonders for my own positive outlook). Okay, let's assume that the public, the government, the churches, everyone lines-up for a taste--with one proviso(to guarantee everyone's safety from that dreaded coitus you seem to harbour such strident resentment towards): Tickling will only be societally acceptable in male-to-male or female-to-female situations, but otherwise, we can all tickle each other to our heart's content(it being, after all, a fun, happy, affectionate thing to do devoid of all dirty subtexts). How would this fly with you, Drew?

What does commercial cocksucking empower a woman to do? Make beaucoup bucks is what. By some estimates, the porn industry brings in more total money than Hollywood. Billions of dollars are there for the taking by the enterprising women, and more and more are taking the reins, directing, producing, etc. Porn seeps into every facet of our society, and, rather than diminishing the value of women, it doubles it. They can be literally anything they choose, from doctors, to lawyers, to politicians, to porn stars(in some cases, both politicians and porn-stars, as is the case with Ciccolina in Italy). Yeah, we lag behind the Europeans in sexual mores, but we're catching up(and on) to what they've already figured out. Chicks Rule, it's their world, and us dumb puds're just living in it(and loving it!).
 
Forgive me. I was referring to SlaverTickler's hypothetical situation with the job applicant when I asked about your answer to his question. What would you say to the woman? Would you at least give her the opportunity to work for you if she was qualified?

Even if I knew of her tawdry past, I'd only be interested in her qualifications, experience, and her references. I could care less how she paid for her education. Hell, if she wanted to continue to turn tricks on the side, I wouldn't care as long as it didn't affect her (non-sexual) performance on the job. What, you think just because I don't dig porn I want to punish anybody involved with it??

But nudity, in and of itself as bad? I am dumbfounded. Leaving out entirely any sexual aspects, the human body is such a marvelous machine to behold.

You still don't get it, do you. I don't object to nudity in and of itself. I just don't want it in tickling material. Keep the nudity with the pornography. Keep the tickling pure and clean.
Yes, the human body is an impressive piece of biological engineering, but I prefer to appreciate it without the genitals hanging out. Cover that shit up, thank you very much.

What if I had a dream of nudity becoming socially accepted in the churches, the schools, and the institutions of everyday life?

You certainly wouldn't be the first. There have been nudist organizations around for decades.

It would never fly, and for the same reason your pipe-dream will never jibe with the general consensus.

Maybe it won't fly. I see it as an acheivable goal but that certainly doesn't guarantee it'll happen. It's the kind of goal at which one can keep working if one don't see results right away. There's no deadline. Pipedream? Maybe. But given the choice I'd take this pipedream over your warped and twisted values any time.

I will say, it's going to be a tad difficult to tickle those tootsies with shoes on(well, you did say no nudity, yes? Does it pertain to everything but feet?).

Should I even dignify this absurd statement with an answer? Let me just leave you with two thoughts. 1) Bare feet do not constitute nudity. 2) There are other places on the marvelous human body to tickle. Man, you are really reaching for those objections, Doc.

Okay, another theoretical scenario: You miraculously campaign to introduce tickling into the mainstream, mayhaps as a bizarre sort of anti-depressant therapy...(eighth grade humor skipped)... Okay, let's assume that the public, the government, the churches, everyone lines-up for a taste--with one proviso(to guarantee everyone's safety from that dreaded coitus you seem to harbour such strident resentment towards): Tickling will only be societally acceptable in male-to-male or female-to-female situations, but otherwise, we can all tickle each other to our heart's content(it being, after all, a fun, happy, affectionate thing to do devoid of all dirty subtexts). How would this fly with you, Drew?

There would be no need for such a provision. You're still looking at it in sexual terms. It would be an activity in which one participates when he/she desires, and with whomever he/she desires. Are we genderally limited by with whom we're allowed to shake hands?...receive a massage?....arm-wrestle? Why would it be any different with tickling?
 
No one person or even a group should be alound to control what anybody see's. The very existance of this site is proof that people are turned on by tickling. There very fact that it is considered a FETISH makes it sexual. There for anything with tickling would be viewed as sexual and there for could be considered pornographic, thus your point is mute. Now bring on the naked people being tickled and rubbed until they cum.
 
I disagree. I like forced orgasms with my tickling, espescially with bondage, and espsecially nude.
 
SillyMan said:
I must agree with the original post: porn should be left out of the tickling videos. Those who like porn can get it anywhere else.

Bull shit, as long as everything has been straitend out between all parties involved and it doesn't involve kids (or sex with animals ack!), then people should be free to do what they want, and watch what they want. These anti porn types are anti freedom. They are no better then radical islamist or anyother group. Just because the don't strap bombs to themselves and blow up sex shops doesn't make them any less retarded. The entire point of our two nations (and by that I mean US and Canada) is the right to do what you like as long as you arn't hurting anyone (unless of course that is something you and they both enjoy lol). If you don't like sax with your funk then thats up to you, but don't denie me my Jena Jameson vids, or something bad might happen to your cats.
 
The_Musician said:
I've seen alot of tickling on the net,alot of differant sites and in the old days some magazines.I think all porn should be left out,tickling should be just that TICKLING and nothing more.Nudity shouldn't be apart of tickling a bra and panty is fine or bathing suit is ok,but the video producers should leave the porn out.If I wanted to see a girl get off having a orgasem there is more than enough internet sites to go to.There are plenty of porn sites,lets not mix them into the few tickling sites we have.MTP,Dungeon maidens,FM Concepts are just a few sites that might do better without the porn.This is me,but I don't care about a nude girl getting her ass tickled or her vagina feathered I can get this about anywhere.
There isn't enough tickle sites as it is.Anyway this is my own personnel opinion for what is is worth.Tickling should be just that tickling and all the tickle spots or should I say the good ones you can get to with her clothes on.Lets leave the vibrators to the porn producers.
The Musician


I totally agree with this. In fact, it might be a good idea to have the forum block the naked pictures. If someone wants to see them, let them pay those who run the forum, the forum gets money, the people who wanna see nudity get to see it, and those of us who do NOT want to see the nudity do not need to see it
 
Scared said:
If this thread were a child, discussing porn on it would be inappropriate. 🙂

Tickling, however, might be a suitably innocent pursuit for it. 🙂

Stop bringing up the word child or we'll all be in trouble. :evilha:
 
NavelTickler75 said:
I totally agree with this. In fact, it might be a good idea to have the forum block the naked pictures. If someone wants to see them, let them pay those who run the forum, the forum gets money, the people who wanna see nudity get to see it, and those of us who do NOT want to see the nudity do not need to see it

Why block just the naked picture? Why not block all images? This is an adult forum, and in my opinion if you have a problem with nudity then it is your problem.
 
Iggy pop said:
Why block just the naked picture? Why not block all images? This is an adult forum, and in my opinion if you have a problem with nudity then it is your problem.

I know its an adult forum, but there are many here who do not like the nudity it is not just me. And I am not saying get rid of the nudity, just block it so those who do not want to see it do not, those who do, can. Other than paying to see it, perhaps there can be a way where you can amend your account so one does not need to see it, that might help.
 
NavelTickler75 said:
I know its an adult forum, but there are many here who do not like the nudity it is not just me. And I am not saying get rid of the nudity, just block it so those who do not want to see it do not, those who do, can. Other than paying to see it, perhaps there can be a way where you can amend your account so one does not need to see it, that might help.

People should posted there is nudity in the title ex (M/F, Bongage, Nudity, sexual content) then there wouldn't be a need for this stuff.
 
SlaverTickler said:
People should posted there is nudity in the title ex (M/F, Bongage, Nudity, sexual content) then there wouldn't be a need for this stuff.

That should be a requirement here yes I agree with that. But what of the banners on the left and above with Solefully yours? There is nudity there too. Yes I know this is an adult site, and SOME adults like nudity. But a lot like just tickling too.
 
So. Maybe segregating specific forums into nudity, sexual and straight tickling content would help...? Then if the advertisers pull out because of a no-banner nudity restriction, the forum would have to become a pay site, of course. I'm curious, since it's on the table...How much would be fair as far as membership/user fees? Should it be a monthly, weekly or per-visit charge?
 
Mistress Aura said:
So. Maybe segregating specific forums into nudity, sexual and straight tickling content would help...? Then if the advertisers pull out because of a no-banner nudity restriction, the forum would have to become a pay site, of course. I'm curious, since it's on the table...How much would be fair as far as membership/user fees? Should it be a monthly, weekly or per-visit charge?

I do understand what the banners are there for, and why they'd be relectant to have their pics closed off or blanked off if it was a pay to see thing here, but perhaps segregating specific forums into what you said might indeed help.
 
Lazarus said:
I happen to agree with the original poster.



BUT, when watching a tickling vid, I much prefer that there be minimal, if none at all, nudity at all.

Lazster

I agree with Laz 😎
 
SlaverTickler said:
People should posted there is nudity in the title ex (M/F, Bongage, Nudity, sexual content) then there wouldn't be a need for this stuff.

Thought I'd de-lurk on this one.

I agree with SlaverTickler. Labeling would help those who prefer to not see nudity in their videos to avoid them.
1. The varieties of tickling videos is wide.
2. This board seems to have members with a wide variety of preferences.
3. There are a good number of professional producers who have their styles and niches in regards to the nature of their tickling images/videos.
4. Amateurs provide a wide variety as well.

Simple labeling or categorization by producers (pros and amateurs regarding the image or video's contents would hopefully be satisfactory.
 
comandatuba said:
Thought I'd de-lurk on this one.

I agree with SlaverTickler. Labeling would help those who prefer to not see nudity in their videos to avoid them.
1. The varieties of tickling videos is wide.
2. This board seems to have members with a wide variety of preferences.
3. There are a good number of professional producers who have their styles and niches in regards to the nature of their tickling images/videos.
4. Amateurs provide a wide variety as well.

Simple labeling or categorization by producers (pros and amateurs regarding the image or video's contents would hopefully be satisfactory.


Thanks for de-lurking.

Hopefully the administrators will see this and really bring the rules tighter, or bring the hammer if those rules are there already.
 
asutickler said:
Holy cow... If this thread was a child, it would be walking and talking by now.
Sure, but if the topic is still relevant, it'll inevitably come around again. 😛 And personally, I think an old bump is usually more productive than starting over from scratch.

Personally, I like watching clips that depict the tickling activities that I enjoy, and having my clit feathered and vibrated is right up there near the top of my list. Therefore, I'm very glad that such clips exist, and I certainly support vid producers continuing to make them.

More importantly though, I just see no sense in the notion that tickling "should" be porn free, as if the existence of sexuality in tickling is an offense to tickling "purists" who don't want to be associated with something so dirty. If you don't like it, don't watch it, but no one gets to impose their personal preferences on what tickling material has the right to exist.

Still, since I'm advocating an "if you don't like it, don't watch it" philosophy, I do sympathize with TMFers who feel that the nude images in ads on this site are imposed on them without their consent. I find them unpleasantly distracting too, and I would prefer that I only happen upon such material when I'm looking for it. I understand the POV of MTP and other advertisers, and the importance of such advertising in keeping this site available for all of our use, free of charge. Thus, I'm completely willing to continue putting up with these ads if it's necessary to keep the TMF alive and free. Still... if our advertisers would be willing to consider the question of whether explicit nudity in the banner ads is actually necessary to sell clips (perhaps by temporarily changing all the ads to fully clothed ones, and seeing if sales suffer), it sounds like there are a lot of people in the TMF community that would appreciate the gesture.
 
LindyHopper said:
Sure, but if the topic is still relevant, it'll inevitably come around again. 😛 And personally, I think an old bump is usually more productive than starting over from scratch.

Personally, I like watching clips that depict the tickling activities that I enjoy, and having my clit feathered and vibrated is right up there near the top of my list. Therefore, I'm very glad that such clips exist, and I certainly support vid producers continuing to make them.

More importantly though, I just see no sense in the notion that tickling "should" be porn free, as if the existence of sexuality in tickling is an offense to tickling "purists" who don't want to be associated with something so dirty. If you don't like it, don't watch it, but no one gets to impose their personal preferences on what tickling material has the right to exist.

Still, since I'm advocating an "if you don't like it, don't watch it" philosophy, I do sympathize with TMFers who feel that the nude images in ads on this site are imposed on them without their consent. I find them unpleasantly distracting too, and I would prefer that I only happen upon such material when I'm looking for it. I understand the POV of MTP and other advertisers, and the importance of such advertising in keeping this site available for all of our use, free of charge. Thus, I'm completely willing to continue putting up with these ads if it's necessary to keep the TMF alive and free. Still... if our advertisers would be willing to consider the question of whether explicit nudity in the banner ads is actually necessary to sell clips (perhaps by temporarily changing all the ads to fully clothed ones, and seeing if sales suffer), it sounds like there are a lot of people in the TMF community that would appreciate the gesture.

I know I would and I think this is a good idea. Keep the banners with the women clothed, but still see if finacial ability keeps it right, okay.

Again perhaps these can be blocked by the forum, and paid to look at by those who want to. The site would still get money, though I admit that those who did not want to pay to look at the pics or threads, or banners, might cause the advertisers to pull out.
 
Mistress Aura said:
So. Maybe segregating specific forums into nudity, sexual and straight tickling content would help...? Then if the advertisers pull out because of a no-banner nudity restriction, the forum would have to become a pay site, of course. I'm curious, since it's on the table...How much would be fair as far as membership/user fees? Should it be a monthly, weekly or per-visit charge?

This plave is chopped up enough. Why can't people just live and let live. It's and adult sight, and adults should be aloud to decide what they want. Guess what sometime you gonna see naked here, thats part of visiting. I wouldn't pay to see any of the clips, they aren't so good that I would pay for them... I enjoy them sure, but not that much. This is all such bull shit. Whats next, maybe the idea of charging people to read sexual stories, no one's gonna pay to read my stuff, cause I'm not that good. This is all bull shit. I wish i'd never found this old fucked up thread.
 
Just Mark it!

People should just mark what is in their post like I said before. As for the soulfuly yours add above, well thats the call of the Mods. If enough people get together and say they don't want it in there face like that I'm sure Myriads will tell them to come up with something a little more G-Raited if possible. Thats sounds fair enough to me.
 
Scared said:
...if we developed a code of 14 different 16 by 16 pixel icons to represent variations in consent, sexual contact, et cetera, all that would need to be done would be overwriting the existing files in http://www.ticklingforum.com/images/icons/

A guide to the code could be made one of the sticky posts, or part of the sticky posting guidelines, at the top of each thread...
I'm all for making it easier for people to find what they want, and avoid what they don't. I think most veteran contributors to the story and artwork forums are good about labeling their work, either in the title, or near the start of the posted content. Simply taking the time to read the title and first paragraph takes care of most of what you'd want to know... and if you skipped over that to get to the "good part," you've got no one to blame but yourself. 😉

Formalizing the presentation of this information through icons would be nice. If that's deemed too difficult to implement, we could also create a text form for authors to fill out first-thing on every story they post: Nudity = yes, Teasing = yes, etc. If these were searchable categories, so you could actually filter to include or exclude stories that included adult themes, that would be even better.

Maybe this is worth starting a thread in the Suggestions subforum?
 
What's New
11/17/25
There is always something happening in our Chat Room. Stop in! Free for all members!.

Door 44
Live Camgirls!
Live Camgirls
Streaming Videos
Pic of the Week
Pic of the Week
Congratulations to
*** TikleFightChamp ***
The winner of our weekly Trivia, held every Sunday night at 11PM EST in our Chat Room
Top